The Graphology Thread

[ashitaria]

Ashitaria, do me, do me!

Sorry...

I'm not gay XD

Wait, let me look at your handwriting....

 

[ashitaria]

Ashitaria, do me, do me!

I'm not gay, but if you want to....

 

[Mary]

Hm...

Mary has difficulty making decisions. Her mind changes constantly. She lives in an emotional tug of war. Mary could be described like a thermometer. Today warm and friendly, yet tomorrow she may be distant and cold, not wanting to be close to anyone.Some research indicates that people with a severe variety in the slant of their handwriting have an inability to tolerate sugar and are suffering the side-effects of too much sugar in their diet. If moods swings are a reoccurring issue, investigate the diet.
If Mary encounters a situation she cannot handle she frequently pulls into herself. She feels her emotions are secure if she is withdrawn. When she has solved the problem she can be very outgoing and again need other people's companionship. Some see Mary as very moody, but it it would be more accurate to say she has two complete personalities that she chooses depending on the circumstance. This type of person is often hard to understand because no one knows what personality she is exhibiting today. She may not be bothered by something one minute, then the next minute become upset at the same thing. It is very difficult to pin down Mary's emotional expressiveness.

People that write very large tend to be very social and friendly. It seems Mary has this type of writing. This indicates a need for people and a particular natural ability to socialize and be the life of the party. Now, if Mary also has specific fears (like fear of criticism or fear of trust) then she will deny she is the life of the party, because fear has overcome her natural inclination to be social. People with large handwriting tend to be effective at anything that requires interaction with lots of people. she is a people person.

Mary will be candid and direct when expressing her opinion. She will tell them what she thinks if they ask for it, whether they like it or not. So, if they don't really want her opinion, don't ask for it!

Diplomacy is one of Mary's best attributes. She has the ability to say what others want to hear. She can have tact with others. She has the ability to state things in such a way as to not offend someone else. Mary can disagree without being disagreeable.

In reference to Mary's mental abilities, she has a very investigating and creating mind. She investigates projects rapidly because she is curious about many things. She gets involved in many projects that seem good at the beginning, but she soon must slow down and look at all the angles. She probably gets too many things going at once. When Mary slows down, then she becomes more creative than before. Since it takes time to be creative, she must slow down to do it. She then decides what projects she has time to finish. Thus she finishes at a slower pace than when she started the project.
She has the best of two kinds of minds. One is the quick investigating mind. The other is the creative mind. Her mind thinks quick and rapidly in the investigative mode. She can learn quicker, investigate more, and think faster. Mary can then switch into her low gear. When she is in the slower mode, she can be creative, remember longer and stack facts in a logical manner. She is more logical this way and can climb mental mountains with a much better grip.

Mary is a practical person whose goals are planned, practical, and down to earth. This is typical of people with normal healthy self-esteem. She needs to visualize the end of a project before she starts. she finds joy in anticipation and planning. Notice that I said she plans everything she is going to do, that doesn't necessarily mean things go as planned. Mary basically feels good about herself. She has a positive self-esteem which contributes to her success. She feels she has the ability to achieve anything she sets her mind to. However, she sets her goals using practicality-- not too "out of reach". She has enough self-confidence to leave a bad situation, yet, she will not take great risks, as they relate to her goals. A good esteem is one key to a happy life. Although there is room for improvement in the confidence catagery, her self-perception is better than average.

Mary is sarcastic. This is a defense mechanism designed to protect her ego when she feels hurt. She pokes people harder than she gets poked. These sarcastic remarks can be very funny. They can also be harsh, bitter, and caustic at the same time.

Mary has difficulty trusting anyone. In fact, she trusts no one completely. This is a result of her trust being betrayed in the past. She has closed up, thus ceasing to allow close friendships. Mary truly wants close friends and desires physical relationships, but she fears she will get hurt, again. She is lonely, yet has a crying need for close friends. This trait can cause much unhappiness. However, it can be changed.

Mary has a healthy imagination and displays a fair amount of trust. She lets new people into her circle of friends. She uses her imagination to understand new ideas, things, and people.


Also adding my own:

I see a high zone, indicating good imagination, and the way your "dots" are way above your "I"s also indicated that you tend to day-dream alot. I also see some print and some cursive, indicating that you like to go your own way. You also reserved and blunt, indicated by your "O's. You also have very fast writing, indicating that you tend to jump to conclusions. Your baseline also slant downwards which says you are a pessimist, but that could also mean that you are a realist.

Am I right?

More or less. My handwriting isn't handwriting I'd consider large but I suppose that's up to personal opinion. I'm certainly not social unless I'm really hyper and will never meet anyone around me again (In which case I generally pretend to be drunk and extroverted; this is more amusing than you may imagine). My friend and I will sit in the corner and listen to music while our other friends complain about how we're being antisocial.

The part about not being able to pin down my personality is fairly accurate. I'm very free spirited sometimes, to the point of absurdity. You have no idea how weird I can get. (I'm very hyper ATM if you haven't noticed) Also, the sugar: I love it. I could it sugar all day long. Unfortunately, my body doesn't put any of that sugar to good use and I can't gain any weight.

I can be brutally honest. It's true. I offend people without meaning to all the time. Some people like honesty, others don't.

I can be diplomatic *if* I want to. As said before, I can be brutally honest with pinches of sarcasm thrown in, which can make people dislike me A LOT. I only use these to really 'take people out' if they annoy me and are obnoxious, pretentious, and hypocritical. It's probably why I was never bullied as a kid; someone would be nasty, then I would make them look like a fool. People never 'bullied' me more than once.

That 'm' theory is interesting. When I'm sewing/creating patterns I get really into my project and can spend hours without realizing how much time is flying by. But I completely write off school. It just doesn't interest me. Hm.

As far as 'planning' goes, I don't. I kinda let inspiration strike where it may and let my mind do whatever it wants to do. I can do anything I set my mind to, I guess, but I don't set my mind to do things I'm required to do.

Sarcasm! Yay! My favorite pastime.

It's interesting that I used the 'closed off' y when talking about my INTJ friend, 'cause that's very much how she is. I wonder if that was subconscious or something.. -shrug-

I'm very open to new ideas. I love them. They are my life. I would die without being able to analyze ways of thinking that are different from my own and gleaning ideas from them. New friends.. Only if I get to know them well. I'm friendly to basically everyone, but that doesn't mean their my friend per se.

I guess I'm a realist. Pessimism is the way I express my sarcasm/OCD. I'll randomly say things like "Wouldn't it be hilarious if -insert something ironic and horrible here- happened?" People tend to give me strange looks when I say stuff like that.

Daydreaming is fun. My imagination is my playground. I have no control over my imagination; it's quite amusing actually. I have no idea where it'll take me at any given moment. Of course, if I really want I can imagine a certain scenario, but mostly I let my mind run free.

Wheee~
I get so weird when I get into this state of mind. My abstract thinking starts spitting out useless junk. It sounds interesting but doesn't really mean much.

 

[ashitaria]

Ah, that's great. I knew you didn't do much planning because of your fast and messy handwriting.

Sorry I'm taking so long Amalech. Geh, I'll make my analysis of yours ready by tomorrow.

 

[walfin]

In the interests of justice and fairness I will post in the order in which requests are made in this thread after shoeless (the backlog before shoeless will eventually be cleared, somehow, someday )

Alice? (I love that question mark)

You are mathematical.

You are quite a straightforward, secure person.

Not always consistent (mood) but generally stable.

You are detached and analytical (common among INTPs). You have realistic aspirations, are goal oriented (sometimes procrastinating but less than several of the others), and confident.

You care a bit about appearances.

Your margin is especially interesting since you wrote on margined paper but it still wasn't straight. Perhaps this means your traits are strong? It seems that you are generally more relaxed when things begin and end, and more committed and structured in the middle. Also, despite the paper being lined, I realise your baseline isn't straight. You are probably quite limbic (i.e. do not control your emotions).

After viewing the Shakespeare one, I have this to add:

You are a pessimist.

Additionally, it reinforced your semi-emotionality, analytical nature, and being more committed once things are under way.

I ignored copybook stuff like the connected writing and lead in strokes. Obviously, it is not your usual writing; it is so controlled (rarely will you have such uniform stroke pressure)

 

[walfin]

This handwriting sample shows a great ability to concentrate, even on small details. There is a lot of persistence, possibly to the point where the effort isn't worth the rewards, but if this person said he'd do something, I would believe he'd follow through.

Agree.

There are signs of efficiency, and wanting to avoid unnecessary effort.

I don't really agree so much with this. There are signs of efficiency, yes, certainly.

This person can be very secretive and finds it hard to open up (really? on an INTP forum?). The writer is modest, but has reasonable self-confidence. This person likes to keep his personal space personal (again, not a surprise here) and can start out very friendly and approaching, but soon withdraw.

Kind of agree.

There are signs of being rather down and depressed right now, with low energy, but that may be a temporary thing.

Not just that, I think there is something major that has affected Anamalech.

Also, I would say that the writer is fairly young, keeps a level head most of the time, and works hard to be organized.

Works hard yes, I'm not sure about works hard "to be organised". Perhaps, in a way, this might be true.

The writer is also scrupulously honest and direct.

I'm not very sure about this.

 

[Sparrow]

Agree.


I don't really agree so much with this. There are signs of efficiency, yes, certainly.


Kind of agree.

Not just that, I think there is something major that has affected Anamalech.

Works hard yes, I'm not sure about works hard "to be organised". Perhaps, in a way, this might be true.

I'm not very sure about this.

Honesty....Do tell :P

Bleh, I've been depressed for years...can't help it...everything affects me nowadays - some things more than others. They're always on my mind.

I don't work hard to be organized. I avoid being organized. My room's a mess. My binders aren't organized and I can't find anything

 

[walfin]

Just a brief one about both ashitaria and hawkeye (the two of you have much in common I think, from what I can see from ashitaria's kind of blur pictures).

Mathematical, logical, creative, musical. Might be irritable. Quick thinker, probably witty. Possibly careless but not a strong trait. Otherwise, quite normal. Nice guys (sometimes to your detriment).

Maybe Anamalech, Ashitaria and I can kind of split any future work coming up? If one of us has anything we disagree about with a prior analysis we can just build on it.

EDIT: Sorry, I actually meant Trebuchet . Though of course Anamalech is free to join in.

EDIT: Oh, I forgot about Cavallierose! The more the merrier.

Honesty....Do tell :P

It's kind of part of the PM I sent you. You can tell if you want.

 

[Sparrow]

I think Trebuchet and yourself would be best qualified for this...I have no knowledge on this subject and Ashitaria is using that handwriting wizard site which does not go in depth.

 

[Trebuchet]

I think I could learn a great deal from Walfin, and I've am having fun doing it, but this is a busy few days.

I should be up for it, though. Comparing what I figure out with Walfin's results sounds even better, so I hope we can do some overlap once in a while.

 

[Cavallier]

@Lithorn: I find yours interesting because it rises off the base line and then comes back repeatedly. Do your flights of fancy or imagine run wild with you? Or do you have difficulty staying connected to the here and now? Then I noticed how you march right past that the stopping point on the right hand side. I think that you only follow rules you think are important. I suspect you follow society's rules so far as they make sense to you. Your initial "I" tells me this as well. Otherwise you are level headed, intelligent, and have a healthy social life. You have distance between your words but no to much. You need your space obviously but it's not as if you can't get along just fine with people. Lastly, your capital I's speak of independence. You strive for it and value it deeply.

Jeez I'm rusty. There is a website that helps you to analyze your handwriting in depth...I think it's linked near the start of this thread. While essentially correct I find that it misses nuance and it's ultimately like taking any online test that describes you in basic broad terms but fails to get the real you.

Edit: Apparently I honored you with my 666th post. Woot!

 

[Trebuchet]

Got another sample for you.

Well, Lithorn, based on this sample (I didn't see another), here is what I came up with. Please let me know what you think, and I hope anyone else looking at the same sample will do the same.


Lithorn is original, direct, and efficient, has good self-control, and is ruled by intellect, but underneath there is a lot of emotion. This sample shows nervousness and agitation, and a preoccupation with money, perhaps a concern about running out of money.

The writer is sensitive and imaginative, though not much of a dreamer. There is a streak of ambition and a desire for attention, which combined with secretiveness and an ability to lie well probably means someone who can be a little manipulative.

Lithorn can be sarcastic, but usually shows restraint about it, and isn't trying to be cruel.

 

[ashitaria]

Nice guys (sometimes to your detriment).

Out of everything (manipulative/flattering) people have complimented me about (smart, handsome, etc.), this is the only thing that I am confident I am.

I am nice, and I have much more self-control than others when it comes to teaching people, lending people stuff, walking people back home, etc.

My kindness is the only thing about me that I don't doubt. For everything else (yes, all the way down to being an INTP, especially my intelligence), I doubt.

 

[Lithorn]

@ Trebuchet
Wow, that's the first time in my life I've been described as "not much of a dreamer", but you're right on with "direct" "efficient" and "sarcastic".
The money preoccupation might have to do with the absurd cost of college, but otherwise I'm not too interested in it.
Ambition and desire for attention are a definite no. I don't go out of my way to blend in and avoid notice, but I'm pretty mellow and don't set out to draw attention either.
I only wish I understood people well enough to be manipulative (not that I would use my powers for evil

 

[Lithorn]

@ Cavallier
Pretty accurate. I thought it was hilarious that two analyses describe me as "given to flights of fancy" and "not much of a dreamer".
Teehee. Yay, controversial handwriting!

 

[Trebuchet]

@ Trebuchet
Wow, that's the first time in my life I've been described as "not much of a dreamer", but you're right on with "direct" "efficient" and "sarcastic".
The money preoccupation might have to do with the absurd cost of college, but otherwise I'm not too interested in it.
Ambition and desire for attention are a definite no. I don't go out of my way to blend in and avoid notice, but I'm pretty mellow and don't set out to draw attention either.
I only wish I understood people well enough to be manipulative (not that I would use my powers for evil

Well, either I was way off-base, or the sample I saw was atypical. I concluded "not much of a dreamer" based on short upper zone letters, which was combined with great practicality.

I put that you are imaginative based on the disconnected writing, accent-grave-shaped i-dots, and a lower-case s a bit taller than the rest of the middle zone, which points to creative, but not necessarily a visionary. (Of course, I could be wrong. )

It is very interesting that I was so off-base on ambition. That was based on arched loops, in the letter m and so on. Of course I know you are an introvert or why would you hang out here, but I figured that didn't rule it out. Thanks for the feedback.

I didn't mean to imply you would use powers for evil, either! Evil tends to show up in heavy, ink-filled loops with long, sharp ends, retouched, artificial strokes, angles where there shouldn't be, indistinct letters, and other things that aren't in your writing. See Joseph Stalin for an example.

I would think the cost of college would cause a preoccupation with it. I have a 5-year-old and already I am preoccupied with it.

Anyway, great feedback, so thanks again.

 

[Cavallier]

Well, either I was way off-base, or the sample I saw was atypical. I concluded "not much of a dreamer" based on short upper zone letters, which was combined with great practicality.

I don't mean to be argumentative but I think that the upper zone though not prominent isn't necessarily "short". I noticed the strong backs on the h's which rise straight up and away from the middle zone plus the strong t's. I think the middle zone is deceptively prominent because her e's reach out from the t crossbars. The reason I noticed it is because my own handwriting is notably middle zone except for the backs of my tall letters reach right into the lines above. Lithorn's doesn't quite do this but I could see it going that way on a day when she's not tired. Also, her upper zone is muddied by the way the words themselves sort of leap into the air.

Meh, at least that's what I found.

Edit: I see practicality too. If you look really close you can kind of see where her t's and l's sort of curl at the top as if they want to keep going up but the author has forced herself back to the ground at the last minute. I really like your sample Lithorn. It's interesting.

 

[Trebuchet]

I don't mean to be argumentative but I think that the upper zone though not prominent isn't necessarily "short". I noticed the strong backs on the h's which rise straight up and away from the middle zone plus the strong t's. I think the middle zone is deceptively prominent because her e's reach out from the t crossbars. The reason I noticed it is because my own handwriting is notably middle zone except for the backs of my tall letters reach right into the lines above. Lithorn's doesn't quite do this but I could see it going that way on a day when she's not tired. Also, her upper zone is muddied by the way the words themselves sort of leap into the air.

Meh, at least that's what I found.

Edit: I see practicality too. If you look really close you can kind of see where her t's and l's sort of curl at the top as if they want to keep going up but the author has forced herself back to the ground at the last minute. I really like your sample Lithorn. It's interesting.

If you see something other than what I see, then I am delighted to discuss it here. I can only improve my eye for graphology when someone points out a shortcoming. Besides, indicators in graphology are fascinating all by themselves, and here are all these great samples. I'll look at it again, thanks. As I've mentioned a couple of times, I am out of practice.

 

[Cavallier]

If you see something other than what I see, then I am delighted to discuss it here. I can only improve my eye for graphology when someone points out a shortcoming. Besides, indicators in graphology are fascinating all by themselves, and here are all these great samples. I'll look at it again, thanks. As I've mentioned a couple of times, I am out of practice.

Oh, no worries. It is great having all these samples. I get tired of only seeing my co-workers handwriting. In fact I find myself staring at people's signatures on official documents analyzing them. I think signatures are particularly fascinating because they are the face that people want to show the world. It's weird how their true selves can be hidden in behind that face.

I'm completely out of practice myself. It's only ever been a fancy of mine and I've studied a lot of books on the topic. I'd love to take a few courses if I could ever find somebody teaching the subject! I find it a little humorous that people view hand writing analysis in the same way they view palm reading. Most people don't realize that it actually is a fairly concrete science. Well, I suppose art would be the better word. It is a part of any reputable profiler's analysis. It has it's shortcomings but it's not woo woo magic either...I didn't realize I felt this strongly about the subject.

 

[echoplex]

hmmm, according to some comments in this thread, I'm probably a pretty dishonest person, considering my handwriting.

Basically, I'm a liar who tries too hard to be creative. I'm also sexually-repressed. (This is my handwriting self-analysis in absence of another's; totally unscientific)

 

[Sparrow]

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g8/adopties999/scan0001jpg02.jpg

Someone do this one pleaaase.

 

[walfin]

Lithorn - to their analysis I add/confirm the following

direct
stubborn
critical
mood swing
quick thinking
could be impulsive
lackadaisical, easygoing, not a perfectionist

Mary, you are a kid inside
Direct/blunt
Detached
Open
Mathematical
Efficient (but it doesn't always work)
Haphazard/disorganised
You are certainly not a hedonist. I do not know if you care much about sex, but it seems like that has a pretty low priority.

 

[TheHmmmm]

Ah, that's great. I knew you didn't do much planning because of your fast and messy handwriting.

Sorry I'm taking so long Amalech. Geh, I'll make my analysis of yours ready by tomorrow.

Wait, what? I have some of the fastest, messiest handwriting ever, but I'm also the most meticulous and cautious in my planning. I think handwriting just comes down to how much effort someone is willing to put into aesthetics.

 

[ashitaria]

Wait, what? I have some of the fastest, messiest handwriting ever, but I'm also the most meticulous and cautious in my planning. I think handwriting just comes down to how much effort someone is willing to put into aesthetics.

The only reason that I said that she didnt do much planning from the speed of her handwriting was because that characterestic was enforced from her "m"s. If I see that you have really fast and messy handwriting but you have really round "M"s, along with a well-organized writing and straight baselines, then I would conclude that you are a slow, methodial thinker, though you are able to jump to conclusions at times.

 

[Mary]

Mary, you are a kid inside

Ahahaha
YES.

Direct/blunt

Many of my more-acquaintance-than-friend friends have complained to my actual friends that I'm rude. 'Tell me honestly" really does mean "please lie to make me feel better" in most cases. Girls are so annoying. (In general.)

Detached

Hm.
I'm certainly not "all there" in most situations. I analyze my reactions to various events and other people's reactions, so I'm assuming that's detached.

Open

I'm willing to listen to basically anything anyone wants to tell me (I've had peers of mine pour out their souls in the middle of class, it's very odd) so I can analyze them and add more dimension to my psychology theories. I'm also willing to listen to new ideas. I love exploring, both literally and figuratively.

Mathematical

MATH!
People don't understand how I can love geometry and algebra at the same time. To be honest, they're the exact same thing, just looking at the problem in a different way.

Efficient (but it doesn't always work)

Meh. Going to this forum while I'm doing my homework is completely efficient. I swear.
>.>

Haphazard/disorganized

YES. I actually enjoy being disorganized. I can organize other people really well, but I hate being organized myself. In 5th grade I organized my friend's locker for her, and she was freaking out 'cause it was so clean. She insisted on seeing my locker. Needless to say, she was surprised.

My dream when I grow up is to have a job where I dress up nicely but get so into my work that it becomes semi-messy. And to have my hair in a bun that leaves me brushing my hair off my face and glasses that are on the verge of falling off constantly.

You are certainly not a hedonist. I do not know if you care much about sex, but it seems like that has a pretty low priority

Yup.
Pain = Experience in most cases, and although I dislike pain, it is a part of life.

 

[ashitaria]

I think what he means by mathematical is being precise.

I actually hate math, because of it's lack of challenge (except for a few odd test questions) and it's rigidness, but I do really well at it, but I tend to slack off...


XP

 

[BigApplePi]

I think what he means by mathematical is being precise.

I actually hate math, because of it's lack of challenge (except for a few odd test questions) and it's rigidness, but I do really well at it, but I tend to slack off...


XP

Ashitaria when you say you "hate math" what kind are you referring to? Algebra, geometry, arithmetic, games, puzzles, history, reading about math, etc. Have you seen this thread? -- 2

 

[ashitaria]

Ashitaria when you say you "hate math" what kind are you referring to? Algebra, geometry, arithmetic, games, puzzles, history, reading about math, etc. Have you seen this thread? -- 2

Yes, I have seen that thread. It was interesting, but I got bored of it after a while.

When I say I hate math, I refer to geometry, because of the required memorization of shapes and formulas, which I hate. Algebra is better because there aren't as much rules and your rely more on thinking it out. I also hate graphs-related Maths, but I like symmetry and problem-solving maths whereby you are free to use which ever math you want (perhaps arithmetic?).

But oh well....

 

[walfin]

Time to clear some backlog

Nicholas AAE

Detached, quick thinking (creative), logical - pretty common traits among INTPs

Ambitious. Possibly meticulous? But mood swings. Tries to be down to earth.

Quite direct, a clear communicator.

Signs of a multifacted personality? Not sure about this.

hmmm, according to some comments in this thread, I'm probably a pretty dishonest person, considering my handwriting.

Basically, I'm a liar who tries too hard to be creative. I'm also sexually-repressed. (This is my handwriting self-analysis in absence of another's; totally unscientific)

Do you know the zones?

There was once a chimpanzee who was trained to identify dogs in photographs; when he failed to do so the researchers discovered that all the dog pictures were taken at night.

Not a true story

 

[ashitaria]

 

[Jill BioSkop]

Oooh, is this thread still going? Anybody willing to analyse me? I make nice quiches.

 

[cheese]

I've suddenly become interested in handwriting again. Anyone willing to give this a go?

WALFIN, I SUMMON THEE!

*edit
Bugger, I'm pretty sure that's too small.

 

[cheese]

Hope this works. Tech fail.

 

[Emil-san]

Spoiler

his personality profile is based on the writing of Emil Nilsson created at the website: Handwriting Wizard.com - Handwriting University's Official automated personality report creator based on standardized basic personality traits as taught through Handwriting University's Certification Level Program.

Emil is moderately outgoing. His emotions are stirred by sympathy and heart rendering stories. In fact, he can be kind, friendly, affectionate and considerate of others. He has the ability to put himself into the other person's shoes.

Emil will be somewhat moody, with highs and lows. Sometimes he will be happy, the next day he might be sad. He has the unique ability to get along equally well with what psychology calls introverts and extroverts. This is because he is in between. Psychology calls Emil an ambivert. He understands the needs of both types. Although they get along, he will not tolerate anyone that is too "far out." He doesn't sway too far one way or the other.

When convincing him to buy a product or an idea, a heart rendering story could mean a great deal to him. He puts himself in the same situation as the person in the story, yet he will not buy anything that seems overly impractical or illogical. Emil is an expressive person. He outwardly shows his emotions. He may even show traces of tears when hearing a sad story.

Emil is a "middle-of-the-roader," politically as well as logically. He weighs both sides of an issue, sits on the fence, and then will decide when he finally has to. He basically doesn't relate to any far out ideas and usually won't go to the extreme on any issue.

People that write their letters in an average height and average size are moderate in their ability to interact socially. According to the data input, Emil doesn't write too large or too small, indicating a balanced ability to be social and interact with others.

Emil is talkative. He enjoys talking and socializing. He may talk when there is absolutely nothing important to say. He enjoys speaking.

In reference to Emil's mental abilities, he has a very investigating and creating mind. He investigates projects rapidly because he is curious about many things. He gets involved in many projects that seem good at the beginning, but he soon must slow down and look at all the angles. He probably gets too many things going at once. When Emil slows down, then he becomes more creative than before. Since it takes time to be creative, he must slow down to do it. He then decides what projects he has time to finish. Thus he finishes at a slower pace than when he started the project.

He has the best of two kinds of minds. One is the quick investigating mind. The other is the creative mind. His mind thinks quick and rapidly in the investigative mode. He can learn quicker, investigate more, and think faster. Emil can then switch into his low gear. When he is in the slower mode, he can be creative, remember longer and stack facts in a logical manner. He is more logical this way and can climb mental mountains with a much better grip.

Emil's true self-image is unreasonably low. Someone once told Emil that he wasn't a great and beautiful person, and he believed them. Emil also has a fear that he might fail if he takes large risks. Therefore he resists setting his goals too high, risking failure. He doesn't have the internal confidence that frees him to take risks and chance failure. Emil is capable of accomplishing much more than he is presently achieving. All this relates to his self-esteem. Emil's self-concept is artificially low. Emil will stay in a bad situation much too long... why? Because he is afraid that if he makes a change, it might get worse. It is hard for Emil to plan too far into the future. He kind of takes things on a day to day basis. He may tell you his dreams but he is living in today, with a fear of making a change. No matter how loud he speaks, look at his actions. This is perhaps the biggest single barrier to happiness people not believing in and loving themselves. Emil is an example of someone living with a low self-image, because their innate self-confidence was broken.

Emil is sarcastic. This is a defense mechanism designed to protect his ego when he feels hurt. He pokes people harder than he gets poked. These sarcastic remarks can be very funny. They can also be harsh, bitter, and caustic at the same time.

Emil is very self-sufficient. He is trying not to need anyone. He is capable of making it on his own. He probably wants and enjoys people, but he doesn't "need" them. He can be a loner.

HOLY SHIT. This is SO amazingly accurate it's scary!

 

[Solitaire U.]

Alright, bumping this thread. @walfin are you still here? Analyze me...

 

[walfin]

Answer posted in other thread