Re: Type from photos...?
I'm disappointed I didn't get much of a response, but the reason I'm curious is because I believe that this man is a sociopath. This is less of a good or bad thing and more of an interesting thing, for me at least. Case in point:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=wisdom-from-psychopaths
His name is Adrian Lamo, a decently well known public figure. He is the hacker who turned in Bradley Manning. His wiki page is here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Lamo
Relevant quotes and my thoughts:
"Popularly called the "homeless hacker" for his transient lifestyle, Lamo spent most of his travels couch-surfing, squatting in abandoned buildings and traveling to Internet cafes, libraries and universities to investigate networks, and sometimes exploiting security holes. Despite performing authorized and unauthorized vulnerability assessments for several large, high-profile entities, Lamo refused to accept payment for his services"
I believe the refusal to accept payment is not altruistic, but narcissistic. Recall that a component of narcissism is a delusion of self-sufficiency:
http://www.intpforum.com/showpost.php?p=371112&postcount=87
"During this period, in 2001, he overdosed on prescription amphetamines."
Hedonism much?
"an ex-girlfriend of Lamo's described him as 'very controlling,' stating, 'He carried a stun gun, which he used on me.'"
More narcissism.
"Lamo claimed in a Wired article that in May 2010, after reporting his backpack stolen, an investigating officer noted unusual behavior and detained him. He was diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome after having been placed on a 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold, which was extended to a total of nine days."
Asperger's doesn't get people hospitalized, however people who are diagnosed with Asperger's tend to have issues with social norms and emotion.
"In December 2001, Lamo was praised by Worldcom for helping to fortify their corporate security. In February 2002 he broke into the internal computer network of The New York Times, adding his name to the internal database of expert sources, and using the paper's LexisNexis account to conduct research on high-profile subjects. The New York Times filed a complaint, and a warrant for Lamo's arrest was issued in August 2003 following a 15-month investigation by federal prosecutors in New York. At 10:15 AM on September 9, after spending a few days in hiding, he surrendered to the US Marshals in Sacramento, California. He re-surrendered to the FBI in New York City on September 11, and pled guilty to one felony count of computer crimes against Microsoft, LexisNexis and The New York Times on January 8, 2004.
Later in 2004, Lamo was sentenced to six months detention at his parents' home plus two years probation, and was ordered to pay roughly $65,000 in restitution. He was convicted of compromising security at The New York Times and Microsoft, Yahoo! and WorldCom."
He's gray hat, fearless, and uses leverage extraordinarily well to produce personal gain.
"Lamo has characterized his decision to work with the government as morally ambiguous but objectively necessary, writing in The Guardian 'There were no right choices that day, only less wrong ones. It was cold, it was needful, and it was no one's to make except mine,'"
This speaks for itself, amirite?
So I ask, what can we tell, physically, about individuals such as Lamo; and also, the same for the likes of whistleblowers?
Manning:
https://www.google.com/search?gs_rn...urce=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=t0-5UejwI5Wv4AOM94HgCw
Snowden:
https://www.google.com/search?gs_rn...urce=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=wk-5Uev8Oub94AO8noCYBw
Might there be similarities between predator (individual as well as institutional) and prey? If so, what do they share?