According to some of the works of some specific self claimed enlightened people (most of the gurus are just narcissist, (You are human with flaws and ego! Obey me! respect me! I have transcended the self , a fully awakened soul muhahahhahahah!! Give me money, bow before me! you a girl? Come sleep with me! Hey you disciples maintain celibacy, never contact with opposite sex. This is the scenario most of the time lol)), I have found some of them to be pretty 'realistic' because they focuses on negation of every belief systems of hocus focus mumbo jumbo, social construction.
They don't promote all the powerful spiritual experiences about moments of infinite bliss, oneness with the universe, kundalini awakening, seeing light within and all that stuff, because they seemed to see them as just feeting moments and not really bringing much of a real psychological change but just addition to memory and when people find one moment to be pleasant they again seek behind such experiences and just end up as slaves.
They also didn't promote higher levels of consciousness and altered states and all that, and also wasn't interested in saikick powers like remote viewing, clairvoyance and other superhuman powers though apparently they believed those existed and cultivable but they didn't care a bit about them.
They say there can be strong spiritual experiences which may just some psychological things, strong insights, some people can have great powers, or easy access to altered states of consciousness and all that but still may not be liberated or truly mature.
They don't really denounce all this spiritual powers, but they just mean that there is no real relation between all that mumbo jumbo with true liberation or maturity.
One of them said this thing: A man seeking for a woman is innocent in front of so called spiritual guys seeking permanent bliss.
The point is spirituality appears to be about restricting bhogya or material enjoyment but yet hypocirtically most of the time it is associated with greed of even more pleasure and bliss and all that.
These people promoted the simplicity of the state of pure awareness. These people though experienced powerful spiritual visions and experiences were not attached to them and later they even stopped having or cultivating such experienced.
They supported the simplicity of just 'being'.
Just as psychology said, man is a work of stimulis, memorie,s habits and conditionings.
There are multiple selves.
There is no one 'I'.
There is no centre of I (soul).
The I dies and a new 'I' gets created every moment.
So these guys negated associated with their own mind, body and all of that, they talked about the thing that always is, that is the thing that creates the illusion of continuity of 'I'.
What is it?
Simple awareness.
Degree of consciousness changes. (like while sleeping consciousness becomes very dim)
But the simple pure awareness is always the same, even when you become mad due to physcial changes.
THey called this state of pure awareness as the pure being, the silent witness, but they also called something about going beyond that to the absolute source of all these, which I don't know much about.
Also they spoke about non-duality of experiencer and experience which is true, because without experience there is no experiencer and without experiencer there is no experience and it is because of this buddha said there is no independant do-er or self (soul) that the philosophers preached at Buddha's time.
And you may have noticed, that the work is best when the sense of self (ego) disappears and you become the action itself.
When you find sometime to interesting and you get lost in it, completely dissolved, and any sesne of 'I am seeing it and all that' disappears, that is when the best work is done.
It is like getting lost in the art while drawing it.
SO one guy also promoted this thing, about this spontaneous action, (getting completely lost in the present moment, becoming the moment itself which I found to be true from my experience).
Whenever an 'I' comes out, trouble comes out, you start to interpret, judge and think all stuffs, you start to think 'oh it is boring' 'oh it is this, well wahetevr' or 'about future stuff'
and you lose the moment.
(But getting lost in thought is also living in the present, no?).
But the problem is which you think about denying something, and still ahve to do it, then it gets troublesome, and suffering occurs, at that moment if one can let go of the 'I' and mix with the experience completely it can be fun and better works can be done this way.
( the masters do without doing and that is why their work is so great or something like that was written in Tao Te ching, I think)
But these stuff I can understand.
Also the theory of all is one I can understand, like my body is not an isolated system, it is continously interacting with universe to grow and all that so in a sense the whole universe in my body (just like my organs within are workng together in harmony to maintain the body, my body and universe is working together too) and then when I die, my body will change form, decompose (or it will be incinerated to ash and mix with the air (thats what happens here)).
So it is an interdependant system.
But some of these guys (who did say a lot of practical things) also made a claim that the pure aware state is all there is, all is within the consciousness, the world is within us not we within the world just like in a dream (where we are the whole world, the dream and the dreamer)
(in a sense it is true because whatever we see is under consciousness but if things exist outside it or not it is impossible to know because if I go beyond consciousness then there will be no 'me' left to percieve whats beyond but the point is we can't know, but how is that guy so sure that there is nothing outside?) and also that the pure awareness is eternal, it was always there, and always will be, birthless and thus deathless, body and mind was born, those will die, infact the mind dies pretty much every moment, but the pure and the simple awareness is eternal : which I am not so sure about. May be I need enlightenment for that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc5c/3dc5c4ffbe4ca8e5e0f4c3e25668c26f96e55480" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
)
Well in the end it is more fun without any 'binding' desires expectations, or any power of predictions or control over life, I let life unfold itself, uncertainty is the real fun.
When you can control and have absolute power, there is no fun.
So I just 'be'. I don't run behind power and control anymore.
( I still do but it is just for fun, without any serious expectation or stuff)
I do meditation when I feel like, and I do it for the sake of nothing,
I just get into inner silence, I let thoughts come and go without interfering or involving in it,
if I get involved and then realize it I get detached again and continue, with more adaptation, thoughts lessen too, mind get silent too. And then I pretty much spontaneously stop meditating.
I pretty much have no control. Things went on happening. Just like I am just going on typing. It all works pretty much on it's own.
I just go with the flow, without resisting anything not even resistance (now it is confusing isn't it? not resisting resistance? But I don't think about all these stuff, because I don't feel like)
When my inner nature get more and more centred in the pure state of awareness and just 'be', mind and body automatically balances and adapts, becomes more and more silent, and just works on their own just like my heart is beating on its own, nose is breathing on it's own,
All goes on on its own, why stress trying control it? Its more fun to not know, and see things happen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/891ad/891ad5775371410c654c59f6531842d3c961248c" alt="Elephant :elephant: :elephant:"