• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Systemizing (SQ) and Empathizing (EQ) Quotient Test

Madoness

that shadow behind lost
Local time
Today 10:47 PM
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
978
---
Location
Estonia
Even though, I found that something similar has been put up here before, I guess the results are a bit different...

The two psychological personality tests determine how your brain functions from an empathizing/systemizing perspective. Understanding how your mind works can help you in making life’s toughest decisions like what to study, what career path to pursue, and much more.

http://eqsq.com/eq-sq-tests/

As for my result

Respondent Average EQ Average SQ Brain Type
Males 39.0 61.2 Systemizing
Females 48.0 51.7 Empathizing
Your Score 35 67 Extreme Systemizing
Generally, the higher the score the greater your natural ability for that trait. However, the EQ test has 40 questions compared to 75 in the SQ test. As a result, although the unprocessed quotients may be used for comparing each trait ability between individuals, the absolute scores do not tell an individual if he or she has a greater tendency to empathize or systemize. A calculation taking into account the quantity of questions in each test is used to determine a person's brain type along the following continuum:
 

didyouknow

Active Member
Local time
Tomorrow 6:47 AM
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
460
---
Location
Outside your window.
I must've done something wrong to get such an extreme result. :eek:

23 EQ and 90 SQ.

It says down near the bottom that 0% of females get extreme systemizing. Ermine, looks like we don't exist. ;)
 

Madoness

that shadow behind lost
Local time
Today 10:47 PM
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
978
---
Location
Estonia
I must've done something wrong to get such an extreme result. :eek:

23 EQ and 90 SQ.

It says down near the bottom that 0% of females get extreme systemizing. Ermine, looks like we don't exist. ;)

Therefore... you don't exist:o Or you are a robot trying to take over the world....:eek:
 

Fukyo

blurb blurb
Local time
Today 9:47 PM
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
4,289
---
33 EQ and 50 SQ.

Doesn't feel too right thought,I expected a higher result in EQ and a low score in SQ.
 

Ermine

is watching and taking notes
Local time
Today 1:47 PM
Joined
Dec 24, 2007
Messages
2,871
---
Location
casually playing guitar in my mental arena
Sweet! So that's why I'm so good at sneaking up on people.

I say we form a coalition of the unknown/nonexistant and scare everyone out of their wits!
 

hope

Member
Local time
Today 3:47 PM
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
97
---
eq 28 sq 67 extreme systemizing
 

Deleted member 1424

Guest
eq-30
sq-81 The sq test felt somewhat off to me.....
Result- Extreme Systematizing


Apparently I don't exist either. Who shall we target first, Ermine?
 

Android

Solyaris
Local time
Today 12:47 PM
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
228
---
Location
Six stories up.
15, 89 - Extreme Systemizer.. which is exactly what I expected, though I will say that I am very disorganized in my personal environment (though I know where everything is most of the time). If some of the questions had been phrased a little better I'd probably have scored even higher (or if I had a bank account).
 

walfin

Democrazy
Local time
Tomorrow 4:47 AM
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,436
---
Location
/dev/null
EQ 16 SQ 63

Some of the questions may have been slightly biased (bank account, read maps, etc.)
 
Local time
Tomorrow 4:47 AM
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
88
---
Location
The land where a merlion is the country's official
Average EQ Average SQ Brain Type
Males 39.0 61.2 Systemizing
Females 48.0 51.7 Empathizing
Your Score 42 101 Extreme Systemizing

I refuse to believe my scores. My life is extremely disorganized. I took an asperger's test and I scored an average of 161/200, where anything above 100 is an indication of asperger's.




... shit. i can never be a psychologist like this. this sucks.

I must've done something wrong to get such an extreme result. :eek:

23 EQ and 90 SQ.

It says down near the bottom that 0% of females get extreme systemizing. Ermine, looks like we don't exist. ;)

*points to post below*

Experimental Control Groups
 

walfin

Democrazy
Local time
Tomorrow 4:47 AM
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,436
---
Location
/dev/null
LucielaMinerva said:
I took an asperger's test and I scored an average of 161/200, where anything above 100 is an indication of asperger's.
Erm. I thought aspie's was correlated with extreme systemising.
 

Rain

Lighting the Way
Local time
Today 3:47 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
79
---
Location
Virginia
EQ- 8 | SQ- 137 | Extreme Systemizing-hmm. Not surprising.
 

Karma

Redshirt
Local time
Today 3:47 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
3
---
Location
Virginia
I must've done something wrong to get such an extreme result. :eek:

23 EQ and 90 SQ.

It says down near the bottom that 0% of females get extreme systemizing. Ermine, looks like we don't exist. ;)

Looks like I'm one of those non-existent, extreme systemizing females also.
14 EQ and 69 SQ
I was truly hoping to get a balanced score. What was I thinking?!
 

polyopulis

Redshirt
Local time
Today 12:47 PM
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
4
---
i really disliked the SQ test to the extent that i stopped on page 8. too many of the questions are way too focused. "when you look at a mountain, do you think about how the mountain was formed?" I already know generally how mountains are formed and going through that process in my head every time i look at a mountain would be pointless.
"when buying a computer, do you like to know exact details of the processor speed and hard drive capacity?"
hard drive capacity is usually irrelevant to me. however, i do want to know about processor specs, RAM, video card, motherboard, cooling...
questions like this (correct me if I'm wrong) are way too oriented towards Se.

a good question (for me) would be "when you look at an integer, do you automatically divide it to find its factors?"
 

nemo

Active Member
Local time
Tomorrow 7:47 AM
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
195
---
Location
Melbourne
It's hard for a test to be created to suit everyone's needs/situations, but yeah, some questions assumed too much. I guess the test is meant to suit the majority.

My result was:
EQ-47 SQ-54
Pretty balanced... It was a surprise to me, I thought I'd be way more of an empathiser. [I'm not INTP btw.]
 
Local time
Today 3:47 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
746
---
Location
metro Detroit area
EQ - 24
SQ - 71

Extreme Systemizing

was it just me or was there 3x as many questions for the SQ part? I only finished it because I was bored and I wanted to see what I'd get
 
Top Bottom