I think that would be a poor move.
Unless someone counter claims seer on you, you are confirmed seer.
So my last huge post happened while pmj posted the sinny rb reveal. I've been unsure if it's ok to keep posting in case I'm disq. If that reveal had happened a bit sooner I might've revealed this right away. It has given me time to think tho and I believe it's important to come forth now so we don't run short on time before lynch
I'm seer and QT is wolf. I already alluded to my role in one of my first posts (not seeing) and alluded to seeing QT as wolf in my long post. I was hoping to go another day in secret, but this way is safer to help town win even if I'm killed this night, or even lynched this day. Hiding one more day is more risky even if it would give me a chance to find the last wolf.
Even if I was scum, revealing this now would put scum team at disadvantage as my bluff would easily be caught and town has a vigilante who can kill me tomorrow.
/vote QT
How do we know that Minends claim isn't geared towards flushing out the true seer?
An the actual seer is doing a good job of keeping their mouth shut?
Aggression?
I haven't even been that aggressive.
This is a lot of BS nitpicking, shady as fuck.
You clearly see I never had a hardon for sinny's lynch the first day, but did it because I thought we wanted a lynch even when risking a townie. There had been a few posts back and forth about nolynch, but nobody stated clearly they wanted a nolynch, so I thought that was off the table. And the obvious thing then is to choose the one I consider more suspicious. I read RB as town like you did, you said he was your strongest town, why are you not allowing for me to have thought him town as well?
"Deflect from rb". You mean the way you're deflecting from QT to me here before I came out?
I don't need to defend myself as you'll see I'm a seer tonight, but this shit needs some focus.
An the actual seer is doing a good job of keeping their mouth shut?
I actually have posted MUCH more than you, cheese. Make sure you look through all the pages, not the early ones before I was brought onboard.smithcommajohn, I know nothing about. He barely posts and I see very little in there I can work with. I feel pretty uncomfortable about him. He seems to have backed up Sinny from the beginning with no reason - called RB and QT scummy for talking a lot, then said Sinny wasn't scummy despite also talking a lot. For no reason. Then later wanted to vote both RB and QT. Then went for nolynch after everyone else did. He's my biggest suspicion atm.
John, why did you suspect QT and RB for one reason and not Sinny for the same reason? Why have you followed everything she's said?
No. I've been relying on my gut almost primarily until Minuend announced role. Now I feel like there is more information to work with. I still don't trust Minuend, and while I was thinking Puffs was green, I still question his immediate conversion from "/vote Minuend" to "she has to be the seer if no one CC's". This behavior is extremely fishy to me.smithcommajohn, I completely forgot you replaced for someone else and were brought in later. My bad.
Still, I don't think you've posted more content than me. I know you've been around more frequently though.
Sinny PMed me to take the heat off her too (which she can confirm). I told her I was busy but did go back in to defend her in the thread because QT and RB's behaviour didn't make sense and seemed like a potential misunderstanding.
You were on board with Sinny before then though. Why? Any reasons other than gut?
Also, if Min IS seer, she's almost certainly gonna die tonight. That's going to set me up. I want to state this now so it doesn't look like defensive BS after the fact, because it isn't: If QT flips red and Min is NK'd, I'm set up. I actually don't even know why she'd say who she's going to check next, because unless it's scum (and given the above she only has a 1 in 4 chance of getting it right), it's gonna set that person up for lynching the next day, and mafia get a mislynch for free. It's weird as fuck to mention. And yes, me saying this is gonna sound defensive and make you all wifom, but the truth is it'd be even dumber not to say anything. Part of our job is to point out obvious dumb mistakes and minimise the damage they'll cause as much as possible, same way I'm trying to check my BS biases-from-shittyass-sources as I read posts.
I just mean the swearing and italics. It's aggressive for what I'm used to seeing from you - though not in the spectator thread.
Overall, you seem very town to me.
QT also defended Helvete early on, I noticed (in response to I think Puff's suspicion of Helvete). Not sure if this implicates Helv or clears him.
smithcommajohn, I know nothing about. He barely posts and I see very little in there I can work with. I feel pretty uncomfortable about him. He seems to have backed up Sinny from the beginning with no reason - called RB and QT scummy for talking a lot, then said Sinny wasn't scummy despite also talking a lot. For no reason. Then later wanted to vote both RB and QT. Then went for nolynch after everyone else did. He's my biggest suspicion atm.
John, why did you suspect QT and RB for one reason and not Sinny for the same reason? Why have you followed everything she's said?
As for my own seeming suspiciousness - you'll note I felt funny about QT pressuring Sinny from day 1, on seemingly nothing
OK, I'll explain my reason for not liking voting: I don't like committing and I don't like killing people. I know it's retarded, but it's the actual reason - I'm not a person who plays with an agenda. Even in the spec thread, with people heartily yelling out their convictions with nothing to lose, I was generally more cautious and iffy. It's actually just who I am. I play Werewolf irl, and I vote 'no' on almost everyone unless it's close to a sure thing. I don't like voting not because I think it's good for the game, but because I have an irrational preference for not voting, and yes it's entirely emotional.
If I were scum I think I'd be voting a lot more because I'd be trying to go against my natural instinct.
Haha, worst defense ever. "Rook at me, I'm sho honest!" It's sadly true though; I'm just not very good at being a real participant in this game. Lynching QT is the one thing that makes sense from all angles because, as I've said, with Min's claim it'll give us actual information. Most of the time, with votes, lynching only gives you a bunch of nebulous shit (until more time passes and a pattern forms). This is not one of those times, so I'm satisfied and comfortable with this move.
and while I was thinking Puffs was green, I still question his immediate conversion from "/vote Minuend" to "she has to be the seer if no one CC's".
No. I've been relying on my gut almost primarily until Minuend announced role. Now I feel like there is more information to work with.
john said:I still don't trust Minuend, and while I was thinking Puffs was green, I still question his immediate conversion from "/vote Minuend" to "she has to be the seer if no one CC's". This behavior is extremely fishy to me.
john said:Cheese, I read you as town early on, but the more you question my relationship with Sinny, the more I question your motives.
Since the claim, though, I've reevaluated all my stances to fuck so I'm spinning in a lot of mental circles right now.
Can someone else explain the logic behind CCs etc better please?
I can confirm this. I did PM Puffs. His instant defense and justification of Minuend's actions did not sit well with me. After that I made my suspicions public in case I was NK. I know the odds of that are very small, but if Puffs was wolf and secretly knew I had suspicions on Minuend, I might be a perfect random NK. I'm probably just too paranoid.Smith,john has been making me uneasy ever since the claim. He PM'd me almost immediately after (I can post the messages here if wanted) and it felt oddly like he was mining me for information and trying to make his next move based on that. Funny, then, that right after our exchange his next post is the one where he says I'm suspicious.
unless the other wolf had no idea QT was wolf, which is obviously possible.
I've been busy with real life stuff this evening, so sorry for my lack of contribution.
I need to go back and examine the remaining players filters (That means posting history Smith)
The last wolf would have voted against QT to disassociate themselves (that's 'Bussing' Smith)
Smith is my buddy, and a green read for me - I know you remaining other two Townies probably need more in the way of your own verification, but he's got my trust.
Appreciate the definitions. I was curious about "bussing", but that fits what I was guessing.I need to go back and examine the remaining players filters (That means posting history Smith)
The last wolf would have voted against QT to disassociate themselves (that's 'Bussing' Smith)
Smith is my buddy, and a green read for me - I know you remaining other two Townies probably need more in the way of your own verification, but he's got my trust.
I am a brilliant mofo, but I'm also quite clueless about this game. Wolves are told who else is a wolf? While we're on the topic, what was special about RedBaron's character? Roleblocker Werewolf.This is a green newbie thing to say. If you were a wolf you would see the other wolves and I think it would be less likely to occur to you to publicly theorize this.
If you are a wolf, then saying this was a brilliant move.
I think I've narrowed my thoughts to Helvete or Cheese. I'm hoping it will become more clear to me tonight.Cheese was my highest scum read after Mineund.. Minuend turned out to be Seer, evidently.
Cheese was reluctant to vote when she/he clearly should have been voting.
Was 'on the fence alot' about his/her suspects.
Was overly defensive when I encouraged him/her to participate more.
Continued to 'pull a Jenny'.
And is now making joke PM's.
I think we've rumbled the whole team.
I am a brilliant mofo, but I'm also quite clueless about this game. Wolves are told who else is a wolf? While we're on the topic, what was special about RedBaron's character? Roleblocker Werewolf.
A show of innocence to lower potential heat.And what do you think prompted this comradery?
Fuck, they had their own chat thread?!? Holy hell, that would have been valuable information. Is there anything else really basic you think I might be missing?Yes. Wolves/mafia have a private chat thread that only they are in where they can talk amongst themselves at night and determine which town member they want to kill during the night.
RB's roleblocker (RB, for short. coincidence that RB was the RB?) wolf is a modifier role which does exactly what it sounds like. During night phases, a roleblocker can choose one town member they think is a power role (ie. seer) and stop them from being able to perform their night action.
So, for example, if RB had chosen to target Minuend night one, her attempt to read QT would have ended up with an n/a read rather than a scum read.
Helvete said:@minu/cheese I noticed you find my behaviour, fishy. Scum helv wouldn't draw so much attention this way, I know how I look and wouldn't run such a risky gambit with no show down value whereas town helvete can. I also want to win as town and this play is more likely to bait mafia into pushing an easy lynch right? Minu esp has pushed this point and has asked for opinions so what do people think? Am I really a Kamikaze wolf riding my own ego? Iirc minu has null read everyone (I need to check this) and said I am capable of this as scum which sounds scummy in itself.
I'm gunna re read stuff then sleep.
QuickTwist said:Scum, especially newbie Scum, do not say shit like this.
Does anyone else find this endorsement damning?