Maybe I'm alone here, but tired of this fountain of perpetual bullshit you seem tapped into. I realize that I'd be wasting my time responding, if this was only for your benefit, but looking at the big picture, I think it should be on record that this crap really is Intolerable.
I don't expect everyone to be happy with it. It probably seemed as though I was directly talking about women when I was actually referring to this in context of the discussion about women. Objectively both men and women suffer this problem.
Nevertheless, I prefer to condescend in a dialogue format, so I will make these concepts as simple as possible for you.
Ok, we'll settle for simple. Have at it.
Despite current cultural dynamics resulting from globalization and overcrowding, human penis size alone provides pulsating, engorged evidence that sexual selection has fallen squarely on the female of the species throughout at least the majority of human history/evolution. Human penises are gigantic compared to other primates.
You mean like horse cocks? Are horses and their enormous brains only submitting their enormous vaginas to studs with enormous cocks?
Or is it just a physical reality that males with larger cocks are more successful breeders?
I would argue that some species have a very easy time reproducing so small cocks and large cocks carry the same success ratio.
Why are we breeding larger schlongs, you may ask? It all comes down to the size of our.... brains. Humans have much larger brains than other primates. It necessitates a much larger birth canal ("vagina"). Now, a small, dissatisfying penis can still impregnate a woman as well as a larger one (our natural lubricant is also slightly spermicidal). The problem is, it's not very pleasureable (the kama sutra just isn't enough. Amirte, ladies?). So, women have been breeding men to have larger and larger penises, which are more stimulating to our bigger vaginas, which are accommodating our ridiculously big-headed babies.
I fail to see what brain size has to do with cock size. Perhaps you've overlooked something fairly
simple here.
Last I checked women generally don't think a longer cock makes them get off any faster. Probably because all the nerve endings in your vagina are on the outside, not inside.
You caught us. We're all Beliebers.
The following is textbook material, and so no one is really bothering with these basic concepts in everyday studies. I could list some textbooks for you, but I don't expect you to read them. I'll summarize.
Men (as a rule) like healthy women. Pretty women are healthy.
Women (as a rule) like men who are expressive and seem capable of providing resources and protection during the vulnerable years of pregnancy and early child-rearing.
Oh come off that horseshit. Ok, maybe you just don't know what I'm referring to. I'll put it this way. In America, it is completely normal these days for a seemingly beautiful, normal woman with a great job to be stuck with a gorilla with a low IQ, poor social skills and no job! This is actually the most common thing going in American ghettos these days. A horde of children following behind a mother they will never impress in Academics, in a professional way and probably not a cultural way.
So pray tell how that is possible given your 'rule' posted above? Do you think they're happy?
Of course, these things are partially contextual. The ecosystem and available resources, along with population size, dynamics and lifestyle, are all important contextual factors that affect views of health and prosperity. However, this isn't brainwashing, propaganda, or whatever you tell yourself when you're feeling lonely.
I wasn't thinking of my lonely self when I was writing this. I was thinking of the last time some angry lady was bitching to me about her fucked up boyfriend who I could have told her years ago was a waste of her time. Too bad the tattoos and the one liners were her kryptonite eh? I wonder why that is..
You're right, of course. The Romans were progressive humanitarians, and dedicated nurturers of the human spirit. From their tyrannical leaders to their military decimations, genocidal campaigns, thriving slave trade for sex and labor, and their incredible insight regarding the barbarian races, it's no wonder they we so forward-thinking about the fate of their young women. I agree that we could all learn a thing or two from their example.
Do you always paint in such giant brush strokes?
A people can be complete barbarians and still have a superior way of doing something.
What can I say? Women are stupid. I mean, who are we to have a say in who we have sex with? Our vapid, impressionable minds just can't handle those big, important decisions.
I'll correct you. I assumed you took it the wrong way and you did. Allow me to fix this.
PEOPLE ARE ARE STUPID. This is precisely why adults hold consent for young people ( who are most prone to being stupid ).
That's really all arranged marriages were. A way to prevent a young human from wrecking her life.
I'm so embarrassed. I wish I had read this before I even started. You know women. I mean, with evidence like this, I don't know why we even bother with books and reading and all that wasteful sciencey stuff.
I don't think science disagrees.
As a side note, I think I've stumbled on to something.
Average penis size appears to be smaller in regions where women are traditionally less empowered to choose their mate. I realize the connection is still conjecture at this point, but I'd like to see a study comparing the length of time in which forced/arranged marriage practices have been common, and the size of the average fuck-stick.
Hello! I think I'm gonna need to move to Venezuela..
Well it probably does ring true because in those societies, large cocks attached to useless assholes don't get used nearly as much where it matters. Maybe they should come here. You don't need a job to breed in America.
.
