ConfoundedPersona
Banned
- Local time
- Today 7:10 AM
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 33
I have a calculated a basic scheme to produce advantages for me with almost all feasible outcomes. A succinct elucidation of the plan would be a script exploiting the precaution against brute force to effectively disable the account of every active user consecutively in 15 minute intervals for the denial of access to be consistent.
My verbal delineation above should be a sufficient visual representation of my intention. Successful implementation of the plan would incite viable repercussion which consequently hinders any adequate future the board may have.
The current precaution has been demonstrated to be efficient, but there are naturally inherent flaws in it which are vulnerable to manipulation. You could remove it (providing direct access for certain hacking mathods) or introduce an alternate contingency (conceivably less efficient, thus providing higher opportunities for expoloitation).
A condition for my cooperation is relatively simple and easy to provide: I am permitted to return to the INTP Forum without any restrictions. You could presume that I shall coerce additional conditions with further schemes, but I assure everyone on INTPf that I shall not.
The reaction of 'no negotiation' would be inevitable with frequent demands and I would be impaired without any reasonable objectives attainable due to the policy. Submitting to my reasonable demand demand is logical, containing few ramifications in contrast to enforcement of my plan.
I am essentially proposing a mutual agreement for no further hostility or disareement. Any opposition would be completely understandable with continued demands from me, but I currently have merely one that is easy to fulfil. If I breach my imposed condition (implementing a plan, betraying all I've stated here) or behave disloyal to my word (threaten or demand after agreement), I empathize with the decision to neglect all I subsequently state to avoid being manipulated until I leave.
It is rational to submit now when it's unrealistic for any other people to commit similar actions or demands. The INTP board is insignificant overall and a sole user acting as I do is rather improbable. I shall no longer be an issue with compliance.
Thank you,
FacetiousPersona
My verbal delineation above should be a sufficient visual representation of my intention. Successful implementation of the plan would incite viable repercussion which consequently hinders any adequate future the board may have.
The current precaution has been demonstrated to be efficient, but there are naturally inherent flaws in it which are vulnerable to manipulation. You could remove it (providing direct access for certain hacking mathods) or introduce an alternate contingency (conceivably less efficient, thus providing higher opportunities for expoloitation).
A condition for my cooperation is relatively simple and easy to provide: I am permitted to return to the INTP Forum without any restrictions. You could presume that I shall coerce additional conditions with further schemes, but I assure everyone on INTPf that I shall not.
The reaction of 'no negotiation' would be inevitable with frequent demands and I would be impaired without any reasonable objectives attainable due to the policy. Submitting to my reasonable demand demand is logical, containing few ramifications in contrast to enforcement of my plan.
I am essentially proposing a mutual agreement for no further hostility or disareement. Any opposition would be completely understandable with continued demands from me, but I currently have merely one that is easy to fulfil. If I breach my imposed condition (implementing a plan, betraying all I've stated here) or behave disloyal to my word (threaten or demand after agreement), I empathize with the decision to neglect all I subsequently state to avoid being manipulated until I leave.
It is rational to submit now when it's unrealistic for any other people to commit similar actions or demands. The INTP board is insignificant overall and a sole user acting as I do is rather improbable. I shall no longer be an issue with compliance.
Thank you,
FacetiousPersona