IssphitiKOzS
Banned
From the irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk, but you've nothing to say.
Said by the guy who makes mostly nonsensical one liner threads.
From the irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk,
From the irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk, but you've nothing to say.
From the irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk, but you've nothing to say.
From the irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk, but you've nothing to say.
Said by the guy who makes mostly nonsensical one liner threads.
Very clever, isn't it? That's exactly the impression it is intended to leave. By dismissing the talk as irrelevant babble, the underlying subtext passes directly to the subconscious. In this way, the Illuminati Overlords can direct their agenda much more effectively than their old method of thought-stealing rays directed through broadcast television. I mean, that Cold War tech had its day, but the aluminum foil beanies were more efficacious than could be openly acknowledged. Also, they tended to set off garage door openers.
So my point is that stunning figure eights might be tidy against the background of wretched porcupines, but singular interest is nowhere to be chastised for its apricot solitiousness.
Folks seem to have favorites whom they talk to and amongst. I conceive of the forum as a middle school cafeteria: many, varied and simultaneous conversations.
Said by the guy who makes mostly nonsensical one liner threads.
From your irrelevant babble posts I've seen, it's like you just want to talk, but you've nothing to say.
You are an INTJ(?).
The depth of conversation lies in the creativity of the listener rather than the speaker.
The depth of conversation lies in the creativity of the listener rather than the speaker.
I disagree. The breadth and depth lie in the intriguing constitution of the material. Our optional aesthetic job, as humans, is to fully appreciate and discriminate between boring and interesting stimuli. When one consumes a drug, especially one which wiggles a wand of specious beauty over one's surroundings, one appears to lose the ability to discern between something truly beautiful and something merely appearing beautiful. There is, in fact, a distinction between these two things.
Is there an extra/unnecessary comma in that sentence?
Said by the guy who makes mostly nonsensical one liner threads.
You are an INTJ(?).
Very clever, isn't it? That's exactly the impression it is intended to leave. By dismissing the talk as irrelevant babble, the underlying subtext passes directly to the subconscious. In this way, the Illuminati Overlords can direct their agenda much more effectively than their old method of thought-stealing rays directed through broadcast television. I mean, that Cold War tech had its day, but the aluminum foil beanies were more efficacious than could be openly acknowledged. Also, they tended to set off garage door openers.
So my point is that stunning figure eights might be tidy against the background of wretched porcupines, but singular interest is nowhere to be chastised for its apricot solitiousness.
I thought we'd agreed to keep the Illuminati connection and the apricots a secret?
Pretty much a prolix sugar-coated way of saying what I said:
Indeed: I only appear ugly.