Zodiac of an INTP

[no0k]

Ok, 3rd time's a charm. PLEASE DELETE THE OTHER 2 THREADS MODS. Figuring out my poll is tricky stuff. Thanks :]

Hi folks. I'm pretty new to these forums. I joined originally because I have questions that I'd like answered from other points of view with a similar personality-type as I. Probably not unlike most of you.

Astrology is something of an interest for me and it's my hypothesis that MB and Astrology are basically telling us the same thing but from two different perspectives in life: one being a likelihood of emotional progression while the other starts from a present perspective when observing personal preference.

That being said, I'd like to see if there's any true correlation between the signs of the zodiac and the MB test.

I'm an Aquaricorn (born on the Aquarian side of the Capricorn-Aquarius cusp - Jan 20). Based on the time of day I was born I'm an Aquarius if we don't observe cusps, but I could have been a Capricorn if I was born just a few hours later on the same day.

And now to the point of this entire thread: What about everyone else?

 

[Trebuchet]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

That being said, I'd like to see if there's any true correlation between the signs of the zodiac and the MB test.

Based on the evidence of the previous poll, no.

 

[EyeSeeCold]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

Astrology is more than your Sun Sign.

:S

 

[no0k]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

Astrology is more than your Sun Sign.

:S

Then obviously I'm interested in what's considered the most dominant part of it at the moment.Perhaps one day I'll figure out a way to include the other 11 or however many aspects in a way that wouldn't waste too many people's time. For now this will suffice.

 

[EyeSeeCold]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

Then obviously I'm interested in what's considered the most dominant part of it at the moment.Perhaps one day I'll figure out a way to include the other 11 or however many aspects in a way that wouldn't waste too many people's time. For now this will suffice.

The most dominant aspect would be the Sun Sign / Ascendant. But natal charts are what you should really be dealing with.

Also, for every Sun Sign there are 30 degrees, and in those 30 degrees, there are 10 degrees of variation for each Sun Sign.

I'm an Aquarius II / 20° / 320°. My ascendant is Capricorn.

These are before the new addition to the Sun Sun roster.

 

[Taniwha]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

Leo.

And I am nothing like Arnold Schwarzenegger.

 

[Kuu]

1. This has nothing to do with technology and science... moving thread...
2. Don't scream at mods, we're not your bitches.
3. Astrology is BS
4. A bit more than a day of having joined and I already find you obnoxious

Redshirts these days...

 

[no0k]

1. This has nothing to do with technology and science... moving thread...
2. Don't scream at mods, we're not your bitches.
3. Astrology is BS
4. A bit more than a day of having joined and I already find you obnoxious

Redshirts these days...

If you thought anything I said was obnoxious just wait til you read this: you should probably consider taking some classes in reading comprehension. I wasn't "yelling" at anyone and the fact you're taking it so personally is indicative of much deeper issues. Feel free to go handle those and keep your narrow-minded trolling out of my threads. Unless of course you just happen to thrive on general unproductivity.

On a side note, it would probably blow your mind to find out that old school qabbalism wasn't just mysticism. It was derivative of Babylonian math and science. Hence why I put it in the science forum. Upon reflection you might ask: "but if it is a science, wouldn't it have to affect the human mind?" Don't worry, I've also got one in the neuroscience and psychology forum too.

Thanks for the warm welcome. Glad to be another one of your doubtlessly countless amount of friends.

 

[Fukyo]

If you thought anything I said was obnoxious just wait til you read this: you should probably consider taking some classes in reading comprehension. I wasn't "yelling" at anyone and the fact you're taking it so personally is indicative of much deeper issues. Feel free to go handle those and keep your narrow-minded trolling out of my threads. Unless of course you just happen to thrive on general unproductivity.

Using all caps is considered as the online equivalent of yelling.

 

[no0k]

What can I say fukyo? I didn't want them to think I was trying to spam forums so I wanted to make sure they saw at least that part of my thread if nothing else. Perhapsvnext time ill just make it bolder. Anyways, I didn't create this thread to be a flame forum.

 

[Kuu]

Using all caps is considered as the online equivalent of yelling.

^that^

Besides, how is a sentence that is finished with a smiley to be taken so seriously and question my deeper issues and friend count?

I do admit that my last comment was perhaps too facetious... my apologies. Nobody hugs me cause I'm abrasive, it's true.

On a side note, it would probably blow your mind to find out that old school qabbalism wasn't just mysticism. It was derivative of Babylonian math and science.

Well that seems indeed quite interesting and proper for the science forum... but it doesn't seem this thread is about that.

Speaking of being on topic: carry on.

 

[Stoic Beverage]

If you thought anything I said was obnoxious just wait til you read this: you should probably consider taking some classes in reading comprehension.

No offense, but I've decided I dislike you. Thinking your post was obnoxious is an opinion, not something proven wrong by "classes in reading comprehension."

I wasn't "yelling" at anyone and the fact you're taking it so personally is indicative of much deeper issues.

I saw no evidence of this being taken "personally".
Even if it was, that's hardly indicative "deeper issues".
Throwing around what some consider to be large words may win you an argument on Facebook, but not here.

Feel free to go handle those and keep your narrow-minded trolling out of my threads. Unless of course you just happen to thrive on general unproductivity.

Narrow-minded trolling? Oh, come on.
His first point: He simply noted that this thread did not fit where it was previously posted.
His second point: This was relatively light-hearted. I would think that's reinforced by the smiley.
His third point: Stating an opinion backed by this fancy new-fangled thing called science. Given that he's a mod with more than 1,800 posts, him stating an opinion should hardly be considered "narrow-minded trolling".
His fourth point: Stating an opinion regarding you. Again, he outranks you on this forum. He can state an opinion if he damn well pleases.

Don't be too defensive, as most of the tongues on this forum are sharp. Wouldn't want you to get cut.

(Also, I apologize to Kuu if he's actually a she. I couldn't tell by looking at their profile, and it was getting difficult to write this post without gender regarding -him?-.)

Also, I'm a scorpio.:smiley_emoticons_mr

 

[no0k]

^that^

Besides, how is a sentence that is finished with a smiley to be taken so seriously and question my deeper issues and friend count?

I do admit that my last comment was perhaps too facetious... my apologies. Nobody hugs me cause I'm abrasive, it's true.




Well that seems indeed quite interesting and proper for the science forum... but it doesn't seem this thread is about that.

Speaking of being on topic: carry on.

Qabbalism is where natal charts were originally drawn. Natal charts are used to illustrate a persons geoastrological placement at birth. That's why this thread pertains.

 

[Reluctantly]

*Temporarily comes out of exile*

Astrology is BS

Yar!

*Hits Melkor on the head with a styrofoam sword*
*Goes back into exile*

Bye!

 

[Jennywocky]

Re: Zodiac of an INTP *THEOFFICIAL-OFFICIALONE*

Leo.
And I am nothing like Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Oh, that's just what you'd like us to believe.

 

[Melkor]

I'm a person.

I think.

 

[pjoa09]

IMMALEOIMMAIMMALEOIMMABELEO.

Yeah, well there is Larry Ellison.

Some comfort there, no there is no comfort.

I am an dreamy thinking loner who is also courages and... oh fuck.. yeah i am not extroverted...

social anxiety, right. yeah no. i am not a salesman.

 

[SkyWalker]

If you thought anything I said was obnoxious just wait til you read this: you should probably consider taking some classes in reading comprehension. I wasn't "yelling" at anyone and the fact you're taking it so personally is indicative of much deeper issues. Feel free to go handle those and keep your narrow-minded trolling out of my threads. Unless of course you just happen to thrive on general unproductivity.

On a side note, it would probably blow your mind to find out that old school qabbalism wasn't just mysticism. It was derivative of Babylonian math and science. Hence why I put it in the science forum. Upon reflection you might ask: "but if it is a science, wouldn't it have to affect the human mind?" Don't worry, I've also got one in the neuroscience and psychology forum too.

Thanks for the warm welcome. Glad to be another one of your doubtlessly countless amount of friends.

what is a good book about "old school qabbalism" ?

 

[MissQuote]

There are 24 catagories

26 people have voted

7 of the catagories no one has clicked

17 catagories have been clicked

11 of them have one vote

6 of them have 2 votes

6 of them have 0 votes

1 of them has 4 votes

0 of the voters specify what type they are

 

[MissQuote]

I fucking love science.

 

[darude11]

I don't believe that signs can have any realtion to MBTI type. The personality is derived from many things by various theories:
Genetics
Date of birth (this one and numerology)
Enviroment, where is the person growing up (I believe this one)
and many more...
As I look at it from distance, the most irrelevant seems to me the second theory, and that the date of birth is determining your personality (or not whole). It would be the believing into fate too. And I hate belief of fate. Why fate? Because anybody can be born sooner or later than he has got determined (get it determined by counting right 9 months after... aehm, act ).

The evidence, that fate is wrong belief is the "Fate paradox" (I call like it). If you get sick, do you really need to go to the doc? Because, if it is determined in your fate to be healthy week later, you don't even need to go to doc. And if it is determined in your fate to die on this sickness, why you should go to the doc, when you know, you will die on it?

See? Simple. Maybe I have interpreted something wrong, so you can find there some kind of mistake, but whatev', I am just saying my philosophy.

 

[Anthile]

No. Go away.