Yeah... that thread was full of word-enamoured robots spewing their programming about things they have no real experience of, like most of this forum. Ease of assignation and designation, and mistaking that and what it manifests/instantiates for reason and understanding, is the primary barrier most modern people face to any genuine independence/depth/wisdom/awakening. Heidegger was right about that: there is a loss of awareness of
being, and total hypnosis by
culture.*
This is what McKenna means by the 'felt presence of direct experience'. To know a thing you often have to
know it, be with it, flow with it. Reason is strengthened and refined through this de-coupling from unpsoken/binding affective/experiential contexts, and the integration of new ones. It actually purifies and becomes
less experientially bounded by this process. Most moderns miss that entirely in their assumption that this equates to 'revelation' or a subjective cop-out, not realising it is their own subjectivity and its boundedness and nature/structure which is the only barrier to entering into this process, and that neither reflexion nor experience can really be properly placed or utilised or honed without an awareness of the dynamic relation they always and necessarily form to one another.
There is thus an almost ubiquitous confusion/conflation of reason/reflexion and the subjective conditions/boundednesses within which its practice is ostensibly sanctioned or normal in our culture. This leads to, involves, and manifests a total absence of reason or wisdom with regards to the
fundamental, to
being, to
what reason is and isn't and how it can therefore be honed and developed beyond the confines of culturally sanctioned subjective/experiential contexts.
This also manifests, not incidentally, in people's attitude towards Pod'Lair. @
Auburn and PHY was a blindingly obvious case study in that error. As is the insistence upon engagement in certain subjective/contexts rituals which are themselves blind to and suppressive of this mutuality (suppression of psychedelic research etc., easily the greatest crime/omission in scientific history). But I won't get further into that here.
Also note that the subjective='the spiritual' in this context. 'Spiritual' is just a placeholder-word that sleeping people use to designate the fundamental (and gateways to it/alterations in it), to which they are not awoken or free to play with/perceive as is. Every experience they have is inherently 'spiritual', but only in a bounded/robotised way. McKenna is describing a means for any with the necessary courage/desire to engage in a rational process of decoupling this imprisoning conflation.
He's also describing the best thing, the most amazing and beautiful and just beyond-every-dream-you-ever-had gift of an experience, in the entire world...
Thanks for linking the thread though, I guess some people might want to read it.
--
*Heidegger's narrativisation of this interestingly meshes with Spengler's in
The Decline of the West, and I think they were both right.
**I'm conflating reason/designation to some extent in this post, for simplicity's sake. A proper cycling/mutual-purification of designation and affective context/experience/symbiosis can actually involve or lead to a reason transcendent of or integrative of both, and there are forms of order/cosmos in psychadelic realms which just cannot be designated about in this 4-dimensional prison-world.