• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Sexual deviancy

Estimate your sexual deviency. Round down and see OP.

  • Vaginal and that's pretty much it.

    Votes: 3 5.0%
  • Oral and maybe light bondage

    Votes: 14 23.3%
  • Bondage, maybe a threesome or anal.

    Votes: 24 40.0%
  • No holes barred, perhaps into BDSM.

    Votes: 13 21.7%
  • Super hard-core BDSM

    Votes: 6 10.0%

  • Total voters
    60

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
That other sex thread got me curious how sexually deviant INTPs are as a group. Vote on your deviance rating!
1: Vaginal (or a homosexual equivalent), and that's pretty much it.
2: Oral and vaginal, that's about it.
3: Light bondage, maybe a threesome or anal.
4: No holes barred, perhaps into BDSM.
5: Super hard-core BDSM, whips, chains, bloodletting and pretty much anything someone from type 1 would look at and get possibly outright offended.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 3:20 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
3 Under certain conditions...
 

Hammett

*************
Local time
Tomorrow 9:50 AM
Joined
May 12, 2008
Messages
32
---
Not into BDSM but I'd never say never. Why limit options ;)
 

Agent of Chaos

The one you were warned about
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
57
---
Location
On the other side of the rainbow
Another define something personal thread.
What is your defination of sexual deviancy? It may not be the same as mine.
Are you talking about societal norms? There are cultural differences and personal tastes to consider before labeling something deviant.
Some may think anything besides missionary position (man on top facing his female partner) is wrong and others that think bestiality is normal (some even find necrophilia acceptible :eek:)

I'm one of those "Why limit my options?" types of people but only when it comes to live women because you never know what you may find enjoyable (sorry, I'm just not attracted to guys so I don't think I'd find that enjoyable). And if it is enjoyable would it still be considered deviant behavior?
:evil:
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
How about you just look at the options and what I mean by deviancy should be obvious. "Deviating from vaginal sexual intercourse". We can discuss social-sexual norms and taboos if you want to, but that's not my intent. My intent is only to see how freaky INTPs tend to be as a group. How freaky that compares to other types and society at large is incidental.
 

Agent of Chaos

The one you were warned about
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
57
---
Location
On the other side of the rainbow
How about you just look at the options and what I mean by deviancy should be obvious. "Deviating from vaginal sexual intercourse". We can discuss social-sexual norms and taboos if you want to, but that's not my intent. My intent is only to see how freaky INTPs tend to be as a group. How freaky that compares to other types and society at large is incidental.
I did look at your listed options. It is a very well thought-out list. I just don't agree that most of them should be listed as being deviant in any way (super hard-core BDSM is the exception) . But then that is my personal opinion.
:evil:
 

Agent of Chaos

The one you were warned about
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
57
---
Location
On the other side of the rainbow
Well why is that your personal opinion?
Sexual deviation is such a negative term and is usually defined as any sexual behaviour regarded as abnormal by society.
I have a problem with the words normal and abnormal. Who gets to choose what is normal? You may think sex with a small furry woodland creature is perfectly fine (Looking at the choices of answers on your poll you probably don't, but that is besides the point) and I may think it is perverse, but who is correct? Which one would be considered normal and who gets to make that choice?
The choices you provided are regarded as normal by some and abnormal by others. I'm not knocking your choices, just pointing out the fact that some people may not agree with your choice of words. I would have used the words
sexually adventurous instead of sexual deviancy, but then that's me.

:evil:
 

₲uardian

Eccentric Stranger
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
93
---
I'll have a #4 with cheese
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
Sexual deviation is such a negative term and is usually defined as any sexual behaviour regarded as abnormal by society.
I have a problem with the words normal and abnormal. Who gets to choose what is normal? You may think sex with a small furry woodland creature is perfectly fine (Looking at the choices of answers on your poll you probably don't, but that is besides the point) and I may think it is perverse, but who is correct? Which one would be considered normal and who gets to make that choice?
The choices you provided are regarded as normal by some and abnormal by others. I'm not knocking your choices, just pointing out the fact that some people may not agree with your choice of words. I would have used the words
sexually adventurous instead of sexual deviancy, but then that's me.

:evil:
You assume the negative connotation, not I. Deviation is simply deviating from what's normal. Something's not bad just because it's not normal (INTPs should be well aware of that, being abnormal ourselves). And normalcy would be defined by whatever the largest number of people do. It's normal because a lot of people do it. It's deviant because few people do it. How many people do or do not do something is not what determines if it's a good or bad thing. Also, having sex with woodland creatures is perverse. Perversion is essentially defined as "abnormal". That doesn't make it bad, though. Sure, I consider it gross, but I see no problem with it if someone else wants to. And if I did, it's not my place to force my values onto them.
 

commandolam

I love TheHmm and Auburn
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
26
---
Location
WinLand
I chose 2, assuming it includes vaginal. I wouldn't mind a threesome, but not really into bondage.
 

Puffy

"Wtf even was that"
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,859
---
Location
Path with heart
Mine must be about 0, lol.
 

Melllvar

Banned
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
1,269
---
Location
<ψ|x|ψ>
Gotta say I'm real proud of this group that we're at 16 responses and no one picked the first option yet.
 

snafupants

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 5:20 PM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
5,007
---
is anal inappropriate once a man is married? can that be done without compunction to the mother of your children? it gets two thumbs up from me - no pun intended; okay, pun intended. by the way, number four had a silly little pun too. good work spaceyeti.
 

Inappropriate Behavior

is peeing on the carpet
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,795
---
Location
Behind you, kicking you in the ass
The choices seem limited to me. Bondage and anal aren't the only fetishes out there. Where's exhibitionism, voyeurism, various paraphilias?

Not that I'm into any of those things! :eek:
 

Agent Intellect

Absurd Anti-hero.
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
4,113
---
Location
Michigan
The choices seem limited to me. Bondage and anal aren't the only fetishes out there. Where's exhibitionism, voyeurism, various paraphilias?

Not that I'm into any of those things! :eek:

Seriously, where is "making someone take a cold bath and cover themselves in talcum powder so they feel like a corpse" or the "peanut butter jelly sandwhich"?
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
It's obviously not a definitive list. Just place yourself where you think you should go even if what you may enjoy isn't specifically listed. If I listed every fetish out there, the whole poll would be too cumbersome to bother with.
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
is anal inappropriate once a man is married? can that be done without compunction to the mother of your children? it gets two thumbs up from me - no pun intended; okay, pun intended. by the way, number four had a silly little pun too. good work spaceyeti.
... What would make anal inappropriate after marriage? I don't get it.
 

Agent Intellect

Absurd Anti-hero.
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
4,113
---
Location
Michigan
I didn't think it was too deviant, but on a different thread I stated that I had a polyamory view on sex/relationships (reply 16), and someone had a rather visceral reaction to this (reply 19) - so, I guess this makes me a deviant.
 

kantor1003

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,574
---
Location
Norway
Hmm, I don't know. Hard to know before you are in the position of acting it out. I was in the position to have a threesome once, but I didn't act it out. 2 guys, 1 girl didn't feel right. Two girls would be fine. Guess I have to set it up and check it out.
I'm probably a 3 after your categorization, but I think your sexual threshold increases with time. Maybe most people would reach a stage of what "normal" people see as sickening sexual behavior if one have enough sexual partners. A titty might get you off at first, but after you have played around with your 40th one, it might not be that interesting anymore :)

And I think A.I mentioned several partners.. I really don't see the problem with that at all. After all, if you get "feelings" for one girl/guy, it doesn't automatically follow that you can't get the same "feeling" with several girls or guys at the same time. Whats the difference between having two relationships with someone "special" then another "special" one after your break up, and having a relationship with two "special" ones at once?
 

avanover

Fire of Prometheus
Local time
Today 3:20 PM
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
99
---
Location
Yuba City, CA
Chose the third option. I'm not into anal though... too unhygienic. What if your mate farted? Haha. Also, wouldn't do a threesome with another guy.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
3.

I consider myself completely exploratory within the range of experiences that are not way out there. (e.g., you can handcuff me to the bed, but no "2 girls 1 cup" for me, thanks.)

It's basically just that I am curious about what things feel like, so I explore them... but only to a certain degree. Things that make me personally uncomfortable in a physical/visceral sense? No.
 

kantor1003

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,574
---
Location
Norway
I have never seen the appeal of human feces either. Can't really imagine something less sexual than that with the exception of perhaps rotten corpses and grandmothers... oh, and vomit. Or nah, thats rather sexy. Anyone wants to join in on a pukekake? We can puke in each others face and use our tongues to lick it off. I'm especially weak for the green stuff, so it would be preferable if you have gone a couple of days without eating before I make you gag with my :eek:
 

cheese

Prolific Member
Local time
Tomorrow 10:20 AM
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
3,194
---
Location
internet/pubs

Inappropriate Behavior

is peeing on the carpet
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,795
---
Location
Behind you, kicking you in the ass
It's one grand per hole, mister. (And don't mind IB, he's just passing through.)

Yes, don't mind me. Since I get it for free, I'm kind of obligated to hang around and make sure paying customers know what they are doing. Consider me the customer service dept.
 

DesertSmeagle

Banned
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
603
---
Location
central ny
If i didnt have social anxiety id definitly be a 5..but sadly im a 0...well maybe one if you count webcam stuff with cute girls from Europe. haha. Ive got a russian girl and an italian girl on my sex webcam roster.
 

Causeless

Active Member
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
343
---
I did look at your listed options. It is a very well thought-out list. I just don't agree that most of them should be listed as being deviant in any way (super hard-core BDSM is the exception) . But then that is my personal opinion.
:evil:

Maybe if we had a checklist with boxes? :confused:

Also, given the current ranking system, approximately three.
 
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
58
---
2.5. Bondage is cool. Threesome okay in theory, although I have never personally participated. Anal = BIG FAT NO.

I think there is a (BIG BIG BIG) difference between guys being cool with anal and girls being cool with anal. Maybe it's just me, but I am of the opinion that it is MORE sexually deviant (and I am using "deviant" here in a non-negative way, although if someone could suggest a better word, I would be open) to let some one stick their dick in your ass than it is to stick your dick in someone else's ass. I'd much sooner shove some part of my anatomy up someone else's butt than I would have someone shove ANY part of their anatomy up mine.

Seriously - would you guys who say you are cool with anal let someone stick it in you?

Eh, maybe I'm wrong. That's just how I see it...
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 3:20 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
^ I totally agree, however subjective and contradicting it seems. That said, why does the graph look like a phallus?
 

Melkor

*Silent antagonist*
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
5,746
---
Location
Béal feirste
I've always said, as part of my shining values, give me a rope, a heavy ceiling beam and a sturdy chair, and I'll swing anyway you like baby.;)
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
Seriously - would you guys who say you are cool with anal let someone stick it in you?
I never do anything to a woman until first attempting an analogous thing to myself first, to make sure it's not too much. I'm fine with anal.
 
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
58
---
^
Well. That's very considerate of you. In a bizarre sort of way. Although there are certain things that you just can't test out on yourself first, for reasons of anatomy...
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 6:20 PM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
I think there is a (BIG BIG BIG) difference between guys being cool with anal and girls being cool with anal. Maybe it's just me, but I am of the opinion that it is MORE sexually deviant (and I am using "deviant" here in a non-negative way, although if someone could suggest a better word, I would be open) to let some one stick their dick in your ass than it is to stick your dick in someone else's ass. I'd much sooner shove some part of my anatomy up someone else's butt than I would have someone shove ANY part of their anatomy up mine.

Seriously - would you guys who say you are cool with anal let someone stick it in you?

Well, I'm figuring people had already assumed all this to be a given.
Men usually don't get penetrated at all, you know.
Women do.
(Unless this is opening up to a gay discussion, but it seems mostly het right now.)

Penetration is penetration, except for the normal distaste associated with the rectum, whether you're penetrating or being penetrated. My main issue with anal is mostly that, while feeling good in some ways, it still hurts; stuff in there seems to stay there longer; and you don't want to cause long-term damage or loosen your anus muscles because of the ramifications.

And of course, if you go that way, don't expect her to want to touch it and do stuff to it after until you clean everything.

I have a far worse problem with the notion of rimming.
 
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
58
---
That generally suffices for me. By which I mean it doesn't particularly bother me when my SO fails to penetrate his own lady parts before messing around with mine. Considerate is nice, but plane tickets to Thailand are awfully expensive.
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
Well, I'm figuring people had already assumed all this to be a given.
Men usually don't get penetrated at all, you know.
Women do.
(Unless this is opening up to a gay discussion, but it seems mostly het right now.)

Penetration is penetration, except for the normal distaste associated with the rectum, whether you're penetrating or being penetrated. My main issue with anal is mostly that, while feeling good in some ways, it still hurts; stuff in there seems to stay there longer; and you don't want to cause long-term damage or loosen your anus muscles because of the ramifications.

And of course, if you go that way, don't expect her to want to touch it and do stuff to it after until you clean everything.

I have a far worse problem with the notion of rimming.
Can I get a Hooah for proactive enemas?
 

kantor1003

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,574
---
Location
Norway
And of course, if you go that way, don't expect her to want to touch it and do stuff to it after until you clean everything.
From my experience, girls into anal usually don't mind doing "stuff" to it afterwards. That might not be the norm though.. haha, you girls are sick. Perverted pigs you are ;)
 
Local time
Today 11:20 PM
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
58
---
Well, yes. Women get penetrated and men don't. My point was more that anal for women is more deviant than anal for men because, while in vaginal sex, both organs are performing their intended functions - the vagina is being penetrated and the penis is penetrating - in anal sex, the male organ is penetrating (it's intended function, albeit with a bit of a change of scenery) and the female's anus (NOT ACTUALLY MEANT FOR PENETRATION) is being penetrated. Maybe this all goes without saying, but I was just suggesting that, if options 1-5 are meant as a scale for sexual deviancy, I think the scale might look a little different if gender is taken into account.

But maybe this is all just driven by my personal aversion to anal. For me BDSM before anal.

As for girls doing "stuff" to it after: EW.
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 4:20 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
my personal aversion to anal.
I find it rare for girls to be against anal for very long, and it only takes a few times before they like it. If the guy doing it knows what he's doing!
 

cheese

Prolific Member
Local time
Tomorrow 10:20 AM
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
3,194
---
Location
internet/pubs
Top Bottom