Basically Pi, the Dominant function is only as strong as the ones below it allow it to be. So yes, technically you can say that one person's dominant is stronger than another one's dominant, but that is do to the experience of refining and developing all of their other functions.I would agree underdeveloped sub-functions can weigh down the primary function. The primary function needs support.
I don't agree the primary function can be underdeveloped. Take two alike temperaments, one ten years old, the other forty. The forty year old will have the stronger primary due to experience.
I was actually considering making it a four part series, for each INxx type.
You're not, but don't let that stop you. You go have fun birthday girl!So, I've just decided I'm an INFJ. This'll probably last for a couple of days until I change my mind again. Apologies for any psycho-messiah behaviour in advance.
Yayyyyy.
Oh, and I like the idea of divising them by the strengths of their functions. It'd be helpful, giving everyone an idea of what they've got to work on. But do keep the quirky names, it makes the whole reading process much more enjoyable.
I need a little inspiration, so any brainstorms for Sub-types of the other "Faces of" installments would be appreciated.
I already have one based on this concept, called "The Generalist aka The vortex of knowledge"The Walking Encyclopedia: WEs' well-developed Si gives them an uncanny ability to remember all of the facts and details their Ti could ever need. They love to provide information when needed (and sometimes when not) and they've got the data to support almost any argument. Can be occasionally annoying.
That's me lmao. Everyone thinks I'm INTJ.
Yes!Adymus, are there ways for an INFJ to refocus their vision for how the world should be (if it becomes distorted and unrealistic?)
Still Fe.Very interesting. A couple of questions though:
If an INJF wasn't in touch with his Fe (as with the Destroyer of Worlds, for example), what exactly would he be using to execute his plans for revolution? If Ni perceives only (correct?) what is being out of "touch"? Does it mean that Fe isn't fully developed, or that it is developed, but being used in a different way? I would think he would need his extraverted judgement functions to get things done. Am I wrong?
Also, although your description fits perfectly, I'm finding it difficult to see Shawn Spencer as an introvert. I thought introverts are supposed to be drained by the external world, yet he seems to thrive on it. I mean, that's one hell of a developed Se.... How do you tell the difference?
It's the anger in their eyes.Regarding INFJs (since my last post was essentially off-topic), with so many forms the personality type can take, what can we say is the one common thread of the type? the one thing all of those diverse 'faces' undoubtedly have in common? Obviously it's dominant Ni, a worldview based on patterns, which gives them the most energy and is where their ego is most oriented...etc....etc...and then Fe, Ti, Se...
But, I'm trying to see it without typology terminology, and just with 'common' language. Basically, what is it in INFJs that people unacquainted/uninterested in typology/MBTI would be able to differentiate from the qualities of, say, ESTPs, INTPs, or any other type INFJs commonly appear to be? It seems as if this type is particularly adept at imitating other types, as if it were their goal to be hard to pinpoint. hmmm.
It's the anger in their eyes.
They all have that deep dissatisfaction for the world, and you can see it in their eyes.
Yeah, it's not scientific, but it's there if you know what to look for. (Unfortunately it is mainly the F's that are in tune with things like this.)
Not necessarily!That's just great. There'll be mass murderers around and we won't even be able to tell.
That is just them confusing neutral emotion for anger.Also, that anger must look different to ours, right? A lot of the people here have complained about being seen as angry all the time, even though they're just emotionless at the time.
*edit
Yeah, I'm still trying to read people and I think I'm getting better! You get a feel for things. (Still a fairly dodgy 'science' for me, but hopefully it'll keep improving.)
Still Fe.
Cognitive functions are never absent, even when not well developed.
Not being in touch with Fe would mean that it is not being used to give them "Push back" on their model. Because when an INFJ articulates their Ni to people, they get a reaction out of people, it could be either in approval or disapproval. When it is in disapproval, then they have to go back into their Ni and remodel it and find out what when wrong, and then try again.
The INFJ who is out of touch with their Fe will just keep increasing their Ni modeling, and in their Ni they will see their Fe being validated, but they are so out of touch with what Fe really values that it will just be a distorted and unrealistic perception.
As for your second question, I already answered that, scroll up.
Those of us that have Fe, can actually abstract an Fe encounter into our Ni or Si (Whichever is connected to it) and essentially play it out in our minds. When we do this we can see based on our Fe connected worldview, whether our plan will work or not, based on how we see Fe values. It is not a hallucination, we all do this (and by we I mean, those of us with Fe, even INTPs.)Validated by... what they believe they are seeing but actually isn't there? Like an Fe hallucination?... or something? How might Fe become so distorted that it becomes blind to "real" values?
They are draining, but times like that are very critical, a peak moment of sorts were a person musters the energy to pull through it. Like I said in the post above, they are also not taking in literally every piece of information and remaining in Se at all times. Because it is for the purpose of Ni looking for an answer, or a time to make a move, so they go back in and out of it.Sorry, I understand that the lower functions can become highly developed, but how are they not draining? I'm misunderstanding everything here...
It's the anger in their eyes.
They all have that deep dissatisfaction for the world, and you can see it in their eyes.
Yeah, it's not scientific, but it's there if you know what to look for. (Unfortunately it is mainly the F's that are in tune with things like this.)
I can relate to the "Empath" and the "Visionary"(and at times "The Robot") but I don't believe I have well-developed Ne nor well-developed Fe.I had some ideas when I read this thread but I wasn't going to post them, but since you asked...
These were just the first things that came to mind. Obviously would need some work, better nicknames, pretty colors, etc...
INTP
The Logic Hawk: The Hawk lives to point out others' mistakes in logic and they can spot one from a mile away. Excellent provider of clarity but underdeveloped Fe means this INTP can unknowingly upset others.
Often mistyped as: INTJ, ENTJ, ESTJ
The Robot: Similar to the Hawk but less motivated. Rarely shows emotion or conviction and usually stays quiet. Arguably the least developed INTP.
Often mistyped as: INTJ, ISTP, ISTJ
The Empath: This is the closest an INTP comes to being touchy-feely. Well-developed Ne and Fe give this INTP a deep interest in people and a desire to understand them that's often equal to their desire to understand everything else.
Often mistyped as: INFP, ENFP, INFJ, ENTP
The Walking Encyclopedia: WEs' well-developed Si gives them an uncanny ability to remember all of the facts and details their Ti could ever need. They love to provide information when needed (and sometimes when not) and they've got the data to support almost any argument. Can be occasionally annoying.
Often mistyped as: ISTJ, INTJ
The Visionary: Amazing things happen when an INTP really develops their Ne. Visionaries can imagine almost anything and love to explore all of the possibilities, even the impossible ones. These INTPs are often the inspiration of many, even if they themselves don't put much stake in their flights of fancy.
Often mistyped as: ENTP, ENFP
Okay there is one thing I should clarify here, that I probably should have clarified when I said this on INFJ forum.Okay, this is a little unclear to me.
Is this anger is the eyes such a pervasive theme among INFJs? I mean, it makes sense in the context of an individual that has the deep dissatisfaction with the world, but are they all really dissatisfied? Also, how would you differentiate between expressions of anger in other types?
I heard you connect distinct emotions with types several times, such as sadness with INFPs and worry with Si. Care to expand on that some time?
When you use Ti it withdrawals us from the world of personal connections, so it will actually deadpan and drop the emotion on your face
Of course I saw that in you, but I know very well what Ti being done by an INTP looks like versus what Ti being Done by an INFJ looks like. There really is a massive difference that I am quite aware of, so I really don't need to be told how to use my own technique.oh and btw - I believe this is what you saw in the video of me:
I do exactly what you describe when I teach - exactly because I need to have that air of authority and not look like a 'used car salesman' - brilliant, I loved that! Of course I used the Method Actor to fit in here and pass as an INTP for so long - even fooled myself for a while!
I'm just going to throw this out there, but that is so not something an INFJ Guru would say. What they contain in their Ni is pure natural law. It is applicable to all aspects of life, and thus is appropriate to be taught anywhere and anytime.I have been the Guru and that's definitely still part of me but I know it's not that appropriate outside of the therapy situation.
Also: (This has nothing to do with you SQ) I'm kind of annoyed that I didn't even get a name drop in that thread, I'm just credited as "Some INTP guy". Not cool, but I'm glad so many people enjoyed it.
Of course I saw that in you, but I know very well what Ti being done by an INTP looks like versus what Ti being Done by an INFJ looks like. There really is a massive difference that I am quite aware of, so I really don't need to be told how to use my own technique.
You were actually using a lot of Fe in that video, it was not at all held down like the INFJ academics do it.
I'm just going to throw this out there, but that is so not something an INFJ Guru would say. What they contain in their Ni is pure natural law. It is applicable to all aspects of life, and thus is appropriate to be taught anywhere and anytime.
Also: (This has nothing to do with you SQ) I'm kind of annoyed that I didn't even get a name drop in that thread, I'm just credited as "Some INTP guy". Not cool, but I'm glad so many people enjoyed it.
hahahaha!INSIGHTFUL POST Adymus.
has it ever occurred to you that you might be an Academic INFJ?
Very good guide! I can actually see a little bit of myself in all of those areas .... heh heh heh. Man, INFJs can be so sneaky.
@ Snowqueen
Why do you want be an INFJ?![]()
I also met an academic/mathematician INTP who blew my head off...
As in it was angry with you? Or amazing?
Words. Can you say anything about content? Something specific?Amazing. She was interesting in so many ways. I did not talk to her much and mainly listened...and even then I was in awe. Perhaps it's simply my Ti Ne being severely stimulated. It wasn't really her academic ability, it was simply her peculiarity that astounded me. (which is quite surprising, even to me)
Words. Can you say anything about content? Something specific?