I agree with you Fukyo.
I understand and support the idea that the way humanity is dealing with everything now is wrong and that it should change, but this speech is way too naive and contradictory to be a REALLY good example for the world. It's way too idealistic and emotion-fueled. In order to appeal to actual world-leaders and such, you'll have to point out the advantages of 'kindness' and equality in the long-term. Such as not letting most of the human race go fucking extinct within the next 100-200 years.
We'll also need to fuck less, or at least use protection more often. Way too many people on this world. But I guess a big apocalyptic crisis will do the trick for us if we don't find a (hopefully peaceful) solution ourselves. Oh, and we'll have to get rid of shitty companies like Shell, so we can finally get the whole green energy and fuel thing going. That'll be quite a challenge though. But hey, a little French revolution here and there might just do it. But in order for that to happen, the quality of life of everybody will have to decrease quite a bit.