• OK, it's on.
  • Please note that many, many Email Addresses used for spam, are not accepted at registration. Select a respectable Free email.
  • Done now. Domine miserere nobis.

Cloning human ancestors and similar species.

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
I have an interest in anthropology and I've been having ideas that it would really be cool to observe and possibly interact with the clone of a close human relative.

I googled it and found an article titled "Should we clone our Neanderthal ancestors?". Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but Homo Neanderthalensis is not our ancestor, but we share a close common ancestor. I'm not completely up to date on which exact species came before which but I have a fairly good idea. I've heard that Homo Erectus and Homo heidelbergensis are our closest ancestors.

It'd be awesome to see/carefully interact with clones of the following:
H. Neanderthalensis
H. Erectus
H. Floresiensis
H. Heidelbergensis
H. Ergaster
H. Habilis
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus afarensis
and even some Ardipithecus species


I know nothing about cloning though. And I'm sure it would be no easy task to do this. I think it would stir up some controversy from certain people if it were attempted or successfully done.
 

Duxwing

I've Overcome Existential Despair
Local time
Today 3:48 PM
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
3,783
---
I have an interest in anthropology and I've been having ideas that it would really be cool to observe and possibly interact with the clone of a close human relative.

I googled it and found an article titled "Should we clone our Neanderthal ancestors?". Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but Homo Neanderthalensis is not our ancestor, but we share a close common ancestor. I'm not completely up to date on which exact species came before which but I have a fairly good idea. I've heard that Homo Erectus and Homo heidelbergensis are our closest ancestors.

It'd be awesome to see/carefully interact with clones of the following:
H. Neanderthalensis
H. Erectus
H. Floresiensis
H. Heidelbergensis
H. Ergaster
H. Habilis
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus afarensis
and even some Ardipithecus species


I know nothing about cloning though. And I'm sure it would be no easy task to do this. I think it would stir up some controversy from certain people if it were attempted or successfully done.

We should clone a male and female of the very first hominid species and then walk them into the Vatican crying, "Hark, 'tis Adam and Eve!".

-Duxwing
 

Nezaros

Highly Irregular
Local time
Today 1:48 PM
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
594
---
Location
Returning some videotapes
I'm actually a little surprised no one has done this yet. I think a surrogate mother of the same species might be necessary, but I have no expertise in this area so I could easily be wrong.
 

Coolydudey

You could say that.
Local time
Today 10:48 PM
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
1,039
---
Location
Pensive-land.....
A homo erects foetus could definitely grow inside a mother today, we are sufficiently biologically similar.
It's more likely ethical and political issues that are holding it back now, as I can't imagine scientists not having found the DNA of these guys.

Edit: we have DNA of Neanderthals and homo denisova (40k years ago), I'm not sure of what else...
 

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
I recall the half life of DNA being one of the reasons it would be hard to find enough of it to start cloning.
 

Cognisant

cackling in the trenches
Local time
Today 9:48 AM
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
11,155
---
Interesting project, but expensive.

What would you intend to learn from this?
 

Nezaros

Highly Irregular
Local time
Today 1:48 PM
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
594
---
Location
Returning some videotapes
It's more likely ethical and political issues that are holding it back now, as I can't imagine scientists not having found the DNA of these guys.

Yeah, I'd believe that. Damn moralists.

Interesting project, but expensive.

What would you intend to learn from this?

20080608.gif
 

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
Yes for science, and my fascination of recent-ish human ancestors.


We would have more to learn from doing it than from not doing it. But again, I'm not a cloning expert so I have no idea how hard it would be to do.
 

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
I was told it was illegal in a lot of countries to clone a human. I wonder how they'd react to cloning something like H. Erectus?
 

Duxwing

I've Overcome Existential Despair
Local time
Today 3:48 PM
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
3,783
---
I was told it was illegal in a lot of countries to clone a human. I wonder how they'd react to cloning something like H. Erectus?

"What is the measure of a man?" --William Shakespeare.

-Duxwing
 

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
That's what I was thinking. H. Erectus, H. Heidelbergensis and other species of the genus Homo are still considered by some to be humans. However, legally, most countries might only consider H. Sapiens (Sapiens Sapiens?) to be human, as we're currently the only living species of the genus.
 

SpaceYeti

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 1:48 PM
Joined
Aug 14, 2010
Messages
5,592
---
Location
Crap
I recall the half life of DNA being one of the reasons it would be hard to find enough of it to start cloning.
... I'm pretty sure the reason DNA works is that it's not radioactive.
 

EyeSeeCold

lust for life
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
7,828
---
Location
California, USA

TheScornedReflex

(Per) Version of a truth.
Local time
Tomorrow 9:48 AM
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
1,946
---
"What is the measure of a man?" --William Shakespeare.

-Duxwing

His penis?

Edit: I have just seen SpaceYeti bet me to the punch.. Bastard!

We could clone our ancestors and put them in museums as a living exhibit.. Maybe a zoo instead :D.


It would be interesting to see how the cloned would react to the modern world. If they could adapt to it. Hell, we could create a new species of human if we let them evolve. We may have to wait a few thousand years first though. That would be cool.
 

Synthetix

og root beer
Local time
Today 12:48 PM
Joined
Jan 13, 2012
Messages
779
---
Location
fajitas
The half life if DNA is 521 years, I think. So it would be hard to find enough DNA in the remains of something tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of years old.
 

Inappropriate Behavior

is peeing on the carpet
Local time
Today 3:48 PM
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
3,795
---
Location
Behind you, kicking you in the ass
Well you could learn what they were physically and mentally capable of through testing.

You wouldn't learn much of anything about how they lived.

Just a thought: I wonder if their base instincts would survive the process.
 

Duxwing

I've Overcome Existential Despair
Local time
Today 3:48 PM
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
3,783
---
Wouldn't he have had to of existed in the first place :confused::phear:?



Now to hide..

Jesus lived, but he was probably little more than a minor religious figure surrounded by fanatical disciples and a cult of personality who was lucky and smart enough to tell the right people the right things at the right time.

-Duxwing
 

Duxwing

I've Overcome Existential Despair
Local time
Today 3:48 PM
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
3,783
---
evidence?

Before I begin: when I say "lived," I mean "was born and later died" and nothing else. I don't believe that miracles occur. Now, on to my argument.

If Jesus didn't live, then who led the apostles? We know that they lived, and they all wrote about their time in the original cult of thirteen, so I doubt that they invented Jesus from thin air as much as they elevated their cult leader to godhood.

I don't mean to derail my thread though.

:D

-Duxwing
 

walfin

Democrazy
Local time
Tomorrow 4:48 AM
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
2,436
---
Location
/dev/null
This is proof that nothing has changed after Da Blob's banning.

Anyway, my understanding is that most modern humans still have some Neanderthal DNA?
 

snafupants

Prolific Member
Local time
Today 2:48 PM
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
5,007
---
I know nothing about cloning though. And I'm sure it would be no easy task to do this. I think it would stir up some controversy from certain people if it were attempted or successfully done.

Humanity is basically too daft right now. Even stem cell research for Parkinson's caused a stink in the eighties. There's usually blowback from pro-life folk who don't understand science, ethics or what state the fetus is in. Haha, the republicans really couldn't care less about the living. Anyway, there's a fun book on cloning by Michael Crichton called Next. It's totally fucked up but the university basically owns the patent for a sequence one of its researches dredges up. So, if a UCLA dude finds the genetic basis for Alzheimer's...yup, that's UCLA's property haha. They own part of you! It's absurd. You can't own the sky or other parts of nature. You can have a star named after you but that's about it, or should be about it. Edit: That's at least how the patents used to work.
 

scorpiomover

The little professor
Local time
Today 8:48 PM
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
3,383
---
Why not clone Velociraptors? I think it would be awesome for someone to clone a pair, and have them breed into billions of Velociraptor packs.

wonderbra-hello-boys.jpg


Hello boys. Here comes lunch!
 
Top Bottom