• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Doctor Who (BBC television show)

Local time
Today 11:46 AM
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
84
---
yea, that sucks . It was like that with the Inspector Linley series also. Is there somewhere I can see them all online.

Apart from the standard... *clears throat* sub-legal methods, there is a slightly less sub-legal method of using a british proxy to access the bbc web site, where they have an embedded web player. Unfortunately, unless you have a good enough proxy, it will be too slow. I recommended the standard sub-legal ways. I don't see a problem with it, since I end up buying the DVDs anyway.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,383
---
The old DW was very INTP. Total science buff. From the 6th Doctor onwards, he's become far more an extrovert action man. There is far more emotion in it. The science is now filled with emotional concepts, like the TARDIS having a 'soul', with little to no explanation. It's fluff for the non-science (nonsense) masses.

I still watch it avidly, though. Got hooked in the early 70s.
 

Chronomar

NOPE
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
678
---
Apart from the standard... *clears throat* sub-legal methods, there is a slightly less sub-legal method of using a british proxy to access the bbc web site, where they have an embedded web player. Unfortunately, unless you have a good enough proxy, it will be too slow. I recommended the standard sub-legal ways. I don't see a problem with it, since I end up buying the DVDs anyway.


Same logic here. The way in which my sister and I see the newer ones is:

this, http://watchseries.eu/serie/doctor_who , or something similar, by which we access different links to possibly functioning, likely non-virus ridden material.

...

Point of silly clarification.
I have had multiple accounts over time which were then lumped together all into one, resulting in such fun things as me seeming commenting in the same way on the same thing different years. Also resulted in younger-me's being (more) stupid (than the present). Reason I made newer accounts in the first place.
 

thelithiumcat

Active Member
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
114
---
Location
England
Since the 6th season is airing in a couple weeks this thread needs to be resurrected! Someone mentioned the 10th Doctor being an ENTP, I'd agree. I think the Doctor has always been an NT of some sort, and most often an INTP (yay us!). Actually, why not try and type them all?!

1st - INTJ
2nd - INTP
3rd - ENTJ
4th - INTP
5th - INTJ
6th - ENTJ
7th - INTP
8th - Not enough televised evidence, anyone who has read the books want to weigh in?
9th - INTJ
10th - ENTP
11th - INTP

I know a few people who were very skeptical about Matt Smith as the 11th Doctor. I must say that he has so far been a total delight. It's amazing that someone so young can play someone so old.

I think the Tenth Doctor's an ENTP. He has stated two comments in the new show about having a mind which naturally connects events to form accurate explanations for the big picture, which suggests dominant Ni. The Doctor subsequently assesses all of this data with his thinking preference, I think, and ascertains its value.

E - His excitement with adventures, essentially, and consistent interaction with new people/environments.
N - His apparent intuitive leaps and general openness. The Doctor also appears to highly value ideas and new inventions.
T - He has nice Fe/Fi, but his thinking preference seems to dominate his decisions generally, and he is often aware of the need for sacrifices on a logical basis. The Doctor seems to become ruthless and callous when required. His feeling side is shared with his companions, which is expected of him.
P - He seems to advance into situations without a calculated strategy and rely on his adaptive abilities. The Doctor would certainly fail with this approach if he was inadequate at improvising. He seems to have a hyperactive, random mind which is open to data and constantly striving for further additions to the frameworks within it.


I agree, I reckon the Doctor's always been some sort of NT. I love that he's most often been an INTP (according to that list, anyway). I only really have proper experience of 9, 10 and 11 but I think those fit them brilliantly. 9 was always a loner and quite strong-minded. I agree with FacetiousPersona on 10 - 10 relied on his adaptive abilities and improvising and he also seemed to have more extroverted qualities; he always enjoyed people. 11 I can see as an INTP. He's like 10 but he's content to go off on his own; he's left Amy and Rory at home for what seem to be fairly long periods of time and he's just more introverted in general. His group of friends seems to be smaller than 10's. I can relate more to 11 than 10.... well, actually, I can relate to 9, 10 and 11 to slightly varying degrees and I suppose the MBTI types assigned here give an idea of that.

What really drove me to post on this thread was the memory of... I think it was Steven Moffat saying that to write the Doctor one has to remember that he doesn't think like 'us'. I find it interesting and strangely saddening that the INTP protagonist is most accepted when viewed as somewhat non-human or superhuman.... although that sentence doesn't feel correct but I can't figure out how to put it right. Comparisons which come to mind (although they might be INTJs but they're similar enough) are L, House and Sherlock Holmes. In fact, when viewed from that angle, it's rather a nice feeling (rather fitting with what I've read and agree with on how INTPs need to do something of significance if they do anything) that the INTP seems to need to be written as an individual, memorable character like that. I'm thinking about it and I really can't imagine the INTP as being just a mundane character; at least, if the INTP is to be shown with their full potential (for lack of a more-suited phrase). I might be wrong but my mind's getting a bit lost... apologies.

Whoa... Tom Baker just appeared as the host of Have I Got News For You on my tv. Weird... but cool. Fitting. As it happens, Tom Baker (the fourth Doctor too, I suppose) would also make a good INTP in my opinion. Tom's always been very much an oddball, but a lovable oddball. I don't own many classic serials but his are my favourites. Recently got City of Death specifically because I remembered glimpsing the scene where they talk about how no one could be as mad as he is (my wording may be a little wrong).
 

DrSketchpad

Active Member
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
217
---
Location
in my head
Doctor Who

I'm a huge fan of doctor who, so I must ask this to the forum;
Have you watched doctor who?

And also, if you've seen the new episode that came out a few days ago, do think it was a good intro to the new season?
 

Melkor

*Silent antagonist*
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
5,746
---
Location
Béal feirste
I saw the latest episode and have been watching it religiously every Saturday with my whole family since the show rebooted in 2005. I've also been rooting my way through the old series bit by bit.

The 'Asylum of the Daleks' had some nice plot points and scenes, I particularly liked the cgi Mordor-esque Skaro and the inclusion of the previous generation of Daleks as opposed to the hideous crayola ones. The terribly emotional Amy/Rory scene was nice as it expanded on their somewhat vague time outside the Tardis and highlighted some heart-wrenching consequences
of previous episodes with fantastic acting. Nice because we rarely get to see the wider implications of the Doctor and his time/space travel.

The ending was also quite (but not entirely unexpected), but I put that down largely to rumour and speculation concerning the actress rather than spectacularly twist story-weaving. (She's been previously confirmed as the new companion.)
It did have some downsides of course. The Zombie/human slave Daleks, while a nice callback to episodes some thirty years back were faintly ridiculous with their unnecessary spontaneously growing eye sockets and hand lasers. Also some of the dialogue suffered from what I can only describe as a 'Douglas Adams' effect, with characters talking a mile a minute with obscure metaphors and references for comic effect.

Sure it was witty, sure it was funny. However it sounded completely unnatural for an 'actual' person to be saying and detracted from the meagre realism the show enjoys.

It is of course excusable if we consider neither participants were human, but they tend to overdo the comedy aspect. Everyday bumbling occurrences with the right comic timing are much more amusing than high speed, self satisfied dialogue.
However it gives me hope for the new series as it combined classic roots and references with new ways of being scary and added something new to the Who mythos.
(Although it was frequently advertised as 'Scarier than ever' I found the original black and white shapeless and camera fuzzy THING that squirmed beneath someones quote in the original Dalek episode to be much more frightening.)
I found the previous series to be a bit lacking in Comparison to previous ones, too fixated with new character styled as more important than the doctor and too prone to shapeshifting its own characters making them entirely unrelatable.
It also had a rather unsubtle plot arc with a dreadful pay-off.

So yeah. Having seen this I'm looking forward to the next episode and the rest of the series without too much worry. Especially since it includes two very excellent British actors in important roles. :)
 

Architect

Professional INTP
Local time
Today 9:46 AM
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
6,691
---
You know it is supposed to be a INTP friendly show. In my case I never watched it growing up for whatever reason, and so I also didn't catch the reboot. I just started watching the reboot the other day (the episode order of original show is really confusing) and while I liked it, my INTP son hated it because of the zombie/creepy theme.
 

eagor

Senior Executive Lab Monkey
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Messages
616
---
Location
i'm a prize in a cereal box near you, so buy, BUY,
it's one of my favorite shows of all time
 

~~~

Active Member
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
365
---
No, I think it is a trick to destroy the human race by luring all the NTs into watching and then trying to completely conform them and thereby eventually the entire race into SFs - no doubt the Master is behind it.
 

Polaris

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 5:46 AM
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,261
---
No, I think it is a trick to destroy the human race by luring all the NTs into watching and then trying to completely conform them and thereby eventually the entire race into SFs - no doubt the Master is behind it.

Yup, I almost got sucked in.

:phear:
 

eagor

Senior Executive Lab Monkey
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Messages
616
---
Location
i'm a prize in a cereal box near you, so buy, BUY,
No, I think it is a trick to destroy the human race by luring all the NTs into watching and then trying to completely conform them and thereby eventually the entire race into SFs - no doubt the Master is behind it.

"shudder"
 

Irishpenguin

Active Member
Local time
Today 10:46 AM
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
328
---
I absolutely love Doctor Who, I know about it until about 3 years ago, and even then I would just catch episodes here and there on BBC. But a few months ago I sat down with netflix and watched the first 2 seasons of Matt smith, totally got sucked into it. One friend doesn't like them too much and another friend...well, she's still getting over the fact that it isn't played by David Tennant anymore.

But yeahs, Doctor Who is amazing

One thing I find interesting is the whole "Hey guys lets guess at each carnation of the Doctor's MBTI type" Shouldn't it be the same? unless apparently we are concluding that regenerating would also switch around your cognitive functions in the brain just a wee bit every time. Hrmmmms, Oh wells lol, I don't even really like this whole typing business much. HOWEVER! I will say that Matt Smith definitely is more quirky than David Tennant. Don't get me wrong, Tennant had his quirks too, but he was just borderline eccentric with it, whereas Matt Smith just blows it out of the water with his goofiness and energy
 

Wolf18

a who
Local time
Today 4:46 PM
Joined
Dec 24, 2012
Messages
575
---
Location
Far away from All This
I liked Eccleston, but Tennant and Smith were/are just OK.

Artifice Orisit - I agree with you: The Daleks and the Cybermen are the best villains
The scariest villains were: The empty child (Eccleston) and the spirits from Ep. 3 w/Eccleston. The weeping angels were scary too...
 
Top Bottom