Why bother with these sorts of tests? Myer Briggs is pseudoscientific enough, but this is worse than reading your horoscope. I thought INTPs were supposed to be logical, rational thinkers.
I've actually been accurately typed by a morphopsychologist using only my facial features and it was quite amazing, honestly.
right, so you're the one with that face and i'm wildly emotionally expressive
we're playing pretend
Why bother with these sorts of tests? Myer Briggs is pseudoscientific enough, but this is worse than reading your horoscope. I thought INTPs were supposed to be logical, rational thinkers.
I think they wanted you to turn your hand "the long way" - I was somewhat confused by that question too, because when I think of "finger length", I think of... well, the length of my finger.
Why bother with these sorts of tests? Myer Briggs is pseudoscientific enough, but this is worse than reading your horoscope. I thought INTPs were supposed to be logical, rational thinkers.
Why bother with these sorts of tests? Myer Briggs is pseudoscientific enough, but this is worse than reading your horoscope. I thought INTPs were supposed to be logical, rational thinkers.
What do they mean with is your forehead the widest part of your face?
My forehead is just as wide as my jawbones and cheekbones...
EDIT: Voted yes because it is.... 1 mm wider I guess.
HOLY CRAP.
I actually came out as an INTP.
INTP
35% Extroverted, 44% Sensing, 64% Thinking, 59% Perceiving
You seek to develop logical explanations for everything that interests you. Theoretical and abstract, you are interested more in ideas than in social interaction. You are quiet, contained, flexible, and adaptable, and have unusual ability to focus in depth to solve problems in your area of interest. You are skeptical, sometimes critical, always analytical. Famous INTPs: Socrates, Rene Descartes, Tiger Woods, and Albert Einstein. (Courtesy of myersbriggs.org)
So how do they figure this out by looking at your face anyways?
I'm actually quite wary of this kind of practice, but at the very least she accomplished what she said she would, she managed to figure out pretty well who I am based on whatever, and she put it in a career context.That has been completely discredited for centuries. The first forms of racial (hierarchical) profiling used these sorts of primitive methods. You may as well be talking about seeing a palm reader.
"Readers" of this type have two real talents:
a) They are good at intepreting even subtle symbolism in a person's physical appearance - clothing, mannerisms, hairstyle, accent and language that reflects socio-economic status (sociolects) etc.
b) They are good at making statements that are general yet that everyone feels relate specifically to them - a charge that can definitely be levelled at Myer Briggs as well, though not to the same extent.
I'm suprised anyone still believes in this nonsense.
I wonder if there is any kind of correlation between static facial (or any bodily) features and personality?
There definitely are SOME things, I think.
Not necessarily in the genetic build of someone, but you can usually read of someone's face and stance if the person is active or lazy, shy or outgoing et cetera. Not to mention the laugh.
Sky Walker said:Ni sees the one why of many thoughts
Ne sees the many how-s of one thought
ISFP.
I'm White BTW and a little Native American.
They didn't even ask about your face shape or anything... I mean, my face is more round than square, but it's definitely more oval than round.
also, "finger length" for forehead; could you get any more vague in measurement?
They've taken down this test, anywhere else I can get it? I need to confirm I am an intp.
re typing by facial features
type this (thats not me btw)
Yeah right, you just want to have the cookie and eat it to![]()