Search results

We are not claiming that typology town is 100% interpretive. Among the footage that we happened to come across on youtube, they were all interpretives. It certainly wouldn't make sense for everybody to be interpretive, but the ones that we came across were. If you're asking if this is...

Please don't dehumanize people. Thanks.

You're being erroneously silly. We grabbed 200 people from a very peculiar bubble, specifically within a subgroup that uploaded videos of themselves to youtube discussing the very peculiar topics of their bubble. Of course we're going to receive results like this.

Yep. Running off of irrelevant information can go a long way. Of course. We only read about 200 or so people. It's interesting that the only interpretive that we didn't happen to find on the list was a Zyy'nai. That remains pretty consistent with the celeb virtual village as well; as we have...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JEamfe-pEU @30 seconds in or so, it discusses the effect of specialized bubbles being massively dominated by just a few mojos. Hence, http://podlair.com/images/Typology%20Town.pdf This doesn't mean that we read everybody as Nai'xyy. It simply means that...

People will invariably switch context all of the time in order to achieve better perfection (Zai) or incorporate new ideas (Nez), or refresh engaged dynamics (Xyy/Zyy), etc. In fact, that is the only way for language and communication to function properly. For example, you state that I should...

That would be rather silly. Making conclusions without any known or highly suspected causality will get you in trouble. This is why I derive causalities from the evidence available. That, in itself, isn't ignorance; because if I'm wrong, I will be corrected either way. Saying, "well, I'm not...

[SPOILER]

[SPOILER] Oh, no. I wasn't referring to that, I was referring to why you were banned. Although, I'll humor the discussion.

"Hey hey, I will read it later. I g2g now, I hope your not making a fool of yourself XD" Ofc not :p If you want to talk about the previous conversation some more you can. I generally enjoy casual conversation. But if it isn't worth it, then we could simply stop, if you want. About PL. Your...

Misunderstanding is always possible. Excluding the possibility in my language could be done, but I don't think that it would yield to better communication. "But I retreat/also_admit_that, my perspective may also have been based on some misunderstood concrete perception. It is INFJs...

Woops, Posted all of that before I noticed your most recent post. "What is going on is that you don't consider the judgments you made in the perspective that you pursued to be false." I don't consider it to be a perspective, so i don't consider it to be false.If it was really a...

"Don't Pod'lair 'diagnose' a lot more INFJs" INFJs are a Jungian Derivative. We don't diagnose Jungian derivatives such as INFJ. "than other Jungian derivatives" Jungian derivatives are jungian derivatives. "You're both wrong. We don't "diagnose" Jungian derivatives." Now...

Approximate replication of previous scenario: Pod'lair clearly is (Insert definition of variable here) of Jung, therefore you can't say that either of us are wrong. Variable =/= Derivative "I never said either of those things" "You used one of them indirectly to support your argument"

By the by, it isn't really necessary that you directly state my representation of your position. That may sound silly, but you have to remember that languages and sentences carry multiple dimensions. For example, if I were to tell you "My dog ate a chicken". You may respond, "You don't have a...

Yeah, I did put a bit too much into yesterday's discussion, as it wasn't even over something worth discussing. I don't consider myself to have been wrong, but I may think otherwise if you were to go go through an explicit understanding of what he meant... or what you had agreed with of him. It's...

Just because it doesn't address the model itself doesn't make it irrelevant to the OP, nor does it make it irrelevant to correct a post that directly responds to the OP. Failing to read my post and failing to achknowlege the purpose of an OP is required to reach such an understanding.

So you've concluded that my interest in this discussion contradicts what I've said to be my interest in this discussion, and you're supposing that I have an interest in arguing every opposing view that comes to me; but I'm really a troll in disguise? Kay. :) You don't say? This is fun. :)...

Never assumed that you did. Indeed I did, and you dropped every single one. Moving on :)

Yup Didn't come here with the intention of arguing this. Although, if you're interested: http://www.skepdic.com/physiogn.html I was also referring to the presumption of validity from where you are attempting to extrapolate from. Who's comparing? Did I ever link those particular...

That reasoning right there demonstrates how extrapolation is impossible in the case that you mentioned. It's a pseudo-unification. Every interpretation is a new creation.

How do you plan to extend 'known' information if you don't know the information you're trying to extend? And even if you did, how would you know if it was right? And if you presume at all, any the latter, how can you discern whether your presumptions aren't tainting your shit? Auburn 11:46...

This is not "Pod'Lair community support". If you want to get a response (given lyra has decided not to waste time here), then you should contact us through one of the PL channels/videos.

^Obvious zero understanding of what we present as reading is obvious Yes, I get it, you're having trouble with pronouns. Now, please stay on topic.

Yes, because categorizing people involves looking for physiological cues. :) Please stop talking around my question with claims of evidence that has not been provided. What categories? :storks:

'We' as in Pod'Lair practitioners. You are not a Pod'Lair practitioner, so I refer to you as 'you'. You can learn more about proper usage of 1st and 2nd person pronouns at your nearest children teaching facility; but for now, it's *probably* best that we stick to PL related discussion. Where...

Please learn how to construct a logical argument. If you want to try to claim that we type people, by all means; but until you get, y'know, that stuff that backs your position, your claims are going to be, y'know, weak as fuck.

Please don't attack strawmen. You concede to have stolen PL material and based your theory off of Pod'lair; and your commercial site, as we speak, is riddled with plagarism and theft of intellectual property.

That would be fucking fantastic. But alas, [Peoplerhetorics.com ]

Not exactly a "problem" per say, but I know why. The vast majority of typology town is either Ad'Rom or Nai'xyy. (Assuming that you're referencing the consideration that we should be crossing Nai'zyy more often)

Extinction happens in thirty minutes Mintz 01 [Morton Mintz, write for the American Prospect] February 26, 2001, “Tow Minutes to Launch”, The American Prospect, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=two_minutes_to_launch, Hair-trigger alert means this: The missiles carrying those...

What mysticism? I've got links. Tell me what you want to be directed towards. Human nature has not been previously canvassed in the context of logical thought effectively as people have not discovered human math. Pod'lair has made this unprecedent discovery. And even if there was an...

I meant beyond the arbitrary understanding of what gullibility means. Oh, yes, and I'm sure somebody must have told me that gullibility doesn't exist.

Gullible people are less likely to remodel, let alone provide well-canvassed justifications for such remodeling. If there is such a thing as gullibility, then it would surely exist within those that are unwilling to canvass evidence due to how "persuasive" and "believable" the contradictory...

I appreciate your enthusiasm :hoplit09::elephant:

Your statements are indicative of arrogance. You make claims founded upon pure assumption and put yourself in a position of superiority from those assumptions. Ironically, this is arrogant, "childish" and condescending. You don't get to call it a pseudoscience until you find anything wrong with...

Re: Dismantling Adymus Video One's mojo is the container, social alchemy is the environment. Okay. So what significance does this have? People don't make sense of what the test says about them, they make sense of how they interpret Fi, Ti, Fe, feeling, thinking, extraversion...

Re: Dismantling Adymus Video Inherent, Fundamentally It's not one or the other. It's both. Why do you think that is? One can answer every question randomly and still get the same clue. Pod'lair claims that you can connect with your unconscious powers or your Uthur. You just don't directly...

Correct. This means that you could easily see if something didn't fit, demonstrate it, then falsify the theory. I didn't want to light up this thread too quickly. People tend to not listen when they're angry. :) You're right, you aren't automatically wrong. But when not knowing much of the...

I don't mean to offend you, but I actually agree with everything that he points out about physiognomy.me. Also, you do understand you attacked them first right? I'm not sure they're the ones who feel threatened. I mean, don't get me wrong, It's perfectly cool to objectively work through a...

Good plan, but there isn't any way of doing that without ditching jung. EDIT: Oh, and I found something in the related videos box. It addresses your video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1uQyjdXyEE

I'm not responsible for some pod'lair nutjob scamming you for $35.

The video is about MBTI. It's such a wonder that I'd come across it! How irrlevent this video about MBTI is! :elephant: And no, it isn't my problem should you decide to fall for a 35$ scam.

I wish I could call myself Adymus, nor do I support his little "Empire of Enlightenment". Either way, that would be interesting to see. Good luck.

:^^: Well they already have thousands of people and celebrities typed, apparently. Now all they need is a pool of people who're willing to read this garbage for more than a couple of minutes.

Actually, I was being sarcastic; I support the MBTI, not pod'lair. I'm sorry that his criticisms of jung's work are less constructive than that of ENTJ+INTP relationships; but in any case, it is just one silly thread. :elephant:

I am aware. I figured this community would find it amusing. ;) He's apparently going to "compare" to "prove" which typology comes out on top.

I don't know.. Adymus seems pretty serious in this video. It might actually be worth considering his criticisms of the MBTI (which very much so don't apply to his "superior" model, of course). :elephant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7suu6h3i0aQ