• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Anyone still play Starcraft?

Darby

New(ish)
Local time
Today 6:13 AM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
624
---
Location
Portland, OR
Most people on here seem to like it well enough, but does anyone still play it? it's been a while for me, but me and a few of my friends have been trying to start playing again in the hopes that SC2 will come out before we die.

I apologize if this thread(or one similar) is out there already, I didn't see it when I searched

EDIT: The point of this post is to see if anyone is willing to play sometime

We use the US West server whatever
 

asdfasdfasdfsdf

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
603
---
Location
Dayton, OH
YES.
i do US East server.
i am no pro, but i do a decent protoss build.
 

Sapphire Harp

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 7:13 AM
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
650
---
Well, I'm out of practice at it and using a mouseless laptop makes it harder still, but I'm good for the occasional game. I usually play US West with the handle "Scaala".

I gotta admit, though... It's come and go for me because so many players you encounter wind up being complete assholes... Usually in the degrading crap they talk about, but also sometimes in the way they play. It's difficult to enjoy after I encounter a bad one or two.

But, I'd love to give it a shot with and against you folks... If we can get enough players (say... 10?), I'd enjoy coordinating a tournament amongst us.

attachment.php


 

Darby

New(ish)
Local time
Today 6:13 AM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
624
---
Location
Portland, OR
yeah, I'm way out of practice(I think last may?), and I have at least 2-3 people that play regularly, hopefully more.

EDIT: in response to sniktawekim, I am not pro either, in fact far from it, I like to think I can play a decent game
 

fullerene

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
2,156
---
I haven't played in several months eiher, but I'd be up for it.

If we had < 8, though, we should totally try to work out some team matches, instead of a 1 on 1 tournament. I sort of doubt that I have an account anymore, but I would remake one.
 

GarmGarf

Active Member
Local time
Today 2:13 PM
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
223
---
Location
Ireland (Dublin)
I'm able to play, but not necessarily well, haha. I still have a Battle.Net account and all that.

I still actively play WarCraft 3 (occasionally melee, but mainly DotA and a bit of other custom maps) on Battle.Net and Garena.
 

Latro

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
755
---
I play most days on US East with the name blindbravado. I don't know everyone's skill level, but most of my games are "1v1 python newb" on bnet, and I win about as much as I lose among this lot.
 

Darby

New(ish)
Local time
Today 6:13 AM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
624
---
Location
Portland, OR
I'm pretty terrible right now, and I was thinking 2v2 games or something until we can get enough players.

I've got a friend whose definitely decent, and then there are me and my two friends who just never played consistently enough to get better

EDIT: Currently I've just been going back through campaign and playing a few 1v1 games, but if I'm ever online my SN is 'DarbyB'
 

RL_Slacker

Redshirt
Local time
Today 2:13 PM
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
3
---
Location
New England
I haven't played in almost a year, but I've got accounts on West and East, if anyone ever wants to play I"d be happy to. Do you play low money or fastest?
 

Darby

New(ish)
Local time
Today 6:13 AM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
624
---
Location
Portland, OR
When I used to play more I played a little fastest, but usually standard games.

and to Jachian, if you still have your CD keys(although it's unlikely if you lost the games), then you can just make a Battle.net account online, and submit them and download the games off their site(this is what I did, because my Brood War disc was pretty damaged)
 

fullerene

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
2,156
---
I'm not a fan of unlimited money games.... I sorta think they're a little dumb.

I do like those use map settings games where they pit a lot of players up against one insane (/cheating) computer, though (and those I don't care if they're infinite money or not). I also like normal games... but would pretty much play anything if you guys wanted to do something else.
 

Sapphire Harp

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 7:13 AM
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
650
---
If you still have your CD keys(although it's unlikely if you lost the games), then you can just make a Battle.net account online, and submit them and download the games off their site.
I've done this, as well, and it works very nicely. The program you download also happens to be no-cd version, which is a boon for me. The cd was very noisy in my laptop's drive.

I honestly don't get what you mean by "low money" versus "fastest"... I mean, I'm assuming that you mean limited resources vs. having an unlimited super patch of minerals right next to your CC, but I don't know that for sure...

Which implies the other thing I was going to say... If I'm playing seriously with other players, it's blizzard created maps for me. Or ones very much like blizzard maps - if I can check them out ahead of time... I don't like being the only one not familiar with the map. And I like to make sure the map is what it was promised to be.

 

fullerene

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
2,156
---
They usually have little map preview things now, though... when you're in that chat room before, you can at least see where all the critters and minerals are.

Doesn't tell you how many resources there are... but it does at least tell you locations.
 

Shatokan

Newest Hostile
Local time
Today 8:13 AM
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
95
---
Location
Amarillo, TX
Never played it before, though i did play c&c tiberium sun quite a bit so i could prob get the hang of it.
 

Darby

New(ish)
Local time
Today 6:13 AM
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
624
---
Location
Portland, OR
Never played C&C(I heard it was pretty good), a little WC3 back in the day, and at this point I'm waiting for the SC2 Beta

I also don't like playing maps where either I'm the only one who knows the map/doesn't know the map. The map preview isn't really that helpful, other than for knowing where the expansions are.

EDIT:
As a general question what does everyone usually play with?
 

fullerene

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
2,156
---
random... nearly always. I get way too bored if I try to play a few games in a row with just one race. Generally I only pick if I random the first 4 or 5 games and it happens to never pick one of them, or if it gives me the same one 2-3 times in a row and I really don't want it again, I'll pick one of the other two randomly.

I'm not one of those people who memorizes their starts or where they place what on the map.... almost every time I play it's a little bit different, and I'm fast enough that I can hang with decent people (I did beat the campaign all the way through, and some of those last zerg levels in the expansion were really nasty... so I am competent), but not enough into it to really practice getting better at things.

SC and tiberium sun don't have a lot in common, tbh. SC runs at a much, much faster pace, and the three races are varied far more than the two factions of c&c were. Like... in all the c&c games that I can think of, each side had basically a one-to-one correspondence of similar troops. You have footmen who are good at killing soldiers, but bad at tanks, and footmen that are mediocre/bad at killing soldiers, but good at vehicles. Then vehicles that are good at killing soldiers, but bad with other vehicles, and vehicles that are mediocre at killing soldiers, but good against other vehicles.

By comparison, SC is very... uneven, in it's power and cost per unit. The first tier of one race's(protoss) "grunt" soldiers can kill 2-3 of any other race's. But another race (terran) gets the benefit of ranged grunt-men, and the ability to build bunkers really early in the game, which they can stock with low-level soldiers to protect them while they shoot. The last race has extremely weak guys to start, but they come out 2 at a time, and you can build 3 pairs at a time, as opposed to the other races, which can only build one at a time. In addition, all these troops cost different amounts of money. Then shortly after, there's a "second tier" of ground units, which all interact with the first/second tiers of other races in different ways.

That sort of layered-balance is scattered throughout the game. That race with the beastly-strong grunt-men have hit-points that are split up, half shield and half life... so if you fight with them briefly, their shields eventually recharge slowly.... though any damage done to their "life" points is permanent. By contrast, the race with the cheap troops that come in pairs are supposed to be biologically advanced, so they regenerate constantly (though it's extremely slow). The last race (with ranged guys) get no natural life regen, but can build medics (which heal soldiers extremely quickly... almost instantly) until they run out of energy (which constantly recharges), and repair their buildings (so those bunkers you stock full of soldiers can be repaired in-battle).

By comparison, c&c is extremely straightforward. You build guys... but one side's troops are roughly the same as the other's, and there's not as much "ok, now what can I do to take care of *those* kinds of troops". You just sort of need to harvest a lot, build more than the other guy, and go take him out. At least.... that's the impression I got while playing it. Again, though, I only did do the campaign.
 

GarmGarf

Active Member
Local time
Today 2:13 PM
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
223
---
Location
Ireland (Dublin)
However, C&C is an RTS game, and that's something. Shatokan, I would imagine, knows the basic idea: gather resources; build structures; produce units out of structures; tech-up; and go destroy some opposing units/structures.

Ok, yeah, some basic things are a good big different, like how Zerg operates, but the solution for that is for Shatokan to just play Terran.

But yeah, one doesn't need to now the profound mechanisms for balance when the goal is to "prob get the hang of it".


Anyways, please no fastest/money maps - they are just a mutilated version of the game of StarCraft.
 

nexion

coalescing in diffusion
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
2,027
---
Location
tartarus
This thread made me play SC. My last game:

Time: 7:44

Scores:
Me: 8087
Enemy 4286

Take some Zerglings to the enemy base right in the beginning and you've won.

What an unentertaining way to play the game.
 

Latro

Well-Known Member
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
755
---
This thread made me play SC. My last game:

Time: 7:44

Scores:
Me: 8087
Enemy 4286

Take some Zerglings to the enemy base right in the beginning and you've won.

What an unentertaining way to play the game.
Against competent people ling rushes usually won't kill them unless they were doing something like tech rushing without caution.
 

nexion

coalescing in diffusion
Local time
Today 9:13 AM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
2,027
---
Location
tartarus
Against competent people ling rushes usually won't kill them unless they were doing something like tech rushing without caution.
Um... yeah, about that.

I haven't played on b.net in forever. I'm talking about a normal game versus the AI.

:phear:
 
Top Bottom