You mean perplex, not perplexes. If you're going to do that, at least get the grammar right. :p
And the choice of the word "vex" seems a little off in that context.
No, that was just the automatic spam filter. Cheese's post had a link in it and was shaped like some spam we've had earlier, so the spam filter blocked it. I'm letting it through now...
No. Socionics gets the E types right. It's only the I types that have P/J flipped.
But either way, Socionics is not a perfect match for MBTI and trying to convert from one to the other might result in confusion.
Not necessarily.
But quoting the bible like *that*, yeah, that's going to lead to bashing.
'Why do you pretend you do not "know" this?' Oh, please, no. Not that. Not again.
I found and fixed a major flaw in my program. It works much better now.
Also, I'm using a Gaussian filter instead of a median filter for noise reduction now.
I've attached the new results.
That probably wouldn't help much. The bias I was referring to was the tendency to see it going in one direction after logical thinking and another direction after creative thinking. It's more likely that it does that just because we expect it to.
This is a thread for me to talk about some programs I've been writing.
To start off, I've been working on edge detection in AI class. I started with this image: http://academics.tjhsst.edu/compsci/ai/vision/italy/italy.png
I converted it to grayscale, and then I ran it through a 3x3 median...
Whaaat? I've never heard that one before.
That doesn't even make any sense. I mean, I could understand why it was called brainstorming, but if I had never heard either term before and I was told it was called brainshowering, I wouldn't get it until someone explained that it used to be...
This site uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. We have no personalisation nor analytics --- especially no Google.