• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Your Interests. Teach us about them. Share your knowledge.

shortbuss

Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
82
---
I just thought I would personally love to hear people on this website discuss their unique interests that they are very knowledgeable on because of their passion for said interest.

We could all stand to learn a lot from each other, and I'd love to read what you all have to say.

Please try to teach in this thread so that you might pass on your passion for whatever subject peaks your interest. Discuss the reasons behind your conclusions so that we can all understand and appreciate where you are coming from, and gain truth from each other in our high esteem for knowledge.
 

jsn0x

Redshirt
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
15
---

Jaffa

Active Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
177
---
Location
UK
I'll help to get this started.

Photography is something I really got into when I was 20/21. When I say 'really got into' what I actually mean is I become obsessed with it.

I did alot of reading, understood the theory after a short amount of time and then went out there learning how to use my camera.

I got into 'strobing' which is basically the lingo for using off camera flashguns for dynamic and portable lighting. They have a great website www.strobist.com.

I then stumbled upon Flickr when trying to get my work 'out there'. This was the golden nugget of photo sharing. They have a section called 'Explore' which is basically the most popular 500 pictures each day. I set myself a goal of getting to #1. If these people could do it, so could I. I became obsessed with it for over a year. I EVENTUALLY got there, number 1. The sense of accomplishment was amazing. I kind of dropped photography after that. I still have my camera, I do a few weddings and I sell alot of my work on Getty Images which is a nice little bit of cash each month.

This was the shot that got me the number 1 position:

5816389060_19bbb04e18.jpg
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
That's not really what you asked for. That would be "tell us about your personality traits."

I don't think he saw your question as an imperative, he answered your literal question.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 2:07 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
Cordyceps
"The more numerous a species becomes, the more likely it will be attacked by it's nemsis, a Cordyceps"

Well I'm not going to sleep tonight.
 

The Gopher

President
Local time
Tomorrow 12:07 AM
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
4,674
---
Unicycling slowly is really, really hard... but on the bright side dismounting is easy. Aside from that going up hills is easier than down.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 2:07 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
If anyone wants to talk robotics just tell me what you want to build.
 

AureliaSeverina

nice kitty
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
141
---
Location
Liverpool, UK
Great idea for a thread. I'm too busy right now, but if I've got time over the summer holidays I might post something.
 

MEDICaustik

Member
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
85
---
We'll I'll go.

I am a firefighter and paramedic, and enjoy both immensely.

I enjoy being a paramedic so much, that I'm returning to college and planning on going to med school.

I've been doing it for 5 years, and every time I'm on duty is different. This is one of the best parts about it. Also, the intensity of going into a building on fire is like nothing I've ever experienced. Every call puts me in a different situation, and the life experience has been ridiculously maturing.

As a firefighter, I do whatever it is that you think firefighters do. Only, probably more cleaning and training than you would expect. I'm in suburbia, so the number of fires is pretty low. Generally, the fire engine goes out on more medical calls than fire calls. We deal with hazardous materials, fire alarms, carbon monoxide, water hazards, rescue, whatever. Between us and the police department, we can generally figure out any problem. If they don't know the answer they call us, if we don't, we call them.

As fun as firefighting is, I maybe spend 10% of my time on duty on the fire truck. The rest of it, is on the medic unit, or ambulance. I much prefer it.

First off, a couple things:

1. There are multiple skill levels of EMTs/Paramedics. They are (in order of lowest skill to highest) EMT-Basic, EMT-Enhanced, EMT-Intermediate and EMT-Paramedic. When we call someone an "EMT", we generally are referring to EMT-Basics. If we call someone a "paramedic" that means they are an EMT-P. Enhanced and Intermediate are generally just called medics. I am a paramedic.

2. The difference between EMT-Basic and EMT-Paramedic is astronomical. As an EMT-Basic, you learn how to recognize some very basic medical conditions, ie. low blood sugar, shock, stroke, difficulty breathing, trauma. Then you learn non-invasive ways of treating. This generally amounts to dressing wounds and giving oxygen. No IVs, no medications, no intubation (tube down the throat), nothing invasive.

On the other hand, Paramedics do it all. IVs, IOs (needle in the bone marrow), ~30 medications, Electrocardiograms, Intubation, CPAP, Induced hypothermia.. and shocks! Paramedics are able to do more without Doctor's orders, than nurses. Nurses hate when you say that though.. there's a little rivalry there.

3. People in cardiac arrest who are flatlining, do NOT get shocked. TV messes this up way too much. The "shock" is termed "defibrillation", and it serves one purpose: To stop a heart that is fibrillating. When someone has flatlined (termed "asystole"), their heart is not pumping at all, and thus defibrillating it does nothing.

fibrillating

On that same note, shocking people does not cause them to suddenly awake. Shocking does not "jumpstart" the heart. Shocking STOPS the heart. Then, we use CPR and medications to try and jumpstart the heart. Also, people who are receiving CPR do not suddenly wake up after 15 compressions. And if they do, they are in a world of hurt, because proper CPR will break their ribs into dozens of pieces.



All that said, here's what you can do to help out.

1. Learn CPR. Learn proper, good CPR. If you're not breaking ribs, you're not doing it right.

good CPR.

2. Calm the F down. When an emergency happens, don't worry, the cavalry is coming. When they get there, they need quick, concise information. Have it. Then get out of the way if you're not the patient, or cooperate if you are.

3. Shock is not a psychological condition. It does not occur when someone cuts their finger and passes out from the blood. It requires a sizeable amount of blood loss. I know TV has programmed you to say "They're going in to shock!" anytime someone gets hurt, but it's not true.

4. If however, somebody is in shock (Unconscious, pale, visible blood loss), lift their legs up about 30 degrees. This will reroute blood from the legs to the core, where it is needed most. Exception: If they have a noted head injury, don't. You could be putting more pressure on the brain, and they could herniate.

herniate

5. Wear your seatbelt.

That is all.
 

MissQuote

kickin' at a tin can
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
1,169
---
I am addicted to books. I have a book on everything. Try me. Even if I don't have a book on it I can make a leap of a mental connection to find one of interest and somewhat to do with the subject requested or a subject to do with the subject.

I counted my books yesterday, my personal collection is pushing 500. Which isn't really that many, actually. I must have more.
 

Jaffa

Active Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
177
---
Location
UK
I am addicted to books. I have a book on everything. Try me. Even if I don't have a book on it I can make a leap of a mental connection to find one of interest and somewhat to do with the subject requested or a subject to do with the subject.

I counted my books yesterday, my personal collection is pushing 500. Which isn't really that many, actually. I must have more.

I started my collection around 6 months ago.

I'm up to 12. I keep promising myself that I won't buy more until I've finished every page of each one, almost there and ready to make my bookshelf look a little more populated.
 

skip

Sock connoisseur
Local time
Today 6:07 AM
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
302
---
Location
Southern California.
wwmc2h.jpg
long distance backpacking
2ezinw8.jpg
expat living
2rp48hw.jpg
rats as pets
sq4ao5.jpg
late 20th-century Bollywood
2vlw4t3.jpg
hunt seat

Too much to type out but if anyone is interested in the above you can ask here or message me.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
Great interests. Thanks for the post.
 

MissQuote

kickin' at a tin can
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
1,169
---
I started my collection around 6 months ago.

I'm up to 12. I keep promising myself that I won't buy more until I've finished every page of each one, almost there and ready to make my bookshelf look a little more populated.

This made me smile.

I have not read all of the books I own (and likewise, I've read many books that I do not own) and a lot of them aren't particularly to be sat down and read like a novel. Many are non fiction- a book about knitting or classic american dolls or the weather or chemistry or witches or power sources or painting or physics or whathaveyou- And many of the novels are rather tattered secondhand copies, I'll buy up any good book I want to read, or that I have read and know is good so I may have it on hand to remedy the situation immediately if someone says to me they have never read, say, The Grapes of Wrath, I can fix that right this moment by loaning them mine.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 2:07 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
1. Learn CPR. Learn proper, good CPR. If you're not breaking ribs, you're not doing it right.
The way you said that, so cool :D

Anything cool and interesting for under $5 and household items from USSR.
That's very hard.
Do you have access to a computer? (duh)
Is there a dump nearby?
Do you know anyone with crimping/soldering tools?
Do you have or know anyone with tools of any kind?
What electronics do you already own, do you have a RC car?
It's hard but it can be done.
 

intpz

Banned
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
1,568
---
That's very hard.
Do you have access to a computer? (duh)
Is there a dump nearby?
Do you know anyone with crimping/soldering tools?
Do you have or know anyone with tools of any kind?
What electronics do you already own, do you have a RC car?
It's hard but it can be done.

Duh.
Duh!
...dump?
I do, but they are... 60-80 years old (the tools).
Duh...
No. I do have an old radio though. I would've already build something out of the RC car motor if I did.
That'd be cool!
 

Moocow

Semantic Nitpicker
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Nov 21, 2009
Messages
911
---
Location
Moocow
I was going to write about painting but I've come to realize in the meantime that a much more frequent and obsessive hobby is the production and purging of mucous from my sinuses.
 

MissQuote

kickin' at a tin can
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
1,169
---
What bout CPR on infants and children? How hard is one to do those compression's to be effective and not, like, crush the baby to death? I've only ever read how to do CPR and nothing ever said anything about breaking people...
 

MissQuote

kickin' at a tin can
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
1,169
---
I was going to write about painting but I've come to realize in the meantime that a much more frequent and obsessive hobby is the production and purging of mucous from my sinuses.

Get better and stuff.
 

MEDICaustik

Member
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
85
---
What bout CPR on infants and children? How hard is one to do those compression's to be effective and not, like, crush the baby to death? I've only ever read how to do CPR and nothing ever said anything about breaking people...

If you're doing CPR they're more or less already dead. CPR is not going to do any further harm than a stopped heart will. And the act of CPR is to use the sternum of the patient to squeeze the heart against the spine. In children, this requires a compression of atleast 2 inches. Ribs will be broken.

I've done CPR on at least 20 people. At first, you get a couple big snaps and cracks. Over time it becomes a crunching feeling. It's a bizarre, yet insanely glorious feeling.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
It's a bizarre, yet insanely glorious feeling.
Why?

A. Because you have such power?
B. Because you cause painful destruction?
C. Because you're having an unusual day?
D. Because you have actually saved a life?
E. Other?
 

CLOfriendOSE

Active Member
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
103
---
I explore the systemic categorization of sound/color/form through the unit circle - ie: practice a walking, malleable consciousness -> apply to art.

I'm also starting my own venture into vibration/mantra/yoga/kinesthetic awareness.

Ultimately, I will tie the two together in a Vocal Pedagogy degree.
 

Pizzabeak

Banned
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
2,667
---
This made me smile.

I have not read all of the books I own (and likewise, I've read many books that I do not own) and a lot of them aren't particularly to be sat down and read like a novel. Many are non fiction- a book about knitting or classic american dolls or the weather or chemistry or witches or power sources or painting or physics or whathaveyou- And many of the novels are rather tattered secondhand copies, I'll buy up any good book I want to read, or that I have read and know is good so I may have it on hand to remedy the situation immediately if someone says to me they have never read, say, The Grapes of Wrath, I can fix that right this moment by loaning them mine.
I have a few books as well. Promised myself not to get more until I read the ones I have; etc

I feel like one of my roommates doesn't like the fact that I have a relatively decent amount of crap lying around my room though
 

MissQuote

kickin' at a tin can
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
1,169
---
I've acquired five new books since my first post in this thread. Because I am sick.


Why would it be your roommates business if you have stuff in your room? It is your room. I hate nosy people.

I had to look up the rib cracking CPR stuff, and everything else I read on it agrees that the person must be broken in order to fix the Dead that they are.
 

MEDICaustik

Member
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
85
---
Why?

A. Because you have such power?
B. Because you cause painful destruction?
C. Because you're having an unusual day?
D. Because you have actually saved a life?
E. Other?

A. I don't know how many can say they've done CPR. In prehospital medicine, the first class they send you to is CPR. Most of the time you go many months before you see one, and you generally are still in training. The first time I actually did CPR, the endorphin rush I had was powerful. I was completely in the zone, my mind was focused on only one thing, and that was doing the best CPR anyone on Earth ever did.

B. Again, CPR is not destructive. Stopped hearts are destructive. And generally there is no pain associated with CPR. They're normally unconscious :)

C. Any day you're doing CPR is an abnormal day. Even for paramedics (in most places anyway).

D. I've never had a patient who received CPR and survived to walk out of the hospital. I've had SEVERAL patients get pulses back. But the pulse normally gets them into the ICU where their family has enough time to say goodbye before they go into arrest again, and this time the family generally denies treatment.

E. I don't mean glorious in that it's a pleasurable experience. I mean glorious in that I enter a state of.. bliss? In that moment, nothing is on your mind except doing what you can for this person. Your heart is pounding, and you're dealing with something you (well, I) never imagined you would be doing. Growing up, I just kind of assumed that you called 911 and people showed up. Never really gave much thought to what it entails. It's 100% unique, and is hard to describe.

Doing CPR is comparable to entering a burning building. Again, nothing on your mind, except getting in there and doing what you can. You don't think about the why, you just do it. You're intensely focused on the goal, and for myself, there is no second guessing, no indecision (which I imagine most of you know plagues INTP life at times), you're just in the now, caught up in the moment, and you are doing something so incredible, so .. alien to your nature..

I feel at ease when I'm in these situations, as strange as that is. I know exactly what must be done, and I don't have to think of anything else. I feel .. right.
 

GYX_Kid

randomly floating abyss built of bricks
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
943
---
Whoever joins the Skype group, can join in discussing Pokemon
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
I was completely in the zone, my mind was focused on only one thing, and that was doing the best CPR anyone on Earth ever did.
I suppose INTPs experience a good many things where they are not the most adept people in the world. That certainly in my experience. My field is or was math. When I prove a theorem, and many are not easy to prove, there is a process that does not deviate. It's toward one goal and that goal is perfection. There is no such thing as a valid mathematical proof that has errors. One is in the zone.
 

chatvite

Mudrat Detector
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
73
---
I am a librarian and lover of information. You need it, I'll find it (if it exists). I will dig and dig and dig and dig and lose track of everything else.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
This could be a tough one. What I'm interested in are examples of hierarchies of three or more levels where the behavior of each level is DIFFERENT from other levels. Military ranks would NOT be such an example. Stars and star constellations WOULD be an example but that is only two levels. Atoms and stars could extend it but that would be a bit of a jump.
 

Chronomar

NOPE
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
678
---
This could be a tough one. What I'm interested in are examples of hierarchies of three or more levels where the behavior of each level is DIFFERENT from other levels. Military ranks would NOT be such an example. Stars and star constellations WOULD be an example but that is only two levels. Atoms and stars could extend it but that would be a bit of a jump.

Do you mean you are interested in situations in which one set of natural laws / relationships is able to work on three different interrelated levels?

Have you come to any conclusions? I could see there being some kind of math way of proving how many "levels" in such a hierarchy are possible before it all entropically breaks down.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 8:07 AM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
Do you mean you are interested in situations in which one set of natural laws / relationships is able to work on three different interrelated levels?

Have you come to any conclusions? I could see there being some kind of math way of proving how many "levels" in such a hierarchy are possible before it all entropically breaks down.
Well sort of. Yes. I believe one can take anything, absolutely anything and place them in some sort of hierarchy. This would be a natural thing to do. It's just that this might be a hard way to recognize things, but once recognized it would be meaningful and make sense. I think of this "hierarchy" in the most general way to apply to EVERYTHING. Then one could organize the whole world.

There would be lots of different kinds of hierarchies. Then when we have a big enough collection, they could be examined for how to make sense of them. That is, different types. My issue is how to get hold of some to play with. The more unique the better. Maybe this is too abstract an idea???:confused:

The previous poster being a library person seemed to promise good organization.
 

shortbuss

Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Nov 1, 2011
Messages
82
---
I'm going to try and give enough of a fuck to talk about what information I feel I know and am familiar with.

Topic 1: Cartoons and Animation

I cultivated this interest due to one exhausted mother who needed to rest after work, and thus left my sibling and I to be raised in part by our television set. Nickelodeon at it's prime, when the first three cartoon shows released by the network premiered in what I think was the early ninties; Doug, Rugrats and Ren & Stimpy (At least I think those were the first three shows).

From this beginning I and my sibling got our first taste of cartoons. Ren & Stimpy is nearest to my heart because I watched it when I was around 6, and I remember being aware that what I was viewing was highly subversive and unlike everything else I watched on television. This taught me that cartoons, while considered a medium for children, held the potential anything the human mind could imagine, which elevated it to level of art, at its best. (I also really enjoyed Rocko's Modern Life. Both these shows hold up for adult audiences in their humor and edginess).

Today, My sibling and I are avid fans of animation as a medium. We recently went to a cartoon art museum. I highly encourage anyone who doubts that the genre of anime has anything to offer, to challenge those beliefs. If you ignore this genre you are really missing out on a lot of original, entertaining and beautiful cinema in a medium that American culture has inadvertently stiffled by restricting it to the label of children's entertainment.

I would recommend Cowboy Bebop for anyone uncertain, but curious to explore the anime genre. It's humorous, clever, has great characters, plot, animation, action sequences, and is genuinely just a solid example of entertainment overall. If you can appreciate cinema that is deep and genuinely anchored to artful expressions and meaningful messages, then I recommend watching some Hayao Miyazaki, or rather, a Studio Ghibli film.

My favorite Ghibli film, though it is a highly personal opinion, is Porco Rosso. It is the story of a man with a curse of looking like a literal pig, which I interpret as symbolism for the fact that it is explicitly stated that he is a Communist (hence the title of the film which means Red Pig in what I believe is Italian). It takes place inbetween WWI and WWII, and the pig protagonist was a fighter pilot in the first world who has refused to take part in WWII because at that time, historically, Italy was becoming fascist and allying with Germany. I believe his pig appearance is symbolic for the stigma of being a Communist in that period (If you don't know what I'm talking about look up 'the red scare'). The movie is heartfelt, deep and beautiful, and Hayao Miyazaki's passion for airplanes is captured so perfectly. I know nothing about them myself, but this director made me feel excited over the real life details as well as the magic element of human flight.

Here's a commercial that gives nothing away, but gives you a vague sense of what the movie is like that I am describing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4SyyLJKmUk

I am an embarrassing encyclopedia, and follower of information related to the topic of animation, and really anything drawn by hand, or brought to life by the human imagination. Music, live-action cinema, animation, books, but animation has always been close to my heart. I have a theory that it is because it reminds me of being young, when everyday could be a lazy day spent indoors, with nowhere to be and nothing to do, just time to kill in an endless quest for relaxation and fun.

Topic 2: Politics & Feminism

I'm going to be brief here because politics is a complicated issue and there is so much that could be said, and I'm just not up for the task of specifying my every opinion and why I hold it.

In short, I consider myself Progressive, and am reveling in this new age of alternate media outlets. I love the knowledge that Fox and CNN are losing viewers in droves because the people finally have a wide range of independent and unique options, and see the general corruption and inaccuracy of the swath of lies forced upon us all year long in the shit storm that is the 24 hour news cycle.

I think OWS is the coolest thing I've seen in a long time, and I love reading and hearing about its successes whenever they pop up, and about how resilient and persistent some of the people involved in it are. It's very inspiring and breathe of fresh air that gives me hope for the future of humanity, though it is a dim, skeptical hope, it is better than no hope at all.

I am open-minded to all points of view as long as I can tell that the person I am conversing with has this same bottom line, which is the acquisition of accurate information, regardless of biases to the best of our abilities.

My favorite recent televised news outlet is on the somewhat obscure channel owned by Al Gore called Current TV. I would highly recommend you get this in your cable package, and watch the news show The Young Turks with Cenk Uygur.

The Young Turks, or TYT, started off as a news show online and have a massive following on the internet and lead the ratings on the Current TV channel. This is the only news program that is aggressively progressive. If you're a democrat, or liberal and get angry over how many mainstream democrats play softball with certain egregious and offensive elements in politics, appearing weak because they are bought off by certain industries and told to maintain their docile and timid defense of classically democratic beliefs- well this is the show for you. This show cites its sources and lays down the facts, welcoming all perspectives to their show for honest intellectual discussion and debate. The host, Cenk Uygur, had a brief career at MSNBC as an anchor after TYT became a hit online, and left this lucrative career after he was confronted by MSNBC management for being too passionate and delivering the news with the outrage it deserved and the poignancy of biting journalism it requires. Cenk made a video to his online audience explaining how he could never censor himself because of his commitment to justice, and that if he had agreed to 'play ball' by obscuring and muddling the truth, then he would be just as much responsible for the hypocrisy and corruption that he has fought so furiously from the very beginning. Cenk Uygur and the Young Turks news have integrity and honesty. That is more than you can ask from any other news channel on television.

Other news sources I flirt with: Alternet.org, Slate.com, TheHuffingtonPost, TheNewYorkTimes, TheLosAngelesTimes, sometimes MSNBC, Motherjones.com, Colbert, Jon Stewart, C-SPAN, PBS

As far as feminist ideology goes, I will say this. It is HIGHLY misunderstood due to stereotypes popularized in film and television that are not at all based in science, and more often than not based in pure and simple ignorance, with the occasional malicious joke thrown in by the legitimately misogynistic terd. One of these studies from UCSD on women and film discovered the little known numerical disparity in Hollywood entertainment of white, middle-aged men who GREATLY outnumber any other group in control of the individual processes involved in creating Hollywood entertainment, THUS many popular stereotypes perpetuated are from the constant perspective the white, middle-aged, male. It is really hard to be a feminist because of certain, uneducated popular sentiments that often favor the white male POV because of the high influence of the white male in comparison to the voice of the rest of us in this world.

The only thing I mean when I call myself a feminist is that I believe in the simple idea that I deserve equal political, economic and general social civil rights. Television and film would have you believe that because I identify with feminism that I hate or blame men for everything, or that I want to burn my bra and yell and complain and play the victim. This is not true at all. It's insulting in the same way as when say your parents believe you are just 'going through a phase', and thus making the assumption that you are just pretending to like something or feel a certain way to feel special, boost your ego, or for some other shallow, illegitimate reasons. It's kind of like when people that are anti-gay make the claim that there are people that pretend they are gay just to be cool. Why would you want to be gay when people are given so much shit, even physical and verbally abused for their sexual orientation? Who would WANT to subject themselves to that? And why would I want to call myself a feminist, when it is not in vogue at all! Many people are uneducated on the subject, and automatically assume false things about you based on stereotypes, and essentially decide to hate you before you have a chance to even show that you're not a frigid, angry lesbian that hates men.

Much of being a feminist, in my day to day experience, is simply trying to make others aware of the fallacies they hold as true and accurate in regards to their understandings on women's rights and issues, and the maligned term of feminist. I don't go looking to discuss the topic, but if I hear someone say something I find ignorant or hateful, I am going to point it out and ask to discuss and debate the topic objectively whilst reminding individuals whenever they allow themselves to make arguments in terms of absolutes, and to think in black and white stereotypes, especially the more offensive and obnoxious ones.

I would recommend 'Full Frontal Feminism' for anyone who would like to give the subject a chance. Also, if you come in contact with a branch of feminism that you find legitimately unreasonable, then please don't let that immediately color your understanding of the entire genre. There are crazy individuals in every group. White people have the KKK, hippies have the Weather Underground, republicans have Fox News, liberals have Bill Maher...you know, you can't control every individual that falls under the umbrella of one ideology.

I realize it is sometimes hard for some men not to take certain conclusions feminist research and studies suggest as a personal attack on men, but let me assure you that personally, I find the legitimate feminist research is not intending to attack the male gender by blanketing men in the light of being 'bad' or the cause of all problems, but only pointing out instances where the patterns of men impact women. There are also plenty of negative things women contribute to the world, to each other, and to men exclusively. We are all to blame for different things to be sure, and it is not the goal of my feminism, or any feminists I regard, to cast men in an unfavorable light for the sake of putting men down. Men do wonderful things that I admire all the time, and I am a big fan of them in more ways then one *wink*. It also doesn't hurt that a feminist woman is likely not to keep an unwanted pregnancy, which I think most men would be relieved and glad to know, and also represent a sexually open-minded sect of the population that has great potential for your wildest sexual fantasies, lol.

After reading my blurb on feminism, you still find yourself unsure of whether you should grant the feminist cause your stamp of approval, I implore you to at least do your very best to not fall victim to blindly accepting popular gender related stereotypes (toward men or women), and also hearing the arguments of non-whites and women with an open mind and with the knowledge that their voices are the ones often unrepresented and thus may take some active listening and genuine desire to understand. After that, you are perfectly welcome to disagree if you still find yourself unconvinced.

....

anyway, there is my lengthy rantings on the useless subject matter I generally invest myself in. Hope you can understand where I'm coming from, if not only slightly.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
It's weird, I can't really identify any self-contained interests, but if I was asked a question about something I'd have some knowledge on it. I just can't do a memory dump.
 

RedN

Active Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
348
---
Location
los angeles
Im a web developer but thats whatever i guess...

Im into industrial, electro(tecktonik), and club dancing lately. I only started learning this feb and its been really fun for me. Once youre there dancing you sorta forget about things. where its all about control at work and with my life... its teh opposite there in the dance floor... its a very unique intoxicating feeling I guess.

industrial is a rivethead/goth style... its like more on a release of rage, the style.:mad: its angular(is that right?), Im into the power style mostly not the girls version. its best danced on power noise music

tecktonik is to me more on the perky playful silly side of things :p. its fast and it focuses on the arms - like the opposite of shuffling, just not as monotonous and boring. well its electro so anything electroish - i go for it

club dancing(I dont know what the style is called really), I guess is for that thing in us thats like... god im so hot n horny just do me now...... :o. a lot of hip swinging, self touching, well you know. I end up doing this on slower music.
 

Puffy

"Wtf even was that"
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,859
---
Location
Path with heart
It's weird, I can't really identify any self-contained interests, but if I was asked a question about something I'd have some knowledge on it. I just can't do a memory dump.

What about Socionics and Music? I thought these were two interests of yours. :p
 

Puffy

"Wtf even was that"
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,859
---
Location
Path with heart
I agree it's a cool idea for a thread, some more people should be less modest. :p

I've always valued the idea of depth rather than breadth, and if I had to name two core interests it would be Comics and Horror (film and literature). I like film, music and things outside these genres too, they just seem like the closest things to specialties. Maybe I'll do Comics another time, I expect Horror itself will take up a bit of space.

Horror

Horror has been with me since childhood really, I remember Goosebumps and a few other horror series being apart of my early bed-time reading. By 9 or 10 I'd moved on to Stephen King by accident (a, in hindsight, disturbed child lent me 'Pet Sematary' in class) and my life went downhill from there. These days, I like Horror across different mediums, I've recently got into Horror video-games and so am going through the classics like 'Silent Hill 2', 'Alone in the Dark', 'Eternal Darkness', (I recommend all three highly, especially 'Silent Hill 2' - one of the best games I've played in ages) but any other recommendations there would be great as I'm new to it. Also, the Horror comics of Junji Ito, but to date, besides him (and one-offs like From Hell - which is fantastic), I haven't found much very interesting in the way of Horror comics (one of my dreams is to pioneer in that area) so I'm open to recommendations there as well.

And of course.... GOYA!

goya_saturn.jpg

Defining Horror is a bit difficult, some believe it requires the presence of monsters but I could list many texts I feel are Horrors which lack them (the literary works of Marquis de Sade and Hitchcock's film, Psycho, as examples). If the six primary human emotions are believed to be: 'happiness, sadness, surprise, anger, disgust and fear', I believe Horror is defined by its intention to evoke fear and disgust. Disgust interests me more, I tend to seek out the most disgusting avant-garde things I can find these days. I get questioned about it a lot, but to me if disgust makes up a core facet of the human condition I see no reason why it shouldn't be given serious examination and analysis. I think on the most basic level, I find the reality of my country quite boring, so disgust has appealed as something which openly violates normative values (even where I myself am not really that transgressive in person). Marquis de Sade and William S. Burroughs are my recent literary crushes, in this respect, more Sade (where the term sadism derives) for disgust, though.

This obviously is quite a broad net, but these days I don't read many typical horror 'monster' stories (Frankenstein, Dracula, et al) at all, really, of those I'd highly recommend people like H.P. Lovecraft, M.R. James, or Algernon Blackwood, but I would include Shock Cinema, to some of the Avant-Garde stuff of Stan Brakhage (The Act of Seeing With One's Own Eyes, in particular) and Andy Warhol, and even a lot of David Lynch as examples in film.

***

(short essay on the nature of monsters, if anyone's interested)

One thing I've been thinking about recently though are the possible links between the age of reason and the more traditional horror stories. Historically, in the West, Horror, as a genre, is thought to have originated around the end of the 18th Century with gothic novels such as Matthew Lewis's 'The Monk.' What's curious is that it's at a very near time as the emergence of the age of reason. I've wondered to what extent a lot of monsters are nightmares unique to the scientific method.
Monsters are often composite creatures, some theorists, like Noel Carroll, have suggested that the feeling of disgust in a monster derives from the fact it escapes categorisation (a were-wolf is both man and wolf, as example), in that sense they're freaks of nature. Writers like Lovecraft based most of their career around the theme of science discovering something it wished it hadn't (and in them the monster usually wins anyway), but in responding to the monster with disgust I think we project onto to it, 'how dare we come across something which violates our ordered view of existence - we must set this right immediately!'
The Horror story is very closely linked to detective stories in that it's based around investigation: invariably, someone dies, investigation ensues, the monster is discovered, the monster is investigated, some weakness is found, and the monster is eliminated. But if through investigation the monster (the threat to our reality) is slain, I wonder if it's reason's means of taming what is unreasonable. This obviously can't be true to all horror, but I think within it a battle between the unconscious (irrational) and conscious (rational) mind ensues, perhaps in our time due to the repression of religious/ spiritual ways of thinking on account of our prevalent materialism.

But yeah, I find considering what the monster represents in horror stories massively inspiring (consider the racist undertones of the film, Night of The Living Dead, for example, or the 'bodysnatchers' as a representation of the Red scare in 'Invasion of the Body Snatchers'). In a lot of cases it makes great social commentary. Unfortunately in most mainstream cases horror is used for conservative ends (the monster is slain so the status quo is maintained), but I've long considered the idea of writing stories where conservative values are inscribed upon the monster as a means of criticism, or rather utilising the thing which is 'horrible' in text as a means of illuminating what I find 'horrible' in reality. I often feel at home with the most 'disgusting' texts, afterall. :D
 

RedN

Active Member
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
348
---
Location
los angeles
I LOVE horror tooooooooooo!!!!!!!

I used to collect such arts when I was young but my computer crashed and they all went poof... I want to try to collect again though :(
 

Cavallier

Oh damn.
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
3,639
---
[FONT=&quot]
I think we should start a horror movie club. Like a book club but with horror movies. We list one to watch. Then we discuss. Then we move on. We could have monthly themes...You know you want to...
[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]I hate to declare something a hobby of mine because then people bombard me with questions and I discover I don't deserve to call myself a hobbyist. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]1. I like eastern philosophy. I've studied it quite a bit to the point of minoring in it in school. I've read quite a bit. Some day I plan on visiting Malaysia, Tibet, and India. Some day. However, this is hardly a hobby. I mean, if you want to know more about it do an internet search and start reading. What I really enjoy about Eastern Philosophy is the idea there there is a path towards education, self-betterment, and logical thought that is completely seperate from the western greek-roman path. I find that once you've done your reading and know the basics of Buddhism, Hinuism, and Taoism you can really start to delve into how the non-western mind works. Being from the USA or even really anywhere west of India means we are generally raised in a specific Greek originated mind set. We have created guide lines for what is considered logical and what is considered irrational. However, a non-western mind raised on the precepts of nothing like Greek Philosophy has an entirely different set of guidelines. How a non-western mind can reach a conclusion so completely alien to the conclusion from the mind of a western raised individual is fascinating and shows that the cultural and philisophical differences run very deep. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I can update this with a small list of books to start with but first I have to take a look at my bookshelf.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Edit: Here you go. A list of books/philosophers. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
In no particular order...
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Bhagavad Gita, Trans. by Stephen Mitchell [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Han Fei Tzu (Basic Writings) Trans by Burton Watson: Han Fei provides us with the most organized and readable version of the Legalist Chinese school of philosophy. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Chuang Tzu (Basic Writings) Trans by Burton Watson: Taoist. Watson is good with this one. Not at good as with Han Fei Tzu but serviceable. And the book is cheap and easy to find. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Mo Tzu: Anything you can find. Any rudimentary education westerners may get in Chinese philosophy will involve Confucianism. Mo Tzu was a rival of the Confucianists. Read him. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Analects , Confucius: D. C. Lau did a good translation.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Mencius, more about Confucianism: David Minton does a good translation. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Tao Te Ching, Lao Tzu: D. C. Lau does a good translation. Though you can find all sorts of translations. You may prefer a different one. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Path to Enlightenment , the current Dalai Lama.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Crest-Jewel of Discrimination (Shankara), Trans. by Viveka-Chudamani. Hindu and a good example of a Vedanta Text.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Upanishads Breath of the Eternal , Trans. by Swami Prabhavananda. Hindu.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Disputers of the Tao , A.C. Graham. Old, musty, and you'll probably find it being thoroughly ignored in your local book store. If you really get into this stuff it's a very good dense text on Taoism.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Wandering On The Way , Victor Mair: Why suggest a second version of Chuang Tzu you ask? Because it's got some really good discussion and interpretation of Chuang Tzu.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Tao of Pooh , Benjamin Hoff: This is a silly and hard to take seriously introduction to and semi-translation of the Tao Te Ching. Mostly I like the attempt at trying to take Taoist principles and explain them in a distinctly western fashion.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Siddhartha[/FONT][FONT=&quot] , Herman Hesse: It's a fantasy-esque fiction novel. Second, it's an interesting introduction to the Buddha origin story. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Lord of Light , Zelazny: Again, it's a novel but I love it. It's a mixture of fantasy and religious discussion. It's simply enjoyable and not meant to be serious intellectual study.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]2. I love to cook. I love to find new or hard to create dishes and figure them out. Master them. Then change them and make them into something new. I sometimes think I would willingly spend my whole life in persuit of being a better cook. I may even try to obtain a degree or get some sort of professional level education on the subject. I'm quite good at it. It's intuitive for me. My nose and tongue tells me what I need to know. I'm good at being given a basket of mystery ingredients and making something delicious out of it. I like to make a dish and then hunt through my spice cabinet, smelling and tasting, till I've created the perfect combination. I love taking things that someone I know thinks is nasty (Ex. beef tongue and tripe) and making them palatable or even a welcome dish that this same person asks me to make for them. What I hate and have come to associate with close mindedness is refusing to taste something out of squeamishness. Sure, don't eat certain things because of medical issues or because of fear of food poisoning but don't avoid something because of some childish fear it might be "icky". /rant [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]I'll update this later as well with a list of cookbooks I love.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Edit: Here you go...[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
Joy Of Cooking, Rombauer: Good for just about any basic American recipe you can think of. Also, good for diagrams and explanations of basic cooking techniques. Not all the recipes are tested though. Even though that might be sacrilege for me to say.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Ad Hoc At Home[/FONT][FONT=&quot], Thomas Keller. Lots of interesting discussion and some very good recipes. Although, this author's idea of what's easy is ridiculous. I suspect he means what is easy for a long time cook who has had some formal training. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Artisan Bread in Five Minutes a Day, Jeff Hertzberg and Zoe Francois. I know, it sounds like a dinky book. It's actually very good. It's great because it gives you an easy way to make sure you can bake up a loaf of fresh bread whenever you want (even every day if you want).[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Feast, Nigella Lawson. Nigella is such a self indulgent old witch but she's a damn good cook. Every recipe is easy, almost lazily so, and also calorically decadent. I love all of them. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The New Best Recipe, from editors of Cooks Illustrated. When I'm curious about the reasons behind a specific cooking technique I find this book has the answer. Like the Joy of Cooking it's got pretty much any basic western recipe you may want.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Tea Drinker's Handbook[/FONT][FONT=&quot], Delmas, Minet, and Barbaste. If you love tea you need this book.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Bread Baker's Apprentice, Peter Reinhart. Very good if you are really getting into bread baking. The best in my opinion if you are trying to learn technique.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Bake Wise, Shirley Corriher. I'm fairly certain the Corriher is an INTP. She takes a scientific approach to baking desserts. She's got the scientific reason why certain techniques work better than others. Plus this book won the James Beard Award for Excellence for a reason.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The Best Meat Recipes[/FONT][FONT=&quot], They explain their experimentation and reasons behind choosing their techniques. If you are looking for a good roast beast recipe this is a great book.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]And of course the Better Homes and Gardens New Cook Book. The older the edition the better. Some of them actually have recipes for opossum and explain the best way to prepare food for cooking over a hearth. Very good and rather educational.[/FONT]

Edit Edit: Formatting issues. Whatever. I give up.
 

Puffy

"Wtf even was that"
Local time
Today 1:07 PM
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,859
---
Location
Path with heart
I LOVE horror tooooooooooo!!!!!!!

I used to collect such arts when I was young but my computer crashed and they all went poof... I want to try to collect again though :(

Arghhh, that sounds a pain. I don't know too much horror art-wise, but I do like Goya, Francis Bacon and some of William Blake's art. (:

@Cavallier - Of course I want to. :D How abouttt.. Profondo Rosso (Dario Argento)? :phear:
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA
What about Socionics and Music? I thought these were two interests of yours. :p

Yeah, you're right.

It feels like it all exists in my head as one big blob of information, I have an easier time making sense of it when answering specific questions or contributing to trains of thought.
 

Cavallier

Oh damn.
Local time
Today 5:07 AM
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
3,639
---
Top Bottom