22. You frequently floccinaucinihilipilificate.
when you remove some sort of delicious foodstuff from its wrapper, then throw the food in the bin and put the wrapper in your mouth - regularly
106. You acquired honorary fraternity brother/sorority sister status by befriending Greeks, without actully joining their pretentious organizations;
It's not "foodstuff" until you begin the digestive process upon it.
@ Preceptor
While I agree that feelings have no place in a scientific debate, I believe that your logic is flawed. You talk about allowing genocide to occur in the same way a park ranger would talk about not feeding the animals. Yes, it's not good to mess with the lives of creatures in a manner which could not have occurred in their natural habitat, but you can't use the inter and intra-species dynamics of other animals to analyze human behavior.
Humans have progressed to a level of intelligence, industry, and self-awareness unprecedented on this planet. That being said, we have not progressed so far that we are capable of behaving unnaturally (which was one of the basic assumptions of your argument). Because where could any of our behaviors come from if not nature? God? Extraterrestrial influence? I thought this was a scientific debate. Yes, we are sentient, thinking beings. But what made us sentient? Nature! Evolution!
I would argue that any idea which occurs to a being living in this world (including one like stopping genocide) is a natural one because that being exists through and as a part of nature. Thinking differently leads to a whole new set of problems. Which acts and thoughts are natural and which our unnatural?How do we decide and who does the deciding? It's feelings that we use to make those distinctions. We Feel like bird's nests are natural and we Feel like buildings are not. Did animals not build those buildings just as animals built the nests? The line we have drawn between the natural and the unnatural is entirely imaginary.
Obviously, I believe in evolution and its ability to perfect a species, but I just don't think that the course of evolution can be perceived in the present in real time. It's only apparent looking back. For example, think about the group that wants to stop a genocide. If they Can do it, they're in a position to forcibly stop another group from doing what it's doing. Thus they are the stronger ones and the perpetrators of genocide would deserve to be defeated by them.
Yes sometimes human behavior lacks a point of reference in the animal kingdom, but that is because we are unique as a species. our incredible place in the world ensures that we have no method of measurement with which to gauge where we Should be headed as a species in an evolutionary sense. Perhaps the altruistic tendency that drives us to stop genocide is the next step in our progression. After all, it could be said that our ability to build bigger and more complex social networks and make those networks interact peacefully has been instrumental in our progress. Instead of warring, clannish bands of hunter-gatherers, we have great civilizations.
when you envy cephalopods for having tentacles. No, not what you think.
-When you:
However, you are usually right when you do so.
Check this entire thread just to realize what you said was already said and this was already said because i checked the entire thread looking for it.
-When, for once, you happen to ask someone a straightforward question about a claim they are making and all they can do is talk in an illogical circle. You then walk away and never speak them unless necessary with the justification of, "S/he doesn't know what they are talking about".
This and an incident bannapahllus mentioned (then deleted) reminds me of some off the wall line of thinking I once had, i.e. what exactly is the cause of the furry fetish?-When you can't seem to understand the huge beef everyone has with furries.![]()
This and an incident bannapahllus mentioned (then deleted) reminds me of some off the wall line of thinking I once had, i.e. what exactly is the cause of the furry fetish?
I figured it was some genetic diversity thing, it's like why unusual traits (green eyes, red hair, especially pale or dark skin, etc) are considered attractive, particularly in cultures where they're practically non-existent. Taken further subtle anatomical alterations (ears, teeth, eyes) are considered relatively attractive by most people, and further still (tails, patterned skin, animalistic ears on top of the skull, etc) the effect remains present, although less people are tolerant of it.
Personally I draw the line at anything remotely animalistic (particularly tails because they look prosimian), but cybernetics are very attractive to me, but then I suppose that's more of a intellectual fascination than sensual attraction.
I digress.
Not to mention you are not allowed to take a break from the forum!!! We will search every fjord if we have to!when yet again you come on to the forum determined to post to say you're going to take a break from the forum and read the new additions to this thread and think 'NOOOOOooooo, I'm not ready to leave home yet.'
-When you can't seem to understand the huge beef everyone has with furries.![]()
Not to mention you are not allowed to take a break from the forum!!! We will search every fjord if we have to!
And there's so many more worthy people to hate out there, like people who won't stop asking ridiculous questions during the Lost premier because they've skipped the last two seasons. Much more annoying than furries if you ask me.
Exactly! There are the ignorant masses, hating what they don't understand, hating "strangeness". Yeah, the dressing up in mascot suits in bed is a little... over the top.
And the funny thing is, while we dislike being illogical, we're perfectly fine with being nonsensical. Unfortunately, most people don't understand the difference.
...you expect the Spanish Inquisition.
if you post a reply and wonder if it is an intp trait. because you still arent convinced that you are an intp. but u took 3 different tests 5 times and ended up the same.
....when you can induce Drug-like Highs and get stoned to a henge without substance.