Seemingly you like exerting power without regard for forum quality.
We're talking about your arbitrary interpretation of forum rules. There is no specific rule applicable. I wrote harsh yet true words, offense was taken, a report was filed and now you think feelings matter.
Not gonna compromise clarity just for the sake of someone's feelings. Besides, it'd be a larger insult to say the same thing in a nicer way expecting him to miss the content, which is a description of his mistake.
I woke up in the morning feeling really strange. It took a few minutes to get any cognitive lucidity to Google the symptoms. Overwhelming "sense of urgency" and whatever the technical word for "Alice in Wonderland syndrome" is. Not enjoyabale.
I had my first ever 'panic attack' (anxiety attack) ever recently. That was a very weird and strange feeling. Not good, of course. Sucks about the stress, though I imagine the material itself won't be difficult for you. So that just leaves the overlord authorities, maybe.
See, the way you phrased it there leaves little room for argument. I could be totally off base IDK, just seemed like in context of what was happening in the thread if you would've put it that way in the first place I would not be able to retort. Anyways, I digress. I've noticed a couple more posts you've made that, while the reasoning behind them is solid, you didn't really drive the point home in a poignant way. I could be totally wrong though, just something that blipped on my radar.
The post was you basically saying that all the people who are pro-life should adopt all the babies that would be aborted and you mentioned babies are not like animals where they can just survive on their own. I know you are better than that post, that is my point. I made a reply saying that there are probably more pro-lifers than there are aborted babies. I didn't even have to get into the fact that babies need care so they shouldn't be aborted (I'm on the fence for or against abortion fwiw).
I'm not trying to tell you to be optimistic, I'm not either fwiw. I just get the sense that the mundaneness of things has caused you to not put as much effort into some of your posts as I know you are capable of. I could be wrong though. I am actually talking about a specific post you made, though can't be arsed to find it. I should not be able to make a reasonable argument against you. When I am able to do this, it makes it seem like you are not even trying. I could be looking too far into things though.
No, my argument is that seeing as you are reluctant to ban a serial offender and spammer but comparaively trigger happy at minor offenders, there is an inconsistency in moderation. If you want me to argue why inconsistency in moderation is undesirable, i will oblige.
There is no "imagined authoritative boogeyman". You are imagining that.
I dislike a lot of members. I know that most of them don't deserve a ban.