redbaron
irony based lifeform
btw qt iirc i voted for esc and didnt unvote yet
I know. I'm not disagreeing with the point that tunnel-vision is bad for town, so help me out and broaden it for me.
btw qt iirc i voted for esc and didnt unvote yet
read the rest of the post, i was being sarcastic.
I said multiple times that I do suspect Hado, but I don't want to lynch him.
You can't deny that he's been valuable. He's gotten the whole thread going. Got the message to people that we need to work together to lynch every day, while still questioning and drilling each other.
Townie or not, he's useful.
What I'm really worried about is the "what if" of Hado being town. If we kill him, and RB survives the night, the town still has some hope. But if RB gets night killed, it'll be anarchy.
I think we need a leader. I just can't see everyone uniting and working together without Hado or RB, which sucks.
So I'm not voting for Hado because that risk is too great and it's likely that RB will be night killed if Hado gets lynched.
1. We lynch Hado
2. Hado is town
3. RB (town) is night killed because then the town will have no leaders. It makes sense that the mafia would do that.
4. We're all bickering amongst each other and we end up losing.
1. We lynch Hado
2. Hado is mafia
3. RB survives the night, a lurker or someone who we're pretty sure is town gets killed. The mafia would do that because we'd probably lynch RB the next day, and he's town. That's another day wasted.
4. The mafia kills another townie and by now the odds are stacked against us, with... Rook, Cheeseums, Helevete, Hado, the NK, RB, and the other NK dead. That's 7 townies dead. And two mafia still out there.
You're certain (or as close as you can get in this game) that Hado is mafia? Good. Then we can lynch him later when need be. Why don't we try to find the rest of the mafia?
It makes sense that if you're sure about Hado, you shouldn't waste time just repeating that he's scum. Try to find the others.
Oh look, more lies coming from ESC.
Here's my very first posts on Day 2:Vote analysis:
10 voted, meaning there's a minimum 1 mafia vote overall. I'd be willing to wager there's a minimum of 2 mafia voting, and that at least 1 of them was on Cheeseums.
Based on that, I want to hear from ruminator. She was already a 30-40% mafia read in my book, but Hado convinced me Cheesums was a little more likely.
Vote Ruminator
No. I think the NK is either:
1. Hunting for a likely cop by targeting a semi-active, out of the way townie who's trying to save face
OR
2. A decision made to deliberately be obscure by way of Helvete's lower post count, leaving no real trail but still eliminating someone who showed active participation in voting. Helvete made it clear that his intentions were town and that he's dedicated to lynching scum with his plea that we really unite.
3. Intended to sew discord by virtue of not eliminating Hado. Right now Hadoblado is in the sights of two people who I think could be town.
~
Honestly I'm suspicious of your last minute Cheesums vote as much as Zerkalo, as well as the fact that a lot of what you've said has related to:
A. making us think about the mafia meta-game, as a potential psych out. Sort of like pre-empting that because you seem to be helping us be more aware of the mafia mentality, you're helping town. When actually you're just sewing discord and making decision-making harder for the town by telling them what they already know.
B. you've basically just echoed things that Hado or I have said at this point without that much original helpful thought process.
You're going in the Zerkalo box of verbally supportive but not action-oriented supportive.
Right now:
Puffy
Zerkalo
Ruminator
Y'all motherfuckers got some 'splaining to do.
There's bona-fide examples of me outright pressuring multiple people into talking so that the Town can pressure them into explaining their shady actions. And you're saying I'm offering no alternatives? Get real.
Be glad about increasing our chances of winning?
If you flip red, it also gives us a plethora of 100% confirmed suspicious posts in your entire posting history - while simultaneously making all of your voting history confirmed as suspicious at the same time. Lots of patterns to draw from that.
Like...I'm not sure where you're going with this?? It's like you know just how guilty you are right now, and you're appealing to the town, "look I'm mafia okay, but don't vote me because then you won't catch the other mafia! If you vote Hado and RB, you'll catch two at once!"
The fact is, that it is in no way bad for us to lynch you if you're mafia. End of story. You're saying lots of anti-town things, and outright distorting people's perceptions about what's going on.
Right now you're either:
Town and absolutely terrible at this (despite the fact that you're actually a highly intelligent and insightful poster outside of this thread)
OR
Mafia
Whoa, you're kidding right?
You mean to say that Hadoblado and RB are going to try and lynch mafia?!?!?! OMG YOU CAUGHT US RED-HANDED DOOD!
I love how you're literally just echoing my sentiments at this point. I've been telling the town to stop playing the tunnel-vision game for the last day and meanwhile you've done nothing but tunnel-vision on Hado and me. Even your accusations toward Puffy/Nebulous are being tied back to how people must be related to Hado or me.
You're playing the false dichotomy game and assuming with more certainty than I am not only who you're suspicious of, but who you're certain they're linked to. I mean, wow!
For a new player you sure must be amazing at this game ESC. Not only have you ascertained the identities of 2 mafia on the first day, you've almost found their 3rd accomplice - just like that! Amazing!
I said multiple times that I do suspect Hado, but I don't want to lynch him.
You can't deny that he's been valuable
He's gotten the whole thread going.
Got the message to people that we need to work together to lynch every day
Townie or not, he's useful.
What I'm really worried about is the "what if" of Hado being town.
If we kill him, and RB survives the night, the town still has some hope.
But if RB gets night killed, it'll be anarchy.
I think we need a leader.
I just can't see everyone uniting and working together without Hado or RB, which sucks.
So I'm not voting for Hado because that risk is too great
and it's likely that RB will be night killed if Hado gets lynched.
You're certain (or as close as you can get in this game) that Hado is mafia? Good. Then we can lynch him later when need be.
Why don't we try to find the rest of the mafia?
It makes sense that if you're sure about Hado, you shouldn't waste time just repeating that he's scum. Try to find the others.
Vote Ruminator
Vote: EyeSeeCold
Vote EyeSeeCold
vote esc
Vote Hado
Vote Hado
I vote Hado
Vote redbaron
VOTE HADO
Hado
Unvote
Unvote redbaron
Vote Puffy
UNVOTE ZERKALO
VOTE ARTSU THARAZ
Unvote Puffy
Vote Puffy
Vote Ruminator
Vote: EyeSeeCold
Vote EyeSeeCold
vote esc
Vote Hado
Vote Hado
I vote Hado
Vote redbaron
VOTE HADO
Hado
Unvote
Unvote redbaron
Vote Puffy
UNVOTE ZERKALO
VOTE ARTSU THARAZ
Unvote Puffy
Vote Puffy
vote EyeSeeCold
Official Vote Count:
1. Hadoblado - 3, EyeSeeCold, ruminator, Sinny91
2. Nebulous - 0
3. Happy - 0
4. Zerkalo - 0
5. ruminator - 0
6. redbaron - 1, Happy
7. Puffy - 1, Puffy
8.RookVanilla Townie
9.HelveteVanilla Townie
10.CheeseumpuffsVanilla Townie
11. Sinny91 - 0
12. EyeSeeCold - 2, redbaron, zerkalo
13. Artsu Tharaz - 1, Artsu Tharaz
Not Voting - 3, Nebulous, Hadoblado, Happy
With 10 Alive it takes 6 to lynch.
Day ends in ~20hours, 55min
Unvote esc
Sorry for being a bit*h QT lol but I just decided to Unvote esc
Why ?
My ratings of suspicion are such:
Rook
Cheese
Sinny
Eye's
Neb
Zerk
Ruminator
Artsu
Puffy
Helvete
Happy
Hado
Baron
@Neb
Yeah, your read on ESC, Ruminator, zerk, and rb are all spot on for the respective alignments.
You, Sinny, Zerk, and RB are all confirmed town. If I die, you'll know that this was a genuine read and can refer to it. Until then don't worry about it.
I also think ESC and ruminator are scum, but am prioritising Puffy because I believe he's the most problematic.
So ATM I'm riding your dick. You need to ask yourself whether I needed to do that if I was scum. I think your posts haven't been the strongest in the first few days, but over time you've become more and more green. Constantly giving little bits of green reads, never doing anything very scummy other than a little martyrdom, and finally committing to your reads that I happen to strongly agree with. Your perceptive faculties are stronger than what I would expect from your non-committal posting, which means you're either better at understanding than you are at acting, or you're holding back while you solve the game. Either way, it works for me and this game.
This goes for you too hypothetical but absolutely not in all truth townie ESC. If you think I'm scum, I'll let you kill me. If you kill puffy.
Makes sense though... Because your readings of pretty much everyone are different from Hado's.Interesting that as my reading of Neb gradually moves from green to red, your reading does the opposite.
Seeing as I'm on academic probation as well, I should really try to get some more homework done before my wifi goes off in twenty minutes. :P Gotta read the sparknotes of the Tempest... Bleh.Nebulous stop fraternising with the enemy. You're on probation from now on.
Nebulous said:Makes sense though... Because your readings of pretty much everyone are different from Hado's.
vote EyeSeeCold
I've stated my reasoning multiple times that we need to lynch someone, I suspect Hado of being mafia but lynching him today would be a stupid gamble. ESC isn't as much of a gamble because 1. It's likely that he's mafia and 2. Even if he's town, I'd rather loose a townie ESC than a townie Hado OR mafia Hado at this point.
]
Sinny
If Puffy dies and flips red, will I be clear of suspicion?
Because my red read on Puffy is as strong as my green read on redbaron and you.
I would risk the entire game on him being red. I'm all-in.
If we lynch Puffy and he's not scum, I offer my head on the block for tomorrow.
I won't post for all of day three, him flipping green will be proof that I'm scum, and I expect everyone to listen to it and lynch me.
So I'm offering you a deal. If you think I'm scum, you will definitely get to kill me and remove your biggest opposition.
Look, Puffy wants to die even! This is win win win.
This goes for you too hypothetical but absolutely not in all truth townie ESC. If you think I'm scum, I'll let you kill me. If you kill puffy.
So I'm not in any danger of being lynched anymore. You won't get me today, but if you let me kill Puffy, you will definitely get one scum by the end of tomorrow.
New suspicion list:
Rook
Cheese
Helvete
Sinny
Eye's
Ruminator
Zerk
Puffy
Artsu
Happy
Neb
Hado
Baron
Agreed. I can see Happy being unsure, he says he is ENTP and that is understandable.
Puffy is intelligent enough to play double agent but he's been consistent the whole time.
Artsu is green for me but he hasn't been as active so I can see why you might be unsure but I don't suspect him at all.
Zerk has unwittingly been a key player and for me it ties in with how Puffy and Neb will react.
So I'm still waiting on Happy, Puffy, Zerk and Artsu to make the Hado vote.
Puffy listen to me. I will not argue your innocence, because right now whether you are town is inconsequential, but that doesn't mean I or anyone else has doubts for you.
But think. The only people who have even uttered your name recently are Neb, Hado and RB. Doesn't that seem suspect to you? I have suspected Hado from the beginning. You must vote for Hado Puffy.
Vote Ruminator
Vote: EyeSeeCold
Vote EyeSeeCold
vote esc
Vote Hado
Vote Hado
I vote Hado
Vote redbaron
VOTE HADO
Hado
Unvote
Unvote redbaron
Vote Puffy
UNVOTE ZERKALO
VOTE ARTSU THARAZ
Unvote Puffy
Vote Puffy
vote EyeSeeCold
Unvote esc
vote puffy
Hadoblado said:Definite Scum: ESC, Puffy
Almost definite scum: Ruminator
Middling: Happy (I hope to read him better shortly), artsu,
Confirmed Town: Sinny, RB, Hado, zerkalo, neb
Usually it's bad to list like this, but I'm working with very high confidence in my reads, and at this point think I can end the game if I can manage to convince town.
i.e. if they kill me now, the first three people on this list die while we still have useful town alive, so there will be at most one mafia between artsu and happy remaining, who I trust a mixture of you, neb, and zerk to catch. There isn't much wiggle room for them.
It's pretty deterministic.
If we are not gonna be making accusations yet, then I don't really know what to post. I've played this game IRL many times before. I haven't read any guides.
Just waiting for night one, so we can get some content to work with.
Cya
Lol what? When I said I'm waiting for day one to be over, obviously I wasn't going to break the "one post every 24 hour" rule because then I'd get kicked off anyway. I just meant I'm waiting for something to happen before starting the suspicion game.
I'm confused a little, why are we voting now? I might have totally missed this in the instructions but when I've played IRL, we vote AFTER the first person is killed. Maybe it is different in this game and I totally missed that.
Anyway, what exactly is the connection between minimal posting and being mafia? I tend to think the overposters are mafia. My first suspicion was Hado.
Cops are allowed to ask the moderator whether a single person is a mafia member or not in each round.
So I'm curious, what's the logic behind reading me as mafia rather than townie?
- I don't know if that's true, the quicker the town starts, the better IF the town's voting is correct. If it is wrong, it just puts the town one point behind sooner.
- That's some interesting reverse psychology shit. But anyway I think it's more than just who is posting most. I think what makes me suspicious is who is jumping into pointing fingers right off the bat.
- wait and see approach is a disadvantage ONLY IF voting would produce a correct vote. Voting early is not automatically a good thing, it is conditional upon whether the vote is correct. Think about it, assume the vote is wrong, and you are voting a townie off, then what benefit did you get by voting early?
Zerk,
Why do you not think it is possible for both, Hado and RB to be mafia?
Personally, I suspect both.
I always suspected Hado due to the nature of the beginning posts.
Then, RB comes along and votes for me for no reason. The stated rationale was that lurkers are more likely to be mafia. This didn't make sense to me, but okay ..
Then, Cheese comes in with beautiful reasoning explaining why RB makes no sense. As soon as RB was implicated, RB switches positions and: 1) turns against Cheese 2) changes the reasoning for voting for me (now stating it was a strategy to force me to talk, rather than using the prior reasoning of lurker's being more likely to be mafia.
Another thing that made no sense about RB was the argument that lynching ASAP is best. This seems like a ploy to get more townies lynched and speed the game.
Finally, there is an obvious concert between RB and Hado. Hado states that it is "100% certain" that RB is not mafia. How did this get proven? I didn't see any proof in the threads. And Hado and RB are agreeing on everything. This seems like a mafia strategy to team up to get more townies out, and prevent themselves from being suspects.
I have suspicions on both RB and Hado. Right now, Hado already has some votes so,
I vote Hado
Hado,
I don't understand your strategy of saying that if you get lynched and turn green, it proves RB is green? Why would other townies believe that in the first place, what proof does that give them?
Are you saying that if X is town and Y is mafia, and X tells everyone that Y is town, Y would want to NK X? I feel that Y would want to keep X around in the game, because X trusts Y and will continue vouching for him.
If we are not gonna be making accusations yet, then I don't really know what to post. I've played this game IRL many times before. I haven't read any guides.
Just waiting for night one, so we can get some content to work with.
Cya
Lol what? When I said I'm waiting for day one to be over, obviously I wasn't going to break the "one post every 24 hour" rule because then I'd get kicked off anyway. I just meant I'm waiting for something to happen before starting the suspicion game.
I'm confused a little, why are we voting now? I might have totally missed this in the instructions but when I've played IRL, we vote AFTER the first person is killed. Maybe it is different in this game and I totally missed that.
Anyway, what exactly is the connection between minimal posting and being mafia? I tend to think the overposters are mafia. My first suspicion was Hado.
Cops are allowed to ask the moderator whether a single person is a mafia member or not in each round.
So I'm curious, what's the logic behind reading me as mafia rather than townie?
- I don't know if that's true, the quicker the town starts, the better IF the town's voting is correct. If it is wrong, it just puts the town one point behind sooner.
- That's some interesting reverse psychology shit. But anyway I think it's more than just who is posting most. I think what makes me suspicious is who is jumping into pointing fingers right off the bat.
- wait and see approach is a disadvantage ONLY IF voting would produce a correct vote. Voting early is not automatically a good thing, it is conditional upon whether the vote is correct. Think about it, assume the vote is wrong, and you are voting a townie off, then what benefit did you get by voting early?
Zerk,
Why do you not think it is possible for both, Hado and RB to be mafia?
Personally, I suspect both.
I always suspected Hado due to the nature of the beginning posts.
Then, RB comes along and votes for me for no reason. The stated rationale was that lurkers are more likely to be mafia. This didn't make sense to me, but okay ..
Then, Cheese comes in with beautiful reasoning explaining why RB makes no sense. As soon as RB was implicated, RB switches positions and: 1) turns against Cheese 2) changes the reasoning for voting for me (now stating it was a strategy to force me to talk, rather than using the prior reasoning of lurker's being more likely to be mafia.
Another thing that made no sense about RB was the argument that lynching ASAP is best. This seems like a ploy to get more townies lynched and speed the game.
Finally, there is an obvious concert between RB and Hado. Hado states that it is "100% certain" that RB is not mafia. How did this get proven? I didn't see any proof in the threads. And Hado and RB are agreeing on everything. This seems like a mafia strategy to team up to get more townies out, and prevent themselves from being suspects.
I have suspicions on both RB and Hado. Right now, Hado already has some votes so,
I vote Hado
Hado,
I don't understand your strategy of saying that if you get lynched and turn green, it proves RB is green? Why would other townies believe that in the first place, what proof does that give them?
Are you saying that if X is town and Y is mafia, and X tells everyone that Y is town, Y would want to NK X? I feel that Y would want to keep X around in the game, because X trusts Y and will continue vouching for him.
Ruminator said:Finally, there is an obvious concert between RB and Hado. Hado states that it is "100% certain" that RB is not mafia. How did this get proven? I didn't see any proof in the threads. And Hado and RB are agreeing on everything. This seems like a mafia strategy to team up to get more townies out, and prevent themselves from being suspects.
There's a problem for the town at this point with the way these two wagons are going.
The thing is: Sinny and ESC are both new to the game. The fact that they both have this certainty that they've correctly read 2/3 people as guaranteed mafia, and found a likely 3rd when they're that inexperienced is plausible. They're going for what seems like the really obvious tell, as it's being sold to them by multiple people.
Ruminator however, isn't new. She's the one we know has definitely played this game before.
Also worth noting that I've never played this game either at a party or on the internet, so it's possibly that I really have no idea what I'm talking about.
Did you or did you not make the following statement earlier?
Unless you're a dirty scum liar, you're new as well so I don't think you have the qualifications to rule on my or Sinny's n00b status, or rummy's expertise for that matter.
I don't think experience is a decent claim against the targets either, it doesn't necessarily follow that a player would draw a certain conclusion or have a certain playstyle if they're experienced...can we get back on track? At this rate we won't reach consensus and we'll loose a lynch
Ok . You still have a vote for puffy, right?can we get back on track? At this rate we won't reach consensus and we'll loose a lynch
Except I'm not the one trying to claim that I've already confirmed 2 mafia and likely know the 3rd![]()
So you're telling me after 15 pages and 700 posts you still have no idea who is mafia?