"do you know how bad chocolate is for you?"
*cough*Humans in general*cough*They generally are so much more happy to join together into a mindless group. Groups are powerful. A group of S's mindlessly following their idealized leader can get a LOT done *cough*Germany1940*cough* and therefore managed to get ahead in the world. When you get a bunch of N's together the product tends to be more or the metaphysical or scientific nature. But a ton of S's with shovels can still dig more holes than a few backhose.
Apparently me and my sister made the best carrot cake once. I admit, it was glorious! (We just accidently made too much buttercream and put it in the middle and on top, made it amazing apparently)ummmmmm
cake.
I know a NF that made a great carrot cake for my coworkers B'day recently. I ate it, and it was really good.
Apparently me and my sister made the best carrot cake once. I admit, it was glorious! (We just accidently made too much buttercream and put it in the middle and on top, made it amazing apparently)
And the NF's and NT's are tools.
except for me![]()
*cough*Humans in general*cough*
I hope you are not suggesting the Nazi regime was the work of sensors...
Look at all of the fanaticism, blind faith, blind patriotism, and tyranny in the world and through out history, and you are seriously going to tell me that this is all an anomaly?*cough*like hell, or else "fascism" would be redundant.*cough*
Idk what caused the Nazi regimme specifically. I think hitler was too smart (I said smart! Not correct!) and creative at his.... "job" to be an S. But no one can fight wars and carry out an order like an xSxJ.
Tyranny is more of a natural human state than freedom is. People are sheep, but it is all for a good reason, if we were all Independent minded nothing would get done.
So you are not disagreeing with me then?My point exactly! N's generally are not sheep, while S's are more prone to joining the herd. While I look at not being a sheep as a good thing, being a sheep gets so much more done! If everyone was an N then who would do all the more basic things vital to running society?
This whole forum is a good example of why so-called N's are susceptible to group-think. These elitism and exclusion type threads are almost a daily occurrence. I'm beginning more and more to agree with the MBTI critics.
I'll send it over in a box tied to a balloon, a fool proof planYou should mail me some![]()
I'll send it over in a box tied to a balloon, a fool proof plan![]()
What color will the balloon be? I am getting so much balloon mail these days. I need to know which has the cake![]()
This whole forum is a good example of why so-called N's are susceptible to group-think. These elitism and exclusion type threads are almost a daily occurrence. I'm beginning more and more to agree with the MBTI critics.
Quite true. MBTI is just an unreliable testing instrument, and one of my biggest frustrations about typology in general is that a plethora of typological approaches, systems and theories get smacked under the label of "MBTI".
Personally, I'd go with carrier pidgeon. Much more dependable... Those balloons just have a mind of their own these days.
Personally, I'd go with carrier pidgeon. Much more dependable... Those balloons just have a mind of their own these days.
I'm beginning more and more to agree with the MBTI critics.
And the NF's and NT's are tools.
except for me![]()
I'd say we should just abandon the tests altogether, leaning on the test taker knowing what their psyche is actually doing can never be reliable. Expert Analysis is the way to go.I think the test needs refinement. The either/or answers are not as cut and dried as the creator seems to think. But maybe the actual professional one is better? It ought to be able to get through what you want to be seen as to what you actually are. This is probably where taking the test and discussing the results with a professional is helpful. And it does seem to be used in inappropriate ways. People do seem to use it merely to pigeon hole others or explain away their poor performance. I don't think that it is useful in all the areas it is promoted in. And everyone seems to have their own theory on what the types actually mean.
So, more research and a better test would be good.
1. No, the SPs are not the overwhelming majority.SP's "rule" the world because they form the overwhelming majority.
SJ's rule t"he world because they are demanding and stubborn, and they aren't afraid to spread their views. The SP's become convinced (because they're SP), and we have a Sensor-archy.
This whole forum is a good example of why so-called N's are susceptible to group-think. These elitism and exclusion type threads are almost a daily occurrence. I'm beginning more and more to agree with the MBTI critics.