• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

STAR WARS 7-9!!

Proletar

Deus Sex Machina
Local time
Today 11:29 AM
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
730
---
Location
The Cold North
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Episode_VII on wikipedia.

Star Wars Episode VII is an upcoming sequel to Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi with an anticipated release date of 2015. It will be the first Star Wars film produced following George Lucas' retirement from Lucasfilm and the first Star Wars film distributed by Walt Disney Pictures. It is intended to be the first film in a planned sequel trilogy with subsequent installments released two to three years apart.


I just learnt about this, and I'm incredibly psyched. Disney bought Lucas arts, if anyone missed it, and with it, they plan to release more Star Wars-movies. True, Lucas have been toying around with his franchise way more than he should have, but Disney haven't. Therefore, this is a new hope for me. Hopefully, since they are not Lucas, they will give the fanbase a little more room.

OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG MORE STAR WARS!!!1!11!1!!oneone!!1
 

The Gopher

President
Local time
Today 9:29 PM
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
4,674
---
If it's good I honestly have no problem, if it's bad people will just pretend it doesn't exist.
 

Architect

Professional INTP
Local time
Today 3:29 AM
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
6,691
---
It's probably a good thing, mainly because Lucas has become such a talentless hack. His Star Wars the Clone Wars animated series has been pretty good actually, except when his daughter did the writing for a season which completely sucked. Otherwise his reworking of the first (third) movie was horrific, and all the movies after the first two were likewise horror shows.

Disney is probably a good choice, the Star Wars universe is pretty squeaky clean which they should be able to handle. As long as they can keep some edge to it the new movies might be pretty good.

Now why don't they do that with Star Trek? The franchise needs a reboot on TV.
 

eagor

Senior Executive Lab Monkey
Local time
Today 10:29 AM
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Messages
616
---
Location
i'm a prize in a cereal box near you, so buy, BUY,
If it's good I honestly have no problem, if it's bad people will just pretend it doesn't exist.

i smell another christmas special..but if im wrong :D
 

Proletar

Deus Sex Machina
Local time
Today 11:29 AM
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
730
---
Location
The Cold North
i smell another christmas special..but if im wrong :D


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXcb7VPw59s


Stay away from cocaine, people. *Shivers*

Keep in mind that this happened even before episode 5.


Edit: This is a great example of how something can be good despite bad contents here and there. Which is to say that Disney can't really 'ruin' Star Wars, whatever they do.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 5:29 AM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
It's probably a good thing, mainly because Lucas has become such a talentless hack. His Star Wars the Clone Wars animated series has been pretty good actually, except when his daughter did the writing for a season which completely sucked. Otherwise his reworking of the first (third) movie was horrific, and all the movies after the first two were likewise horror shows.

Pretty much. Those who have licensed the properties have done pretty well... especialy in the computer game arena. I've long felt like the torch was best picked up by SWKOTOR 1&2. Even their animated cut-scenes were better acted and directed than the prequels.

Disney is probably a good choice

I would just go by Disney's track record with Marvel, which elevated superhero movie quality from that publisher and had some long-term planning resulting in The Avengers. It remains to be seen what will occur with Pixar, since Pixar was BETTER than Disney (IMO) and I feel like I've seen a slight decline in some of their offerings (like Brave) as well as producing a movie like Cars 2.

As long as they can keep some edge to it the new movies might be pretty good.

Edge would be nice. They can make movies more dramatically interesting without losing PG or PG-13 status.

Now why don't they do that with Star Trek? The franchise needs a reboot on TV.

The movie reboot was great, although the upcoming one will clarify whether it just came nicely out of the blocks or doesn't have the strength to keep running so well.

The big problem with Trek IMO was the sheer glut of it -- at one point, I think there were three separate Trek series airing new episodes at one time, and I just couldn't keep up with them, so I bailed on everything. (Plus our kids were very young, so regular TV show viewing kind of went out the window for awhile.) I saw all of TNG, missed almost all of DSN, saw a season of Voyager, and then quit without ever seeing Enterprise.

I think, though, they would need to recreate the concepts. I don't know what Enterprise was like, but Voyager and TNG were very much this happy little series -- very formulaic, endings seem to reach a particular type of closure.

I was very much reminded of TNG when I watched Terra Nova and now episodes of Revolutions this season, but the reason is that TV and the TV audience has somewhat changed -- they want more depth, some ongoing plot interest, etc. I wanted to like Terra Nova very much, but it just kind of left me ill, everything felt too neatly packaged without a lot of compelling conflict... and Revolutions is leaving me the same way. The writing isn't as strong, dramatically.

I think Once Upon a Time is geared towards a younger audience as well and have kind of navigated in that old style, but the longer show arcs and twists have saved it at least through Season 2.
 

redbaron

irony based lifeform
Local time
Today 9:29 PM
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,253
---
Location
69S 69E
Yay! I wish all recordings of the new movies could be forever burned. It pains me to even think about them but I just pretend they don't exist and aren't really part of the Star Wars story.

I want to know which actors they're starring, I'd love to see Liev Schrieber as a Jedi.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Yesterday 11:29 PM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
Yay! I wish all recordings of the new movies could be forever burned.
I wouldn't be so harsh, granted there were parts that were cringe inducing but since I wasn't around when the original saga played out I didn't head into the theatre with such high expectations and in comparison to most of the other crap that comes out they weren't all that bad.
 

Proletar

Deus Sex Machina
Local time
Today 11:29 AM
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
730
---
Location
The Cold North
I wouldn't be so harsh, granted there were parts that were cringe inducing but since I wasn't around when the original saga played out I didn't head into the theatre with such high expectations and in comparison to most of the other crap that comes out they weren't all that bad.


True that.

Actually, I firmly enjoy the new trilogy. In my opinion, if a movie has great visuals and plot, bad acting is excusable, and vice versa. If one thing is great about a movie, other stuff doesn't really matter.

And by the way, Jar-Jar Binks? What about the ewoks? What about Chewbacka? What about a lot of the characters and the sub-plots from the old movies? Who cares, other things were good about them, and that is what we should hold on to. I, for one, LOVE the sub-plot about Palpatines scheming, and how you miss the fact that he in fact is the bad guy until the last second if you so much as lets a single line slip your mind. That's good writing.


But, of course, nothing can top 4 and 5.
 

redbaron

irony based lifeform
Local time
Today 9:29 PM
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,253
---
Location
69S 69E
True that.

Actually, I firmly enjoy the new trilogy. In my opinion, if a movie has great visuals and plot, bad acting is excusable, and vice versa.

I'd agree with you if the plots for the 3 newer movies weren't atrocious. I know a lot of people can't watch this review because of the guys voice, but it's actually very accurate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 3:29 AM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
you miss the fact that he in fact is the bad guy until the last second if you so much as lets a single line slip your mind.
... No? That was one of the most obvious things in the movie, right next to the knowledge that the doofy little boy was going to eventually become Darth Vader!
 

Proletar

Deus Sex Machina
Local time
Today 11:29 AM
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
730
---
Location
The Cold North
... No? That was one of the most obvious things in the movie, right next to the knowledge that the doofy little boy was going to eventually become Darth Vader!

The fact yes, but not the how.

I misspoke.
 

Jennywocky

Creepy Clown Chick
Local time
Today 5:29 AM
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,739
---
Location
Charn
And by the way, Jar-Jar Binks? What about the ewoks? What about Chewbacka? What about a lot of the characters and the sub-plots from the old movies? Who cares, other things were good about them, and that is what we should hold on to. I, for one, LOVE the sub-plot about Palpatines scheming, and how you miss the fact that he in fact is the bad guy until the last second if you so much as lets a single line slip your mind. That's good writing.

It wasn't really that great. It was pretty transparent, and on a par with the worst TV dramas. One merely has to watch any other movie and see more dramatic nuance than in the prequels.

I'll say unfortunately that Palpatine was probably one of the BETTER written characters, though, in the Prequels. If only the rest of the movie had floated up to that standard of competence, as low as that bar was set, the movie would have doubled in excellence.

One of our family memes: When one of my kids is getting dramatic, I'll suddenly just blurt out in the whiniest voice one could imagine, "Oh, Anakin -- you're breaking my heart!" And they all start to laugh.
 

Magus

Active Member
Local time
Today 10:29 AM
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
114
---
Eh. George Lucas ruined my childhood with the prequels. Not sure if my young adulthood can stand against the wrath of the Disney machine as well. Praying they don't ruin Han Solo though, he remains the only character untainted.

Joking of course (the prequels had nothing on the original series especially Hope and Empire mind you though), but hopefully Disney can do an alright job.

Does anyone have any info plotwise?
 

Wolf18

a who
Local time
Today 10:29 AM
Joined
Dec 24, 2012
Messages
575
---
Location
Far away from All This
Well, Timothy Zahn wrote 3 sequels to the original trilogy in the 1980s: Heir to the Empire, Dark Force Rising, and The Last Command. They're excellent sci-fi books. If the movies are based off them, I will be happy. Grand Admiral Thrawn would be a brilliant movie villain.

SW
 

Architect

Professional INTP
Local time
Today 3:29 AM
Joined
Dec 25, 2010
Messages
6,691
---
One of our family memes: When one of my kids is getting dramatic, I'll suddenly just blurt out in the whiniest voice one could imagine, "Oh, Anakin -- you're breaking my heart!" And they all start to laugh.

I use the Yoda voice on my INFJ to great effect when she gets all worked up

Eh. George Lucas ruined my childhood with the prequels.

The first released movie (however the numbering works out) sort of defined a good portion of my childhood. I lost interest after the third movie (release order)
 
Top Bottom