own8ge
Existential Nihilist
- Local time
- Today 6:16 PM
- Joined
- May 31, 2012
- Messages
- 1,039
This post will account for 90 percent of the people on this forum.
A lot of miscommunication takes place whenever I post something on this forum. A typical INTP prejudgment would be that I either am stupid, can't make sense or am mentally ill. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
This is my thesis.
You can't interpret my posts as I intended them to be interpreted, thus you assume a prejudgment and reason this with adaptiveness (Pness). (Adaptive/P is the combination of Pe and Ji.) Which could be considered rational, but the irrational part is that you then take confidence in your stance thus actually believing it (until proven else) whilst you don't reflect it with the live subject you are judging (Je)! How could this be justified?! To a rational mind, it couldn't.
So: You blame the environment rather than yourself for your lack of understanding. Then you strongly defend your made up judgment without reflecting it with environment to test it's reliability. Instead, you back up your argument by observing that others came to the same judgment as you did.
Oh god you are stupid.
A lot of miscommunication takes place whenever I post something on this forum. A typical INTP prejudgment would be that I either am stupid, can't make sense or am mentally ill. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
This is my thesis.
You can't interpret my posts as I intended them to be interpreted, thus you assume a prejudgment and reason this with adaptiveness (Pness). (Adaptive/P is the combination of Pe and Ji.) Which could be considered rational, but the irrational part is that you then take confidence in your stance thus actually believing it (until proven else) whilst you don't reflect it with the live subject you are judging (Je)! How could this be justified?! To a rational mind, it couldn't.
So: You blame the environment rather than yourself for your lack of understanding. Then you strongly defend your made up judgment without reflecting it with environment to test it's reliability. Instead, you back up your argument by observing that others came to the same judgment as you did.
Oh god you are stupid.