I went through a phase where I took it as a challenge to be able to answer "what are you thinking" at any particular time. I got good at it.
Here are the two most common archetypes of the responses:
* By sheer force of will of breaking out of the almost-nonlinguistic Ti process I was in, I said something like, "oh, I was thinking about how epistemologies are so easily affected by the statistic frequency of the appearance of their constituent symbols, and how corporate and political brand ubiquity manipulates people's belief systems."
* I put my honest feelings out there (whee Fe) either by forcing it through a disaffected Ti / Ne (or something like that) or by actually feeling the feeling (Fe... uh oh, skin turning green...)
In the former case, the result was often that the asker thought I made something complicated up to deliberately distance myself from the asker, and would file me away as arrogant and unapproachable. Unless they were xNTx and then they'd be all over it! Happytimes!
In the latter case, which is really two cases (Ti/Ne or Fe), I have never gotten what I consider to be a positive result unless I have paid someone to understand me (e.g. a therapist).
Expressions of emotions via Ti/Ne come off as "cold" (and therefore weird and possibly "contrived" -- earning me the response of "How is that supposed to make ME feel?!" -- jeez, hell if I know!) and true expressions of Fe come off as HULK MAD.
In conclusion, this experimenter has aborted the "say what you're really thinking" experiment in favor of the following response:
"Oh, nothing. What's up?"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7c33/b7c335e1dcecb8caa4edba9362aa65106e7e9114" alt="Cthulhu :cthulhu: :cthulhu:"