• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

The INTP to ENTP project!

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
@Mango - I watched one of your videos on reality tv. I was quite impressed with my identification with the mannerisms you exhibited during the video. It was rather adhoc but it was lucid as well, and I could see myself in you as you drifted from thought to thought. What I find odd is that after such close identification with you and with the rest of the posts on this forum is that people would attempt to reinterpret my MBTI into some other type - that just seems weird. Basically, I have felt quite at home here during the short time in which I have visited. I have rarely found that in any other community, or identified the same thought processes in others as I have known myself to possess. Thanks for the input =)
 

Mary

ad nauseam
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
329
---
Location
In my own head
When I make videos with my friends I'm super hyper, but it's an act. I can change my 'act' based on who I'm talking to; if I'm on a gaming forum, I'll lurk and see their general attitude about things, formulate my own beliefs, then actually start posting. I'd actually be interested in what you'd label me as..

I have all the basic, sterotypical INTP characteristics.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Adymus:

For the record I am not terribly impressed with the subjective opinions without scientific substantiation to back them up. If you want to prove something to me you had better talk to me about the causality of your inferences, from whence they are derived, and what would in comparison make them more valid an interpretation than the current findings (in this case multiple unbiased test results coupled with reflection of life experiences). I wasn't setting out to prove anything when I took the tests, I merely took them out of curiosity one night, and dug up my old MBTI from '02/'03 later to see what its results were because I had forgotten what they were except for the strong emphasis on Thinking to the near exclusion of all else.

I in fact wonder if your assertion was somehow prompted by my asking BA-PI if he was Fe... could that have anything to do with this? I didn't mean for that to be offensive, but I was merely wondering because he had made an earlier comment about thinking that he was an INTP (this implies that he was/is uncertain), and as well I noticed that his responses seemed more empathic to me than most of the dialog I have read in this forum thus far. That is by no means a bad thing, but it was just a sense that I had about him being guided by empathic identification in his responses. I have no idea - I will make no claim of being able to read people's MBTIs - especially based on expression - to me that seems a bit like phrenology :) - which is of course a psuedo-science.

Ok I really have to go now :)
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
When I make videos with my friends I'm super hyper, but it's an act. I can change my 'act' based on who I'm talking to; if I'm on a gaming forum, I'll lurk and see their general attitude about things, formulate my own beliefs, then actually start posting. I'd actually be interested in what you'd label me as..

I have all the basic, sterotypical INTP characteristics.

You are awesome.
 

Robbaz

Member
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
25
---
I can change my 'act' as well if I'm around people that I feel comfortable with. Perhaps it wasn't a fair assessment on my part. I just know that if I did a spontaneous video like that where I shift into analyzation mode, I wouldn't be able to overcome a lot of the stereotypical mannerisms, unless I had plenty of preparation prior to. But Boradicus did mention that he practiced several times before filming. Perhaps even his drama class, like he mentioned, helped out as well.

That's one reason why I love these forums. I learn something new about my own potential and break some of the previous conceptions I had about our type. Thanks for sharing your journey, I'll keep watching for the conclusion of your new years resolution. I am still skeptical on one's ability to alter themselves to a different PT, but I'll keep my mind open and see if it works.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
boradicus. First let me say I have a different reaction toward you than to the other INTPs I've encountered. I'm not sure in myself what that reaction is but we may find out. After reading Adymus's statement calling you an INFJ I skimmed your video a 2nd time. I realize in no way am I qualified to make such a judgment on my own but I do see that Adymus is saying something that I overlooked. One thing I see in your statements is you say you are quite open to feedback. I'm going to give you some but I don't know if it will be pleasant. I say that because I'm a person more fond of abstract theory than saying something to you quickly face-to-face. Since you have said an awful lot I may have to be selective. If I were thorough I'd be willing to bet no one would give one whit anyway.

What you said about Marvin Minsky I didn't disagree with so my comments were only reflections upon the idea. I will let you decide whether what I said was more intropective than the broader views of yours:

Originally Posted by BigApplePi
That has me thinking about consciousness. What we are conscious of flows, jerks, conks out. Thoughts --

F.* My impression is emotions flood the conscious mind in a way affecting the rest of the body. The brain/body does not so easily toss off the results when the body is so deeply affected and our minds dwell on the results. Do we believe the images and feelings that result?

S. Our immediate surroundings affect our senses and if they are strong enough, they also flood the brain/mind. Step in from the cold to a hot bath and will you continue rational thought? Not if the sensory result floods us. Same with sudden pain.

TN. Now what about rational thought? How does this differ from daydreaming? The former is goal oriented, the latter drifts. Both are mental rather than sensory or emotional.
_____________________________

S - forced, inescapable because it happens from the outside.
TN - controlled because it is internal. It IS us.
F - in-between. Precipitated by something external but appealing to something internal. Can be controlled but because we are human, fails.
_____________________________
*
F = feelings/emotion
S = sensory
TN = thinking/intuition
You underestimate the Imperatives of Rational Thought, and you miss the point of Minsky's premise entirely;
I wasn't aware of under or overestimating anything. I missed a point? I'm not judging Minsky. Wasn't trying to.
emotions need not control us (we are rational beings, self-aware, self-directed, and with a full capacity for the rational transcendence of limitations imposed by sensory input
I take that as a true but general statement of our capacities. I was looking at something else. Namely what happens at an instant in time inside ourselves before reason gets a chance to intervene.

- if you elect to disbelieve me, let me refer you to a case of monks who set themselves on fire as they meditated in protest against anit-buddhist policies --> http://www.vietnampix.com/fire1.htm).
I'm familiar with those monks. Great example of studied control. They went into that experience prepared. They must have been prepared to focus on their assignment and shut out pain. Took great courage.

Our capacity for Love, in a more simple and perhaps less dramatic way - which by the way is not a feeling of Love in the sense in which I am describing it, but a rational decision to Love - enables us to easily transcend the needs of the body and emotions for those whom and that which we choose to Love.
You are talking about somethng very broad here, not just a warm feeling inside of us. Love involves much more than what is inside us, but how we direct ourselves toward the other person, how we choose to be responsible, and what we know of them. That is far more than one emotion.

What you seem to be describing is tantamount to torture; "can the human capacity for rationality be overridden by sensory overload" is the question that you have presented to us.
I wasn't aware I was talking about that at all. Torture is brought on externally. I wasn't thinking of overload either, but rather any sensory experience. Even at the mildest level it can distract and interrupt our thought processes or even feelings. A mild itch can be ignored, but poison ivy? A headache can be ignored but it will tend to slow us down. I'm not talking about specialized training those monks have, but ordinary people. For all I know that specialized training of those monks cuts out openness to other life experiences, but I'm not studied on that.

I do not advocate torture, nor do I support its advocators -
I count that as a plus, lol.
'scientific inquiry' does not excuse - sorry. But since torture is the focus of your inquiry
One reason why it wouldn't and couldn't be my focus is it is extreme. I was interested in ordinary sensory distractions. I wonder what was on your mind distracting you to this?
, let me enlighten you (you are going to enlighten me?) as to its workings upon the rational mind. While it is true that pain (sudden or prolonged at minimum psychological threshold) may be capable of eliciting immediate aversive responses (short term) in the untrained mind, the essential nature of the rational decision process will not conform to any blueprint other than its own; in other words, once a threat has been identified, the mind (of the rational) begins to work with cool precision upon the nature of the problem, its origin, its capacity for resolution (long term), the constraints for resolution (is no, full, or partial resolution possible)(you don't believe in conflicted individuals?), its probability for resolution, the measures that need to be taken so that the problem not only does not happen to oneself again but to others (we are good like that), the most optimal course of action to be taken toward the end of resolution and future prevention, the most accessible course of action for the same, what our value systems and beliefs are in light of all of the above, and what actions should and will be taken as a result of this analysis and any constraints imposed by the current and projected situation. (Again you don't believe a situation can be unresolved?)

There are many instances in which a rational conclusion may be reached to do absolutely nothing, or to functionally ignore the situation altogether. But to a rational, torture is not rational except for its veiled true purpose - to instill fear; this fear is not for the acquisition of information, because there are many more effective routes to that end, it is the fear of some group of people who are out of control and wish to reestablish the illusion of their own control by making others to endure their own weaknesses. You are making some interesting statements. I attended a seminar on the subject a couple months ago at Columbia University where the professor characterized institutional torture (very much in control in a police state) as a ritual. On the social level it was something not to be talked about but at the same time was something to be well known. Certainly as you say to instill fear. There was more but it was a little over my head and I my notes aren't handy.

There is no strength achieved by such endeavors, nor are there any solutions found by such barbarisms - the fact is that it is a long outmoded sociological survival mechanism left over from a more barbaric time. (Except that a high percentage of the countries of the world still practices it.) At the end of the day, society only gains by the application of rationality even if rational people are destroyed, maimed and killed in the process; The Lord of The Flies describes this all too well, perhaps you should (Is this a statement of a J?!) have read it. I'm familiar with it. Good story.
M.

Let me say boradicus I will be happy to talk to you anytime. You seem to be a person of good spirit with thoughtful issues.
 

Adymus

Banned
Local time
Today 11:52 AM
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
2,180
---
Location
Anaheim, CA
There are different types of INTP, and not a single one of them has Ni or uses Fe at the ease that you use it at. Interestingly enough, your Fe is not as well developed as INFJs usually have it, and it is still being used in a far more advanced way than any INTP would use it.

Like I have been saying before, you have a very incomplete understanding of the typology model that we are discussing, so I am not surprised that you are misinterpreting... nearly everything.

I would not find it odd at all for all of your MBTI tests to be wrong, it is a terribly inaccurate instrument. You also have a far greater use of Ti than INFJs usually have, which is why it does surprise me that you use it so well. The test means nothing, all it does is take a person's opinion of how they use their mind. That is in no way proof of anything.

However, based on the way you are talking here on this forum and in your video, it is pretty clear that your Ti is not in charge so to speak.

INTPs do not only have Ti, they Have Ti as a dominant function, supported by their Ne, and then Si as their worldview, and Fe as their articulator and Reader/Controller of external dynamics.

INFJs Have Ni as their dominant function (And worldview), which is supported by their Fe, then Ti as their logical compass, and Se as their gatherer of external information.

You said that you cannot be an F because you are objective and rational, well being a F does not mean that you are irrational necessarily. INFJs are not irrational, or at least not in such a way someone with dominant Fe would be. Some of the most highly intelligent and highly rational people I know are INFJs. Essentially it is their Ni that is calling the shots and they use Fe as a tool to support their Ni by directing their Ni models into the world.
It is also crucial to note that you also have Ti to support your Ni, and I must admit you have done a great job using Ti on your model of understanding, but I can see that is a logic that was used to tighten up a worldview model.

As for you being a J, not all J's make quick descitions neccesarily. See this is the problem with only having a basic understanding of MBTI, J's are not all J's for the same reason, and they do not all express the same behavior.
If you have Ni as your dominant function, then you certainly will not make quick and rash decisions, Ni is actually the slowest of all functions, because it takes time to peculate and see the whole picture. But when it does see the whole picture, it completely masters it.
I actually think you are confusing Ni with "thinking", because there is a difference between the act of cogitation, and Jungian "thinking". Using Ni is very much cogitating, and when using it a person could still say that they are thinking, and not be wrong.

It is funny that you consider what you are doing as "Rambling", that is the most structured rambling I have ever seen in my life, which only furthers my point. If you think that is rambling, you should see INTP rambling. An INFJ also would have taken a few attempts to gather their thoughts, but an INTP would not have busted it all out smoothly with a clear beginning and a clear ending without even breaking a sweat.

There is a crucial factor that I need to make clear. What defines a personality is where that personality get's their energy. You have been looking at this under the context of "An Extrovert get's there energy from people, and an introvert get's there energy from being reserved." This is incorrect. An INTP get's there energy from using Ti, and in order to use Ti they must withdrawal from active social dynamics, they fact that they are not talking to people is incidental and more of a consequence of using Ti. If you were an INTP then you would get your energy from the adaptive side of your brain, the Right hemisphere. You would gain energy by free forming your thoughts and just letting them go where ever they take you. If an INTP was to give a talk that was as structured as the one you did, we would be stumbling, taking longer to think and express ourselves, and then boucing off into Ne riffs and sidetracking into other things, and over all just not be as linear with our points.
When we actually did bounce off into some Ne and Ti tangent you would see an increase in our energy because it is something we enjoy more than putting structure into our thoughts.

The way you spoke was Eins-Swei-Drei, a to b to c to d, and you did it ease, it was clearly your strong side, you were being energized by using your Left brain functions. Also note the way you are speaking to people in this thread versus the way we (and by we I mean everyone who is an INTP, so not Lyra.) are speaking to you. We are being reactive, you give us information, and we process that information and give it back to you, no more and no less. What you are doing in response to us is reacting to us by giving us parts of your worldview, you are not just processing what we say, you directing us into thinking a certain way, for example the way you say things such as "let me enlighten you as to its workings upon the rational mind." This is Directive/Left-Brain/J behavior.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
When I wrote the above I hadn't read any of the recent posts. What I wrote was about an older post of boradicus. I'm greatly impressed by the difference of opinion on boradicus's type. It shows something about this character typing has to be studied.

How can we judge it? Our characteristics are those we are most comfortable with and only we are the best to judge (only if we know ourselves) that because the persona we present to others is different? How different? Yet Adymus may be reading what we are not aware of. So he is accurate also.

In my case I believe I constantly have to make judgments. Yet I hate doing so. So I have to self-rate as P over J. As for Fe, INTPs have Fe as the 4th trait. I think it's a matter of experience and practice if I use Fe. I have been well known by J(?) others in the past to exhibit lack of that. That is true especially if I'm excited about some theory or other that I fail to explain.
 

Adymus

Banned
Local time
Today 11:52 AM
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
2,180
---
Location
Anaheim, CA
Let me also add to this that throughout the course of my life, my natural tendency has always been to gravitate toward theory. I studied Music Theory, which I was quite good at by the way, and later I got my BA in Political Theory (classical philosophy with a political twist). I am a programmer - drawn to the field not by technical proficiency but by the idea of learning new models and constructs to help me understand the world around me- which concepts and models are quite useful when used as analogies for other things - it is a very cool way to look at the world - by comparing one structure to another structure and drawing inferences. I would never have finished my paper on Plato's Republic in fact if it had not been for an intuitive guess based on a statement made by Douglas Hoffstadter in his similarly structured work, Goedel Escher Bach.

Anyway, cheers, I have to go to class or something...
What you are describing is Ni.

Ni thrives on absorbing theoretical and conceptual models, and then applying them as analogies to other constructs that are seemingly unrelated. It is all a part of the convergent nature of Ni, taking patterns from one piece of natural law, and recognizing it in another.

"it is a very cool way to look at the world"

That's right, it also becomes a map of the natural law of the world, effectively becoming your worldview.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
An INTP get's there energy from using Ti, and in order to use Ti they must withdrawal from active social dynamics, they fact that they are not talking to people is incidental and more of a consequence of using Ti. If you were an INTP then you would get your energy from the adaptive side of your brain, the Right hemisphere. You would gain energy by free forming your thoughts and just letting them go where ever they take you.
That is essentially what I do, with the exception of when that function is shut down, at which point I resort to a variety of strategies, including Left-brained analysis to lead me back to the intuitive side and be unstuck again. You have never interacted with me personally and have only watched some videos - I respect that you have an opinion about this, but I would not at all agree about the ease of which you speak - to me I struggle to order myself so that I don't ramble - as I said earlier, if you talked to in person you would probably see this. How I interact here is necessarily more ordered because it is written and is therefore subject to greater scrutiny before it is posted. You are claiming that I am an idealist and have some world-view to sell you - I am telling you that despite my open attitude toward self-discovery that your assertions are more world-view than my own. I am merely stating what I know to be the results of several tests, as well as my own experience and identification with the MBTI type after having taken the tests. I am open to discussion but I am also weary of the tendency to get pushed around because of my very openness. This does not mean that I am a J - in fact I find the number of justifications you have had to make regarding my earlier response about my personality mostly untenable.

What I am interested in on the contrary, is the differences you are purporting between Ni and Ne functions - as I am completely unfamiliar with Ni and have absolutely no idea what it is. I'll bet it isn't me however, ;).

Additionally, there is nothing that I have read anywhere (or heard discussed - and I have been to psychologists!) about any correlation whatever between Left and Right Brained dominance and MBTI types. Perhaps I have live a bit of a sheltered life, however, once again, show me some evidence of what you are talking about so that I may discuss it with you.

I just looked at this: http://www.socionics.com/articles/nifq.html - if this estimation of Ni is correct, then perhaps there is something... However, thinking is still my dominant trait where ever Ni may or may not fit in; for my Father, Ni was definitely a dominant trait - he tended to view things over long spans of time.. While I am a 'big-picture' person - in other words I tend to see things in terms of analysis of conceptual models and abstractions that hold as either spatial or temporal patterns - I am not convinced at all that this is Ni:

I just went to Wiki to look at Ni, and while I some possibility of it, I have a much higher correlation with the following:


  • Extraverted intuition (Ne): Ne finds and interprets hidden meanings, using “what if” questions to explore alternatives and allowing multiple possibilities to coexist. This imaginative play weaves together insights and experiences from various sources to form a new whole, which can then become a catalyst to action.[24]
  • Introverted thinking (Ti): Ti seeks precision, such as the exact word to express an idea. It notices the minute distinctions that define the essence of things, then analyzes and classifies them. Ti examines all sides of an issue, looking to solve problems while minimizing effort and risk. It uses models to root out logical inconsistency. [25]
These two descriptions are the essence of how I work. I can suppose that on occasion, my intuitive side may in fact be strong enough to incorporate its shadow function of Ni, but I just don't identify with your read at all.

Just looking at the differences between INTP on wiki according to the functions I can tell you that my behavior exemplifies the following:

Inferior: Extraverted Feeling (Fe)

Fe seeks social connections and creates harmonious interactions through polite, considerate, and appropriate behavior. Fe responds to the explicit (and implicit) wants of others, and may even create an internal conflict between the subject’s own needs and the desire to meet the needs of others. [20] Fe drives the INTP to desire harmony in community. At their most relaxed, INTPs can be charming and outgoing among friends, or when they have a clearly defined role in the group. When under stress, however, INTPs can feel disconnected from the people around them, unable to use their extraverted Feeling to reach out to others. As their inferior function, Feeling can be a weak point; when threatened they will hide behind a wall of stoic logic. This can lead them to bottle up their emotions to preserve reason and harmony; but a failure to deal with these concealed emotions can lead to childish outbursts.


and:



Tertiary: Introverted Sensing (Si)

Si collects data in the present moment and compares it with past experiences, a process that sometimes evokes the feelings associated with memory, as if the subject were reliving it. Seeking to protect what is familiar, Si draws upon history to form goals and expectations about what will happen in the future. [19] Si gives INTPs the potential for keen observation. They use this function to gather empirical data, use physical tools, perceive physical relationships, and support their internal logic with a rich sense of space.

These are all INTP functions...

But the following (taken from INFJ), is completely alien to me:

Inferior: Extraverted Sensing (Se)

Se focuses on the experiences and sensations of the immediate, physical world. With an acute awareness of the present surroundings, it brings relevant facts and details to the forefront and may lead to spontaneous action. [24]


----


I think in evaluation of your comments that you are mistaking Ne for Ni and are seeing an exaggerated INTP Fe that is slightly more developed in me and that you are misinterpreting as belonging to an INFJ.


That is what I think is happening but I am game for more discussion =)
 

Adymus

Banned
Local time
Today 11:52 AM
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
2,180
---
Location
Anaheim, CA
Adymus:

For the record I am not terribly impressed with the subjective opinions without scientific substantiation to back them up. If you want to prove something to me you had better talk to me about the causality of your inferences, from whence they are derived, and what would in comparison make them more valid an interpretation than the current findings (in this case multiple unbiased test results coupled with reflection of life experiences). I wasn't setting out to prove anything when I took the tests, I merely took them out of curiosity one night, and dug up my old MBTI from '02/'03 later to see what its results were because I had forgotten what they were except for the strong emphasis on Thinking to the near exclusion of all else.

I in fact wonder if your assertion was somehow prompted by my asking BA-PI if he was Fe... could that have anything to do with this? I didn't mean for that to be offensive, but I was merely wondering because he had made an earlier comment about thinking that he was an INTP (this implies that he was/is uncertain), and as well I noticed that his responses seemed more empathic to me than most of the dialog I have read in this forum thus far. That is by no means a bad thing, but it was just a sense that I had about him being guided by empathic identification in his responses. I have no idea - I will make no claim of being able to read people's MBTIs - especially based on expression - to me that seems a bit like phrenology :) - which is of course a psuedo-science.

Ok I really have to go now :)
There is really not an awful lot that I can point to, MBTI is not based in any factual scientific principles at the moment. It is an observable pattern in the world, there is no doubt about that, however the patterns are difficult to create quantifiable evidence out of. Thus all we have to go by is a test, which is by no means unbiased, I find it almost laughable that you would even suggest that. The fact that it's results rest on your interpretation of yourself makes it biased.

Therefor the only way that you can currently gain an understanding of it, is if you are like me and have actually made a point to scrutinize the current hypothesizes, and people themselves and how they function. That is, until we are discover a connection that these types share that can yield quantifiable empirical data. Believe you me, I'm working on this.

My analysis of you was not provoked by asking Pi if he was Fe. If you are wondering why I didn't claim you were an INFJ earlier in thread then it is because I didn't have a chance to watch your video, and nothing too peculiar stuck out to me at the time. Although I would say that there was something Fullerene pointed out that gave me some what of a red flag that I held off on expressing.

As for my ability to read your type, I am not going to act like this is a known scientific technique, it isn't at all. It is a technique that is really only known by those, such as myself, who have been developing it, as well as the theory of typology that it follows. I can see the relation to phrenology, but it is not by any means discerning a person's personality based on the physiology of their skull. It is an observation of how the cognitive function physically manifest themselves in very specific and observable ways a person's apparatus. It takes an excessive amount of theoretical knowledge and understanding to do this, as well as the experience of reading very many people before you can begin to do it confidently.
I can't tell you how exactly the cognitive functions cause the eyes, mouth, face, or personal energy to shift in the ways that they do, all I can say is that we have observed this phenomenon to be a consistent factor in a person's behavior.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
When I wrote the above I hadn't read any of the recent posts. What I wrote was about an older post of boradicus. I'm greatly impressed by the difference of opinion on boradicus's type. It shows something about this character typing has to be studied.

How can we judge it? Our characteristics are those we are most comfortable with and only we are the best to judge (only if we know ourselves) that because the persona we present to others is different? How different? Yet Adymus may be reading what we are not aware of. So he is accurate also.

In my case I believe I constantly have to make judgments. Yet I hate doing so. So I have to self-rate as P over J. As for Fe, INTPs have Fe as the 4th trait. I think it's a matter of experience and practice if I use Fe. I have been well known by J(?) others in the past to exhibit lack of that. That is true especially if I'm excited about some theory or other that I fail to explain.

Right... in fact I have to say that (oh and sorry for the Fe question I was in the midst of my earlier misinterpretation at that point) for the purpose of self-determination or any other form of determination, that a negative identification response ought to weigh more heavily than a positive identification response. In other words, if there is something that we completely do not relate to it makes little sense to seek justification for it.

Positive identification responses on the other hand would seem to me to me much more open interpretively than the converse, meaning essentially that if we look at the scientific method we will then begin to understand that theories may be disproven but that theories by definition are never provable or else they would be something else. Does that make any sense whatever??

Thanks :)
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
PS - I might be addicted to the INTP forum -heh
 

Adymus

Banned
Local time
Today 11:52 AM
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
2,180
---
Location
Anaheim, CA
A person who withdrawals to access their Ni would not be escaping the social dynamics of the external world, but the Sensations of the external world (Se). So of course Se is alien to you, if you were an INFJ then it would be your polar function, it would be the most subconscious, the most draining, and you would relate to it the least. Se would be most noticeable when it distracts you and pulls you out of your Ni because of some outside sensation, like a noise or being touched.
I don't actually have to know you to be able to analyze you cognitive functions and personality. They are not hidden, you engage the world with them and they are there for everyone to see, given that they know how to see it.
What exactly are you defining as rambling? Having no direction at all, Or going on tangents? Sidetracking into tangents is not an exclusively P trait, especially if you have a well developed Ti, the question is are you gaining energy by having no direction in your thoughts, or losing it?

I'll admit I am rather pushy with my understanding of typology. but that is really the only thing you will see provoking strong a worldview coming of me. Because I have more confidence with this model than anything else I have, so I am not as confident to go out and "enlighten" people with other viewpoints. You on the other hand seem to be confidently showing your worldview on quite a few different subjects.
About brain quadrants correlating to functions, check out the work of Lenore Thomson.

The only way to use Ni is to have it in your top for conscious function, you cannot possibly use it at all if you are an INTP.
While I am a 'big-picture' person - in other words I tend to see things in terms of analysis of conceptual models and abstractions that hold as either spatial or temporal patterns - I am not convinced at all that this is Ni:
You just described Ni in an almost perfect log line. Spacial and Temporal patterns, this is a crucial factor in knowing the difference between Ne and Ni. Ne happens in the moment, at captures patterns as they come and does not try and see a direction besides what it immediately leaps to. Ne is actually a pattern seeking version of Se, only instead of taking in the details of the "here and now" It takes in the patterns of the here and now. Ne is by no means placed in space or time and can hold no concept of either, neither can Ti.

Ni on the other hand can place and map out it's conceptual models in both time and space. This is actually why you are so good at naturally structuring what you are talking about, because you are articulating your Ni which is already structured spatially, temporally, and sequentially.

I assure you I am not mistaking Ne for Ni, Ne has a very distinct appearance in both physical behavior as well as the opinions one would express, I see neither in you. As for your Fe, an INTP could not possibly use it as much as you can without being drained by it, and then have to drop out of it for Ti, you are not doing this.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
As for my ability to read your type, I am not going to act like this is a known scientific technique, it isn't at all. It is a technique that is really only known by those, such as myself, who have been developing it, as well as the theory of typology that it follows. I can see the relation to phrenology, but it is not by any means discerning a person's personality based on the physiology of their skull. It is an observation of how the cognitive function physically manifest themselves in very specific and observable ways a person's apparatus. It takes an excessive amount of theoretical knowledge and understanding to do this, as well as the experience of reading very many people before you can begin to do it confidently.
I can't tell you how exactly the cognitive functions cause the eyes, mouth, face, or personal energy to shift in the ways that they do, all I can say is that we have observed this phenomenon to be a consistent factor in a person's behavior.
Yes, in other words it is quite subjective. Let me address a few specifics regarding your post however:
1. Who is the 'we' to which you refer? Are 'you-all' practicing clinicians, forensic profilers, research scientists, graduate-level students in the cognitive sciences, or amateur enthusiasts?
2. What is the technique called?
3. Where did it originate?
4. What empirical data do you have to back up your research?
5. What are some links to published results of tests conducted concerning the validity and accuracy of said technique?
6. What is the exact procedure and methodology of said technique?
7. What are the quantifiable mensurations/scales used by the technique and where may they be found?
8. What is the complete list of observable characteristics being measured by said technique?

Additionally, let me point out that I find it quite curious for you to attempt to 'tell' me what I am rather than to discuss such potentialities. Even were I a professional, I would not jump to such conclusions without first obtaining the consent of my client to discuss the ideas themselves - that is just bad form. Also, as relates to psychology, and as was stated earlier by BA-Pi, noone knows themselves better than themselves, and for this reason clinicians always consult the thoughts and feelings of their clients to see if they identify with the ideas of the client.

You obviously did not respect my perspective on the matter, neither did you consult me about your ideas before asserting them both publicly and decisively. In my opinion, such an attitude does not bespeak professionality nor is it a convincing basis for the believablity of any argument put forth on such grounds.

As I said earlier, I am convinced that your 'misread' of my personality type is due to your overemphasis of any Fe I possess, and a gross misinterpretation of my Ti/Ne function being Ni. What you 'see' insomuch as there may be generation of energy by left-brained thinking is the Ne generating ideas and scenarios for Ti to analyze. It is very clear to me - especially after looking it up on the wiki - that this is what occurs. In fact, this is exactly what I was attempting to describe earlier when I was explaining getting unstuck with the left brain - in essence it is the generation of scenarios by Ne and the subsequent analysis that I am speaking of - this is what kicks me into 'free thinking' mode where Ne starts to move with fluidity.
 
Local time
Today 11:52 AM
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
118
---
Location
California
In response to the ENTP wanna-be ENTP

Yah, yah, it took me a while to respond. Interesting and humorous stuff going on here, an ENTP wants to be more like an ENTP.

Here I’d like to quote you: “Additionally, let me point out that I find it quite curious for you to attempt to 'tell' me what I am rather than to discuss such potentialities.” – it’s the best way to learn – real world data and living specimens to get reactions from…. I like learning as fast as possible.

Let’s do this in parts.

Unless you want to get retarded ideas in your head, hesitate with Sociology
I have yet to find anything valuable out of those people…and if you’re wandering around those parts, I know your curiosity cannot be stopped – but, observe it first with a long stick that keeps the stench from frying your brain cells.

In relation to your original post
Either Jungian typology is false in believing that types are life persistent and more of it needs to be questioned, or it has it correct and you won’t be able to change your type. Out of the information that is available and supporting Jungian typology, it also supports that type is life persistent.

In order to understand the introversion and extraversion’s effects in terms of energy, please see this article.

If you are INTP, then I think a good starting point would be reading “The Shy INTP” in Greenlight Wiki’s Tertiary Temptation. I also recommend spending some time browsing entp.org, but beware of the ESTPs who have mistyped themselves.

You might be ENTP
As an ENTP myself, though, I’d like to point out that I think there’s a chance you are already an ENTP.
  • ENTPs are perhaps the most reserved of the extraverts. We don’t get along with everybody, we are still foremost NTP (the types are very closely related), and this means our abstract pursuits and interests aren’t often in alignment with most people. Also, our extraverted operation is tertiary, and it is extraverted perception that leads us, observing depth, learning new things, taking in more abstract information with which we use our introverted operation (Ti) to systematically categorize, find variables and then our extraverted intuition comes into play further by interconnecting relationships between these models. What if you’re an ENTP who just doesn’t get along with many people (common), and isn’t typically extroverted (with the ‘o’, outgoing, and all that; not direction of psyche).
  • You wanted to involve more people, brainstorm ideas and so on. You figured that other people could benefit from this exercise, things can be learned, and more can be done by collaboration – you created a wiki, and soliciting for participation in the project. This is not uncharacteristic of common ENTP behavior.
  • In your video you mention introversion in relation to violation of personal space. I can assure you that I take my personal space incredibly seriously, and this is a trait commonly strong in NTs who value their autonomy as a part of their self-respect. It then sent you on lines of thought of possibilities and what you clean learn from the situation.
  • You get so excited when you get to share these possibilities and how they relate – your optimistic about this journey, and you seem fine with holding a number of possibilities at the same time.
  • You experience your own talking as an audience member, your natural about it – which is commonly said as “thinking out-loud” but your style is ENTP-ish. I’d expect this out of an INTP after they became very comfortable with the audience they were talking to, and it’d be all thought out, and the collaboration would probably be less emphasized – they tend to do less info hunting, but definitely do it and need to do it as well.
  • The INTP does enjoy stability, so does the ENTP – I mean it’s nice, but we cause chaos – and then stabilizing it, but INTPs keep it stable…that chaos in your mornings, you sure that’s not how you get lost in so many ideas, get hooked on a project and fly with it, and then drop it and move onto another, and it’s always a tornado? How many simultaneous projects you got, anyway? I always have quite a few.
  • Your desire to improve your external relationships, to stabilize things, that you created ‘subsystems’ to supplement yourself and that you learned this lets you optimize your creative time and lets them not pile up, and gives you a clarity that gives you whole new vision – yah, dude – so I use Personal Brain, MindMaps – I’ve studied PRINCE2, Agile, GTD, and synthesized the best ideas from them all… a girlfriend used to joke that I was becoming a machine but it’s impossible because I’m too spontaneous…but it worked out because none of my things have due dates, things slide forward – I just need clarity and I can roll with it. Don’t know of any INTPs that do as much of this – see, they tend to be quite good at having a really big interest and going further and further with it – whereas we ENTPs tend to juggle many ideas and far easier launch into other possibilities from roads we’re on – ending up different places altogether.
  • Like your optimism, the joy you get out of sharing interesting information like about the tigers, and the awesome and the automatic Fe rubbing of other people – it’s so much like an ENTP; I dig it too.
  • How you really try and have people understand your perspective even when they are being non-productive (the inflammatory posts at the start) – that level of going out of your way to reach mutual understanding is far more ENTP-like than INTP-like. You’re not vested enough in this community yet for the inferior Fe of an INTP to get rattled enough to make such an effort.
  • Your intimidation of being social, or not knowing how to deal with stupid people or other things – that’s not type related – so you could still be ENTP…. If you it intimidates you because you will run out of energy, it’s too distracting from your core projects, you don’t have much a drive to interact but feel it’d be healthy (not that you feel anxious about it, but not driven to is a different matter, that is introverted like) – then maybe INTP.
  • I’m all big into self-improvement too and perpetual self-growth and spout about it all the time, and make lots of efforts do it in many ways…Lenore Thompson and Keirsey both point out how ENTPs like to model this kind of stuff – and like everything, improve it.
  • Notice how your posts are long and you make whole wikis? I do that too, maybe quite a bit more though – I let my Ne roam free. We should get together and do a “who has more to add for longer” competition. Knowing that it'd be about life-hacking and cognitive stuff, do you excited by the idea of that too?
  • You probably scored eight times INTP on those online tests and I plan to post something soon in entp.org about how ridiculous those tests are and pitfalls; one of the big ones is on E and I and since you like learning: it is about the direction of the psyche more than anything and you should start here with the Jungian compass.
  • Your description of the being young, reading lots of book (extraverted perception), asking lots of questions (extraverted perception), and letting yourself go and pondering over the meaning of all this (Ne+Ti), sounds very ENTP-like; more so than INTP-like. You also make a bunch of little projects?
  • Optimize the best type of groceries: so here’s what I got recently, maybe we can collaborate – if I eat breakfast bars put together with honey, supplements and juice smoothie in the morning I can go without milk which goes bad faster and requires more maintenance and I can order Tasty Bites from Amazon (got prime account already), and it’s about $5 a bag, and it takes 5 minutes to make, and in combinations with rice, and I’ve experimented with bread and such – and am now toying with ways of having yet more diversity with least complexity – well it’s all going well… I like the improvements so far; this is certainly not the first time I’ve optimized food, it’s just the latest time I got around back to that one – I optimize as much as I can.
  • Unlike the INTP with the inferior Fe, the ENTP is more aware of social dynamics but their Fe is subverted by the Ne+Ti, like when you are aware of how irrationality and subversion work together and how you are just automatically aware of these social models at play and what the impositions are as they are happening (Ti works automatically and smoothly as current perceptions move forward; the abstract foreseeing perceptions of extraverted intuition).
  • Your emphasis on gathering and collecting information over pondering and processing the information you already have further suggests to me Ne is dominant.
  • Your sudden break from the original argument to share interesting information about Ocham’s Razor also suggests Ne is dominant.
  • Interesting how you like to switch directions as new information becomes available, and not within the scope of one pursuit but in this multi-threaded way as pursuits relate to one another and make new things possible – in my discussions with another ENTP on entp.org, we were laughing at how we both change jobs every two years. It’s hilarious, but hey, there’s new things to learn out there.
  • Oh, this was the biggest one: “I am a programmer…to help me understand the world around me.” As a systems architect philosopher artist-minded rambler, I find even my INTJ mathematician friends kind of laugh when I say code is like dancing and like math is raw with the universe – and how everything is a system and by learning the mechanisms of systems we learn things about everything – I compared it somehow to dancing but I forget that metaphor now. I got into programming the fourth grade, and I think it’s why I have such a well-developed introverted thinking function, and like you, I like to apply it to everything else, be it even the arts (more so film for me). But what do you think Adymus? Doesn’t comprehending things as a way of revealing more about the depths of one’s experience and the interrelationships of the world when we face our psyche outward (the world around us) seem like Ti is working for Ne instead of the other way around? That’s what I’m seeing.
  • I don’t say “I have to go to class or something….” – I shortcuted it a long time back, part of that optimize everything – now I just say “I go do the stuffs”. Free flow, river flow, extraverted intuitives just go (catch the Morrison reference?).
  • You analyze people like their algorithms – your comments about Mango, that’s NTP in general but the ENTP is more interested in these outer world things like civilizations, societies, people dynamics, what’s going on in the contexts they find themselves in, etc.
  • “I have a different reaction to you than I do with other INTPs.” Haha, that’s what people said to me when I first got into type and thought I was INTP. Funny stuff.
  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.
  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.

LOL@INFJ
  • He’s definitely NTP. Attitude (extraversion vs introversion preference) is the smallest difference between types, but the dude is an NTP…
  • His init reaction to the negative attitudes of some of this forum’s members was not characteristic of a Fe dom/aux – it was characteristic of an NTP – he didn’t really even take it personally as much as think he messed up and wanted clarity on how the system/model works. It even goes into the ideas of what constitutes the category of a forum (and determining and developing internal frameworks and categorization systems to makes sense of the world is very much a Ti description), and it wasn’t anything about the interpersonal connotations in an attitudes or Fe kind of way.
  • Adymus: His face showed enthusiasm – like an excited person – and we already knew he was excited – people who aren’t Fe dom/aux get excited too – this is not a type trait.
  • Adymus: Articulation skills? I think you mean the ‘flow’ and so on – ENTPs got that too, and I’m sure you know that, and we aren’t Fe dom/aux.
  • Adymus: Linear thought process: He knows what he’s exploring and what his goal is...and worldview? I must’ve missed that (beyond the models we’re all assuming in this context, typology and such)
  • I have no idea what drifting into Ni looks like, because as far as I can tell the INJs just get introverted…and then when they share ideas afterwards you can perhaps suspect Ni based on how they perceived information and then what they processed.
  • Adymus: What was left-brain? You should come find me and chat with me, I’m curious – you know where to find me. The “here’s the goal and let’s see what we find” approach is not what I associate with left-brain – it tends to either on E front (Te/Fe) get organized and cause effect models in Te’s case of this leads to that leads to that, or social relationship organization – and when introverted (Ni/Si) doesn’t share as much structuring – and INFJ is Ni+Fe.
  • Robbaz: the content of your post suggests you agree he is not INTP (not enough introversion, too expressive)…which I won’t take as INFJ per se.
  • The “I have pictures of the results” and arguing his way out of things using impersonal logic (which does relate to the topic at hand and isn’t that rationalization of the personal – we NTPs can see which one it is nearly automatically..I trust my perception here) – that’s Ne+Fe defending itself from Ti, I think – but INTP – ok, I’m willing to hear it out – but INFJ? Nah.
  • Adymus, when you say “It is funny that you consider what you are doing as "Rambling", that is the most structured rambling I have ever seen in my life, which only furthers my point. “ – Ne+Ti rambling makes sense, it just moves fast – and there’s threads, but when we edit or write it out – like here, we can just jump between different parts of what we’re writing and thus it comes out organized looking ?. That he struggles to not ramble suggests to me he does actively keep his Ne in check – sometimes, like often casually with some of you, I just let it go… but as some of you have learned with interactions with me, that can be a bit much and it seems people appreciate me finding the conclusion and then just sharing that….E and I relations….
  • Ni asks itself “What does this mean? Not the parts, but beyond the parts; if I look at this from enough sides and perspectives I’ll gain clarity on it and know it beyond the image.” Ne asks “What else is out there? Not people and things, but those too and I know what my eyes see, what is beyond what I see? How does this unfold, and how does this inter-relate and where does this go and what else is possible and how else can the story be told?” What I see here is Ne, and not Ni.

What is wrong with you people?
  • I got linked this thread when it was first posted and I ranted on how ridiculous it was that someone shows up, puts forth effort on understanding themselves and typology, clearly is interested in learning more and being open-minded, wants to engage a forum oriented around a type about something important to that type and the response had absolutely nothing contributory or valuable at all – just negative bull – and I’m glad Anthile and Adymus commented on the silly “Adamite” religion going on of “wait till Adymus sees this” – how about try this instead – take in information from anyone putting forth genuine effort and learning this stuff for yourself. I’ve been asked before if I think Adymus has things right and I said then and say again here: it doesn’t even matter to me when he’s right or wrong because I get excited someone else is genuinely interested in figuring it all out – and success improves over time. He shares his ideas as he has them at this time, and keep working on your own, and thanks Adymus for sharing.

In regards to Lyra’s posts
  • I realized in reading “thanks to Lyra,…” that Lyra posted here too. No comment, that’s the only user I have on my ignore list, so whatever that was – I’m sure it was useless anyway…

P.S. I ended up buying “The Society of Mind” by Marvin Minsky.
P.S.S. the Title is for the lulz.
P.S.S.S. This is where optimism leads: success! Congratulations, you’re ENTP. Or so it seems from over here. Now harness yourself (quick tip: Ti is the way), and you’ll be quite an awesome master of the force indeed.
 

Lyra

Genesis Engineering Speciation
Local time
Today 7:52 PM
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
992
---
In regards to Lyra’s posts
  • I realized in reading “thanks to Lyra,…” that Lyra posted here too. No comment, that’s the only user I have on my ignore list, so whatever that was – I’m sure it was useless anyway…
Honestly, what the fuck? Why did he even write this if he's got me on ignore and didn't know what I wrote on the first page? These have to be the most pointless and uninformed 4 lines of text I've ever read. Does he really think that his words are so valuable that he has to post his inane comments on every single aspect of the thread? I'd castrate him if I knew who he was; there's no way I could willingly allow such an odorous, pompous windbag to force future generations to suffer the expression of whatever revolting genetic makeup he'd pass on.

Some things just need to be eradicated, for the greater good and the future of humanity.
 

Agent Intellect

Absurd Anti-hero.
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
4,113
---
Location
Michigan
As far as brain regions corresponding to different functions, there have been studies done on this:

There were eight regions correlated with introversion and seven correlated with extraversion. Regions showing a relationship with introversion had a larger volume than did regions associated with extraversion (10.7 cc versus 4 cc). In line with predictions, introversion was correlated with blood flow in the lateral extent of the frontal cortex, Broca's area, the insular cortex, the right temporal cortex, and the anterior nucleus of the thalamus. Further, several cortical regions were found to be correlated with extraversion. These regions included the anterior cingulate gyrus, right insular cortex, bilateral temporal lobes, and pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus. Figure 1 and figure 2 depict regions correlated with introversion and extraversion, respectively.

[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14t1.jpeg[/BIMG]

[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14f1.jpeg[/BIMG]

[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14f2.jpeg[/BIMG]

(Source)



From the official MBTI website:

Our data strongly support the basic tenets of
Eysenck’s (1967) biological theory of personality
concerning arousal and suggest that, at a minimum, the
Extraversion–Introversion scale of the MBTI tool is
measuring these constructs at least as well as Eysenck’s
own EPI index (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1964). Unlike
much of the past research, which only examined
changes in alpha bandwidth activity (see Gale &
Edwards, 1986), we found differences in the beta 2 and
beta 3 bandwidths as well. Specifically, we obtained the
EEG differences proposed by Eysenck. Extraverts
produced greater mean alpha bandwidth amplitude,
whereas Introverts produced more amplitude in the
higher frequency beta bandwidths.

If past researchers based the discrimination of
Extraverts and Introverts on data that primarily
included beta 1 activity (e.g., Gale et al., 1969; Gale et
al., 1971), it might explain why equivocal results were
obtained. Our data show that the beta 1 bandwidth
(13–25 Hz) is a mixture of both greater mean amplitude
for Introverts at one frontal site and for Extraverts at
another. As mentioned above, the beta 2 and beta 3
bandwidth data were more definitive. Introverts
generated more activity in the beta 2 and beta 3 bandwidths
than Extraverts at all significant recording sites.

It is difficult to compare the differences between
Extraverts and Introverts in Gale et al. (1969) and the
present study for a number of reasons: First, their data
are problematic because they used a bipolar reference
in the occipital area only, with the inherent problems
associated with this type of reference. Second, the bandwidths
they used were not the same as the ones we
used; their filters included both high alpha and low beta
in one bandwidth (11.5–14.5 Hz), and they used only
one other beta bandwidth (14.5–20 Hz). The latter is
similar to our beta 1 bandwidth and includes the
concomitant problems with using that bandwidth.

In contrast to Rösler (1975), we did not find
significant differences between Extraverts and Introverts
in either the delta or the theta bandwidths. In Rosler’s
study, the delta and theta bandwidths just barely
reached statistical significance and only occurred in a
triple interaction of task, frequency, and Extraversion,
and specifically appeared only when the subjects
were in a stressful task situation (e.g., calculation under
pressure). Their tasks did not correspond to our
eyes-open baseline condition, which was not as stressinducing.

The other purpose of this study was to explore the
possibility that each of the other MBTI dichotomies
may have unique EEG distribution patterns across
cortical recording sites. When participants were divided
according to the S–N dichotomy, analysis of the EEG
bandwidth data showed that Sensing types displayed
significantly more mean amplitude at every cortical site
in the theta bandwidth than Intuitive types. No other
personality dichotomy showed such strong differences
in the theta bandwidth than Intuitive types. No other
personality dichotomy showed such strong differences
in the theta bandwidth, and in no other bandwidth was
the number of significant recording sites as pervasive.
Because there was little activity in the relatively sparse
experimental room, participants having a preference for
Sensing apparently were able to quiet their minds, as
indexed by the high levels of theta activity. In the case
of the beta 1 bandwidth, this pattern was reversed, so
that Intuitive types had greater mean amplitude than
Sensing types. This implies that Intuitive types were
doing more internal processing than Sensing types in
the relatively quiet experimental room.

The data for the Thinking–Feeling dichotomy
indicated that Feeling types produced greater mean
amplitude in theta through beta 3 bandwidths
compared to Thinking types. This pattern was most
pronounced for the bandwidths from alpha through
beta 3 amplitude data.

Finally, when the Judging–Perceiving dichotomy
was considered, Judging types generated greater mean
amplitude in the alpha bandwidth through beta 3 bandwidths
than Perceiving types. Future research is needed
to determine if the Thinking–Feeling and Judging–
Perceiving dichotomies’ EEG patterns are truly unique.

In conclusion, our data provide additional strong
evidence for Eysenck’s (1967) basic notions concerning
Extraversion and Introversion and suggest that the
Extraversion–Introversion scale of the MBTI instrument
may be a more reliable measure of this dichotomy
than the widely used EPI. Although our study of
the remaining MBTI factors was descriptive and
exploratory, the results suggest that differential EEG
frequency patterns are related to personality variables
other than Extraversion–Introversion, particularly to
the Sensing–Intuition dichotomy, and therefore further
study is warranted

(Source)


Some more reading from the Journal of Psychological type:

Politics and Type.
Argumentativeness and Type.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
As far as brain regions corresponding to different functions, there have been studies done on this:



[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14t1.jpeg[/BIMG]

[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14f1.jpeg[/BIMG]

[BIMG]http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/content/vol156/issue2/images/large/aj14f2.jpeg[/BIMG]

(Source)

From the official MBTI website:

Our data strongly support the basic tenets of
Eysenck’s (1967) biological theory of personality
concerning arousal and suggest that, at a minimum, the
Extraversion–Introversion scale of the MBTI tool is
measuring these constructs at least as well as Eysenck’s
own EPI index (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1964). Unlike
much of the past research, which only examined
changes in alpha bandwidth activity (see Gale &
Edwards, 1986), we found differences in the beta 2 and
beta 3 bandwidths as well. Specifically, we obtained the
EEG differences proposed by Eysenck. Extraverts
produced greater mean alpha bandwidth amplitude,
whereas Introverts produced more amplitude in the
higher frequency beta bandwidths.

If past researchers based the discrimination of
Extraverts and Introverts on data that primarily
included beta 1 activity (e.g., Gale et al., 1969; Gale et
al., 1971), it might explain why equivocal results were
obtained. Our data show that the beta 1 bandwidth
(13–25 Hz) is a mixture of both greater mean amplitude
for Introverts at one frontal site and for Extraverts at
another. As mentioned above, the beta 2 and beta 3
bandwidth data were more definitive. Introverts
generated more activity in the beta 2 and beta 3 bandwidths
than Extraverts at all significant recording sites.

It is difficult to compare the differences between
Extraverts and Introverts in Gale et al. (1969) and the
present study for a number of reasons: First, their data
are problematic because they used a bipolar reference
in the occipital area only, with the inherent problems
associated with this type of reference. Second, the bandwidths
they used were not the same as the ones we
used; their filters included both high alpha and low beta
in one bandwidth (11.5–14.5 Hz), and they used only
one other beta bandwidth (14.5–20 Hz). The latter is
similar to our beta 1 bandwidth and includes the
concomitant problems with using that bandwidth.

In contrast to Rösler (1975), we did not find
significant differences between Extraverts and Introverts
in either the delta or the theta bandwidths. In Rosler’s
study, the delta and theta bandwidths just barely
reached statistical significance and only occurred in a
triple interaction of task, frequency, and Extraversion,
and specifically appeared only when the subjects
were in a stressful task situation (e.g., calculation under
pressure). Their tasks did not correspond to our
eyes-open baseline condition, which was not as stressinducing.

The other purpose of this study was to explore the
possibility that each of the other MBTI dichotomies
may have unique EEG distribution patterns across
cortical recording sites. When participants were divided
according to the S–N dichotomy, analysis of the EEG
bandwidth data showed that Sensing types displayed
significantly more mean amplitude at every cortical site
in the theta bandwidth than Intuitive types. No other
personality dichotomy showed such strong differences
in the theta bandwidth than Intuitive types. No other
personality dichotomy showed such strong differences
in the theta bandwidth, and in no other bandwidth was
the number of significant recording sites as pervasive.
Because there was little activity in the relatively sparse
experimental room, participants having a preference for
Sensing apparently were able to quiet their minds, as
indexed by the high levels of theta activity. In the case
of the beta 1 bandwidth, this pattern was reversed, so
that Intuitive types had greater mean amplitude than
Sensing types. This implies that Intuitive types were
doing more internal processing than Sensing types in
the relatively quiet experimental room.

The data for the Thinking–Feeling dichotomy
indicated that Feeling types produced greater mean
amplitude in theta through beta 3 bandwidths
compared to Thinking types. This pattern was most
pronounced for the bandwidths from alpha through
beta 3 amplitude data.

Finally, when the Judging–Perceiving dichotomy
was considered, Judging types generated greater mean
amplitude in the alpha bandwidth through beta 3 bandwidths
than Perceiving types. Future research is needed
to determine if the Thinking–Feeling and Judging–
Perceiving dichotomies’ EEG patterns are truly unique.

In conclusion, our data provide additional strong
evidence for Eysenck’s (1967) basic notions concerning
Extraversion and Introversion and suggest that the
Extraversion–Introversion scale of the MBTI instrument
may be a more reliable measure of this dichotomy
than the widely used EPI. Although our study of
the remaining MBTI factors was descriptive and
exploratory, the results suggest that differential EEG
frequency patterns are related to personality variables
other than Extraversion–Introversion, particularly to
the Sensing–Intuition dichotomy, and therefore further
study is warranted

(Source)


Some more reading from the Journal of Psychological type:

Politics and Type.
Argumentativeness and Type.




So when is the dissection planned??? Ack !

Nevertheless thanks very much for sharing your information even if I am shaken to my core by the stark figures without ancillary explanation! :rolleyes:

So I take it from my fast read of this post that the data supplied are from a study conducted for the purpose of evaluating the degree of correlation between the MBTI 'instrument' and the EPI 'instrument' (whatever that is - am I really that lazy...? lol - well being that my google search proved fruitless..) with physical supporting data (i.e. EEG patterns, blood flow, etc).

However, must I point out (the theorist in me automatically 'smelling' a tautological rationalization of the hypothesis) that to some extent increases in blood flow and chemical-electrical activity may be induced just as easily by cognitive preference as by innate biology? Could socialization of a child play just as strong a factor - if not a stronger factor - than innate brain makeup and chemistry? Even should such biological factors exist, how likely is it that they are sufficiently the decisive factor contributing to MBTI typologies?

Help Help!! before the rampant INFJ Doctors of Pharmacy take over the world!! ;) - jk - ok so I knew ONE rampant INFJ pharmacist or was she an ISFJ? Whatever she was it was terrifying! =) (and that probably had little to do with here MBTI!)
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Lyra - oh no - what is this sub-titulary reference to being banned??? Please no self-banning =) - and more seriously, I really like both of you guys (meaning Spiral and Lyra) so please do not be offended by my non-partisanism! Lyra, you will always be endeared to me by your courageous championing of my posts and your defense of a new idea (well I say new - but perhaps only new in the sense in which it occurred to me) to be explored non-judgmentally, which principle I hold quite dear. In fact do not take my mere paucity of words as indicative of the level of appreciation I feel for your posts and contributions on my behalf - 'dazzled' is perhaps more descriptive of my reaction. Please forgive my lack of response as I am not quite sure how to articulate my thoughts - yet... Certainly there is a great depth of emotion, awareness and knowledge - yet I sense a depth of passion and intellect just frightening to approach - but tempered with such compassion and sympathy and courage - and these latter are the most important. By comparison I feel like a daft old (very) brother or something... In any case I am quite grateful to be accepted into a company of peers from all walks and ages of life ! Thank You =):cool:
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
Re: In response to the ENTP wanna-be ENTP

SpiralHacker. Couldn't help but notice some of your post. I hope I get time to read more of it. You are an ENTP? Always glad to meet an ENTP. They are among my favorites as they compensate for my introversion. I say that advisedly as I don't like to type people, not that I'm against that, but just that I don't know how to do it. The only one I type is myself (INTP) as I seek to find myself and need a home, not that I can be sure that's even accurate, but what else?

One thing I'm fond of SpiralHacker is all kinds of people -- having them on the forum, that is. We need more of them. I did notice in amazement you had special things to say about Lyra. Personally I think she is the best. Why? Because I have her firmly typed as an XXXX. We need more of these types. She is much woman and you, as an ENTP would do well to take advantage of her creative presence. Perhaps you are so mired in your extroversion you need to relate to all people in all ways. That I would not advise. You need to see what she has to say and to appreciate it. Ignore? Doesn't that have something to do with the ignorant? With all those links you post you are anything but ignorant.

Best wishes to you but one request. You are so extroverted you don't care who is reading you. I can't tell to whom your message is directed and who you are quoting. Who?

Yah, yah, it took me a while to respond. Interesting and humorous stuff going on here, an ENTP wants to be more like an ENTP.

Here I’d like to quote you: “Additionally, let me point out that I find it quite curious for you to attempt to 'tell' me what I am rather than to discuss such potentialities.” – it’s the best way to learn – real world data and living specimens to get reactions from…. I like learning as fast as possible.

Let’s do this in parts.

Unless you want to get retarded ideas in your head, hesitate with Sociology
I have yet to find anything valuable out of those people…and if you’re wandering around those parts, I know your curiosity cannot be stopped – but, observe it first with a long stick that keeps the stench from frying your brain cells.

In relation to your original post
Either Jungian typology is false in believing that types are life persistent and more of it needs to be questioned, or it has it correct and you won’t be able to change your type. Out of the information that is available and supporting Jungian typology, it also supports that type is life persistent.

In order to understand the introversion and extraversion’s effects in terms of energy, please see this article.

If you are INTP, then I think a good starting point would be reading “The Shy INTP” in Greenlight Wiki’s Tertiary Temptation. I also recommend spending some time browsing entp.org, but beware of the ESTPs who have mistyped themselves.

You might be ENTP
As an ENTP myself, though, I’d like to point out that I think there’s a chance you are already an ENTP.
  • ENTPs are perhaps the most reserved of the extraverts. We don’t get along with everybody, we are still foremost NTP (the types are very closely related), and this means our abstract pursuits and interests aren’t often in alignment with most people. Also, our extraverted operation is tertiary, and it is extraverted perception that leads us, observing depth, learning new things, taking in more abstract information with which we use our introverted operation (Ti) to systematically categorize, find variables and then our extraverted intuition comes into play further by interconnecting relationships between these models. What if you’re an ENTP who just doesn’t get along with many people (common), and isn’t typically extroverted (with the ‘o’, outgoing, and all that; not direction of psyche).
  • You wanted to involve more people, brainstorm ideas and so on. You figured that other people could benefit from this exercise, things can be learned, and more can be done by collaboration – you created a wiki, and soliciting for participation in the project. This is not uncharacteristic of common ENTP behavior.
  • In your video you mention introversion in relation to violation of personal space. I can assure you that I take my personal space incredibly seriously, and this is a trait commonly strong in NTs who value their autonomy as a part of their self-respect. It then sent you on lines of thought of possibilities and what you clean learn from the situation.
  • You get so excited when you get to share these possibilities and how they relate – your optimistic about this journey, and you seem fine with holding a number of possibilities at the same time.
  • You experience your own talking as an audience member, your natural about it – which is commonly said as “thinking out-loud” but your style is ENTP-ish. I’d expect this out of an INTP after they became very comfortable with the audience they were talking to, and it’d be all thought out, and the collaboration would probably be less emphasized – they tend to do less info hunting, but definitely do it and need to do it as well.
  • The INTP does enjoy stability, so does the ENTP – I mean it’s nice, but we cause chaos – and then stabilizing it, but INTPs keep it stable…that chaos in your mornings, you sure that’s not how you get lost in so many ideas, get hooked on a project and fly with it, and then drop it and move onto another, and it’s always a tornado? How many simultaneous projects you got, anyway? I always have quite a few.
  • Your desire to improve your external relationships, to stabilize things, that you created ‘subsystems’ to supplement yourself and that you learned this lets you optimize your creative time and lets them not pile up, and gives you a clarity that gives you whole new vision – yah, dude – so I use Personal Brain, MindMaps – I’ve studied PRINCE2, Agile, GTD, and synthesized the best ideas from them all… a girlfriend used to joke that I was becoming a machine but it’s impossible because I’m too spontaneous…but it worked out because none of my things have due dates, things slide forward – I just need clarity and I can roll with it. Don’t know of any INTPs that do as much of this – see, they tend to be quite good at having a really big interest and going further and further with it – whereas we ENTPs tend to juggle many ideas and far easier launch into other possibilities from roads we’re on – ending up different places altogether.
  • Like your optimism, the joy you get out of sharing interesting information like about the tigers, and the awesome and the automatic Fe rubbing of other people – it’s so much like an ENTP; I dig it too.
  • How you really try and have people understand your perspective even when they are being non-productive (the inflammatory posts at the start) – that level of going out of your way to reach mutual understanding is far more ENTP-like than INTP-like. You’re not vested enough in this community yet for the inferior Fe of an INTP to get rattled enough to make such an effort.
  • Your intimidation of being social, or not knowing how to deal with stupid people or other things – that’s not type related – so you could still be ENTP…. If you it intimidates you because you will run out of energy, it’s too distracting from your core projects, you don’t have much a drive to interact but feel it’d be healthy (not that you feel anxious about it, but not driven to is a different matter, that is introverted like) – then maybe INTP.
  • I’m all big into self-improvement too and perpetual self-growth and spout about it all the time, and make lots of efforts do it in many ways…Lenore Thompson and Keirsey both point out how ENTPs like to model this kind of stuff – and like everything, improve it.
  • Notice how your posts are long and you make whole wikis? I do that too, maybe quite a bit more though – I let my Ne roam free. We should get together and do a “who has more to add for longer” competition. Knowing that it'd be about life-hacking and cognitive stuff, do you excited by the idea of that too?
  • You probably scored eight times INTP on those online tests and I plan to post something soon in entp.org about how ridiculous those tests are and pitfalls; one of the big ones is on E and I and since you like learning: it is about the direction of the psyche more than anything and you should start here with the Jungian compass.
  • Your description of the being young, reading lots of book (extraverted perception), asking lots of questions (extraverted perception), and letting yourself go and pondering over the meaning of all this (Ne+Ti), sounds very ENTP-like; more so than INTP-like. You also make a bunch of little projects?
  • Optimize the best type of groceries: so here’s what I got recently, maybe we can collaborate – if I eat breakfast bars put together with honey, supplements and juice smoothie in the morning I can go without milk which goes bad faster and requires more maintenance and I can order Tasty Bites from Amazon (got prime account already), and it’s about $5 a bag, and it takes 5 minutes to make, and in combinations with rice, and I’ve experimented with bread and such – and am now toying with ways of having yet more diversity with least complexity – well it’s all going well… I like the improvements so far; this is certainly not the first time I’ve optimized food, it’s just the latest time I got around back to that one – I optimize as much as I can.
  • Unlike the INTP with the inferior Fe, the ENTP is more aware of social dynamics but their Fe is subverted by the Ne+Ti, like when you are aware of how irrationality and subversion work together and how you are just automatically aware of these social models at play and what the impositions are as they are happening (Ti works automatically and smoothly as current perceptions move forward; the abstract foreseeing perceptions of extraverted intuition).
  • Your emphasis on gathering and collecting information over pondering and processing the information you already have further suggests to me Ne is dominant.
  • Your sudden break from the original argument to share interesting information about Ocham’s Razor also suggests Ne is dominant.
  • Interesting how you like to switch directions as new information becomes available, and not within the scope of one pursuit but in this multi-threaded way as pursuits relate to one another and make new things possible – in my discussions with another ENTP on entp.org, we were laughing at how we both change jobs every two years. It’s hilarious, but hey, there’s new things to learn out there.
  • Oh, this was the biggest one: “I am a programmer…to help me understand the world around me.” As a systems architect philosopher artist-minded rambler, I find even my INTJ mathematician friends kind of laugh when I say code is like dancing and like math is raw with the universe – and how everything is a system and by learning the mechanisms of systems we learn things about everything – I compared it somehow to dancing but I forget that metaphor now. I got into programming the fourth grade, and I think it’s why I have such a well-developed introverted thinking function, and like you, I like to apply it to everything else, be it even the arts (more so film for me). But what do you think Adymus? Doesn’t comprehending things as a way of revealing more about the depths of one’s experience and the interrelationships of the world when we face our psyche outward (the world around us) seem like Ti is working for Ne instead of the other way around? That’s what I’m seeing.
  • I don’t say “I have to go to class or something….” – I shortcuted it a long time back, part of that optimize everything – now I just say “I go do the stuffs”. Free flow, river flow, extraverted intuitives just go (catch the Morrison reference?).
  • You analyze people like their algorithms – your comments about Mango, that’s NTP in general but the ENTP is more interested in these outer world things like civilizations, societies, people dynamics, what’s going on in the contexts they find themselves in, etc.
  • “I have a different reaction to you than I do with other INTPs.” Haha, that’s what people said to me when I first got into type and thought I was INTP. Funny stuff.
  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.
  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.

LOL@INFJ
  • He’s definitely NTP. Attitude (extraversion vs introversion preference) is the smallest difference between types, but the dude is an NTP…
  • His init reaction to the negative attitudes of some of this forum’s members was not characteristic of a Fe dom/aux – it was characteristic of an NTP – he didn’t really even take it personally as much as think he messed up and wanted clarity on how the system/model works. It even goes into the ideas of what constitutes the category of a forum (and determining and developing internal frameworks and categorization systems to makes sense of the world is very much a Ti description), and it wasn’t anything about the interpersonal connotations in an attitudes or Fe kind of way.
  • Adymus: His face showed enthusiasm – like an excited person – and we already knew he was excited – people who aren’t Fe dom/aux get excited too – this is not a type trait.
  • Adymus: Articulation skills? I think you mean the ‘flow’ and so on – ENTPs got that too, and I’m sure you know that, and we aren’t Fe dom/aux.
  • Adymus: Linear thought process: He knows what he’s exploring and what his goal is...and worldview? I must’ve missed that (beyond the models we’re all assuming in this context, typology and such)
  • I have no idea what drifting into Ni looks like, because as far as I can tell the INJs just get introverted…and then when they share ideas afterwards you can perhaps suspect Ni based on how they perceived information and then what they processed.
  • Adymus: What was left-brain? You should come find me and chat with me, I’m curious – you know where to find me. The “here’s the goal and let’s see what we find” approach is not what I associate with left-brain – it tends to either on E front (Te/Fe) get organized and cause effect models in Te’s case of this leads to that leads to that, or social relationship organization – and when introverted (Ni/Si) doesn’t share as much structuring – and INFJ is Ni+Fe.
  • Robbaz: the content of your post suggests you agree he is not INTP (not enough introversion, too expressive)…which I won’t take as INFJ per se.
  • The “I have pictures of the results” and arguing his way out of things using impersonal logic (which does relate to the topic at hand and isn’t that rationalization of the personal – we NTPs can see which one it is nearly automatically..I trust my perception here) – that’s Ne+Fe defending itself from Ti, I think – but INTP – ok, I’m willing to hear it out – but INFJ? Nah.
  • Adymus, when you say “It is funny that you consider what you are doing as "Rambling", that is the most structured rambling I have ever seen in my life, which only furthers my point. “ – Ne+Ti rambling makes sense, it just moves fast – and there’s threads, but when we edit or write it out – like here, we can just jump between different parts of what we’re writing and thus it comes out organized looking ?. That he struggles to not ramble suggests to me he does actively keep his Ne in check – sometimes, like often casually with some of you, I just let it go… but as some of you have learned with interactions with me, that can be a bit much and it seems people appreciate me finding the conclusion and then just sharing that….E and I relations….
  • Ni asks itself “What does this mean? Not the parts, but beyond the parts; if I look at this from enough sides and perspectives I’ll gain clarity on it and know it beyond the image.” Ne asks “What else is out there? Not people and things, but those too and I know what my eyes see, what is beyond what I see? How does this unfold, and how does this inter-relate and where does this go and what else is possible and how else can the story be told?” What I see here is Ne, and not Ni.

What is wrong with you people?
  • I got linked this thread when it was first posted and I ranted on how ridiculous it was that someone shows up, puts forth effort on understanding themselves and typology, clearly is interested in learning more and being open-minded, wants to engage a forum oriented around a type about something important to that type and the response had absolutely nothing contributory or valuable at all – just negative bull – and I’m glad Anthile and Adymus commented on the silly “Adamite” religion going on of “wait till Adymus sees this” – how about try this instead – take in information from anyone putting forth genuine effort and learning this stuff for yourself. I’ve been asked before if I think Adymus has things right and I said then and say again here: it doesn’t even matter to me when he’s right or wrong because I get excited someone else is genuinely interested in figuring it all out – and success improves over time. He shares his ideas as he has them at this time, and keep working on your own, and thanks Adymus for sharing.

In regards to Lyra’s posts
  • I realized in reading “thanks to Lyra,…” that Lyra posted here too. No comment, that’s the only user I have on my ignore list, so whatever that was – I’m sure it was useless anyway…

P.S. I ended up buying “The Society of Mind” by Marvin Minsky.
P.S.S. the Title is for the lulz.
P.S.S.S. This is where optimism leads: success! Congratulations, you’re ENTP. Or so it seems from over here. Now harness yourself (quick tip: Ti is the way), and you’ll be quite an awesome master of the force indeed.
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
It is one thing to be interested in expanding one's abilities and another to define the place where one wants to go. People do not work like that for we are organisms. We grow but we do not grow into .... something. Nudging ourselves in a direction is fine. But I'll bet that's a bit awkward if one makes progress along that road and fails to consult where one has been.

Some of us seek labels or categories; others resist being put in a box. Why is that? Those are polar opposites.
 

Agent Intellect

Absurd Anti-hero.
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
4,113
---
Location
Michigan
So when is the dissection planned??? Ack !

Nevertheless thanks very much for sharing your information even if I am shaken to my core by the stark figures without ancillary explanation! :rolleyes:

I posted the sources beneath the figures, which were more to 'wet the whistle' for the links; but, sadly, I have found that most of the links I post go unread, which generally results in me having to explain them (which, admittedly, I don't always hate doing).

So I take it from my fast read of this post that the data supplied are from a study conducted for the purpose of evaluating the degree of correlation between the MBTI 'instrument' and the EPI 'instrument' (whatever that is - am I really that lazy...? lol - well being that my google search proved fruitless..) with physical supporting data (i.e. EEG patterns, blood flow, etc).
The first article is only looking at blood flow to regions of the brain with regards to introversion and extroversion. It concludes that there are more cortical regions, particularly in the frontal lobe, correlated with introversion, along with the anterior insula and several bilateral frontal lobe regions involved in "self talk". Extroverts, on the other hand, have more activity in the anterior cingulate gyrus, which is involved in emotional sensory perception and autonomic activity regulation from emotions; they also have more blood flow to the posterior insula, which is involved in sensory information, but has also been found to have marked decrease in activity in people who suffer from autism.

Long story short, parts of the brain that have to do with recalling memories and 'self talk' are correlated with introversion, and parts of the brain that have to do with external sensory input and empathetic processing are correlated to extroversion.

The second article covers all of the functions of MBTI (as it's an MBTI publication). To keep it short, they did scans of peoples brains in low stimulus environments (the subjects stared at a blank wall). Introverts and iNtuitives retained more beta waves than extroverts and "...individuals who preferred Sensing produced greater mean theta amplitude than did individuals who preferred Intuition."

This image may help that make more sense:

waves.gif


Basically, Introverts and iNtuitives had more brain activity in a sensory deprived state, as they are more likely to recall old memories and think about things that don't require external stimuli to prompt the thoughts.

The article says of T-F and J-P:

"The data for the Thinking–Feeling dichotomy indicated that Feeling types produced greater mean amplitude in theta through beta 3 bandwidths compared to Thinking types. This pattern was most pronounced for the bandwidths from alpha through beta 3 amplitude data. Finally, when the Judging–Perceiving dichotomy was considered, Judging types generated greater mean amplitude in the alpha bandwidth through beta 3 bandwidths than Perceiving types. Future research is needed to determine if the Thinking–Feeling and Judging–Perceiving dichotomies’ EEG patterns are truly unique."

But the actual results require the visuals to understand which I can't post here.

However, must I point out (the theorist in me automatically 'smelling' a tautological rationalization of the hypothesis) that to some extent increases in blood flow and chemical-electrical activity may be induced just as easily by cognitive preference as by innate biology? Could socialization of a child play just as strong a factor - if not a stronger factor - than innate brain makeup and chemistry? Even should such biological factors exist, how likely is it that they are sufficiently the decisive factor contributing to MBTI typologies?
I hate to break into another 'nature vs. nurture' debate, but I fail to see the difference between innate biology and ones cognitive preference? The brains structure is primarily a product of our biology, and our personality is primarily a product of our brains structure.

There are certainly environmental factors that influence the development of our brain and it's neuroplasticity, but ultimately the way we process information is a result of our biology.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Re: In response to the ENTP wanna-be ENTP

Yah, yah, it took me a while to respond. Interesting and humorous stuff going on here, an ENTP wants to be more like an ENTP.

Right on ;)

Unless you want to get retarded ideas in your head, hesitate with Sociology
I have yet to find anything valuable out of those people…and if you’re wandering around those parts, I know your curiosity cannot be stopped – but, observe it first with a long stick that keeps the stench from frying your brain cells.

Quite. In fact I found their system of MBTI type interrelationship daft. To think that a mere linear algorithm could be fitted to the intricacies of the interactions between the various types and their idiosyncracies is a great example (once again) of an idealist misconceived as rational.


I'll check it out ;)

You might be ENTP
As an ENTP myself, though, I’d like to point out that I think there’s a chance you are already an ENTP.

In retrospect this actually makes a great deal of sense. What I mean is that perhaps due to the nature of certain restraints during my upbringing I was not interactive at a highly social level. When I did interact with others, it tended to be with other (hahah) adults because I did not comprehend the preoccupation of my age peer-group with such childish fancies as I had already outlived in my earliest years (if that - because I don't rightly recall ever being involved in much childish thinking except reenactments from movies and tv series - and that was fun because it involved and required improvisation!).

Also, it comes to mind that the first (and only) band manager I ever had told me once that I was much more like Mr. Gabriel from Genesis and would be better suited to doing my own projects where I was in relative direction of the creative assembly of things. At first, I was offended - I thought who does this man think he is telling me that I will never connect with anyone?!?! Clearly my perception was one of being typecast as a non-collaborating solo act which prospect I found frighteningly confining! I enjoy collaboration! So much so that I continually sought it out musically - to spin off others' ideas is the most amazing process there is! I love it! =) Anyway, it was years later - in fact just recently, that I came across a page on famous MBTI types and saw the Mr. Gabriel, ipse, was classified as an ENTP! Suddenly, gone were the fears previously associated with the band manager's opinion and I felt this enthusiasm! I thought, gee - if I could just push more envelope on my extroversion I could become a lot like Gabriel in his approach to things. My perception of him had essentially changed, see, over the past few years especially, and after seeing early videos of him on youtube performing with his early Genesis group! How amazing! What energy, freedom! Yes, this is sort of my natural desire for expression which I have experienced when in a group and singing performing with them. I have a natural tendency to pop-out.

  • ENTPs are perhaps the most reserved of the extraverts. We don’t get along with everybody, we are still foremost NTP (the types are very closely related), and this means our abstract pursuits and interests aren’t often in alignment with most people. Also, our extraverted operation is tertiary, and it is extraverted perception that leads us, observing depth, learning new things, taking in more abstract information with which we use our introverted operation (Ti) to systematically categorize, find variables and then our extraverted intuition comes into play further by interconnecting relationships between these models. What if you’re an ENTP who just doesn’t get along with many people (common), and isn’t typically extroverted (with the ‘o’, outgoing, and all that; not direction of psyche).

This actually makes a great deal of sense to me. I am a closet extrovert lol :) - who knew??? My best friend swears up and down that I am NOT an introvert - and people, I have noticed, seem a bit awed by my shear lack of intimidation when broaching subjects with complete strangers sometimes quite randomly in public. However, I had merely attributed this to a desire to have social interaction of which seemed to have very little. Therefore I was interpreting myself as a starved introvert trying to get out - when in fact I may have been a starved extrovert with general frustration at my ability to converse with other interesting types? My point of confusion does lie in this plane, however, that if introversion/extroversion is simply how we 'get' our energy recharged, then is it possible that we have multiple ways of doing so? When I am seemingly defeated in my attempt to achieve positively reinforcing social interaction do I then break down into a mode of introversion from which I am apt to recover and pounce back (or if not, dream and desire to!) into the course of new interaction? What initially clued me to such possibilities was the idea from the enneagram thinggy that we have central archetypes with auxiliary poles that we extend toward when we are in good from and running well and when we are broken - more or less; from looking at my type according to this analysis it made great sense because when I am fine and exemplary in fact I tend toward the leadership spectrum quite a lot more than not and when I am suppressed by the tide of superimposed weaknesses I tend toward quiet introspection and at its extreme toward dissolution and apathy - which is quite extreme and considerably more rare =)

  • You wanted to involve more people, brainstorm ideas and so on. You figured that other people could benefit from this exercise, things can be learned, and more can be done by collaboration – you created a wiki, and soliciting for participation in the project. This is not uncharacteristic of common ENTP behavior.
Funny, I didn't think of that myself! =)

  • In your video you mention introversion in relation to violation of personal space. I can assure you that I take my personal space incredibly seriously, and this is a trait commonly strong in NTs who value their autonomy as a part of their self-respect. It then sent you on lines of thought of possibilities and what you clean learn from the situation.

Thanks so much for your encouragement with relation to this! As Mango so astutely points out in his video on reality tv,

http://www.youtube.com/user/BananaMango99#p/a/u/0/pv6YpBtJb9w

there seems to be less and less room for the necessity for privacy in our ever encroaching Orwellian world of modernity. Clarke's somewhat eerie Childhood's End comes rather readily to mind...

But what is this preoccupation of his with Giant Space Babies? I just don't get it !

  • You get so excited when you get to share these possibilities and how they relate – your optimistic about this journey, and you seem fine with holding a number of possibilities at the same time.

Yes ! I wish I had known! (the ENTP correlation)

  • You experience your own talking as an audience member, your natural about it – which is commonly said as “thinking out-loud” but your style is ENTP-ish. I’d expect this out of an INTP after they became very comfortable with the audience they were talking to, and it’d be all thought out, and the collaboration would probably be less emphasized – they tend to do less info hunting, but definitely do it and need to do it as well.

Yes - I think out loud often and often to my detriment LOL. But that is correct, I tend to generate ideas on the fly as I think and speak at the same time. And yes, I tend to listen to myself (which sounds funny - sometimes I have to talk to myself like some nutty professor when I am all alone and have had an eureka! - well! who else is there to listen??! *grin*) and then analyze what I just said or jump and branch off from what I said as new thoughts occur. I would say that the latter is the more natural and fluid for me and that the analysis comes when I tend to get stuck, which is why I probably hesitate and begin to drawl on, repeating myself seemingly needlessly while I attempt to find a new logical branch in lieu of the intuitively inspired one...

  • The INTP does enjoy stability, so does the ENTP – I mean it’s nice, but we cause chaos – and then stabilizing it, but INTPs keep it stable…that chaos in your mornings, you sure that’s not how you get lost in so many ideas, get hooked on a project and fly with it, and then drop it and move onto another, and it’s always a tornado? How many simultaneous projects you got, anyway? I always have quite a few.

I had no idea that ENTPs enjoyed/required stability too - and perhaps I am simply biased by a particular lack of consistency of it on my part in that I am continually looking for the open space upon which to start laying track... Projects: yes, these are certainly a problem! Although I can't give them up for the life of me! I have several, all tangentially related in the evolutionary progress of my rather modular conceptualization of the world and the very laterally portable theories which I encountered to date. They range from inquiries into AI, (if I only had more time and structure! I could do so much! and contribute new things!!!!), Music Theory, Theories of cognition, Descartesian reanalysis of Hobbesian social contract theory in light of current social issues and in contradistinction to the Hegelian polarities - and these are simply areas of current research - projects currently entail teaching guitar, delineating the Segovian approach to compassing the neck respective to each of the modes in all twelve keys (upon which is predicated the idea that such vertical knowledge of the neck of the instrument is sufficient to mastery of the instrument and relatively inclusive of static-position scalar formations as well), re-opening the old web programming consulting company, overcoming my physical illness, properly installing W7 x64 on the other machine so I can get ProTools to run and begin composing stuff to send in for potential film-scoring gigs, and the little things, as well as tabled projects (due to shear time limitations) such as novel writing, etc. And yes, there is the intp-to-entp project =) lol.

  • Your desire to improve your external relationships, to stabilize things, that you created ‘subsystems’ to supplement yourself and that you learned this lets you optimize your creative time and lets them not pile up, and gives you a clarity that gives you whole new vision – yah, dude – so I use Personal Brain, MindMaps – I’ve studied PRINCE2, Agile, GTD, and synthesized the best ideas from them all… a girlfriend used to joke that I was becoming a machine but it’s impossible because I’m too spontaneous…but it worked out because none of my things have due dates, things slide forward – I just need clarity and I can roll with it. Don’t know of any INTPs that do as much of this – see, they tend to be quite good at having a really big interest and going further and further with it – whereas we ENTPs tend to juggle many ideas and far easier launch into other possibilities from roads we’re on – ending up different places altogether.

Hmmm... I have never heard of these beyond MindMaps - I'll have to take a peak - although I get frustrated with research at times because I begin to notice an actual paucity of new ideas, and instead creative marketing of some old, already assimilated conceptual model or paradigm - or a merely incrementally adaptation to an old idea - which while at times may prove enlightening is often some old sludge of which uninspired non-generative thinking would normally conceive.

  • How you really try and have people understand your perspective even when they are being non-productive (the inflammatory posts at the start)...

Thank you :)

  • Your intimidation of being social, or not knowing how to deal with stupid people or other things – that’s not type related – so you could still be ENTP…. If you it intimidates you because you will run out of energy, it’s too distracting from your core projects, you don’t have much a drive to interact but feel it’d be healthy (not that you feel anxious about it, but not driven to is a different matter, that is introverted like) – then maybe INTP.

Yes. And I believe I relate more with your former perspective in that it is more a sense of diffusion than ennui that ensues at breakdown. Although, per my earlier reference, I believe that such breakdown does occur if only rarely or in the extremity of circumstances

  • Your description of the being young, reading lots of book (extraverted perception), asking lots of questions (extraverted perception), and letting yourself go and pondering over the meaning of all this (Ne+Ti), sounds very ENTP-like; more so than INTP-like. You also make a bunch of little projects?

Yes. and Yes.

  • Optimize the best type of groceries: so here’s what I got recently, maybe we can collaborate – if I eat breakfast bars put together with honey, supplements and juice smoothie in the morning I can go without milk which goes bad faster and requires more maintenance and I can order Tasty Bites from Amazon (got prime account already), and it’s about $5 a bag, and it takes 5 minutes to make, and in combinations with rice, and I’ve experimented with bread and such – and am now toying with ways of having yet more diversity with least complexity – well it’s all going well… I like the improvements so far; this is certainly not the first time I’ve optimized food, it’s just the latest time I got around back to that one – I optimize as much as I can.

It used to be along the constraints of budget - and quite often still is - however, it is always along the lines of concept, which perpetually shifts, so that whether I am planning some new cuisine for the week, a convenience oriented leveraging of readily available snacks, or a spartanly health conscious diet, it all devolves upon the concept d'jour (or week - but since my French is so limited I won't make the attempt lest I fall on my face publicly and disgrace Frenchmen - and women - everywhere - which may not be difficult to do but is hardly deserving of so magnanimous and creative and wonderfully beautiful a civilization!)

  • Unlike the INTP with the inferior Fe, the ENTP is more aware of social dynamics but their Fe is subverted by the Ne+Ti, like when you are aware of how irrationality and subversion work together and how you are just automatically aware of these social models at play and what the impositions are as they are happening (Ti works automatically and smoothly as current perceptions move forward; the abstract foreseeing perceptions of extraverted intuition).

I would really appreciate a further explication here (*windbag* I am really laughing at myself and at Lyra's comment as I apply it with proud ingnominy to myself ! - hahahhaha! isn't it the truth of the matter though - we NeTi-s leap from leap to leap!! *grin*) about how subverting the Fe with the Ne+Ti happens and what the relationships are... I'm probably just not that well terminologically verse here and my Ti is feeling a bit weak as of late due to chemical/neurological damage of unknown origins (although I suspect some one on campus here is chemically addicted to something and using it nearby, which has unfortunately happened on several occasions before, and due to my extreme chemical sensitivity I seem to be the unfortunate casualty of such possibly well-intended temperate permissiveness on the part of the church - I am at what used to be a Nazarene bible college and is now a Nazarene church plus with apartment conversions - but this is a story for another time!)
[/QUOTE]

  • Your emphasis on gathering and collecting information over pondering and processing the information you already have further suggests to me Ne is dominant.

Cool. What is the relationship to Ne here in contradistinction to other other related functions?

  • Your sudden break from the original argument to share interesting information about Ocham’s Razor also suggests Ne is dominant.

Haha. I am wondering if Adymus will see this as "highly structered" argumentation lol - point taken - it actually makes sense, yet the focus was more to the point a dissection of all arguments and their bases.

Hmmmm.

  • Interesting how you like to switch directions as new information becomes available, and not within the scope of one pursuit but in this multi-threaded way as pursuits relate to one another and make new things possible – in my discussions with another ENTP on entp.org, we were laughing at how we both change jobs every two years. It’s hilarious, but hey, there’s new things to learn out there.

I have never ever held a job longer than two years. I just can't do it man!

  • Oh, this was the biggest one: “I am a programmer…to help me understand the world around me.” As a systems architect philosopher artist-minded rambler, I find even my INTJ mathematician friends kind of laugh when I say code is like dancing and like math is raw with the universe – and how everything is a system and by learning the mechanisms of systems we learn things about everything – I compared it somehow to dancing but I forget that metaphor now. I got into programming the fourth grade, and I think it’s why I have such a well-developed introverted thinking function, and like you, I like to apply it to everything else, be it even the arts (more so film for me). But what do you think Adymus? Doesn’t comprehending things as a way of revealing more about the depths of one’s experience and the interrelationships of the world when we face our psyche outward (the world around us) seem like Ti is working for Ne instead of the other way around? That’s what I’m seeing.

YESYESYES! I was at one point, characterizing the entire world and all of the information in it as 'languages.' Similar to dances I suppose, yet, what I was seeing was Math as language, Music as Language, Language as Language (duh), Programming as Language, etc etc ad infinitum ad naseum - :D

But the biggest telling difference between myself and computer nerds is my complete inability to follow written and verbal instruction. Sad to say, but this is the case. I attribute this to my prevalent Ne and my extreme relative debility with Sensing. It was then that I began to understand that my strength as a programmer was not in proficiency per se, but in abstract modeling and new idea generation. Programming was merely the media through which expressed my art hehe. Proficiency/efficiency-wise I otherwise am humbled by my competition :slashnew:.

  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.
  • The “I’ll bet it isn’t me” with a wink, like you knew what kind of logic twist your doing but confident as is, this is far more ENTP than INTP, especially just to toss in.

Ahem. LOL - yah well... yeah ;) (the intuitive grasping out there but not yet in Ti articulation? It's my Ne surety lol - oops - sorry Adymus - didn't mean to encroach by that..)

  • His init reaction to the negative attitudes of some of this forum’s members was not characteristic of a Fe dom/aux – it was characteristic of an NTP – he didn’t really even take it personally

I agree on general principle with this statement, although I feel I still messed up. :/ Sorry. Yeah - but the general tenor is not dom Fe, and with that I concur with all my heart (*snicker*) ok that was bad! So I am not dom Fe, and I am glad.. and I cannot seem to think of anything witty to say here... ehm

  • Adymus: Articulation skills? I think you mean the ‘flow’ and so on – ENTPs got that too, and I’m sure you know that, and we aren’t Fe dom/aux.

Albeit I have very little experience with this, however I would tend to agree based on some videos I watched on youtube (youtube youtube youtube) by some dude named Tom who self-labeled himself (redundant wasn't I) as an ENTP and went on in his videos with such brilliance and at quite a staggeringly fluid pace of it to boot! Quite impressive! If, in addition, you "take a gander" at Mr. Gabriel's Lunatic Vlog (yes yes - puts it out every full moon he does) you can see, albeit subdued a bit with age, how excited he gets and how fluid and cogently connected are his musings - if musings indeed - it is all perspective there I believe =)

  • Ni asks itself “What does this mean? Not the parts, but beyond the parts; if I look at this from enough sides and perspectives I’ll gain clarity on it and know it beyond the image.” Ne asks “What else is out there? Not people and things, but those too and I know what my eyes see, what is beyond what I see? How does this unfold, and how does this inter-relate and where does this go and what else is possible and how else can the story be told?” What I see here is Ne, and not Ni.

I still am confusticated by this whole Ni premise/function/concept. The best that I can make of it is that it is a sort of intuition - not unlike my father's - in which over a protracted period of time things apparently begin to line up. Now not that that has never happened. To anyone who has had an eureka experience, certainly this seems to be a familiar scenario - but alternately from the big picture scenario it would begin to make sense to me except that I don't believe that a big-picture scenario is expressly defined by or constrained by such forms of rumination...? I am really unclear as to the workings of this concept.



In regards to Lyra’s posts
  • I realized in reading “thanks to Lyra,…” that Lyra posted here too. No comment, that’s the only user I have on my ignore list, so whatever that was – I’m sure it was useless anyway…

Now now...

She may not in fact be the captain of your heart, however, I hold her in very high esteem at present and until such time as such opinions may (if indeed they are) be dislodged - which I find dubious on my own part; nevertheless, it should be known that it was Lyra who first stepped in - quite chivalrously, may I add - and defended this thread-posting - not just on my behalf (being that she scarcely knew who I was, having just arrived here) - but on the general civilized principle of rational discussion and openness. I laud her ferventy in reciprocation for her deed and owe, just as much as to principle as to her person, a like and equable defense on her behalf =).

So please don't be angry with me but I will support Lyra as she was so kind as to be supportive of me when I first got here just a few days ago. Cool ? :) :)

P.S. I ended up buying “The Society of Mind” by Marvin Minsky.
P.S.S. the Title is for the lulz.
P.S.S.S. This is where optimism leads: success! Congratulations, you’re ENTP. Or so it seems from over here. Now harness yourself (quick tip: Ti is the way), and you’ll be quite an awesome master of the force indeed.

You are perhaps the only other person besides myself to use PS, PSS, PSSS lol - I'm not sure what this means but it is most certainly informative as to general demeanor and potentially Enitsh... being that Ents are quite long-winded that is ;)

Hehehe! Nice to meet you ! =) Rock On!
 

Robbaz

Member
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
25
---
Re: In response to the ENTP wanna-be ENTP

  • Robbaz: the content of your post suggests you agree he is not INTP (not enough introversion, too expressive)…which I won’t take as INFJ per se.
Yeah, being the INTP that I am, I was withholding typing him until I felt more certain about it. I don't know enough about the INFJ type to back Adymus up on that analysis, but I agreed with him that he certainly did not fit into the INTP. I'm not going to get as deep into typology as many others here, (although I really have learned a ton from the more knowledgeable members here), but as I mentioned earlier, the mannerisms, confidence level, facial expressions and overall demeaner set Boradicus apart from the everything I am certain of with INTP. Since I last posted, I've read more of his responses and it is clear that he fits the ENTP "lawyer" type. Arguing and defending just for the sake of a good argument or defense. As an INTP, I would have not been so confident in my assessment of myself after having read other comments. Boradicus puts up a good fight for his belief's in who he is and seems to have a lot more confidence, and/or charisma than a lot of us INTPs have.

Without getting too in depth with the science of MBTI, just take it from a logical, analytical observation. Check out other INTP videos out there, observe all of his comments both making his case and defending his case, and compare it with his videos he produced for his experiment and you'll see that the INTP just didn't fit. Even if he did some practicing before hand, I think it would be really difficult to pull it off as well as he did if he were true INTP. Finally, read the ENTP typology and you'll see that he fits well there. In any case, I envy the ENTP because of their ability to make such great verbal and written arguments. There are also so many similarities between our two PT's that we get along great. I have an ENTP friend and I can see a lot of similarities between Boradicus and him.

Boradicus, thanks for the enlightening discussion. If I'm reading your last post correctly, I think you made your new years resolution of becoming an ENTP quicker than you thought. (I guess it helped expedite things when you are already an ENTP). :) And thanks for not taking offense to the analysis given.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
@ BA-Pi:

(you don't believe in conflicted individuals?)
It is not that I don't believe in conflicted individuals, it is that I believe in rationality as Imperative. In my belief, a rational will (because I will and do) systematically deconstruct whatever needs to be deconstructed to get at its root and once the root has been unearthed to then decide upon a course of action. In any extreme circumstance, such as torture, the extremity cannot be sustained without damage and therefore without some form of address. The essential constraints are thereby already delineated and the root need only be unearthed and addressed. Personal conflictedness plays no part in this as the parameters are purely external in nature; hence, only the root must needs be examined.

Your reference to some conflicted state of the individual with respect to the proposed torture is made irrelevant by the very act of torture itself. The implication presented by your statement is: that resolution of inner conflict could lead to resolution of outer conflict. This implication is not only false but offensive - let me explain to you why:

1. Torture as it is understood to be is not self-torture; that is masochism or some other form of aberrant behavior and is not what was being referred to in any sense
2. To make any sense of such an implication in any other case other than as was dealt with in #1 above, we must ask the question 'what is the implied causal relationship between resolution of inner conflict and outer conflict?' The answer is obvious, as the outer conflict, being the conflict that is desired to be resolved (refer to #1 again to see that the primary conflict being addressed with a view to resolution is not inner conflict) can be influenced by the resolution of some purported inner conflict. The only way such a relationship can exist is either through some communication related to the resolution of the outer conflict or through resolution of inner conflict arising as a result of the outer conflict (this would be akin to the ability or inability of the Buddhist monks to withstand or not withstand their self-immolation, but because this is predicated primarily upon the resolution of inner conflict - i.e. the external conflict is not resolved - this too falls under the domain of #1 above and may be summarily 'thrown out').
3. Next we ask, quite simply, "what kind of communication could effect the cessation of this external conflict?" Quite obviously, communication implies contact with some intelligence other than one's own, within who's domain of control is the cessation of the external conflict. This should be obvious, for if the external object communicated with were inanimate (say, using the term 'communication' in the broad sense, e.g. my hand may 'communicate' with the volume knob of the stereo, thereby turning the loud and obnoxious music down or off), then the resolution of the external conflict would be within the purview of the person's reach who is experiencing it, and hence it devolves to 'inner conflict' whereupon I refer you again to #1 above. Therefore, knowing by our elementary methodology, through which to this very place we have just arrived, we must limit the rational interpretation of this implication to mean one and only one thing: that the cessation of the external conflict *might* be determined by the resolution of some communication as a result of the resolution of an inner conflict; hence (and once again, ruling out masochism from #1), torture for information (purportedly - as I said on the one hand the resolution of the external conflict *might* be determined by such; also, there is another lemma here, but it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand, and therefore it shall be promptly ommitted) is the inferred scenario that fits the bill.
4. Our scenario is clearly (again!) one of torture (and purportedly for information's sake); this is because all other internally conflicted states relevant to the external introduction of pain and/or discomfort have been clearly eliminated.
5. (apparently this did not convey in my previous posts so I will try to explain things differently-->)

  • A rational betwixt interstices of distracting sensory overput is still a rational; he/she at the beginning and ending of the day is a rational, and is governed by the principles thereof.
  • Logic is the governing principle of a Rational (define this however you wish; but in essence it is a system of methodical analysis and decision branching).
  • The violation of a person's privacy, space, property, mind, relationships, and body constitutes a breach in trust; torture constitutes such (a) violation/s.
  • Once a breach in trust occurs, the logical conclusion is reached that other similar breaches may occur in a similar fashion, and/or that the same breach may continue indefinitely.
  • Considering, as it were, the potentiality for the indefinite continuance of such a breach, the rational must then reconcile himself/herself to the non-expectation of the reestablishment of any functionally causal relationship between himself/herself and the perpetrator of the violation of his/her person, meaning of course that the expectation of any cessation of the torture related to any causal relationship entailing communication or action of any kind on the part of the victim must be hence forth disregarded utterly and removed from any consideration.

  • The problem therefore resides in the failed attempt to communicate on the part of the torturer via his/her violation of the Rational's trust.
  • Based on further assessment, this failure to communicate may be either addressed or ignored by the Rational; however, the refusal on the part of the torturer to acknowledge either such an addresses or the lack thereof can have no further bearing whatever on the course of the Rational. We are consistent.

I hope I made myself clear.

I shall leave to your conscience the consideration of the offense of the implication upon which I have just expounded ...

I find it interesting that you refer to your lack of notes.. I find that most theoretical types (NTs) will just pick up and go with a concept rather than refer to specifics laid down by some other party - it is in our nature to extrapolate exploratively... This smacks a bit of S of some sort.. in my estimation, that is =)

What kind of person are you - going to seminars on torture? Oh my! See! I wasn't far off-bases was I? It was in the background of your thinking at the very least as I plucked it out so readily.

Mark
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Boradicus, thanks for the enlightening discussion. If I'm reading your last post correctly, I think you made your new years resolution of becoming an ENTP quicker than you thought. (I guess it helped expedite things when you are already an ENTP). :) And thanks for not taking offense to the analysis given.

Right on dude ;)

__________________
If the facts don't fit the theory,
change the facts." Albert Einstein

TOTALLY (and for sure...)
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
boradicus. I like this line from the INTJ description. I'd be interested in what your opinion of yourself is with regard to it:

"However, their primary interest is not understanding a concept, but rather applying that concept in a useful way."

(3rd paragraph down)
http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html

Mind you I am not ready to judge you. I'm keeping in mind your P-J score on your test and Adymus's questioning of tests.





 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
boradicus. I like this line from the INTJ description. I'd be interested in what your opinion of yourself is with regard to it:

"However, their primary interest is not understanding a concept, but rather applying that concept in a useful way."

(3rd paragraph down)
http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html

Mind you I am not ready to judge you. I'm keeping in mind your P-J score on your test and Adymus's questioning of tests.


My Dear Apple-Pi, I think perhaps, just perhaps, if you looked at the dialog between myself and spiral that you would see the answer there... But since you are apparently less intuitive than I would have garnered - I will spell it out for you in concretes (or whatever terrible approximations thereof I can come up with - I'm just not good at that lol!)... Because I find myself continually in research about the theoretical and have many projects that are tangentially related based on the further accumulation of tangentially related knowledge-models, the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition (because everything is centrally related, being the central paradigm whereby I can streamline my life and derive some form of satisfaction and sustenance). This does not preclude the sharing of findings! Far from it! In fact, I prefer much more to share and to continue to discover, erecting such models as I find pleasing and entertaining for others to share in along the way; I am however quickly engaged by new ideas and then soon become impatiently bored with the ones already explored except inasmuch as they may serve as starting points for even better ideas! When I played Sid Meyer's Alpha Centauri, I ALWAYS played the techie dude (the one who placed I higher priority on technological advancement vs the other potential priorities in the game like military and finance for example). That was just my personality - couldn't help it =).
 

Anthile

Steel marks flesh
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
3,987
---
boradicus. I like this line from the INTJ description. I'd be interested in what your opinion of yourself is with regard to it:

"However, their primary interest is not understanding a concept, but rather applying that concept in a useful way."

(3rd paragraph down)
http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html

Mind you I am not ready to judge you. I'm keeping in mind your P-J score on your test and Adymus's questioning of tests.








Just look at his postings. If that's not Ne, nothing is.
 
Last edited:

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
intp25.GIF


Just for comparison's sake I thought I would include this other test of which I took a screen capture...
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
intp25.GIF


Just for comparison's sake I thought I would include this other test of which I took a screen capture...
What??? That says INFJ or am I reading it rong? Unless that's 25 of 26 and 11 of 12.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Anthile - did you see the new Sherlock Holmes? I thought it was pretty good! Better than I expected Downey to be - at the very least it was a great effort and I dug the cool boxing routine =) That was awesome! And it was cool to relate to his abstract round about way of dealing with things - I could so relate - my friend, the ISTJ is often frustrated by my anticipatory assumptions lol - a lot like poor Watson.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
What??? That says INFJ or am I reading it rong? Unless that's 25 of 26 and 11 of 12.

Don't ask me! I don't know how these things work! That is what is so fascinating about them! =)
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
What dialog between you and spiral? Link please. You mean this or other?
In response to the ENTP...

You want me to trust spiral, lol. Just ask him if he thinks I should trust him. I'm sure he'd make up my mind for me, lol. I'm interested in your outlook because you offer yourself and you have a good cause and IMO a person who wants things DONE.

Quoting you,
"the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition"
"the sharing of findings!"
" erecting such models"
" priority on technological advancement"
Would you say those are more statements of action or of how things work? Just take the statements, not what's inside them.

Contrast those statement to this, assuming I'm an INTP. Am I different?
Nuclear Attraction Angst!


My Dear Apple-Pi, I think perhaps, just perhaps, if you looked at the dialog between myself and spiral that you would see the answer there... But since you are apparently less intuitive than I would have garnered - I will spell it out for you in concretes (or whatever terrible approximations thereof I can come up with - I'm just not good at that lol!)... Because I find myself continually in research about the theoretical and have many projects that are tangentially related based on the further accumulation of tangentially related knowledge-models, the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition (because everything is centrally related, being the central paradigm whereby I can streamline my life and derive some form of satisfaction and sustenance). This does not preclude the sharing of findings! Far from it! In fact, I prefer much more to share and to continue to discover, erecting such models as I find pleasing and entertaining for others to share in along the way; I am however quickly engaged by new ideas and then soon become impatiently bored with the ones already explored except inasmuch as they may serve as starting points for even better ideas! When I played Sid Meyer's Alpha Centauri, I ALWAYS played the techie dude (the one who placed I higher priority on technological advancement vs the other potential priorities in the game like military and finance for example). That was just my personality - couldn't help it =).
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
Just look at his postings. If that's not Ne, nothing is.

Anthile. Look at these from his recent statement:

"the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition"
"the sharing of findings!"
" erecting such models"
" priority on technological advancement"

Which are those? Ne or Ni? I'm no expert on this but to me those are personal statements, all things he wants to do. Isn't that I? E would be

"here is the knowledge I'm after"
"here are my findings!"
" here are my models"
" here is the technological advancement I'm after"

Those are Ne because they are sharing.
I could be wrong. Adymus?
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Anthile. Look at these from his recent statement:

"the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition"
"the sharing of findings!"
" erecting such models"
" priority on technological advancement"

Which are those? Ne or Ni? I'm no expert on this but to me those are personal statements, all things he wants to do. Isn't that I? E would be

"here is the knowledge I'm after"
"here are my findings!"
" here are my models"
" here is the technological advancement I'm after"

Those are Ne because they are sharing.
I could be wrong. Adymus?

Weak.

Obviously, this is a conscious subversion of the dialog. The primary question should be - why is everyone preoccupied with a typecast different than the one presented? Is this an INTP forum or a "gang-up on newcomers who think they are INTPs forum?'

I agree with Spiral:

What is Wrong with You People???
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Anthile. Look at these from his recent statement:

"the focus then becomes knowledge acquisition"
"the sharing of findings!"
" erecting such models"
" priority on technological advancement"

Which are those? Ne or Ni? I'm no expert on this but to me those are personal statements, all things he wants to do. Isn't that I? E would be

"here is the knowledge I'm after"
"here are my findings!"
" here are my models"
" here is the technological advancement I'm after"

Those are Ne because they are sharing.
I could be wrong. Adymus?

I think this is the confusion - in the case of BA-Pi - (once again how can an Intuitive make this mistake?) is centered around a confusion between abstract and concrete; look at the hypothetical replies you formed verses the ones presented...

Firstly, 'here' is a denotative word that brings into the here and now and away from the abstract and passive - this seems to be very concrete cognition.

Secondly look at the use of the passive (and hence more temporally and personally abstract) of my actual statements listed above.

It is clear to me that the difference is abstract/passive vs. concrete/active.

But once again, why the Witch Hunt??? Pah-leez - Thanks =)
 

BigApplePi

Banned
Local time
Today 2:52 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
8,984
---
Location
New York City (The Big Apple) & State
I think this is the confusion - in the case of BA-Pi - (once again how can an Intuitive make this mistake?) is centered around a confusion between abstract and concrete; look at the hypothetical replies you formed verses the ones presented...

Firstly, 'here' is a denotative word that brings into the here and now and away from the abstract and passive - this seems to be very concrete cognition.

Secondly look at the use of the passive (and hence more temporally and personally abstract) of my actual statements listed above.

It is clear to me that the difference is abstract/passive vs. concrete/active.

But once again, why the Witch Hunt??? Pah-leez - Thanks =)

boradicus. Will think it over. What you said. No witch hunt. Do you see ANY statement of mine I am after that? I don't give one flying f if I'm right or wrong except maybe I'd like to be wrong here. All I'm interested in is the truth, and the whole truth, of what's going on.

BTW, do you have any sound bite reactions to this analysis of yesterday? The parts in blue I mean?
Re: The INTP to ENTP project!
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
You want me to trust spiral, lol. Just ask him if he thinks I should trust him. I'm sure he'd make up my mind for me, lol.

Is there a rationalization for this opinion? Like where did this come from? I just got here remember, so forgive me if this strikes me as completely off the cuff and unsubstantiated. A great deal of what he said I actually found quite helpful and related to quite a bit. I saw no cause at all for distrust nor a motive for a cause for distrust. Let's look at this rationally, shall we? 1. I have never before met him in my life 2. his analysis is consistent and clear 3. His only motivation is to share his perspective 4. His perspective is a unique offering in contrast to the others offered on here - why would there be a motivation for distrust? I don't get this at all... Is this some "feeling" you have??? What is it exactly ???

x-FS...J? ??

Mark
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
No witch hunt. Do you see ANY statement of mine I am after that?

Ahem...

except maybe I'd like to be wrong here. All I'm interested in is the truth, and the whole truth, of what's going on.

*coughs*

BTW, do you have any sound bite reactions to this analysis of yesterday? The parts in blue I mean?

:rolleyes:
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Someone, just now, curiously went to my youtube video associated with my INTP to ENTP wiki project and claimed that I was a 'hot' INFJ. Gee I wonder who that might be?

#1 I am not Gay
#2 I am not an INFJ
#3 Please act your age
 

wadlez

Active Member
Local time
Tomorrow 6:22 AM
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
385
---
I have read most of this thread but not all of it, so forgive me If I overlook someones previous post.
First of all I think this thread needs a nudge back to the original point, we need to stop discussing whether this guy is an INTP or not. There are many INTJ's on this forum (which is my most disliked type) and just we ignore that and let them think there INTP's (INTJ's hate being INTJ's), so boradicus should be treated no differently. The fact he's trying to convert from INTP to ENTP is good grounds to point out that he is not an INTP as it makes his task impossible, but I think you are wasting your time as even if he was definately an INTP its impossible to change your type anyway.

As you you may already know or have learnt from reading this thread; it is your orientation of your functions which defines your type. If you are an INTP your primary type is Ti, so your energy for Thinking comes from within rather than the object, you cannot just decide that you want this energy to come from somewhere else. The observations you have made about what introverts or INTPS are like (eg like to withdraw etc) are just consequences of this. This is due to the hard wiring of your brain (see MRI scans) or an interaction of your levels of neurotransmitters in different areas of the brain, You cannot just conciously decide to change this.
All you would be doing is trying to conciously censor your thoughts or take on a different personality which would be overly forced. It is not just your decision making but rather how you perceive objects, people and view the world, you just wouldnt be able to force your brain have this perception.
Lets take an Extroverted Feeling type for example, they love going to concerts, you might know a group who are all punks or some other trend. An INTP could think, "I dont see the point in standing around in big groups of all people, why are we all worshipping these people on stage just because they can play a musical instrument, its sounds better on cd than live anyway". If this same INTP decided that he was going to be an Extroverted Feeling type he would think "OK, I know these guys like to go to concerts so I am going to go there and try to do what they do" But he would just be acting and copying the observable behaviour of these types rather than actually being there types.

There is also the matter of the development of each function. The functions of each type are also developed according to there orientation, an INTP has a very highly developed Thinking function, Imagine a primary Feeling type trying to copy us without this development "Hmmm, I'll go on a PC computer machine and go on an internet forum and use big words, I'll go to a library and stare at the pages of a book with a frowed brow", this is basically the equivalent of what we would be doing if we tried to copy a Extroverted Feeling type.

Boradicus, I think you should study MBTI or Jung intensively so you actually understand this theory. It is much more complicated than you might imagine it to be and you would gain more from learning it rather than just jumping in and trying to revolutionise and change it.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
Hi! Thanks for posting =)

Boradicus, I think you should study MBTI or Jung intensively so you actually understand this theory. It is much more complicated than you might imagine it to be and you would gain more from learning it rather than just jumping in and trying to revolutionise and change it. __________________

Ok, firstly, I am not attempting to change the MBTI - neither do I allow myself to be constrained by it. My experiment is for myself, primarily, secondarily, if I happen upon anything along the way that can be used by anyone else then great! Darwin, Galileo, and Descartes were all scorned and treated harshly for their endeavors - but their endeavors were scientific inquiry - many of which proved correct at some later time. They were out to discover, but the sheer act of their discovery was offensive to some - not to all mind you. Curiosity led them to challenge their perceptions of what had been taught them and to look deeper into the mysteries of Life! And why not? The models we create are continually shifting as we gain more and more knowledge. Should we slink back into the primordial ooze of our obscure past or should we with the light of reason set our own courses? Certainly, a ship without a helmsman eventually runs afoul of some reef - or worse. And who shall be our own helmsman but our own reason itself?

Scientists the world over continually contest theories and plumb more deeply than the ideas preached by their predecessors. Need we be scientists to set our sails and embark upon a voyage of personal discovery? Henry Ford began as a meager apprentice to a machinist, but eventually discovered a better way to produce things. Joshua Slocum was a retired seaman who because of his desire to experience new things was the first to circumnavigate the globe - solo! Look at the writings of Kerouac and his adventures. Why should we be so daunted and frightened of life that we quell our own spirit of adventure and curiosity - our desire to learn? Why die before we live? Why not do something new - however small and insignificant? That's how we experience and learn =)

This is due to the hard wiring of your brain (see MRI scans) or an interaction of your levels of neurotransmitters in different areas of the brain, You cannot just conciously decide to change this.

I'm not sold on this argument. I could be valid, it may not be, or it may not be entirely valid - or anywhere in between... If I say to you that my strong legs enable me to run for miles at a time, do you simply believe me because of the plausibly tangible evidence of my claim? Or do you stop and think for a minute that perhaps some other explanation may be more sufficiently explanatory.. say that my legs are strong because day after day after day I practice running farther and a little farther and a little farther, and eventually as a result my legs *did* become quite strong indeed! Yet in our initial assessment, all the tiny actions from day to day were quite invisible to us... until we asked a question.. :)

The fact he's trying to convert from INTP to ENTP is good grounds to point out that he is not an INTP as it makes his task impossible

The argument is fallacious being that it is based on the ground that being an INTP prevents the attempt to transmute into an ENTP; if being an INTP prevents such an attempt, I wonder what other attempts - based on such reasoning - merely being an INTP would prevent... would being an INTP prevent me from attempting to go to parties, to have a girlfriend, etc. - you see what I am getting at?

Nevertheless I appreciate and respect your sentiment:
First of all I think this thread needs a nudge back to the original point, we need to stop discussing whether this guy is an INTP or not.

Au Revoir
 

shoeless

I AM A WIZARD
Local time
Today 7:52 PM
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,196
---
Location
the in-between
... i love concerts...

anyway, carry on.

(ps. - he's not saying that being an INTP prevents you from doing anything -- it just prevents you from changing where you draw your energy from. that much is pretty much ingrained in us.)
 

Anthile

Steel marks flesh
Local time
Today 8:52 PM
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
3,987
---
*scratches head*

But just because you are perceived as offensive doesn't mean you're right. In fact, there were also lots of scientists who were acclaimed during their lifetimes.

Additionally, changing types is not like changing clothes or learning a new skill but rather like changing your skin colour or your DNA. Of course, you could pretend to be an ENTP and try to act like one but you will never have the same experience.
MBTI does not work that way.
 

boradicus

And as he gazed her eyes were filled with the dark
Local time
Today 12:52 PM
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
165
---
*scratches head*

But just because you are perceived as offensive doesn't mean you're right. In fact, there were also lots of scientists who were acclaimed during their lifetimes.

Additionally, changing types is not like changing clothes or learning a new skill but rather like changing your skin colour or your DNA. Of course, you could pretend to be an ENTP and try to act like one but you will never have the same experience.
MBTI does not work that way.

I didn't think I was being offensive... *yawn*

I'm still not sold on this biological mbti concept model. It is quite strange to me, in fact, that another INTP would be sold on such a definitive view of anything - it seems against my very grain to base assumptions on static 'truths' because I am by my very thought-nature propelled into open-ended thinking.
 
Top Bottom