• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

To what degree should a person be self satisfied?

Xel

When in the course of inhuman events....
Local time
Today 3:10 PM
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
226
---
Location
Spacetime Continuum
Is being totally happy with your self and your life a good thing? If you think you are at your best or have simply said "Okay, I'm satisfied with myself" is this a good thing? Should you always try to be better than you are?
 

Toad

True King of Mushroomland!!!
Local time
Today 12:10 PM
Joined
Apr 7, 2009
Messages
1,778
---
94%
 

Deleted member 1424

Guest
No toad he said degree!

so 338.4°:P

However to answer the OP I think people should always be trying to improve themselves. You can be satisfied where you stand, but you should always have the ambition to go further. Otherwise you would stagnate. That being said, there is no shame in taking a break every now and then.
 

Inappropriate Behavior

is peeing on the carpet
Local time
Today 3:10 PM
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,795
---
Location
Behind you, kicking you in the ass
Adair pretty much says it as it should be said. Being happy with yourself isn't the same as knowing you can improve. Be aware and okay with the knowledge that you aren't perfect and yet still take advantage of any opportunity you find to improve yourself in ways you want. Maybe if you think of self improvements in terms of what you want to improve instead of need to improve, or at least try to view it that way. We probably all have some 'needs to improve' I guess so....hell I don't know.

Be happy, keep learning. That's the best I can come up with at the moment.
 

Anthile

Steel marks flesh
Local time
Today 9:10 PM
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
3,987
---
No toad he said degree! :P

so 338.4°:P

However to answer the OP I think people should always be trying to improve themselves. You can be satisfied where you stand, but you should always have the ambition to go further. Otherwise you would stagnate. That being said, there is no shame in taking a break every now and then.



Agreed. I think it's perfectly possible to be happy but still see potential to improve oneself. Stagnation means always stepping back in the long run which would reduce happyness. Like an eternal spiral, always upwards.
 

Ermine

is watching and taking notes
Local time
Today 1:10 PM
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
2,871
---
Location
casually playing guitar in my mental arena
Is being totally happy with your self and your life a good thing? If you think you are at your best or have simply said "Okay, I'm satisfied with myself" is this a good thing? Should you always try to be better than you are?

Happy? Sure. Complacent? Absolutely not.

I don't think there's any stopping point when it comes to being your best. It's a lifelong process. If you think you can't be any better than you are, why continue living? And I'm curious to hear another side to the argument. Is there any reason why we shouldn't be better than we are?
 

echoplex

Happen.
Local time
Today 3:10 PM
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
1,609
---
Location
From a dangerously safe distance
I've always thought it's good to be content, but never satisfied. I mean that in a general sense though. There are obviously times when you're satisfied with a certain accomplishment that you've finished.
 

Sapphire Harp

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 1:10 PM
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
650
---
I'm rather of two minds about whether one should continuously be trying to improve... If you're strenuously trying to improve a lot of the time... it's easy to lose sight of what you're doing because you're so focused... The effort to improve gets abstracted and doesn't really produce results, I think...

For an example of self-improvement that has become completely lost and deluded... I honestly think of the XIII personality change experiments he brought up originally. Obsession levels of energy were being driven into that game of self-modification and improvement... But it seemed doubtful anything was changing - at a guess, I'd say the whole-process was merely making him more self-fascinated, with no real change at all...

Do we grow out, or do we grow in? Do we become different - or become more thoroughly ourselves as we clear out fears and misperceptions?

I don't really believe in an answer to these questions, but I get the feeling most of our paths move in a spiral. We'd like to think we're changing, but the path we cut only changes slightly each time... We'd prefer to move from A to B, but by the time we reach point B, we've traveled far enough to reach point Y...

So, should you try to be better than you are? I don't know that the trying really helps all that much... It seems like you move through the spirals a whole lot faster, but you cut the difference more narrowly... I remember a period where I tried and tried to act differently than I did with miniscule results... but in the end, I just grew completely sick of the effort... It felt like I was frantically moving nowhere.

Although, I'm fairly certain that gaining perspective allows greater changes... Sometimes it seems like the only thing that does help you grow.

But if someone does say, "Arright - that's it. I'm as good as I'll ever be. I've made it." I can't but help to say they're probably thoroughly misguided. Or self-centered or whatever. ..."The quintessence of what can be disappointing about an SJ individual."
 

walfin

Democrazy
Local time
Tomorrow 4:10 AM
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,436
---
Location
/dev/null
I think it's fine to be satisfied with yourself, yet dissatisfied with what you've accomplished.

And satisfaction is usually temporary.
 
Top Bottom