peoplesuck
is escaping
post your thoughts
Last edited:
No. Evolution is slow, over-population is recent.
someone check japan, its supper clustered.
Even the girls 0_o?
Do larger populations show a greater percentage being homosexual?
Genetic mutations are slow but some adaptations exist as dormant genes that awake during specific situations.
Evolution is an unguided random process.
Evolution is an unguided random process.
that is interesting. japan sounds cool for desperate people xD(guys)
Genetic mutations are slow but some adaptations exist as dormant genes that awake during specific situations.
No evidence suggests this. In fact evolution tends to be more beneficial than not.
Wishful thinking. Maybe you should join the Discovery institute
Non beneficial evolution dies out. Or maybe you are speaking of the other stuff I posted. Just a creative thought.
I assumed nothing. You assumed that evolution is not guided by some means.. It is less plausible but not impossible until you can prove otherwise.
Nothing is impossible, you can never prove a negative. Is there any reason to think that evolution is guided by some means? Elsewise: spaghetti monster.
Mutations occur by accident and if the mutation survives, it is passed down to future generations. These mutations accumulate overtime to produce new species.
.
Yes, random.
Random is just a way of saying "we don't know" but with a label. I don't know.
I thought you just said a purpose-driven evolution was less plausible? That doesn't fit together with there being no more reason to believe it random.
MISCONCEPTION: Evolutionary theory implies that life evolved (and continues to evolve) randomly, or by chance.
CORRECTION: Chance and randomness do factor into evolution and the history of life in many different ways; however, some important mechanisms of evolution are non-random and these make the overall process non-random. For example, consider the process of natural selection, which results in adaptations — features of organisms that appear to suit the environment in which the organisms live (e.g., the fit between a flower and its pollinator, the coordinated response of the immune system to pathogens, and the ability of bats to echolocate). Such amazing adaptations clearly did not come about "by chance." They evolved via a combination of random and non-random processes. The process of mutation, which generates genetic variation, is random, but selection is non-random. Selection favored variants that were better able to survive and reproduce (e.g., to be pollinated, to fend off pathogens, or to navigate in the dark). Over many generations of random mutation and non-random selection, complex adaptations evolved. To say that evolution happens "by chance" ignores half of the picture. To learn more about the process of natural selection, visit our article on this topic. To learn more about random mutation, visit our article on DNA and mutations.
Random is just a way of saying "we don't know" but with a label. I don't know.
Evolution is an unguided random process.
Do you even science?
Mutations are random; however evolution is an accumulation of successful mutations, ergo not random.
I disagree strongly with this. Evolution is purposeless, random. Absolutely purposeless. Instances where it is deemed successful are a matter of probability AND happenstance, only.
Mutations occur by accident and if the mutation survives, it is passed down to future generations. These mutations accumulate overtime to produce new species.
BOOM! Evolution.
I disagree strongly with this. Evolution is purposeless, random. Absolutely purposeless. Instances where it is deemed successful are a matter of probability AND happenstance, only.
Well for one thing I've been told before this is actually speciation. We're not really talking about speciation here, are we?
Speciation: the formation of new and distinct species in the course of evolution.
It's directly related to evolution and completely relevant. ^^
Oh ok so that's relevant but when you accuse me of 'confusing adaptation./mutation with evolution' it's the crux of your argument...
Just so we can move forward I want to be clear that I am accurate on this.
My point is that evolution is the overall process which is not random because it relies on natural selection. Survival of the fittest is not a random event, the fittest survive.
Fitness is random. It's directly determined by environmental conditions, which are random.
Fitness rises and falls with the tides.
No. Evolution is slow, over-population is recent.
Evolution is an unguided random process.
Do you even science?
Mutations are random; however evolution is an accumulation of successful mutations, ergo not random.
I don't think so. The way I see it (and I very well may be wrong), is that homosexuality is the result of environmental factors. i.e. the homosexual individual's own life experiences. I'm not saying that I think there is some underlying cause of homosexuality. Rather, I'm saying that I think it's a result of the individual's thought processes as they develop into maturity.Could homosexuality be an adaptation of an overpopulated world?