PaulMaster
Well-Known Member
Ill be taking a little road trip in about a month. I like to be prepared. When crossing state lines I usually carry a machete or a baseball bat. Front seat, hotel room, etc...
Anyone else?
Anyone else?
Wow must be tiresome?I carry my fists everywhere.
Wow must be tiresome?
Don't really need a weapon in metropolitan Australia. Not unless you're asking for trouble, at least. Or appear to be weak or are part of an ethnic minority (which is pretty sad, really).
Rural Australia is a bit different. I was raised in the middle of nowhere, and although I never felt any need to carry a weapon, I know a lot of people who do. That said, I've had to talk my way out of a number of dangerous situations (some involving weapons), and had a few physical altercations, but never ones involving weapons (usually drunken idiots or white trash).
But as you move further into Crocodile Dundee territory, weapons become more and more common, I believe. I'm not sure on that one though.
Good job paulmaster didn't see that, he would of obliterated you into meat dust.Bro how do you think I got these guns? *flexes*
As a kid I was in a lot of fights. Since becoming a "grown up" I've not even been close. I think about how to get out of it all the time. I know I can fight, I trust jiu jitsu completely. But I also know for a fact I dont want to get involved in anything I dont have to.
The States are similar. Our cities have plenty of guns, but the more rural it gets the more common guns get.
That's something I've encountered as well. Even if you're on the lower end of the intimidation scale, confidence and the appearance of comfort in "risky" environments is better defense than a crowbar in your hands. Which is good, because I go into high-crime areas almost daily to provide in-home counseling to clients with no transportation.I've noticed that people don't generally attack you when you show no fear. Violent people choose easy targets. They're cowards, really.
That's something I've encountered as well. Even if you're on the lower end of the intimidation scale, confidence and the appearance of comfort in "risky" environments is better defense than a crowbar in your hands. Which is good, because I go into high-crime areas almost daily to provide in-home counseling to clients with no transportation.
Actually, there was a study on this recently. Victims are often chosen by their walk.
That depends heavily on the dynamics of the environment. For example, living in poor, largely Hispanic neighborhoods in Oregon, yes your statement makes sense. There was less violence and more theft. While sometimes "Brown Power" would be be left in spray paint on a garage after it was stripped of all its contents (even items that were bolted to the fucking concrete), it was predominantly "just business".While that may be a small part of it a lot of it is correlated with certain minorities or oppressed groups or in gang violence. Criminals try to avoid people and steal when you are not around.
Arguably an oppressed group is likely to exert less confidence in their surroundings...
People don't see me as a target anymore. They did until I was about 20 and I started to fill out a bit. I became even less a target when I took up bodybuilding. Now all my muscle intimidation is gone (lost it all when I fell ill for an extended period) but now I have a gnarly beard and crazy eyes to intimidate with. The decade of martial arts training helps with street confidence. I've noticed that people don't generally attack you when you show no fear. Violent people choose easy targets. They're cowards, really.
Agreed.Anyway, I figure that carrying a weapon I've no skill in using is about as stupid as handing said weapon to would-be assailants.
To avoid such situations, you must acknowledge the person, and respond as if this is the kind of thing you see everyday. You can even be a little dismissive of your would-be aggressor, if you do it in a breezy, joking fashion. Then, keep going about your business.
There's a bully-sport I've seen practiced, by those looking to blow off steam, and identify whether someone "doesn't belong". I've observed it often enough to recognize a clear formula.
To avoid such situations, you must acknowledge the person, and respond as if this is the kind of thing you see everyday. You can even be a little dismissive of your would-be aggressor, if you do it in a breezy, joking fashion. Then, keep going about your business.Someone, usually a man, but sometimes a woman or a small group, will start acting "off the chain" (usually with little regard for personal space), and wait for someone to appear uncomfortable. Most of the time, the discomfort is expressed by increasing their walking speed, tensing up, and/or pretending to ignore the impossible-to-ignore stimuli. Once the victim is identified, many just proceed to doggedly harass them for a few minutes, but I've also seen it result in assault, when the chip on the assailant's shoulder is particularly large.
This MO works, of course, because it provides the predator with ample opportunity for rationalization during and after the event.
Since it began by stereotyping the victim as someone who see's the aggressor's minority group as "other", the uncomfortable behavior can be interpreted as racism, and therefore justifies the aggressive actions. "They had it coming." The fact that the aggressors target those of other races, and ignore the possibility that their victim would probably be just as uncomfortable with someone of their own demographic acting the same way, doesn't seem to occur to them.
Is it double-bladed?
Plusses for spikes running down the sides of the haft.