Do not suppose that I have ignored your reply to me in the Burden of Proof thread due to the fact that I cannot answer your questions or back up my claims (even if this is, in fact, true, I mostly just don't care to). Any response I could give would be meaningless, as it seems we, for the time being, operate under entirely different assumptions concerning the nature of reality.
You have always been more sensible, realistic, and pragmatic than I, and for a long time, I hated for you for it, though I cannot say why. Now I can only say that I admire you for having a firm ground in your views and for having some degree of 'certainty' in a universe where, as best as I can tell, no certainty exists. The fragile philosophical framework I have devised does not lend itself well to determining anything abstracted from the subject, and even then, that framework is constantly shifting.