.“'But I don’t want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
'Oh, you can’t help that,' said the Cat. 'We’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.'
'How do you know I’m mad?' said Alice.
'You must be,” said the Cat. 'or you wouldn’t have come here.'”
Edward IV would have the solution to all your problems: actually most of his forebears had the same serene solution for anyone who disagreed with them.
<3 Perseus
Shouldn't the strong Ne give away the Rattlesnake? Perseus, how did you tell that the ENTJ was a ExTP ?
.
Quote:
“'But I don’t want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
'Oh, you can’t help that,' said the Cat. 'We’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.'
'How do you know I’m mad?' said Alice.
'You must be,” said the Cat. 'or you wouldn’t have come here.'”
.
How can someone be mad by nature? That doesn't very objective, more like a prejudice.
What is your reasoning behind that?
SF are capable of premeditated or spontaneous murder on the flick of a cognitive switch in their brain, PS are rapists by nature
I was thinking of Jimmy the First.
In England the show is a cause for celebration.
Perseus, what is it that makes you to link the types with the animals? Like, why is each type what animal it is.
And isn't it kinda harsh to say this:
Not all people of a type are the same, so not all PS people are 'rapists by nature' and not all SF people are capable of murder (Whether that's due to physical or mental reasons (And I mean that they're not a murderous person, they can't bring themselves to kill a person even if they want to)
So, how do you think of these things about each type? If it's based on people you've met, then how can you be sure about their type? And that person isn't a perfect representative of their type either, so you can't base it on them alone without it being biased.