Fallenman
Active Member
Sometimes the most interesting thing for me to do before writing an essay or a thread is in trying to guess what the title of my piece should be knowing that linear paths is not something I know well when it comes to conveying my thoughts. At least to the general populace, because I know exactly how I got from nuclear warheads to the fruit fly if you only just took my path you would too
.
So it has kind of been an unspoken rule of mine to stay away from making comments that would encompass INTP's in general. As much as I feel I know I am INTP I am constantly questioning it, probably another indicator that I am one. But this one I am taking from other examples. So on another thread someone was pointing out the difference between an INTJ and an INTP, where an INTJ would sacrifice body and soul to finish an project, or achieve some objective goal, outside and separate from the INTJ. The INTP on the other hand sacrifices the external world for the internal project, something that is subjective to the INTP.
I know i'm butchering this but the key note is that INTP's are incredibly subjective in the way they think, and INTJ's objective. Te versus Ti. So today I was in a class where the question was posed what stresses you in life. The people before me threw out school work and money so all the default answers were gone and I came up with the next best thing, maintaining relationships. Attempting to fit everyone in, giving them a slot. Now I just threw it out there for discussion, in reality I have plenty of time to see anyone. The issue though is that I don't want to see a lot of people, and in fact I'd rather see some people over others. The reasoning being is that it is incredibly subjective. I'm doing it for me, who do I want to see who do I think would lead to my having the best time. But I decided to pretend as if I was only stressing about finding the time.
Well they ran with it, expanded on it, one girl gave examples that depicted exactly what I meant in my head, although hadn't explicitly stated. So the teacher chimes in about a similar experience that she had, but both of them said something along the lines of they were committed towards seeing certain people for certain amount of time. I think at some point we all come to this realization, that you are committed towards spending time with people in order to maintain a relationship.
Well lets see if I stay true to my title. Basically this is what I was thinking. Ok my natural tendency is to do what makes me feel better, which is to hang out with Joe (fictional character) who has a car and can take me places (i'm currently a pedestrian), rather than Al who lives within walking distance but cannot drive and has not much to do (based on a real story). Obviously I wanna hang out with Joe more, but the point isn't who can do most for me but rather am i giving each of them their due share. The list of people I have to see goes on but there was recently a Tug-Of-War between two best friends where Al was getting upset with me because I was spending all my time with Joe. Joe, the bigger man, understood when I told him that I did need to spend a little bit of time with Al so that he wouldn't be offended and so Joe left me to my own devices. But this is where I had to come to terms with the fact that sometimes I have to realize that it isn't always about me. But at the same time it probably still is about me because I'm just trying to maintain the relationship so that Al would stop bothering me lol.
So long story short, do you have a difficulty maintaining relationships (i'll allow it to be broad family friends & acquaintances), and if so do you think its because we, more than most, fail to take value in honoring objective cultural standards, what ever you wanna call it, which dictates that we spend X amount of time with people. Is it because on any given day we're more likely to be thinking about something that pertains to ourselves more than things that pertain to other people. What say you!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bf43/6bf43403f77fe449d3bb3e8da02a78b75110e755" alt=":) :) :)"
So it has kind of been an unspoken rule of mine to stay away from making comments that would encompass INTP's in general. As much as I feel I know I am INTP I am constantly questioning it, probably another indicator that I am one. But this one I am taking from other examples. So on another thread someone was pointing out the difference between an INTJ and an INTP, where an INTJ would sacrifice body and soul to finish an project, or achieve some objective goal, outside and separate from the INTJ. The INTP on the other hand sacrifices the external world for the internal project, something that is subjective to the INTP.
I know i'm butchering this but the key note is that INTP's are incredibly subjective in the way they think, and INTJ's objective. Te versus Ti. So today I was in a class where the question was posed what stresses you in life. The people before me threw out school work and money so all the default answers were gone and I came up with the next best thing, maintaining relationships. Attempting to fit everyone in, giving them a slot. Now I just threw it out there for discussion, in reality I have plenty of time to see anyone. The issue though is that I don't want to see a lot of people, and in fact I'd rather see some people over others. The reasoning being is that it is incredibly subjective. I'm doing it for me, who do I want to see who do I think would lead to my having the best time. But I decided to pretend as if I was only stressing about finding the time.
Well they ran with it, expanded on it, one girl gave examples that depicted exactly what I meant in my head, although hadn't explicitly stated. So the teacher chimes in about a similar experience that she had, but both of them said something along the lines of they were committed towards seeing certain people for certain amount of time. I think at some point we all come to this realization, that you are committed towards spending time with people in order to maintain a relationship.
Well lets see if I stay true to my title. Basically this is what I was thinking. Ok my natural tendency is to do what makes me feel better, which is to hang out with Joe (fictional character) who has a car and can take me places (i'm currently a pedestrian), rather than Al who lives within walking distance but cannot drive and has not much to do (based on a real story). Obviously I wanna hang out with Joe more, but the point isn't who can do most for me but rather am i giving each of them their due share. The list of people I have to see goes on but there was recently a Tug-Of-War between two best friends where Al was getting upset with me because I was spending all my time with Joe. Joe, the bigger man, understood when I told him that I did need to spend a little bit of time with Al so that he wouldn't be offended and so Joe left me to my own devices. But this is where I had to come to terms with the fact that sometimes I have to realize that it isn't always about me. But at the same time it probably still is about me because I'm just trying to maintain the relationship so that Al would stop bothering me lol.
So long story short, do you have a difficulty maintaining relationships (i'll allow it to be broad family friends & acquaintances), and if so do you think its because we, more than most, fail to take value in honoring objective cultural standards, what ever you wanna call it, which dictates that we spend X amount of time with people. Is it because on any given day we're more likely to be thinking about something that pertains to ourselves more than things that pertain to other people. What say you!