A comment on the article that I think is very true.
The problem with this article is the problem with hipsters is the problem with youth today. We (I am a sixteen year old kid living in Toronto Canada) are pretty much the first generation growing up in a society that is so saturated with identities it is nearly impossible for us to create one without it being labelled and marketed back. If the majority of kids my age were like me and read adbusters instead of Vice, you can bet that Blackspot sneakers would be the only thing on the shelves of Urban Outfitters and small "urban design" boutiques.
I live in a world where anyone is capable of making 'art'. I live in a world where 'friends' of mine can post shitty digital photos that they fucked with on Adobe to facebook and are met with a hundred "OMG this is like, so pretty. I didn't know you were so artsy!"s. I live in a world where there are an uncountable number of good and bad bands playing gigs on myspace, where there is no musical glue to hold my generation together. Unlike the psych-blues-jam-rock that 'revolutionary' culture revolved around in the '60s, or the thrash garage punk that led the popular 'anarchism' of the late '70s and '80s, there is no one type of music to listen to.
Within my generation there are so many labels that it is physically impossible to be yourself without being told you are following someone else. That is the problem with this article. Hipsters are so afraid of being called hipsters because they want to be themselves. I spend a fairly large chunk of my weekend partying time in so-called 'hipster bars' because they are the only places I can go to party where I'm not surrounded by girls who just discovered alcohol and want to pass out in their own vomit. And how many 'hipsters' have I met and spoken to that share my taste in what I consider to make me, me- literature, music, plans for the FUTURE, political ideologies... These people are just trapped by the fact that cynicism is probably the only thing that is common in my generation.
Apathy is constant through the vast majority of young people, regardless of what cigarettes they smoke and what cheap beer they drink and what vintage clothing they throw on before heading out at night. There are probably eight people in my grade at my school who have read a newspaper in the last six months, and three of them wear skinny jeans and plaid shirts. There are a hundred more kids who wear loose pants and sweatshirts that don't even know what universal healthcare means. Just a last little note, you ridicule these people for riding one-speed bikes. Why? Is your mission as a magazine not to perpetuate a sustainable and anti capitalist society? Is bicycling to a party not what your ideal human would do? I think biking is a pretty fucking handy way to get around. So, Adbusters, what are you going to do? Accept the fact that apathy is around regardless of what clothes are on its practitioners? Or keep being cynical about a generation that is lost in the media. Those who are lost will remain so. Why not give strength to those who want to be found. Who want to embody your magazine. This has been the most rambling piece of shit I've ever written but something irked me about your article and I can't quite put my finger on it. Perhaps I will return later....