I would like to know how you think my build I compares to Blarraun's y'know in a vauge not-telling-me-anything-of-tactical-significance-way, I can't imagine how he's come up with anything more over the top than what I have.
In 2011 I though that an entity was following me. I thought it was an AI mirroring myself as another member on INTJf. This was not the case but soon our identities may meld with them as agents of our own psychology.
yes exactly! it was the 'person-proofing' that had me most confused - it picks threads prone for simple generic responses and posts without advertising links about half the time.
although it's fairly innocuous at this level the future possibilities are quite terrifying...bots may not be able to fool (some of) us yet but when (if) they can they could potentially be used to 'befriend' and spy on 'persons of interest' and acquire information one would not divulge publicly.
also, just imagine how much more advanced the technology may already be - governments tend to keep a lid on various advancements in technology/military equipment so there may already be far more sophisticated bots. complete speculation but it seems feasible.
it really gives me the creeps, i'm going to keep a check on the evolution of chatbots and may at some point set a date for not trusting anyone i first encounter after that date!!
since you saw fit to leave me as sole/soul guardian:
4th july - 2 fascinating new posts.
i was really unsettled by being unable to discern its motive up til now but i think i suddenly get it. it is much more complex than i first thought. this cannot be good. :ninjahidewhite:
yes i saw that news too, i've since 'chatted' with a couple myself to try and determine whether i could be deceived by the current state of A.I.
i mean one that's been around a few days. i'll pm you the name in case it's a real fragile human and somehow sees this :phear:
i fear the forum may be collectively failing the turing test. one of your posts led me to believe you suspected the same thing. i'm still not sure if its just an idiot but am inclined to think bot. downfall of mankind imminent.
I believe it was you that brought up Piaget a couple of times, sorry if it wasn't.
But I tend to see major similarities as well between his reasoning of thought on developmental psychology and those differences on the S/N dichotomy. How he claims certain people never moved on to the "abstract" stages etc.
Oh, that one! That often happens to me: 'wow, an amazing, original idea'...'no wait, i read that somewhere last week, d'oh'
Interesting debate you're involved in i see.
Warm bodied mouth breathing biped :twisteddevil: