I understand what you are trying to do, I just would say it appears futile, without ACTUAL data about that person to confirm your guesses. Using stock image resources seems incredibly pointless, because you can never really find anything else related to their physiology. Illusions are a form of...
are those just stock images? i ask, wondering if there is a way you can CONFIRM your 'readings' with an actual answer to compare it to.
because without that, you are just playing a guessing game.
ESFJ ^
Re: Dreams.
I ABSOLUTELY find them to be interesting as well. The logical side of me agrees, yes of course most of the time dreams are just recycled nonsense that went into my sponge earlier that day, or try to explain them simply as chemicals in my head...
but the loopy side of me says that...
Re: Dreams.
last night i had another vivid dream...involving a car crash filled with extended family relatives i havent seen or spoke to in years (uncles, cousins, etc) ... i remember having this extreme feeling of guilt and sorrow over responsibility over the outcome. It was one of those...
a showcase of emoticons, related to feelings that arise during my attempts to 'flirt' like a normal human being:
:eek::herzen02::gott0::gott0::o:o:o:o:o:o :confused: :storks::storks::facepalm::segen:
its playing off of our recognition of KEYWORD phrasing...pretty obvious is it not?....we live in the day of technology where that is how they are going to manipulate YOUR thoughts...(not a conspiracy, just a clever ol trick) ... when a debate such as this arises...where do you think the FIRST...
See this makes sense. :) Nature acts as the agent of design? To me this is good stuff...could i say its the explanation of ' intelligent design ', but detaching itself from the traditional religious dogma? sort of like a dirty pagan outlook on things?
i really have no clue.
i edited, now ill just post it here...
im much more open to an idea like self organization than ID, they are different...ID is explicit about a definite creator/designer...where SO seems a bit more open...
in fact reading the article now, is sort of turning me on...
you enjoy wiki articles? I DO TOO!
"Two offshoots of creationism—creation science and intelligent design—are pseudoscience"
So i guess, you are technically right? Not the same thing. would you accept,
"ID is just the bastard child of creationism" ?
my interpretation of the link you provided...
they asked for peer reviewed scientific journal materials in support of intelligent design right?
From Discovery:
This means, that they can throw around the "peer reviewed" phrase as much as they like (which they do in the opening...
but how is intelligent design'a better idea than creationism? they are the same thing. the language has been updated, ideas refined, sure..but the core is still there. and the timing of this paradigm change didnt come with a scientific discovery...it coincided with the findings that...
I was actually thinking about this today...Polaris' responses to bap's thread...
so does culture/environment dictate personalities? or is it really some intrinsic temperament?
flip flop the OP and lets investigate the typology of a random african village. id GUESS that, since life will be...
i love how 'paul frampton' now yields tons of pictures of denise milani in google search.
see i dont get how visual photographs can tell you anything about a personality. or at least on a consistent basis. i have my doubts about mbti, but thats just another topic i suppose.
i just see an...
its not significant, just interesting. i agree with a lot of the points you make here.
i interpreted the OP as the implication being INTP exposes this man's inability to grasp a realworld relationship. but as you say, nothing exclusive about a specific personality.
i dont know much about typologies...keep that in mind...but id say,
doesnt sound too intp ish...but of course it could just be TRUE, if its in the context of his childlike understanding of relationships.
the whole premise of being duped by an online relationship scammer...seems more...
to be fair, i think that person already posted the sole article...but it was published by the discovery institute, as spaceyeti has pointed out
http://www.discovery.org/a/2640
theres a list of papers there ^
:cambrian explosion: logic:
The ONLY aspect of this argument I can sort of relate...
i found this to be interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_intelligent_design
to me the bigger picture is clear. there is a human agenda. always been there. it changed clothes, but its still the same person underneath it all...
lots of psychedelics. lots.
or just unified by the understanding that we wont be around forever. peaceful coexistence in response to the external threat of this universe trying to kill us (and it will succeed one day).
and if that doesnt work. go kick some rocks at cthulhu's lair.
its incredibly easy to just check out the DSM manuals and give docs what they want, in order to obtain what you want. with a bit of research, acting, and smooth deception skills, manipulating the game is easy (with certain disorders). its costly and sort of pointless, but when u have the...
Topped with noodle or STUFFED with noodle?
or you talkin some brand new hybrid noodle pie crust?!!?!
edit: or even a noodle dish, WITH apple pie elements sprinkled in...
soo hungy right now...
for some reason reading this triggered something. Me breaking into my sister's room and painting myself like a clown. And then having the full blown wrath of my sister's rage cometh down upon me.
Hells yes. Ive thought about this before...how children (lets go with ages 6-12), when treated like adults would actually perform and think like one. Go back to when life expectancy was much shorter, and children were a source of labor.Im not gonna sit here and try to claim that children were...
i can see the affinity towards 'logic' and 'math', but computers dont necessarily fit into a pattern there (at least to me). Logic and math are things that have been around for a long time, and ARE apart of computers, but to me its just different (think, BEFORE the existence of cpus) not just...
yes, it has a strong affinity for serotonin receptors. as far as dopamine, you get nothing.
this article is a good one for a basic breakdown if ur interested...even has a little bit in there about its potential against depression. one of the more fascinating things about the powerful...
think of it like this...wouldnt it be appropriate for you to approach a life long adventure when your wisdom and experience in life is higher than most others attempting to learn the same craft?
sure they might have a head start on the material, but you bring another perspective to the table...
revolution comes, when the INTP population arises. but intps lack relationship skills. relationship skills are generally needed for sex. sex is needed for reproduction. reproduction is needed to increase our numbers.
are our personalities just designed for us to forever be the minority?
"The storage in sensory memory and short-term memory generally have a strictly limited capacity and duration, which means that information is available only for a certain period of time, but is not retained indefinitely. By contrast, long-term memory can store much larger quantities of...
@theintrovert
BUT REALLLLYZ ! My advice is based off of experience, but before experience I had to research and figure this stuff out for myself...
while wikipedia and other more academic approaches DO give good technical information....if you havent already CHECK OUT EROWID.ORG - its like...
i suppose if that changes somewhere down the line as agent intellect mentions...yea it would make more sense. but currently theres more carbon, and carbon does the job.
but even so, silicon based organics arent nearly as good for 'life'. And while I realize "life" at this point could be...
This site uses cookies to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. We have no personalisation nor analytics --- especially no Google.