It has been my experience that (except for people who are just anti-math) most people gravitate to either geometry or algebra. It looks like my preference for geometry is similar to many people here. That might be an INTP thing, since most people I have met prefer algebra and hate geometry.
I don't hate algebra, though. My dad is a brilliant math teacher, and I had some other good ones along the way, especially my HS Physics teacher who took the time to make sure everyone understood things, so eventually I mastered and enjoyed algebra as well. I've also taught it in vocational schools with great success.
I have a lot to say on the subject of math education, which I will mostly spare you. But I will say we need to get rid of the insane vocabulary. Don't "multiply by the multiplicative inverse" if you have an inconvenient coefficient. Move it across the equals and put it on the bottom. Get rid of set theory in HS, too. No one needs to know if something is in the set of counting numbers, natural numbers, whole numbers, rational numbers, or real numbers. Who cares? If someone cares, let them explore it, but no one needs that stuff on their final exams.
@figaro_black: I have a book called
Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers by Jan Gullberg, a very dense book filled with love of math, fun, and history, as well as great explanations of everything. The author is from Sweden, and many times he writes about his frustration with the mathematical education in Sweden. A short example, on the topic of New Math and Set Theory is
An idea that was meant to simplify in fact complicated matters. A dull but useful drill was replaced by a dull and useless drill. Sadly, in Sweden and other countries, the New Math created a generation with sometimes very limited residual arithmetic skill. p. 232
There are a lot of other comments like that. So you are not alone in your complaint. You might want to check out the book. It is actually a lot of fun to look through.