• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Will People Give Up Their Reproductive Rights For Longer Lifespans?

Will People Give Up Their Reproductive Rights for Longer Lives

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 40.7%
  • No

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 8 29.6%

  • Total voters
    27

TriflinThomas

Bitch, don't kill my vibe...
Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
637
---
Location
Southern California
*first off, let's assume that we are stuck on earth*
It's inevitable (with the advances in medical science) that humans will start living longer. This will eventually lead to overcrowding, unless a worldwide birth control policy is implemented. Will people give up their reproductive rights in exchange for longer lives?
 

TheScornedReflex

(Per) Version of a truth.
Local time
Tomorrow 6:46 AM
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
1,948
---
I'm cool with the normal lifespan for now...
 

Inappropriate Behavior

is peeing on the carpet
Local time
Today 2:46 PM
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,795
---
Location
Behind you, kicking you in the ass
I don't plan on living that long but I voted yes because I never wanted children anyway so I'm not losing anything. That being said I think I'd advocate a Logan's Run type solution before advocating giving up reproductive rights.

Actually I probably wouldn't advocate anything. Selfish me pulled the trigger first, unselfish me would have voted no.
 

Cheeseumpuffs

Proudly A Sheeple Since 2015
Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
2,238
---
Location
Earth Dimension C-137
Yeah, I don't want kids. I'd be more than willing to waive my right to reproduce if it meant I could have a longer lifespan.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
Depends on at least three circumstances:
(1) What kind of world would I be living in, to make it worth it?
(2) How much longer?
(3) What is the process of the birth control? Any pain or side-effects? Reversible?
 

joal0503

Psychedelic INTP
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
700
---
*first off, let's assume that we are stuck on earth*
It's inevitable (with the advances in medical science) that humans will start living longer. This will eventually lead to overcrowding, unless a worldwide birth control policy is implemented. Will people give up their reproductive rights in exchange for longer lives?

increased life spans in developed nations, overcrowding...like this isnt the case NOW?

If its framed the way you present it, i dont see it having an impact. people wont 'give up their reproductive rights'...especially if it came in the form of sterilization or other forceful measures.

i think if there were an honest attempt to really educate people about the potential impacts of overpopulation, there could be an intelligent, responsible approach that would be considered...but with the current populations and paradigms in place...theres no way thats ever going to happen.

its not imminent, its not 100%...but resources, sustainability, and increased shortages could be a real bummer somewhere down the line.

longer age = more time to realize how much bullshit there is out in the world hooooray
 

Deleted member 1424

Guest
Castrated males live significantly longer than intact males.
That makes the dilemma a bit more contemporary.

I could only imagine it appealing to a very specific type of asexual male though.
 

Minuend

pat pat
Local time
Today 8:46 PM
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
4,142
---
The way things are now I speculate most would choose to give birth. Quite a few see it as one of those things you have to have in life to be... happy. They just see it as an obvious thing to do. Choosing a longer life would probably scare a lot of individuals, but mainly it would mean going against something they have always imagined themselves doing in life. It would be like telling them they suddenly would have to change gender or wear only pink clothes. It would be misplaced, strange for them.

I've brought up the idea of longer lifespans at work a few times. I haven't encountered anyone who admitted they wanted such. Though, a big factor seems to be the fragility a lot of people experience when getting old. I bring up advancement in medicine, but they remain unconvinced.

But as the next generations grew up with this choice being more normal, things might change.
 
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
5,022
---
This brings back memories of reading The Giver back in 6th grade...

Perhaps child-rearing will become more of a community affair?
 

kora

Omg wow imo
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
2,275
---
Location
Armchair
You asked if people would, and I can't know as I don't know what other people would do. I personally would though, but thats because I don't want kids...
 

Teohrn

Active Member
Local time
Today 8:46 PM
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
116
---
It depends. I believe that would happen in modern, consumerist and individualist societies that have long ago cast away the notions of family, traditions and so on. That is not to say all would do it, but a relatively large number would. The ones who would not do it are the family oriented religious cultures, or just the backward ones, although they are somewhat related.

And on to the personal level: A longer lifespan and reproducing are of course not mutually exclusive, so there is nothing stoping me from extending my lifespan (perhaps infinitely so) and reproducing. Besides, when it comes to overpopulation, people like me are hardly a problem at all.

80994493268728298_vOc1XldA_b.jpg
 

InvisibleJim

Banned
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
199
---
Location
Everywhere
I was recently given some aghast looks at a London Mbti meetup for stating: I don't have kids, so why should I modify my behaviour or donate my resources to subsidise what is other peoples problems.
 

Cavallier

Oh damn.
Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
3,639
---
Depends on at least three circumstances:
(1) What kind of world would I be living in, to make it worth it?
(2) How much longer?
(3) What is the process of the birth control? Any pain or side-effects? Reversible?

Without becoming nit picky about the details I have to say that my choice would be based on the answers to EyeSeeCold's questions.

I think that this sort of a scenario would never be feasably implemented if we didn't first come up with a way of dealing with adolescent pregnancy. At what age is a person mature enough to make that choice? I personally don't think most 14 year olds are mentally prepared or experienced enough to make a life altering descision concerning their desire to live longer or have children. Yet they are sexually capable of getting pregnant or impregnating others.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 2:46 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,736
---
Location
Charn
Okay, when doling out additional lifespan time, are we really thinking about the criteria we'd be socially screening for in pursuit of that? :phear:
 

joal0503

Psychedelic INTP
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
700
---
Okay, when doling out additional lifespan time, are we really thinking about the criteria we'd be socially screening for in pursuit of that? :phear:

bling bling and cash monay?
 

TriflinThomas

Bitch, don't kill my vibe...
Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
637
---
Location
Southern California
One can still have children if they can't reproduce (adoption). If you have a longer lifespan, you don't have to rush as much (more leisure time), you can acquire more capital, or you could have more time to find answers to questions that you have about life.
 

Da Blob

Banned
Local time
Today 1:46 PM
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
5,926
---
Location
Oklahoma
The problem is this. Unless basic human nature changes the Oppressors will deprive the Oppressed of the right to reproduce, in order that the Oppressors enjoy longer lifespans, while maintaining their own right to reproduce...


So It Goes....:slashnew:
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 7:46 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,478
---
The people who are having less kids in order to live longer, are those who are in the wealthier parts of the planet and are middle-class, and those who are very wealthy in the poorer parts of the planet, which is usually those here. The rest of the planet is having lots of kids. They just don't go on the internet much. They got more important things to do, like looking after their kids.

Actually, what you are talking about, is already going on.

Those who in the middle-class of Western countries, are having so few kids, that they have a negative population rate. Accordingly, there are less people than is required to replace them in the responsibilities that they fulfil. The new generation goes for the most socially impressive jobs, like in science, leaving the least socially impressive jobs, like cleaning the toilets, to someone else. However, Florence Nightingale showed that even in a war, 8 out of 9 deaths are caused by poor sanitation. So someone HAS to clean the toilets, no matter what, for us to survive. So those from poorer countries were encouraged to come to Western countries, to take up those jobs, as even the poor wage they got in those jobs, was substantially more than they were paid in their own countries for being a professional electrician. So you see, we can't really survive if we cut the birth rates for the entire planet as a whole.
 

nexion

coalescing in diffusion
Local time
Today 2:46 PM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
2,027
---
Location
tartarus
I'll take short life and no reproductive rights. :smiley_emoticons_mr
 
Top Bottom