It is entirely subjective, which is why I asked.
I want the opinion of others of what they find ugly.
You all seriously suck.
Assholes.
So there's a collective acknowledgement that ugliness is subjective, after which you insist on us telling you our subjective views of what is and what is not ugly, after which the replies you get are generally still that it's subjective or situational, and that makes us all assholes? Did you want specific examples of people and things we find ugly? You might have asked for them, in that case.
Consider that some people may not feel able, for whatever reason, to provide a simple list of things that are ugly. Nor does the original question suggest that that is what you're asking for - you ask, "What is 'ugly'?", with quotation marks (instead of inverted commas?) around the word "ugly", indicating that you are referring to the
word ugly, rather than asking a question like, "What is red?" or "Who is the queen?" There are specific examples there, albeit a few.
Consider also that when you ask INTPs what they think is ugly, it shouldn't surprise you - especially when you ask in a manner that appears to suggest that you specifically want to know about what people think ugli
ness is - they try to find some rule that can applied such that what is ugly can be determined in any given situation, including from their perspective - an objective rule - that answers your question but still accommodates subjectivity. For instance, deviation from the ideals of a taxonomic category is an objective rule - if it satisfies that criterion, it is ugly - that permits subjectivity, because it's based on the subjective ideals in the situation being examined. Knowing that definition of ugly, if you know pjoa09's ideals for any given category of things, you know what pjoa09 considers ugly. To an INTP, a far more useful answer than an incomplete list of disparate things. Equally, ugliness being that which causes repulsion is an objective rule - if it's repulsive, it's ugly - that allows subjectivity to exist because it's based on what the observer finds repulsive. If you know what ApostateAbe finds repulsive, you know what he considers ugly. Also offered are naturalistic explanations of the phenomenon of ugliness which equally do not absolutely state that any particular thing is ugly, but allow you to work out what things are ugly. You asked INTPs what they find ugly, and they gave you a rule for determining what they find ugly. What did you expect? Or an INFP - me - replies that it really depends on the specific thing because there aren't really any attributes that are always ugly, with one principle-based exception. Again, that isn't exactly shocking.