JansenDowel
Active Member
Anyone here have a well developed Fe but totally non existent Si? What do you think the cause of such a situation might be?
Anyone here have a well developed Fe but totally non existent Si? What do you think the cause of such a situation might be?
Sadly, i agree. :-)come off as urbane and caring (when needed), but it's a fake compared to a dominant Fe user. We just learned the motions and persona.
I've come to believe it's impossible to have a well developed inferior. No matter what you do, at root it'll still be infantile.
it's a fake compared to a dominant Fe user. We just learned the motions and persona.
However, I wouldn't go so far as to say Fe is completely fake. Just unmanageable, and hard to reign control of. It is almost as though it had a mind of it's own.
Ditto for Se vs. Ni. I think there is an aphorism that goes: "No matter where you go, there you are." I think that applies here. I see the functions in mostly the same way, namely: adult, adolescent, child and infant. I don't know how long you have been studying the cognitive functions but I am developing opinions that are similar to yours as far as the development of inferior and subconscious functions. It really perturbs me when I see CF tests presented (on Facebook usually) with 7 of 8 functions all being moderately expressed, along with one dominant function. I get further perturbed when it is posited by some that dominant Ti will manifest itself (externally) in the same way as Se or Te dominant (think ESTJ-Enneagram 5). I enjoy your posts.I think we agree, and I didn't say it's completely fake, just that it's a faker. It's like a child pretending to be an adult. There's a little adult there, a kernel of an adult, but not the real thing. I don't mean fake in the sense of being entirely false. The inferior has real <whatever> - Fe in our case, it's just uncontrolled, magnified and so on. In particular it's not strong. A person doesn't want to experience their inferior for long periods of time. For example I get uncomfortable with strong emotions, like immediately, and want to go back to my computer. A Fe dominant is the opposite.
The concept is captured in the meaning of infantile, which is desires without abilities. The immature want without knowing out to get, which results in magnified desires (the Puer Aeternis of Von Franz). So developing the inferior is a misnomer, you're not developing the inferior itself but filtering out its demands. The inferior still has magnified and childish desires, and no amount of work seems to be able to do anything about it.
Ditto for Se vs. Ni.
Maybe 10 years. Unsatisfied with vanilla PUM preferences I moved on to the functions and have been studying them deeply since. Maybe you haven't seen my theories on this but I don't think we can develop any of the functions. I suspect that the actual functions are hardwired motivations in our cortex. The neocortex can learn, and develops behaviors, memory and our personality, but our true desires come from our type which motivates all this. If you like you can then say there are sympathetic functions in our neocortex which mirror the cortex functions - fine, but they should have a different name to make it clear.I don't know how long you have been studying the cognitive functions but I am developing opinions that are similar to yours as far as the development of inferior and subconscious functions.
If you are under 30, then i think it is pretty normal. The tertiary function (Si, for us INTPs) starts manifesting in your 30s, at age 40 it should be fully implemented
Ni-Se is what I meant yes. Curiously, I have trouble with clutter, especially in a bathroom. I can have "organized" clutter in my room though. It may be more to do with my mother, who always kept things in order and would rail if they were not. She was constantly cleaning and putting things away. I know some of that rubbed off. I have to say though, that living alone, you can set it and forget it...my living room is like a museum. I don't have any pictures of family...sort of like the shadow gallery in V for Vendetta...definitely a taste for aesthetics. My Se focus is mostly all or nothing though, even at 45. I take full advantage of a stopwatch at work. Even so, when I'm deep into understanding something, any Se is overwhelming and I can feel Ni dragging me back to home base...ain't no messing with the dominant function.Or Ni vs Se as in the INFJ (maybe that's what you meant). I see it with my INFJ wife with an Se inferior. She desires a certain physical world. Good hair, good physique, clean house, everything ordered and just so, but has a terrible time actually getting it. I'm better at cleaning up than she is. And she'll make a terrific disgusting mess in the bathroom say, and blame it on "well there's no organization system for all this stuff (dental, makeup, etc) so I just give up and <act like a slob>". That's pure infantile inferior.
Which is interesting as Se is off in my 'nether stack', Beebe's shadow stack. How can I do it better? I don't like strong Se activities and they drain me, but I've learned how to do them and attach no emotion to it. Just get it done.
Maybe 10 years. Unsatisfied with vanilla PUM preferences I moved on to the functions and have been studying them deeply since. Maybe you haven't seen my theories on this but I don't think we can develop any of the functions. I suspect that the actual functions are hardwired motivations in our cortex. The neocortex can learn, and develops behaviors, memory and our personality, but our true desires come from our type which motivates all this. If you like you can then say there are sympathetic functions in our neocortex which mirror the cortex functions - fine, but they should have a different name to make it clear.
At any rate I think at root the functions based on the preferences which are information streams in the cortex. So an E is a person who can handle lots of extrasensory information, and an I is one who can't, and so forth.
My Se focus is mostly all or nothing though, even at 45.
Anyone here have a well developed Fe but totally non existent Si? What do you think the cause of such a situation might be?
I've come to believe it's impossible to have a well developed inferior. No matter what you do, at root it'll still be infantile. At best we can build a support structure around it in our psyche, which is what we mistake for maturing it. I've seen this in myself and my ISTP brother. We both come off as urbane and caring (when needed), but it's a fake compared to a dominant Fe user. We just learned the motions and persona.
Si? It's there, probably stronger than you believe, but Fe is so immature and wailing/crying for attention you just don't see your tertiary in the cacophony. It'll become more obvious over time.
Oh, I'm going to like you.![]()
Does anyone else read this guys post in the 'Architects' voice?
Yeah...INFJ...more Ti than Fe these days, as I am pretty reclusive. 36 years of alone time...more Chess time than my 9 years of total SO relationship time. So Ti might be drawing nearer to Fe. I found a nice depiction of the four stages of Ti...from dominant to inferior. Pretty cool, you might get a chuckle or two as an INTP:Late 40's here too ... so you're an INFJ I take it? Yeah the inferior is an "all or nothing" affair too.
Being an INFJ that wants to be an INTP.
"inadequacies in the system"
Yeah, that's what they always say when they can't figure out their type or their ego isn't satisfied with what's offered.
"inadequacies in the system"
Yeah, that's what they always say when they can't figure out their type or their ego isn't satisfied with what's offered.
"inadequacies in the system"
Yeah, that's what they always say when they can't figure out their type or their ego isn't satisfied with what's offered.
Wow, no need to be nasty ahole about it. Also, i'm not confused.
I had the exact opposite reaction. Its good to see that spiteful come out once in a while.
Why? It reflects negatively on your character.
Pshh I don't care about that.
So your a douchbag? Glad you cleared that up for me.
If "using Si" means doing detail oriented work that is inspired by subjective demands or subjective enthusiasm, such as setting up your computer for geeky needs, inventing custom paint/photo-shop brushes, skinning your mp3 player, writing a script to automate things, then it's something that JiNe types can develop passion for but also loose or give up entirely, depending on motivation.
If you take Si into a more embodied context, such as doing x repetitions of exercise y every day and counting calories it's even more unlikely that Ji types can muster up the patience.
In contrast entirely-passive Si, in the form of subjective aesthetic sensibilities or preferences, is never lost, but frequently ignored. my understanding is that we can live in a garbage can without noticing, while we enjoy that favorite tumblr. being ignorant of the trash can that is our room is perhaps in part itself a feature of Si, selective attention, merely motivated by Ne, but we use it more than Si dominant individuals.
Yeah, I know you cognitive function purists will complain that I can't possibly have strong Ti and Fi at the same time...