Imagining a scene, preferable to the one before you, is not enough for action: you need to be convinced that the scene can be reached through your actions.
Man, I'm barely even rambling: it's bedtime.
By the way, thanks for sharing the pic of your friend in the goth thread.
But what's stopping you from believing that it can be reached through your actions? If you really want to see a unicorn riding a rainbow, why are you convinced that you'll never be able to? How could you see that - what steps could be taken to achieve your driving goal of seeing a unicorn riding a rainbow before your eyes? Would it be sufficient to see a photorealistic rendering or video? If not, can a rainbow-riding unicorn be created? I would say so. Maybe not right now, but at some point, when the technology exists, sure, why not a rainbow-riding unicorn?
And maybe there's very little you can do about it in the present, but you can do what little you can and work towards being able to do more. Train to be a scientist, and in the meantime, try to contribute however you can to the fields of science that might one day result in unicorns riding rainbows. Rally people to your cause: convince them of the glories of unicorns riding rainbows, muster support that it might be realised sooner.
It can't actually be known for sure that a certain fantasy can't be realised unless it's inherently oxymoronic. Even then, twist the rules of the universe or the nature of your perception enough and it can be done. I would be quite happy to fought all my life for something that turned out to be unattainable and to have my epitaph read, "Died trying."
Also, no problem.
I don't mean saying whether your lives are good or not, i'm saying what do you think of humanity, what we are doing, do we have a purpose etc. I guess I should've been more specific
And I agree with you about the life comparison thing.
I think the same applies. Life in the sense of humanity, the universe, etc. differs day by day, part by part, mile by mile, and it's possible to conceive of nonexistent alternatives. Presumably there are some aspects of it that we consider good or bad; if we consider the whole bad, there must be a conceivable good alternative. If there is no conceivable good alternative, why not? What's stopping it from being good? Why assume that can never be overcome? And then our purpose would be to promote the good, reduce the bad, and strive for the ideal.