nanook
a scream in a vortex
we all have more or less different perceptions of what types are like.
please share some prominent examples of various types.
if you can do 16, awesome, but 4 would already be a good start.
if you don't even know their types, but you can list so many people, all of which seem to be different types, that's interesting too.
don't name various people of one type in one post/batch, unless they are very obviously identical. one man and one woman would be okay.
and i don't make it mandatory, but it would be helpful if all of your examples are somehow roughly similar, like in age, health, equally recognizable and typed by the same method, which ever.
let's not argue about the objective truth of another one's claim. (you can always include a previously mentioned person in your own batch, assigned to another type)
let this be about the subjective coherency of a view.
in so many years of typology i was not able to get something like this.
well, I have many folders of images for each type (wherein tons are sorted incorrectly) and i could perhaps extract some coherent examples.
but i seek inter-subjetivity.
there are plenty of sites that list so many examples for every type.
but i feel each of those listings contains some wrong examples for every type.
then it all becomes meaningless. "which examples are right and which are wrong?"
i always collect people who are the same. but i end up with many chunks, more than 16, or like more than 4 who seem INxx for sure.
then i become confused, about which of those chunks could be merged.
and i beginn to lose perception of where people are even different....
also i suffer from being ignorant about all the types who don't resonate with me. most of my experience is with intuitives.
thanks for considering
please share some prominent examples of various types.
if you can do 16, awesome, but 4 would already be a good start.
if you don't even know their types, but you can list so many people, all of which seem to be different types, that's interesting too.
don't name various people of one type in one post/batch, unless they are very obviously identical. one man and one woman would be okay.
and i don't make it mandatory, but it would be helpful if all of your examples are somehow roughly similar, like in age, health, equally recognizable and typed by the same method, which ever.
let's not argue about the objective truth of another one's claim. (you can always include a previously mentioned person in your own batch, assigned to another type)
let this be about the subjective coherency of a view.
in so many years of typology i was not able to get something like this.
well, I have many folders of images for each type (wherein tons are sorted incorrectly) and i could perhaps extract some coherent examples.
but i seek inter-subjetivity.
there are plenty of sites that list so many examples for every type.
but i feel each of those listings contains some wrong examples for every type.
then it all becomes meaningless. "which examples are right and which are wrong?"
i always collect people who are the same. but i end up with many chunks, more than 16, or like more than 4 who seem INxx for sure.
then i become confused, about which of those chunks could be merged.
and i beginn to lose perception of where people are even different....
also i suffer from being ignorant about all the types who don't resonate with me. most of my experience is with intuitives.
thanks for considering
And Jung INTP? You must be shitting me. And the other 2 so called corrections are a joke as well. I could and clarify why they are the types I gave them, but I see it as unnecessary as you simply should have to lurk a little longer IMO.