@ thread in general:
http://doctorsonly.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/22102013_psych_Leucht.pdf
These are the power dynamics that I hate. I once had a psychiatrist try to convince me to switch to haldol by telling me that it "affects the same receptors as abilify." Nevermind the most basic difference between the two (haldol is a typical antipsychotic and abilify is atypical), they have a completely different binding profile. I suppose if you classify agonism and antagonism under the "affects" umbrella he technically wasn't lying (in the same way that fire and water might destroy something differently), but it was extremely disingenuous.
Funny story.
Somehow, it crept into our conversation about all I've been learning about the neuroleptic I was taking.
Initiating the topic with the psychiatrist, I decided to start simple, and just simply state something along the lines of how I've read that it's generally believed that dopamine is the responsible neurotransmitter for causing psychosis and similar effects. What I really wanted (with him being an experienced doctor) was an in-depth conversation of what he knows about the symptoms, the causes, and the medication used to treat it.
Yet instead, he leaned forward very amused.
"What's this about dopamine? I've never heard of such! What made you come up with this.. what do you call it....dopamine? "
A little bit of a shock came over me, as I started to wonder if everything I've known was just a fabrication of my mind. Unlikely. And also, I deemed, it's unlikely he's
that stupid. I assume this is a certain game or tactic of some kind. Probably just assessing my reaction. I didn't choose the best one though.
I gave him a subtle cold stare, and passed it off.
"Whatever, nevermind".
***
With your story, it brings to mind where we could be in a similar position as the psychiatrist. Let's say your with someone, who's not as technologically experienced, and they look up to you for your knowledge. I've found some instances where it's easy (and tempting) to purposefully misconstrue a truth for a particular aim. For instance:
"No, don't touch that button, or else the machine will blow up".
Laughing to myself, I know it won't blow up, and also amusingly taking in their reaction and complete faith in what I said.
I'm speculating with doctors, that they assume the patient's lack of understanding, and can sometimes 'lie' towards achieving a particular aim. Though I also have a distaste towards their power dynamics as well.