Picture typing. Help me.

[own8ge]

I really need a picture typing buddy... Will you help me, please?

1. http://24.media.tumblr.com/0e0cfd78f41947ff75cd4043ed32ffa2/tumblr_mgsyp4qmt21s3r8vpo1_1280.jpg
Fi.

2. http://24.media.tumblr.com/f423d36a79619311f7b76f8487e697fc/tumblr_mhtny4KBKo1rk5655o1_500.jpg
INFP?

3. http://24.media.tumblr.com/2b60d52f4a731eccbc7275d4e1869610/tumblr_mhuk5kgGoY1s3ih7oo1_500.jpg
ISFJ? (Or Fi?)

4. http://24.media.tumblr.com/23be6681ccb3859f523ca4aea3bfbd20/tumblr_mhtzh4SxfV1s3imlbo1_500.jpg
ESFP?

5. http://24.media.tumblr.com/16cf4e8b1986478b92d56463c4626a84/tumblr_mhh26htZtL1rk5655o1_500.png
INFP? (ENFP?)

6. http://25.media.tumblr.com/cb550f4e99a5f89bfc47ba2f0b88d3c0/tumblr_mi45q8zoRW1rk5655o1_500.jpg
ENFP? (ENTP?) (Or perhaps a Sensor?)

7. http://25.media.tumblr.com/5454adf1d3212f74478835b20971e419/tumblr_miu73cBLWD1s6odj5o1_500.jpg
ENTJ?

8. http://24.media.tumblr.com/6fc9173a96130c250fcaacb0937bbfe1/tumblr_mj36daCgZN1rk5655o1_500.jpg
ESTP?

9. http://25.media.tumblr.com/bbe663842f8379b556c93c40303c59f3/tumblr_mi3y839v251rk5655o1_500.jpg
ESFP?

10. http://25.media.tumblr.com/48a3a8060a2d48eb8824c2717851a7f3/tumblr_mh6mme9ryT1s43m0ro1_500.jpg
ISTJ? ISFJ?

11. http://24.media.tumblr.com/1552276d7a194b38df0baef7bc33096e/tumblr_mhpd1cr3PQ1s3g9mjo1_500.jpg
INFJ? ENFP?

12. http://25.media.tumblr.com/9e7002d6dc8c7c7e7b1a69440a5228a7/tumblr_mhmdqenMRD1s0y7n7o1_500.jpg
ENFP?

13. http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3nz9ybGfv1qdixm6o1_500.jpg
ENTP?

14. http://24.media.tumblr.com/a8775046d52ef0f13585044267b8d7e9/tumblr_mg8d4pAuBH1qzb6wpo1_500.jpg
?

15. http://25.media.tumblr.com/6611cc807308fa4deadfdc1f40498b7b/tumblr_mh6vbkK7Ys1rpvklbo1_500.jpg
ENTJ?

16. http://24.media.tumblr.com/921e5fb2ae8b03e9e1e0bc542cfdd510/tumblr_mfym4ienBX1rmhj53o1_500.jpg
ENFJ?

17. http://25.media.tumblr.com/e00a60eab037e11d0f00dd5ef1de5437/tumblr_mjd2vvAzeE1s6ndy0o1_1280.jpg
?

 

[Chad]

I confused how do you expect someone to type another person by just a photo?
Secondly, What is you obsession with juvenile boys?

It's just a little creepy dude.

 

[own8ge]

@Chad
Do you have a problem with me?

1. Picture typing is 100 percent possible. It can be done with great accuracy.
2. Premature subjects are the utmost clear examples of the types. -Older subjects become more unique but will always keep the typological features they have which were utmost obvious in their premature years. Imagine it like this: Babies all look alike, Old folks all look unique. Premature is the perfect age.

 

[Montresor]

You should post pictures of yourself in all the same poses.

 

[own8ge]

@Montresor
It won't be possible. The typological ques of your personality type will always be visible, no matter how you 'pull your face'. Pulling your face will only fool those of whom don't know what to look for.

 

[Chad]

@Chad
Do you have a problem with me?

1. Picture typing is 100 percent possible. It can be done with great accuracy.
2. Premature subjects are the utmost clear examples of the types (due their state of development).

No, I do not have a problem with you per say I just don't agree that your theory is possible. There are too many unknown factors your theory would be assume that look is driven by physiological factors which has been studied and been proven wrong. I learn this much form taking classes on the history of criminal profiling. They have proven time and time again that someone appears can not my statistically tied to any physiological know functions. Therefore statistically typing someone MBTI functions by appearance alone would be near impossible if not impossible.

I am also not convinced that it is possible to type people form videos either even though I see this as more likely than photos as mannerisms are more likely tied to type than appearances are tied to typing.

The other question was just out our curiosity because I find having a collection of Juvenile male photos to me creepy. This is more likely just a person issue driven by my conscientious and I meant no offense sorry if it was implied.

 

[Nick]

lol @ this post.
I am not qualified to type people at face value but I will agree with @Chad that your sample population is quiet odd.

 

[own8ge]

No, I do not have a problem with you per say I just don't agree that your theory possible. There are too many unknown factors your theory would be assume that look is driven by physiological factors which has been studied and been proven wrong. I learn this much form taking classes on the history of criminal profiling. They have proven time and time again that someone appears can not my statistically tied to any physiological know functions. Therefore statistically typing someone MBTI functions by appearance alone would be near impossible if not impossible.

I am also not convinced that it is possible to type people form videos either even though I see this as more likely than photos as mannerisms are more likely tied to type than appearances are tied to typing.

The other question was just out our curiosity because I find having a collection of Juvenile male photos to me creepy. This is more likely just a person issue driven by my conscientious and I meant no offense sorry if it was implied.

Physiological typing is being considered the most accurate way of reading one's personality type. Pod'Lair theory (which is somewhat an extended version of MBTI) holds the record for accurate personality typing. They use physiological ques to determine the personality type. (They also agree that picture typing/reading is accurate).

Think of it like this: If you stare long enough, you will see all their underlying emotions etc. You can link this with the Jungian functions, concluding their personality type. (Provided that you are observing correctly, you might even recognize other people of whom you will know they have the same personality type. Evidently, this enables accurate 'quick-typing')

 

[Montresor]

I would expect that a picture doesn't relay anything more than a person's appearance.

From what I've seen on video typing there is an objective methodology but it involves searching the face and body language for clues.

Full on typing from a photograph seems ridiculous. I challenge you to rationalize even one of your judgements.

 

[joal0503]

are those just stock images? i ask, wondering if there is a way you can CONFIRM your 'readings' with an actual answer to compare it to.

because without that, you are just playing a guessing game.

ESFJ ^

 

[own8ge]

I would expect that a picture doesn't relay anything more than a person's appearance.

From what I've seen on video typing there is an objective methodology but it involves searching the face and body language for clues.

Full on typing from a photograph seems ridiculous. I challenge you to rationalize even one of your judgements.

One's physique is determined by how the brain works. It can be directly reflected with the Jungian functions. This is old news folks... Have you been living under a rock lately?

are those just stock images? i ask, wondering if there is a way you can CONFIRM your 'readings' with an actual answer to compare it to.

because without that, you are just playing a guessing game.

Every judgment that is being made can be considered a guess. But that is an irrational philosophy, innit? ... Judgment is based on perception, always. If you see an apple, you know it's an apple. The same go's with the personality types.

(If you have build up a working worldview, the conclusions you draw from that will be accurate as long as your judgment is accurate. If others agree with your drawn conclusions it becomes objective, thus reliant/certain until further ado)

 

[Chad]

Okay we are not talking about Physiological typing here as physiological typing by default is the same thing as personality typing.

Weather you can successfully type someone is a different question all together.

You are saying you can type someone just by seeing a picture of that person.

There are very few if any physiological ques in a pictures. I can see the idea being used in videos of people and I see a possibility for this use limitied of course by nonvisual indicators as well as the possibility that visual indicators can to changed or altered by effects that have nothing to do with personality types. (such as developments issues, ailments, age, ticks, and even physiological abnormalities that are not personality related, hormonal/puberty effect.).

Lastly who are They. This is not are very convincing argument if I don't know who "they" are.

As for as my counter argument goes. I am talking about behavior scientific the debunked the once popular belief in criminal justice that one could profile a criminal based on how they looked and other eugenic factors. They believe that ugly (or appealing people) were an outside manifestation of the inner nature of the soul. Therefore all evil people are ugly. This of course is absurd. That is why behavior scientist have studied this effect in dept they have concluded that there isn't any probability reason to believe this effect.

I will remand open minded your theories but I don't see enough proof you validate it as of right now. Stranger things have happened.

 

[Ink]

This is stupid

Have a read if you're interested: http://socionist.blogspot.se/2006/12/do-socionists-diagnose-type-using.html

 

[own8ge]

@Ink
You are stupid.

 

[Ink]

@Ink
You are stupid.

That's quite an immature insult, want to expand on that?

 

[Chad]

This is stupid

Have a read if you're interested: http://socionist.blogspot.se/2006/12/do-socionists-diagnose-type-using.html

I agree interesting article @Ink

 

[own8ge]

@Ink
Don't be hypocritical. You called this topic stupid, thus you argue the reliability of my worldview. Which is my dominant function (thus the utmost offense you could give).

I merely returned the favor, by calling you stupid (as Ti is your dominant function).

Besides, I'm not wrong about picture typing. I'm not here to convince you. I posted this thread MERELY for those who actually share this ability.

 

[Ink]

Well then... It's still stupid. What is the point? The accuracy will be extremely low no matter how "good" you are.

 

[own8ge]

@Ink
Well then, you are still stupid. What you are saying simply isn't true. Picture typing can be done with 95+ percent accuracy. (THAT, is my worldview... Go ahead and disagree with me, but I am certain of myself so I don't need this discussion with you.)

 

[Ink]

Ok, I'll join in, ESTP on 8. Please come with the results soon

 

[Chad]

Well then, you are still stupid. What you are saying simply isn't true. Picture typing can be done with 95+ percent accuracy. (THAT, is my worldview... Go ahead and disagree with me, but I am certain of myself so I don't need this discussion with you.)

Wow, you can not be more close minded and arrogant. You can't stand to have a wrong worldview yet it is also impossible for anyone worldview to be including yours to be perfect. You claim to have the ability to understand other people perspective but you can't relate to anyone else of this site. Therefore your worldview is at least wrong in two aspect. If this is the only place were your worldview is deficient that I would count you a genius.

I am not saying you are dumb just wrong on some aspects of life. Your worldview isn't perfect no reason to cry about it.

 

[Montresor]

Wow why am I compelled to keep posting on this thread?


1. Blank eyes, indicative of Fi. Not ISFJ.
3. Same argument. Eerily Fi.
5. Clearly displaying Fe, meaning not INFP or ENFP.
6. This person is a sensor. Not ENFP.

These are the ones I care to point out as obviously incorrect.

Also, I think #11 is the only INTP. You guessed INFP.

I can admit, at this time, that this little game you've brought forward has kept me busy for 20 minutes and helped me exercise the practise of breaking MBTI types down into functions, as well as searching for visible cues. I accept that people get better at it with practice, meaning that some could potentially achieve 95% accuracy.

 

[joal0503]

One's physique is determined by how the brain works. It can be directly reflected with the Jungian functions. This is old news folks... Have you been living under a rock lately?

"One's physique is determined by how the brain works." I really didnt know this to be a fact. are you referring to Sheldon's work (ecotmorph, mesomorph, endomorph)? If you are, its complete bullshit (unless of course, you live with me under my rock fort)

Using physiology to determine temperament to me is a shaky subject...I see more cultural stereotyping, than I do accurate typing. In fact, thats my whole problem with this. It just seems to run off of generalizations and stereotypes. Not actual information or feedback from the subject being studied.


Every judgment that is being made can be considered a guess. But that is an irrational philosophy, innit? ... Judgment is based on perception, always. If you see an apple, you know it's an apple. The same go's with the personality types.

See, I disagree. An apple is an apple. True. But humans are not apples. What we can SEE, is a human. But thats it. Do not confuse JUDGEMENT with PREJUDGEMENT.


(If you have build up a working worldview, the conclusions you draw from that will be accurate as long as your judgment is accurate. If others agree with your drawn conclusions it becomes objective, thus reliant/certain until further ado)

I understand what you are trying to do, I just would say it appears futile, without ACTUAL data about that person to confirm your guesses. Using stock image resources seems incredibly pointless, because you can never really find anything else related to their physiology. Illusions are a form of deception, and thats all you are getting with those pictures.

I guess, if you are just having fun with it and just playin a game for entertainment, thats all good. Im not trying to bang this thread or anything, dont get me wrong. I just see a problem if you truly are trying to type a friend of yours with just pictures. I would guess it to be better to attempt to type off of your experiences with them instead?

 

[ProxyAmenRa]

Ohh god! They're all so young...

 

[joal0503]

Ohh god! They're all so young...

the bieber clone army arises...

 

[own8ge]

@Montresor

Sweet! I want to marry you.

5. Are you sure he uses Fe rather than a Fi>Te?
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=160249470791781&set=vb.530499896968602&type=2&theater

Here is some1 I know IRL, of whom I know is an NFP.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/309541_2206457525033_75354236_n.jpg

 

[own8ge]

@joal0503

Fair enough. The purpose of this is to practice typing.
I can agree with some of your viewpoints, with some I disagree. I think picture typing to have potential, I might be wrong. But so far, I have made some accurate judgments on pictures (thus proving it to be useful/working).

Here, let me give you an example.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5097/5469400772_813e6d605e.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528522_382965018441005_1633105604_n.jpg

These are both ESTPs. The 1st is someone I know from TV, the second one is someone out of my class. Based on pure physique I 'prejudged' (as you call it), this mate out my class to be an ESTP. After I got to know him, I was indeed right. (This, is just 1 example of many)

---
It's not that I judge purely based on concrete things, I look for the emotions etc behind the facial expressions. That is how I observe (The layers behind that what is visible).

... ALSO... Pod'Lair theory has learned us that Ti dominants have spider hands. This is actually true. Every Ti dominant person I know, has this. So by merely observing the hands, you could determine this... (This hand thing, is merely 1 out of many ways of determining a personality type.. Combine them all, and it'll become accurate)

 

[Chad]

the bieber clone army arises...

That exactly what I was thinking.

 

[ProxyAmenRa]

the bieber clone army arises...

bahahaha! hilarious!

 

[Montresor]

@Montresor

Sweet! I want to marry you. Are you a girl?

5. Are you sure he uses Fe rather than a Fi>Te? Yes absolutely I am.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=160249470791781& Noset=vb.530499896968602&type=2&theater

Not sure what you want with this facebook photo ... this isn't Fe if that's what you're asking.

Here is some1 I know IRL, of whom I know is an NFP. Fi again.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/309541_2206457525033_75354236_n.jpg

I only want to marry girls.

I am confused about some of those pictures who is the person you know? And yes, #5 in the original list is showing Fe. Clear as day.

 

[joal0503]

@joal0503

Fair enough. The purpose of this is to practice typing.
I can agree with some of your viewpoints, with some I disagree. I think picture typing to have potential, I might be wrong. But so far, I have made some accurate judgments on pictures (thus proving it to be useful/working).

Here, let me give you an example.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5097/5469400772_813e6d605e.jpg
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/528522_382965018441005_1633105604_n.jpg

These are both ESTPs. The 1st is someone I know from TV, the second one is someone out of my class. Based on pure physique I 'prejudged' (as you call it), this mate out my class to be an ESTP. After I got to know him, I was indeed right. (This, is just 1 example of many)

---
It's not that I judge purely based on concrete things, I look for the emotions etc behind the facial expressions. That is how I observe (The layers behind that what is visible).

... ALSO... Pod'Lair theory has learned us that Ti dominants have spider hands. This is actually true. Every Ti dominant person I know, has this. So by merely observing the hands, you could determine this... (This hand thing, is merely 1 out of many ways of determining a personality type.. Combine them all, and it'll become accurate)

what happened to 'lets just leave it at that'? ... dont sweat it dude, you arent going to convince me that you have quasi psychic reading abilities, and you dont have to. whatever floats your boat man.

 

[own8ge]

@joal0503
I was not trying to convince you. And actually at first I'd have 'leave it at that', But then Fe kicked in... You did the effort to post something sweet, so I did some effort to clarify my perspective