Duxwing, for your sake I hope you are trolling.
Whoa. Look out everybody, we have a tough guy over here.
--Which is "objective fact," my being human, or such a state being pitiful? The former is quasi-verifiable, while the other is mere opinion.
--You're concluding that since clarification judgment is a certain kind of judgment it is therefore not a kind of judgment, a conclusion that contradicts your premise, and is a fallacious argument akin to: "Penguins are flightless birds, therefore they are not birds". If penguins are flightless birds, then they are birds, but they are not birds, and a logical explosion results.
Now you could be putting one kind of judgment over another, but you held that human judgment is categorically trivial: "It's a pity you're only human. Your judgment is trivial." Now-- and even in your first post-- you're implicitly asserting that "clarification judgement", a kind of human judgment, is not trivial.
In the proper context, yes.
What context? You're asserting this context ad-hoc.
In the proper context, yes.
What context? You never said anything about context.
This is assertion is an ad-hoc argument.
When I clarify perception (ergo judging perception), the judgment is merely identifying perception.
But it is still human judgment and therefore trivial.
Not judgmental conclusiveness that is based on judgment.
If you're going to change your argument, then admit that your previous one was wrong: you did not assert that judgmental conclusiveness was trivial, but rather that human judgment was.
Judgment based on perception, is a WHOLE DIFFERENT story than perception based on judgment.
Maybe, but we're not arguing about that right now.
Now this, is perceptive. Good job
Are you saying that my sarcasm was well-placed, or that you're above me?
As I presume you might not understand, I'll clarify it a little. (Yes, this sentence is Judgment>Perception. But! It's not concrete conclusive, it's speculative)
You certainly didn't sound very "speculative" when you judged perception based on judgment to be "idiotic" and lashed out at everyone. Perhaps you weren't aware, but your tone has calmed significantly through these last few posts. And if you were aware, then stop acting tough when you know that you can't back your assertions up with logic.
Perception can't be there without Judgment. Judgment and perception are both necessary in order to create thought-flow. If you miss 1, you miss both. They both always work simultaneously. However.. How the stream of consciousness is evolved, is dependent on what the purpose is. Is it perceptive or judgmental? We all use both, as it is necessary; but that doesn't justify an abuse of judgmental progressed thoughts. Puberty is a perfect example of abusing judgmental thoughts in order to progress your consciousness. In that particular case, it isn't that bad but rather good. But I do not wish to be involved with 'you' 'the puberty'.
This block of text is wholly unrelated to your initial point. Finish one argument, either through victory or concession, before moving on to the next one.
-Duxwing
Anybody else have similar experiences with marketing jobs?
so I just started doing that during my demos and it's becoming pretty natural (also, caffeine helps). The great thing is that I don't have to go door to door 
