When you don't fit in, then you have to explain how you don't fit in. Otherwise others just keep trying to push your square peg into their round hole, and you have to try to get them to see how square you actually are.
True. But the problem with using typology to 'explain how you don't fit in' is that too many maladjusted intuitives abuse it. They convince themselves that they should make no attempt to engage, however loosely and sporadically, with that round hole.
Being so square as they are, they say that the round hole is meaningless and irrelevant to them.
But this merely arrests their development and further alienates them from their fellow man.
In this manner, their discovery of typology (MBTI specifically, since Socionics and the Enneagram perhaps lend themselves to a healthier, more holistic and more fine-grained conception of human temperament) actually compounds the difficulties they faced in life which inspired their inner quest in the first place.
Simply put, it's wondrous to have the ability to dwell in the elevated world of the mind. However, the mind exists inside a body. It would be folly to forgo eating due to its tedious banality.
Similarly, the individual (or collective of like-minded individuals) exists within a body of cognitively diverse humanity. It would be foolish in the extreme to alienate oneself from that body, on account of its tedious banality.
Take it from this fairly maladjusted intuitive who has only recently understood the value of making a small effort.
