There is no reason to believe that stricter rules would make things harder. Is that what you are referring to? Maybe you can quote exactly what you are referencing...
1) setting the tone by quickly tallying infractions for even the small stuff
a) if you get a very clear and stated...
...The vague rules create more work for you not me...what do you mean my issue? You must feel the gains are worth the effort. Obviously other forums are different and so post count limits would cause a different reaction.
The backlash is more due to the vagueness of rules. You want more room to budge and interpret the law but by doing this you take on the responsibility of that interpretation.
If a user clearly knows what the speed limit is and they choose to drive over it they have no one to blame but...
Don't make me hit you with my paddle!
I know that it easy to setup. I was wondering more about what it does to a forum and how it affects users, posts, and discussions.
I am curious of what everyone thinks of hard coded post count limits. What are the benefits and complications?
I am not suggesting we do it. I am honestly curious. Anyone see such a thing in action?
I think people will put more thought into their posts if they were limited. They wouldn't be...
I think a lot of users support ignoring posts that lead to 'shit posting' but for some reason I don't get the impression that they applaud it when you notify everyone or the other person that you are ignoring them. Telling them that you are ignoring them instead of just ignoring them seems...
I missread your definition of quality control...
So I guess the only two ways for censorship to appear as 'quality control' is when quality control is more often enforced when certain 'ideas' are brought up and not other times. Another is to prohibit or provide no outlet in which an idea might...
It seems a convenient view of what censorship is. By that I mean anytime 'your standards' deem it okay to censor it is then retitled as quality control.
I don't mind censorship to a degree that is necessary but I think that Cogs view of censorship is a little more honest. It is only honest to...
It seems a different scenario is playing out here but I understand your fear. She is actually a very confident person and I don't think your opinion hurt her. My concern was that the forum itself holds fault in some ways for what has occured. Awareness of those faults and how they might clash...
I went back and read Chad to 'some' degree. It is astounding how upset people on this forum get over spelling, typos, and bad logic.
I figured there must have been something more to it but I guess you guys just take this stuff really, really, seriously.
It's like we are all together...
Sure. All suggestions are welcome.
Mostly i see this as an issue that will go until the death of sinny. It is already written in the stars. Why prolong it instead of do something different for once?
My argument would indicate that they were the original 'humans' and therefore not animals. They are made in the true image of god and we are the corruption of that image.
I understand your position. My argument is not that all arguments are sourced from dominating behaviors but that such behaviors elevate existing disagreements. Nor do I argue that only men practice dominating behavior. However, it is a fact that men are more prone to such behavior because of...
That doesn't make sense to me.
1) The reaction is greater than past reactions towards individuals who are perceived to be spouting self evident truths.
2) her conspiracy theories have initially been supported by several links and references. The fact that people don't regard her sources as...
Anyone notice the constant clash of ego battles that is more common of the male? I think people are more threatened by Sinny because she is a female and that puts the male ego at a greater risk.
What is the pecking order of this forum?
When I was learning about Buddhism they said we don't have control and that the only choice we have is to not take hold of our thoughts.
Arguably, you choose by altering your information and changing your view of it by not being open and not taking hold.
The loss of low labor jobs due to technology is supplemented by more technical jobs. Also, increased regulation and information gathering has and will continue to create more jobs. Finally entertainment will grow and produce more jobs and technology in this area only creates more opportunities...
Businesses aren't going to hire more people that they don't need just because labor is cheaper. They will always try to get by with the least amount of workers they can.
Yes, as more awareness programs come out concerning the evils of the animal industry, cancer from too much meat, heart disease, global warming co2, and the effect on our land people will support such things.
Cigarette use has been reduced by 50% in the last 30 years.
The greatest wall...
This is a good article that addresses the future of our environment. So even if you don't care about animals, if you care about humans then this is a good case to support going vegan.
http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/eat-for-the-planet-meat-and-the-environment/
Side thought: I am...
I attempted to ask questions before I made accusations. I attempted to give him an out. Shit posting in context of shit posting is fine as RB has argued well. Shit posting another user outside of that context is not fine.
This is a very valid argument. I believe that Sinny handled RB trolling...
I have trouble seeing how you come to this conclusion but likely we use different standards to judge quality. Posts like Yellow's, although extensive, are of high quality in my opinion. There is a lot of objectivity and when an biased argument is posed it is given as a stated opinion and not as...
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/bambi-or-bessie-are-wild-animals-happier/
@Yellow
I found the above to be a good read and strongly related to your argument, although in opposition to your argument.
Yes this is how the experiment went. I had included a link to a written summary of the experiment; I don't know if you saw it. I haven't found anything in detail.
It only reveals to people what they are really capable of. It is an opportunity to alter who you are and be a better person. How is that unethical? If they didn't want to suffer the guilt of what they did they should not have done what they did in the first place.
I don't know what you are...
Anyone else know about this experiment?
http://www.simplypsychology.org/milgram.html
https://youtu.be/eTX42lVDwA4
There is also a movie on netflix
I am curious if Ti and Fi dominants would be less susceptible to obedience in the conditions of this test or if there are other factors at play...
I use it to find definitions within the concepts so that I have more words in which to plug into various search engines. I rarely use the information on wiki.
They won't do nothing. They are bunch of pussies. Redbaron has been doing shit like this since he has been here. He trolled Sinny the moment she walked through the door dor days. Her looking for a way to incriminate him is largely a response to his bullshit over the course of time.
I figure if the mods leave an obvious troll thread open then it must be unspoken approval of any resultant consequences, such as myself trolling the thread, of leaving such a thread open. This way I don't have to take responsibility for my own actions.
This site uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. We have no personalisation nor analytics --- especially no Google.