One logical problem

[s0cratus]

One logical problem.
=.
On the one hand:
We cannot reach constant speed of photon (c=1)
but we say that photon exists.
One the other hand :
We cannot reach absolute zero ( T= 0K) but we can read:
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
==,
The logical problem is:
Why to one and the same problem ( we cannot reach , , . )
we give two different solutions:
a )photon exist and has meaning , , but
b) there is such a thing as absolute zero . . . . .but it has no meaning ?
==..
Maybe therefore someone wrote:
' If you try to search for 'reference frame ' for the photon
'emission & re-emission', you will find only some
'Quantum-Mechanics' Mumbo jumbo and very little else.'
==..

 

[Black Rose]

A Temperature Below Absolute Zero: Atoms at Negative Absolute Temperature Are the Hottest Systems in the World

 

[BigApplePi]

s0cratus

One logical problem.
=.
On the one hand:
We cannot reach constant speed of photon (c=1)
but we say that photon exists.
One the other hand :
We cannot reach absolute zero ( T= 0K) but we can read:
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
==,
The logical problem is:
Why to one and the same problem ( we cannot reach , , . )
we give two different solutions:
a )photon exist and has meaning , , but
b) there is such a thing as absolute zero . . . . .but it has no meaning ?
==..
Maybe therefore someone wrote:
' If you try to search for 'reference frame ' for the photon
'emission & re-emission', you will find only some
'Quantum-Mechanics' Mumbo jumbo and very little else.'
==..

My understanding of what you're saying is limited but I have a couple comments.

I've always assumed absolute zero represents zero motion of whatever it is. So it is a limit which is never reached.

I don't know what a photon is, but it seems to always be in motion. So if those two things are true, I'm ready to hear the QM mumbo-jumbo.

 

[walfin]

This depends on what your definition of exists is.

Does an asymptote exist?

 

[s0cratus]

P,S.
"Quantum gas goes below absolute zero"
http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-gas-goes-below-absolute-zero-1.12146
/ Posted 03 January 2013 /
It is hard to me to say something,
but ,it seems, that this discovery is a step to correct our logic.
===…

 

[BigApplePi]

P,S.
"Quantum gas goes below absolute zero"

Evidence?

 

[s0cratus]

One wrote: ' Universe inside black holes'
Other wrote: ' our universe came from a supermassive black hole'
Third wrote: ' black holes is a mother for . . . another universes'
I say that that all these sentences are equal to the sentence:
'All universes are inside vacuum'.
Why?
Because black holes and vacuum have one and the same temperature
near to absolute zero ( or absolute zero T=0K ).
Because they all can radiate energy . .. . . .
and this radiation changes the surrounding space
and this radiation can create new universes ( material universes).
=.
And if someone would ask ' the conditions BEFORE the big bang'
the answer is given as 'it was nothing- no time, no space'
it means ' it was no gravity time, it was no gravity space',
it was 'nothingness' ,
it means: it was only an eternal, infinite absolute vacuum: T=0K
. ====,,,

 

[SLushhYYY]

That is a good point. Its a blow to mainstream science who reject string theory and energy beyond the speed of light, but accept other unimaginables. Maybe not.