We are tired.

[Words]

To not sound too egoistical and, by probability, too self-aggrandizing, we have decided to eliminate the symbol of "I". Although it may sound cowardly literal, it's effects are, in certain, more than what one usually absorbs. It is like having the mundane efforts of pinching a small soda can and whispering "crunch" to it; it is much more than what we can imagine. Really, the straightforward boring hidden interpretation is so simple that it could be squeezed into the box known as "additions". There is really no extra servings to it; it's an excuse.

Tie up a rock and await the sounds of its replies...That does not sound nice. Wait. The torture of the soulless "being" or the sound? or maybe the quality of understanding of the person tying---in another identification, it is not enlightening.

It is an exercise, or for a set of words naturally invented and with vague essence, it is a reincarnation of thought. It, the thread. It's a spill of thought---a vomiting secretion of everything being ruinously dumped into the floor.

If we collect the remains and recess of the contaminated world, would the bleeding halt and would it rise up cleansed? Would this big bob talk to momma and show eternal appreciation? (Eternity is another region of exploration, so ignore it.) We know you know it is "no". Little timmy will simply play in his pile of sand the next day. So what do we do? We kill the child? Ew, no. That's a defiance to the objective; a known negative divagation. You are the Janitor so you will clean it everyday.

The cat died so we are paused. We, then, start shouting and complaining to alarm the available officer. But listen, it's not a matter of emotion, it's a matter of resolution. We simply want to "kill" things and strike the newest flavor of aroma. It's what we are, a bored child.

 

[Fukyo]

May I further depersonalize you by using the pronoun "it" and attach various other attributes such as vacuous, meaningless, empty and barren to your persona to emphasize this?

 

[Words]

May I further depersonalize you by using the pronoun "it" and attach various other attributes such as vacuous, meaningless, empty and barren to your persona to emphasize this?

Why? Maybe we are empty without "toys", but with these things, we could be something. With us as the clothing of a character with greater "something", we are perhaps shared "crumbs" of that precious resource known as "meaning".

----

What is one without inputs? Can a thought-process have anything besides the thought? Can chained reactions occur? Will the thought form its own concepts since it naturally does? A living being with only an un-exercised brain, someone knows this yeah? Does the brain require certain amounts of external stimuli?

 

[ckm]

By replacing "I" with "we", you are still referring to yourself, are you not? Surely, by your logic, that is still egotistical?

 

[Anthile]

I think we can conclude now that Words is a bot that randomly generate sentences. None of this makes sense. I've read Finnegan's Wake and it was pithier than this. Everyone can put some beefy words in a row and hope that anyone would find it deep, but this is just a joke.

 

[Words]

By replacing "I" with "we", you are still referring to yourself, are you not? Surely, by your logic, that is still egotistical?

By our logic, there is a difference between using "We" and using "I"---something "literal understanding"(absence of substitution), something in relation to common perception.

But as we have said, it's just an excuse---a coating to hide and/or further our ego. It's a transparent mask with purpose originating elsewhere, a place you would most likely find distasteful.

I think we can conclude now that Words is a bot that randomly generate sentences. None of this makes sense. I've read Finnegan's Wake and it was pithier than this. Everyone can put some beefy words in a row and hope that anyone would find it deep, but this is just a joke.

Ok..

But you're actually right in that our point is nothing deep(arguable since it leads to the question: What is deep?); it's just a simple condition.

 

[ckm]

But as we have said, it's just an excuse---a coating to hide and/or further our ego. It's a transparent mask with purpose originating elsewhere, a place you would most likely find distasteful.

Perhaps I would find it distasteful, perhaps not. Can you elaborate?

 

[Words]

Perhaps I would find it distasteful, perhaps not. Can you elaborate?

It's not literally a "'place' of the mind". But it's that "place" of hidden intentions and the source of "facades". Deceit. We will elaborate later...We have to go. But yeah, nothing deep or "new".

EDIT:

It is the "'pool' of 'negative' emotions". And this time, Pride(Ego) has participated and played the major role.

(I =/= We) (but still)= egotistical. Not egotistical in the "common literal" sense but in reality, = egotistical. "Not egotistical in the "common literal" sense still affects ego. Ego about self ego.......I have to go.

 

[Words]

I reckon I should probably put this to closure. What I basically did was transform my understanding of describing concepts in a way that I personally see them. It's simply the use of metaphors stated as words...somewhat.

To not sound too egoistical and, by probability, too self-aggrandizing, we have decided to eliminate the symbol of "I".

"Eliminate" meaning removing the "symbol"(word) that is "I". Thus, the resulting peculiar use of "We" instead of "I.".

Although it may sound cowardly literal, it's effects are, in certain, more than what one usually absorbs.

"Cowardly" since I hide myself behind a "We" instead of an "I". The "effects" means the "effects" of using "We" instead of "I"; It promotes an illusory defensive measure to protect my ego.

"Absorbs" meaning understands.

It is like having the mundane efforts of pinching a small soda can and whispering "crunch" to it; it is much more than what we can imagine.

"Mundane efforts" meaning initiating simple things such as "pinching a small soda can and whispering crunch to it". It's a strange example but the fact that it seems "useless" is the point. The possibility that it's an elaborate secret message is available and that relates to switching "I" to "We".

Really, the straightforward boring hidden interpretation is so simple that it could be squeezed into the box known as "additions".

We > I for ego. And that is the "addition".

There is really no extra servings to it; it's an excuse.

"extra servings" = other meanings. "It's an excuse", 'excuse' to imply that efforts are made to hide something.

Tie up a rock and await the sounds of its replies...That does not sound nice. Wait. The torture of the soulless "being" or the sound? or maybe the quality of understanding of the person tying---in another identification, it is not enlightening.

This is an extra random thought. The words "Tie up a rock and await the sounds of its replies...that does not sound nice" is a puzzle. What does sound nice? The person who tied it? The rock? Or most simply, the sound?

It is an exercise, or for a set of words naturally invented and with vague essence, it is a reincarnation of thought. It, the thread.

This explains the purpose of the thread. The thread is a "reincarnation of thought". I use to describe things in a certain way and this is its "reincarnation".

It's a spill of thought---a vomiting secretion of everything being ruinously dumped into the floor.

This explains the content of the OP. They are mostly "spills of thought" and the "secretions" of the mind "dumped" into a "floor". In other words, sharing scattered thoughts.

If we collect the remains and recess of the contaminated world, would the bleeding halt and would it rise up cleansed?

This mainly talks about the world and humanitarian affairs. It is about "collecting the remains" and/or "cleaning" the world; It's about helping the "sick" world. (It's the perception that the world is not what it should be.) It asks the question, if we "cured" the world, will it be forever cured?

Would this big bob talk to momma and show eternal appreciation? (Eternity is another region of exploration, so ignore it.)

"Bib bob" is the personified metaphor to represent the world. Momma=people who do good. Eternal appreciation - forever stability.

We know you know it is "no".

The answer to the question.

Little timmy will simply play in his pile of sand the next day. So what do we do? We kill the child? Ew, no. That's a defiance to the objective; a known negative divagation. You are the Janitor so you will clean it everyday.

"Little timmy" is another metaphor of "World". "play in his pile of sand"=dirty himself.

So what do we do? Kill the world? No, you don't. You have to keep on "cleaning" it.

The cat died so we are paused.

An eventful occasion has caused me to a "pause".

We, then, start shouting and complaining to alarm the available officer.

Common tendency of sudden deathly occasion is reaction.

But listen, it's not a matter of emotion, it's a matter of resolution.

I react not because of emotion, but because I feel the need to move on.

We simply want to "kill" things and strike the newest flavor of aroma. It's what we are, a bored child.

In fact, I would actually prefer moving on and "killing the kitten" would've only be one way.

I am bored because of my perceived recent inactivity of the forum.

It feels weird explaining this...

 

[Fukyo]

It feels weird explaining this...

You are overdoing the semantic accuracy.

 

[AlisaD]

If I was replaced by we, how comes you is still there?

You'd think that if I was eliminated we'd be lift with just we, but we still have you, them and us.

I guess we can't really be us, if there's no them.